Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Neighbour demanded proof of our hosepipe ban exemption

610 replies

HoseBan · 11/07/2026 16:35

My NDN has just demanded to see proof that we are exempt from the local hose pipe ban !!!!

I have said to them I won’t be showing them anything as it’s private but they can report me if I want and the water company can check.

We literally have just been filling a small paddling pool daily for the dc for after school and today have a little sprinkler toy as it’s boiling.

I know some people aren’t aware that there are exemptions (eg being on priority services register or certain tariff) but I’m so shocked they demanded proof !!!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
BlueFahrenheit · 14/07/2026 19:02

SerendipityJane · 14/07/2026 18:58

Well if we hadn't wasted so much on benefits, then we could have had bonuses and infrastructure

Don't get me started on the abysmal state of affairs surrounding benefits 😅

HolyHannah · 14/07/2026 19:51

Hayfield123 · 14/07/2026 18:38

You might be exempt but that doesn’t mean you should be filling a paddling pool for your grandchildren. Your meant to use it for watering plants that will otherwise die and animals because you can’t carry a watering can. How selfish can you be! People are having there water turned off because there’s not enough ( no drinking water) but your grandchildren can have a paddling pool because your exempt. It beggars belief.

But why? When their neighbour could fill a paddling pool with a bucket? In fact, their neighbour could fill the paddling pool with a bucket and leave the tap running between bucket fulls because they can't be arsed to turn it on and off all the time. Yet that is not banned.

ForeverTheOptomist · 14/07/2026 21:07

BlueFahrenheit · 14/07/2026 18:50

Share your frustration with the water companies.

It's actually more of an appalled vibe than one of frustration.

It takes my breath away that some of the human race can be so totally dense, inconsiderate and misinformed. You may blame the water companies for the diminishing water supply, and place it at their doors and from a financial viewpoint, but the fact is that we're fucked. We're going headlong into some severe effects of global warming, and at a way greater speed than ever anticipated.

So rather than blatantly flaunting these water company requests (and 'requests' is what we have atm where I am) and thinking that it's clever to use your sprinklers, hoses, etc, consider that it actually isn't clever at all. it's blatant ignorance and stupidity.

This has seriously pissed me off.

Oh and BTW I have the priority service. And I use a watering can.

ElectricLegs · 14/07/2026 21:41

The Government (of all stripes) might consider not allowing the building of housing estates in areas where water availability is 'under pressure".

The lack of water has got nothing to do with 'benefits'. Water bosses have racked up debt, borrowing money, to pay the directors massive bonuses. This the way of venture capital: sweat the assets, fail to maintain infrastructure, fail to properly treat sewage, then pump it into rivers and the sea, pay huge bonuses to the 'top dogs', keep increasing the customer bills, request Government hand-outs.

Duvetdayneeded · 14/07/2026 21:58

WTF can benefit claimants ignore the hosepipe ban?! That’s two tier treatment so screw water companies. Getting hose out now…

ForeverTheOptomist · 14/07/2026 22:04

Duvetdayneeded · 14/07/2026 21:58

WTF can benefit claimants ignore the hosepipe ban?! That’s two tier treatment so screw water companies. Getting hose out now…

I don't believe so. I think that they have to have a disability to get the priority support.

XenoBitch · 14/07/2026 22:05

Duvetdayneeded · 14/07/2026 21:58

WTF can benefit claimants ignore the hosepipe ban?! That’s two tier treatment so screw water companies. Getting hose out now…

Enjoy the reduced water pressure and restrictions where you live when everyone else thinks the same as you.

JohnnieFedora · 14/07/2026 22:33

Hayfield123 · 14/07/2026 18:38

You might be exempt but that doesn’t mean you should be filling a paddling pool for your grandchildren. Your meant to use it for watering plants that will otherwise die and animals because you can’t carry a watering can. How selfish can you be! People are having there water turned off because there’s not enough ( no drinking water) but your grandchildren can have a paddling pool because your exempt. It beggars belief.

Everyone is allowed to fill paddling pools...for their kids,. grandkids, pets, the ducks.

BlueFahrenheit · 14/07/2026 23:10

ForeverTheOptomist · 14/07/2026 21:07

It's actually more of an appalled vibe than one of frustration.

It takes my breath away that some of the human race can be so totally dense, inconsiderate and misinformed. You may blame the water companies for the diminishing water supply, and place it at their doors and from a financial viewpoint, but the fact is that we're fucked. We're going headlong into some severe effects of global warming, and at a way greater speed than ever anticipated.

So rather than blatantly flaunting these water company requests (and 'requests' is what we have atm where I am) and thinking that it's clever to use your sprinklers, hoses, etc, consider that it actually isn't clever at all. it's blatant ignorance and stupidity.

This has seriously pissed me off.

Oh and BTW I have the priority service. And I use a watering can.

Edited

Goodness.

I forgot the UK is an arid desert.

What on earth are we to do?

BlueFahrenheit · 14/07/2026 23:15

Duvetdayneeded · 14/07/2026 21:58

WTF can benefit claimants ignore the hosepipe ban?! That’s two tier treatment so screw water companies. Getting hose out now…

I believe it's the WaterSure tariff.

Reduced prices for those on benefits.

Hoorah! Excellent news for those of us who work hard.

Let your hose flood the garden 🤣

XenoBitch · 14/07/2026 23:23

BlueFahrenheit · 14/07/2026 23:15

I believe it's the WaterSure tariff.

Reduced prices for those on benefits.

Hoorah! Excellent news for those of us who work hard.

Let your hose flood the garden 🤣

I am on benefits and not eligible for WaterSure. For my supplier, your bill has to be 10% of your monthly income to qualify. My bill (spread out over the year, I get billed twice a year) is £24. It would have to be 4 times that for me to be on that tariff.

So no, not every one on benefits gets cheap water.

BlueFahrenheit · 15/07/2026 09:25

XenoBitch · 14/07/2026 23:23

I am on benefits and not eligible for WaterSure. For my supplier, your bill has to be 10% of your monthly income to qualify. My bill (spread out over the year, I get billed twice a year) is £24. It would have to be 4 times that for me to be on that tariff.

So no, not every one on benefits gets cheap water.

Edited

Wonderful to know.

justasking111 · 15/07/2026 09:35

BlueFahrenheit · 14/07/2026 08:38

The Water Police. I'm sure there are plenty of busybodies in this thread who would gladly volunteer their time.

The COVID times were the peak of their lives.

JohnnieFedora · 15/07/2026 10:27

BlueFahrenheit · 14/07/2026 23:15

I believe it's the WaterSure tariff.

Reduced prices for those on benefits.

Hoorah! Excellent news for those of us who work hard.

Let your hose flood the garden 🤣

my sister works hard and is also on benefits.... why are you being so weird?

BlueFahrenheit · 15/07/2026 10:48

JohnnieFedora · 15/07/2026 10:27

my sister works hard and is also on benefits.... why are you being so weird?

I am simply drawing attention to the rather elementary fact that certain individuals on benefits also enjoy reduced water charges.
It’s hardly an eccentric revelation.

JohnnieFedora · 15/07/2026 11:38

BlueFahrenheit · 15/07/2026 10:48

I am simply drawing attention to the rather elementary fact that certain individuals on benefits also enjoy reduced water charges.
It’s hardly an eccentric revelation.

so what if they can?

XenoBitch · 15/07/2026 13:40

BlueFahrenheit · 15/07/2026 10:48

I am simply drawing attention to the rather elementary fact that certain individuals on benefits also enjoy reduced water charges.
It’s hardly an eccentric revelation.

The reason people are on Water Sure is usually because they have a disabled person in their household that uses more water due to bathing, washing of clothing etc because of things like incontenence.
It is not something they "enjoy".

And it is weird you say it is "wonderful" to know that just because someone is on benefits that they don't automatically get a discount.

chaosmaker · 20/07/2026 07:40

What I don't understand is why the shareholders aren't liable for the debts the water companies have?

LittleBearPad · 22/07/2026 08:07

chaosmaker · 20/07/2026 07:40

What I don't understand is why the shareholders aren't liable for the debts the water companies have?

Because that’s the whole point of a Limited company. Ultimately in an administration the shareholders will lose their investment but it’s limited to the money they have invested.

chaosmaker · 22/07/2026 11:39

but they also aren't guaranteed a huge payout if the business is not doing well. Same with fat cat bosses. Not paying people properly and sucking up all the cash like a black hole, benefitting noone

ElectricLegs · 22/07/2026 14:15

chaosmaker · 22/07/2026 11:39

but they also aren't guaranteed a huge payout if the business is not doing well. Same with fat cat bosses. Not paying people properly and sucking up all the cash like a black hole, benefitting noone

They can guarantee themselves whatever they wish up to a point. They just borrow the money from the bank. Losding the debt on the company.

this is a bit simplistic but mostly correct.

chaosmaker · 22/07/2026 18:10

Do they own the infrastructure? Or just the service, if the latter the gov should just set up a rival company and everyone can switch to that one. Taking into account that it needs running properly and inspecting regularly. The programme 'Dirty Business' was an eye opener (and still available to watch on All 4).

SerendipityJane · 22/07/2026 18:30

chaosmaker · 22/07/2026 18:10

Do they own the infrastructure? Or just the service, if the latter the gov should just set up a rival company and everyone can switch to that one. Taking into account that it needs running properly and inspecting regularly. The programme 'Dirty Business' was an eye opener (and still available to watch on All 4).

The whole point of privatising our national infrastructure was to allow customers "choice". The idea being that would drive competition to provide the worst service.

By the time we got to water, the pretence of competition was dropped, and we simply switched from a public monopoly to a private one. The only difference being the quality of shareholders lives.

We were promised we could switch water supplier. Whatever happened to that ?

chaosmaker · 23/07/2026 13:26

Capitalism is for the few, not the many.

ElectricLegs · 24/07/2026 20:29

Private profit, public debt.

Swipe left for the next trending thread