Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Man has jumped into Tiger enclosure

1000 replies

PrincessHoneysuckle · 10/10/2026 17:45

At Yorkshire wildlife park.Anyone seen the video? I live local to it and the video of the man wagging his finger at it telling it no like a toddler is shocking.Hes lucky he wasnt killed.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
ChunkyMonkey36 · 11/10/2026 18:57

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Unfortunately, lots of people do imagine that.

My son has, to date:

Ran into traffic
Jumped into a lake
Put his hand directly into an oven
Ran away at various community locations

He’s 10. And has already been physically held back to prevent every one of those incidents from causing an injury.

I can well imagine that he would try to get into the elephant enclosure at Chester zoo. Because he likes elephants. So why wouldn’t he want to be near them, to his mind they’re just things from books and videos.

For that reason, he doesn’t go to said zoo unless restrained in a wheelchair of some sort, or on reins.

The level of risk awareness you’re referring to as idiocy is many people’s reality.

Bitsostuff · 11/10/2026 18:57

Portmore · 11/10/2026 18:30

A train is not a tourist attraction

The park is providing a leisure attraction (I know there is conservation work too but the visitors were paying for entertainment/leisure)

Almost certainly one of the changes that will happen as a result is that the areas where visitors are allowed are fully enclosed.

Unfortunately it takes a death & a regulation 28 (prevention of future deaths) report to bring about changes.

A lot of the safety regulations we take for granted came from PFD recommendations (paracetamol labelling, soft surfaces on kids play areas, appliances coming with ready wired plugs etc)

A beach is a tourist attraction. Should we fence off the sea?

Papyrophile · 11/10/2026 18:57

SupernaturalAddict · 11/10/2026 18:49

The man was using makaton. Imagine not understanding that the tiger is going to hurt you or doesn't understand that you won't hurt it. Imagine that your communication level is such that you you use Makaton to tell a tiger to stop.

This man had clearly been taught Makaton (a SEN communication system) which indicates that he has SEN to an extent that resources had been used to teach him.

Why had he been out without carers? Had he been assessed as needing PA's/ carers (clearly he did need them) of he was out on his own?

He had been failed- I think with all the cuts we will see more of people like this being failed maybe/ hopefully not the same circs but failed in diff circs. It's incredibly sad. Adult social care being left out of AB's social care reforms isn't going to help. These people aren't able to advocate for themselves and their families if they still have them are exhausted upon exhausted.

Bigger questions about social care need to be asked. Vulnerable people are being let down.

You raise huge, important and very expensive issues with this post.

Without going into the how and why of the argument, it is very important socially and politically to explore which direction you are going to espouse.

ILoveAGingerCat · 11/10/2026 18:59

Bitsostuff · 11/10/2026 18:57

A beach is a tourist attraction. Should we fence off the sea?

Exactly. Ridiculous isn't it? We can't change everything, because one person just might...............

OffTheMap · 11/10/2026 19:01

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 11/10/2026 18:18

This model makes disabled people ripe for abuse by people who claim they can ‘consent’ to all sorts. Sorry but no

No it doesn't - any safeguarding policy includes 'vulnerable adults' and protects them accordingly.

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 11/10/2026 19:02

Bitsostuff · 11/10/2026 18:55

You can't keep everyone locked up "just in case" they one day act irrationally though, can you? There has to be some sort of risk assessment process and sometimes decisions will be made that were, in retrospect, the wrong ones. A bit like with criminals and probation.

I think you can, yes. Obviously there will always be reasons to go into public - doctors appointments, family visits etc - but I fear we have gone too far with wanting disabled people to have ‘independence’ at the cost of their own safety (as well as other people’s). The thought of an adult wearing a manacle so they can’t run from their carer sounds unpalatable but would’ve saved this lad’s life had he been with anybody.

SupernaturalAddict · 11/10/2026 19:03

SouthLondonMum22 · 11/10/2026 18:55

Apparently he also verbally asked someone to take a picture of him with the tiger behind him shortly before he jumped in. He also thanked them afterwards.

That doesn't mean anything. Many people with SEN use verbal language and other communication means. Many are also taught to say please when asking for something and thank you afterwards.

Many people with such needs use a total communication approach; verbal, pictutes, signs, objects of reference, communication devices....

Papyrophile · 11/10/2026 19:03

@ChunkyMonkey36 I sympathise with you and your son, and the need for care and compassion. It must be extremely difficult everyday for you both. But, while there has to be a degree of live and let live, and freedom to explore, most people don't need to be told to stay outside the enclosure.

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 11/10/2026 19:05

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Can you answer this question in a straightforward manner?

Do you think mentally disabled people are idiots who deserve to come to whatever harm their disability leads them to?

I feel we need to be really clear on your position as this endless skirting around it while using pretty horrible language is quite cowardly on your part.

Bitsostuff · 11/10/2026 19:07

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 11/10/2026 18:18

This model makes disabled people ripe for abuse by people who claim they can ‘consent’ to all sorts. Sorry but no

Whereas the model whereby they were infantilised, deprived of their liberty and institutionalised led to no abuse at all. 🙄

Rattymcratty · 11/10/2026 19:09

toiletpaperthief · 11/10/2026 17:26

Also: if humans had me in a tiny enclave, and i had no zebras to run after or lakes with hippos just plenty of people staring at me all day I might a) be bored or in a bad mood and b) welcome any human thrown at me i can toy around with.

Edited

Tigers are from Asia. If they’ve had a long boat ride I’m sure they’d be quite disoriented finding themselves on the African plains.

SouthLondonMum22 · 11/10/2026 19:10

SupernaturalAddict · 11/10/2026 19:03

That doesn't mean anything. Many people with SEN use verbal language and other communication means. Many are also taught to say please when asking for something and thank you afterwards.

Many people with such needs use a total communication approach; verbal, pictutes, signs, objects of reference, communication devices....

Of course I know that many people with SEN use verbal language. I just wasn't sure if you were aware that the man in question was able to communicate verbally.

Disappointed100 · 11/10/2026 19:10

Mooselove · 11/10/2026 18:12

"Nobody of sane mind is going to jump into a tiger enclosure". I would have agreed with you but does someone of sane mind drive the wrong way down a motorway on purpose?

Who did that?

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 11/10/2026 19:10

Bitsostuff · 11/10/2026 19:07

Whereas the model whereby they were infantilised, deprived of their liberty and institutionalised led to no abuse at all. 🙄

You do realise it’s not locking them in asylums OR treating them as compos mentis when they’re not. There is a middle ground.

Papyrophile · 11/10/2026 19:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

frozendaisy · 11/10/2026 19:12

There was obviously a way into the tiger enclosure for a fully grown man who was determined enough. It doesn’t mean the wildlife park is at fault.

It seems this man, by interpretation of his hand gestures knew sign language which could indicate he had learning difficulties or was of limited mental capability.

It seems he attended alone.
Reports indicate he was wearing headphones.

You can speculate, what was he listening to? Had he become influenced from the darkest side of the web? Was he on drugs? Did he suffer from (un)diagnosed mental health disorder (bipolar/schizophrenia)? He could have been on prescribed drugs that were unsuitable? Or slipped through the cracks and was self-medicating illegally?

People die everyday due to their mental health. Be that from their own hand, personal neglect or medical services being unable to offer or even know what is required.

All of us want a perfect society where those that need additional resources can access them and those that don’t aren’t put in situations which are concerning or dangerous. But reality shows there just isn’t the time, money, manpower or expertise to fully support the increasing number of complex cases we currently have. There are no easy answers or even realistic ones everyone agrees on.

People are detained in prison as punishment but also to keep the public safe. Quite rightly a court is required to remove someone’s liberty, but the ethics around detaining people who lack capacity and might be a danger is murky and needs to be addressed sensitively in a civilised society.

As the seemingly increase of future needs grows, who knows there might be drugs being developed or therapy techniques which will bring about a new era of treatments, and diagnosis.

There might be conversations and decisions in future about the semi-detainment for some, maybe, but these are decisions that will be approached with compassion and intelligence.

It has only been recently confirmed about ND and genetics, not necessarily hereditary, not necessarily not. But with further research and greater accuracy with predictions it could mean in the future prospective parents are more informed about potential possibilities and risk analysis more accurate to the probability of their personal outcomes.

But the removal of someone’s liberty is, and should remain, an issue of last resort. Of course there may have to be some acceptance that ‘house arrest’ effectively, is the only viable option at certain times for certain people.

I am sure the coroner’s report will be released and poured over in due course, the police will obtain the man’s lap top/phone/search history and medical records. And there may be no definite answers just further speculation.

Wildlife parks can give some people, especially children, a connection to big animals they would never see in the wild, this can instil a desire and understanding with the natural world far away and by effect be part of their drive to help contribute to conservation. (And I say this as a life long vegetarian - I would ban horse racing/greyhound racing before wildlife parks)

Bitsostuff · 11/10/2026 19:12

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 11/10/2026 19:02

I think you can, yes. Obviously there will always be reasons to go into public - doctors appointments, family visits etc - but I fear we have gone too far with wanting disabled people to have ‘independence’ at the cost of their own safety (as well as other people’s). The thought of an adult wearing a manacle so they can’t run from their carer sounds unpalatable but would’ve saved this lad’s life had he been with anybody.

But thats true of all of us. Should we all be prevented from buying alcohol because some people harm themselves and others by drink driving? Perhaps your independence needs to be curtailed incase you decide to engage in risky sex or snort cocaine or take up an extreme sport? Because bad stuff can happen to non-disabled people too. Or what if tomorrow you get sepsis and lose a leg? Should your freedom to make decisions about your life be taken away at the same time?

Coconutter24 · 11/10/2026 19:13

Dunnocantthinkofone · 10/10/2026 19:49

Well hindsight is clearly an easy lens to view this through. But that enclosure looks quite open for such dangerous animals

That enclosure has been there 15 years, it’s not to open at all, a tiger has never escaped. No one could accidentally trip and fall in to the enclosure. The enclosure is fine and built for purpose but as with everything if someone wants to find a way to do something they usually do

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 11/10/2026 19:13

Bitsostuff · 11/10/2026 19:12

But thats true of all of us. Should we all be prevented from buying alcohol because some people harm themselves and others by drink driving? Perhaps your independence needs to be curtailed incase you decide to engage in risky sex or snort cocaine or take up an extreme sport? Because bad stuff can happen to non-disabled people too. Or what if tomorrow you get sepsis and lose a leg? Should your freedom to make decisions about your life be taken away at the same time?

Massive difference. A NT person can make a (bad but) informed choice about those things. A learning disabled person can’t.

Coconutter24 · 11/10/2026 19:14

Disappointed100 · 11/10/2026 19:10

Who did that?

That happened like 2 months ago!

ChunkyMonkey36 · 11/10/2026 19:16

@Papyrophile

I did start responding to you sensibly, and then saw your post re asylums and lost all sensible words to offer you - so deleted it.

Thanks for being so horrendously candid, though.

Sparrowsandbudgies · 11/10/2026 19:18

frozendaisy · 11/10/2026 19:12

There was obviously a way into the tiger enclosure for a fully grown man who was determined enough. It doesn’t mean the wildlife park is at fault.

It seems this man, by interpretation of his hand gestures knew sign language which could indicate he had learning difficulties or was of limited mental capability.

It seems he attended alone.
Reports indicate he was wearing headphones.

You can speculate, what was he listening to? Had he become influenced from the darkest side of the web? Was he on drugs? Did he suffer from (un)diagnosed mental health disorder (bipolar/schizophrenia)? He could have been on prescribed drugs that were unsuitable? Or slipped through the cracks and was self-medicating illegally?

People die everyday due to their mental health. Be that from their own hand, personal neglect or medical services being unable to offer or even know what is required.

All of us want a perfect society where those that need additional resources can access them and those that don’t aren’t put in situations which are concerning or dangerous. But reality shows there just isn’t the time, money, manpower or expertise to fully support the increasing number of complex cases we currently have. There are no easy answers or even realistic ones everyone agrees on.

People are detained in prison as punishment but also to keep the public safe. Quite rightly a court is required to remove someone’s liberty, but the ethics around detaining people who lack capacity and might be a danger is murky and needs to be addressed sensitively in a civilised society.

As the seemingly increase of future needs grows, who knows there might be drugs being developed or therapy techniques which will bring about a new era of treatments, and diagnosis.

There might be conversations and decisions in future about the semi-detainment for some, maybe, but these are decisions that will be approached with compassion and intelligence.

It has only been recently confirmed about ND and genetics, not necessarily hereditary, not necessarily not. But with further research and greater accuracy with predictions it could mean in the future prospective parents are more informed about potential possibilities and risk analysis more accurate to the probability of their personal outcomes.

But the removal of someone’s liberty is, and should remain, an issue of last resort. Of course there may have to be some acceptance that ‘house arrest’ effectively, is the only viable option at certain times for certain people.

I am sure the coroner’s report will be released and poured over in due course, the police will obtain the man’s lap top/phone/search history and medical records. And there may be no definite answers just further speculation.

Wildlife parks can give some people, especially children, a connection to big animals they would never see in the wild, this can instil a desire and understanding with the natural world far away and by effect be part of their drive to help contribute to conservation. (And I say this as a life long vegetarian - I would ban horse racing/greyhound racing before wildlife parks)

I know this is a very small point in your post but just to point out a lot of older teens and adults with autism wear headphones, even when they’re not actually listening to anything, as a form of less visible ear defenders. My teenage son with autism rarely ever removes his AirPods for this reason. As a young child he had those huge ear defenders but he grew very conscious of them as he’s got older. He even has it written in as part of his ehcp that he can wear his AirPods at school when necessary- he is at an autism specific specialist school - which is linked to an electronic device kept under teachers lock that plays a pre selected soundtrack if he wishes or he can just have them silent.

Sparrowsandbudgies · 11/10/2026 19:19

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

How very gracious of you. 🙄

Bitsostuff · 11/10/2026 19:20

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 11/10/2026 19:13

Massive difference. A NT person can make a (bad but) informed choice about those things. A learning disabled person can’t.

Do you seriously not know the difference between the terms neurotypical, neuodiverse and learning disabled? Embarrassing.

You can be nt or nd or disabled without having learning difficulties. You should probably remember that when your calling for nd and disabled people to be deprived of their liberty.

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 11/10/2026 19:20

Bitsostuff · 11/10/2026 19:20

Do you seriously not know the difference between the terms neurotypical, neuodiverse and learning disabled? Embarrassing.

You can be nt or nd or disabled without having learning difficulties. You should probably remember that when your calling for nd and disabled people to be deprived of their liberty.

You know what I meant.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread