But none of the above things were used to condemn all WC people, they were factors that might influence people.
The poster who said that at her BF group they were all professionsls - isn't she just reporting a fact, not a judgement?
Lots of this is just fact, and yes, you could also substitute the word black. Black people in our country do have lower incomes, lower life chances etc, in general.
Somebody on that thread said that the drug thing was irrelevant as that would more likely be 'upper class and students'. Well yes, students are generally heavy drinkers etc.
Again, that's a fact, not an opinion or judgement.
I just don't see the point of taking offence at what is verifiable fact: in deprived areas, more people take drugs, FF, etc etc etc.
Just last week there was a report into life expectancy based upon where you live. There is something like 10 years difference between your life expectancy in Glasgow and in Kensington for example. This isn't a judgement - it has been statistically verified.
Will all Glaswegians die of alcoholism before they see 50? Of course not. Are all residents of Kensington pampered toffs with private medical attention etc? Of course not.
But general comparisons can be drawn, and in fact need to be drawn, so that resources can be targeted where most needed.