Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Neighbour demanded proof of our hosepipe ban exemption

610 replies

HoseBan · 11/07/2026 16:35

My NDN has just demanded to see proof that we are exempt from the local hose pipe ban !!!!

I have said to them I won’t be showing them anything as it’s private but they can report me if I want and the water company can check.

We literally have just been filling a small paddling pool daily for the dc for after school and today have a little sprinkler toy as it’s boiling.

I know some people aren’t aware that there are exemptions (eg being on priority services register or certain tariff) but I’m so shocked they demanded proof !!!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 20:37

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 20:34

But, what are you watering? Access isn't meant for keeping grass green.
For example,
it only applies to domestic use of hosepipes for actions like filling paddling pools and hot tubs, washing cars and windows, and watering the garden. fruit/veg may be watered.

It doesn’t matter what the PP is watering. If she has a hose she can use it. Just like the rest of us.

justasking111 · 13/07/2026 20:37

We don't bother with the lawn. It's brown now but will recover. However the tomatoes and soft fruits won't. Nor will the tubs and troughs of flowers.

But you should see the olive tree it's gone quite mad in these heatwaves

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 20:40

BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 20:33

Do you genuinely think a couple of days of people not watering their lawns will be what makes a difference?

Not the decades of profiteering, refusal to update crumbling infrastructure despite billions of £ of profit, prioritising shareholders over customers and polluting the waterways but Jim down the road watering his begonias?

But it all counts. Just because of the problems you pointed out doesn't mean one should not do their part or that these measures shouldn't be taken to preserve supply. One doesn't negate the other. 14 billion litres of water are used across England per day. It's infuriating, though.

BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 20:45

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 20:40

But it all counts. Just because of the problems you pointed out doesn't mean one should not do their part or that these measures shouldn't be taken to preserve supply. One doesn't negate the other. 14 billion litres of water are used across England per day. It's infuriating, though.

I do my part by paying a fair price for a utility. If the company I pay prefers to use that money to line the pockets of its shareholders instead of investing in its infrastructure that’s their call, but it won’t change my actions. I have a right to use what I pay for.

Now as I’ve said in a previous post, if they are prepared to stop charging me for the period in which they are not prepared to provide a full service then I will adhere to a hosepipe ban. But apart from that I see it as any other service.

You wouldn’t leave Tesco with only half your shopping after you’ve paid for it, would you? What’s the difference when it comes to water?

BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 20:46

justasking111 · 13/07/2026 20:37

We don't bother with the lawn. It's brown now but will recover. However the tomatoes and soft fruits won't. Nor will the tubs and troughs of flowers.

But you should see the olive tree it's gone quite mad in these heatwaves

Please water your fruit and vegetables at the very least.

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 20:47

BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 20:37

It doesn’t matter what the PP is watering. If she has a hose she can use it. Just like the rest of us.

For essential needs only, ie medical, fruit/veg watering.

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 20:48

BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 20:46

Please water your fruit and vegetables at the very least.

And it is allowed.

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 20:49

BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 20:45

I do my part by paying a fair price for a utility. If the company I pay prefers to use that money to line the pockets of its shareholders instead of investing in its infrastructure that’s their call, but it won’t change my actions. I have a right to use what I pay for.

Now as I’ve said in a previous post, if they are prepared to stop charging me for the period in which they are not prepared to provide a full service then I will adhere to a hosepipe ban. But apart from that I see it as any other service.

You wouldn’t leave Tesco with only half your shopping after you’ve paid for it, would you? What’s the difference when it comes to water?

It's apple to oranges.
You do not have the same rights.
1991 water act, I think...
eta, the difference is that water is essential for all of society and private companies manage in behalf of gov't. Citizens have managed access.

BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 20:49

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 20:47

For essential needs only, ie medical, fruit/veg watering.

No. She can use the water she pays for in whatever way she likes. Whether that’s for medical uses or to fill a swimming pool. I doubt the CEOs of these water companies are going without, why should we?

BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 20:50

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 20:49

It's apple to oranges.
You do not have the same rights.
1991 water act, I think...
eta, the difference is that water is essential for all of society and private companies manage in behalf of gov't. Citizens have managed access.

Edited

I don’t know what you mean or what you’re referring to.

Itchthescratch · 13/07/2026 20:53

Some supremely selfish attitudes on this thread. Unfortunately this is why Draconian measures often get introduced. People can't be trusted to do the right thing unless they are forced to do it. Personally I would be tempted to ban all people from using hosepipes for anything other than watering plants that would die without it. This should be true if you're disabled or not.

Corianda · 13/07/2026 20:58

Why not just tell them

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 20:58

Itchthescratch · 13/07/2026 20:53

Some supremely selfish attitudes on this thread. Unfortunately this is why Draconian measures often get introduced. People can't be trusted to do the right thing unless they are forced to do it. Personally I would be tempted to ban all people from using hosepipes for anything other than watering plants that would die without it. This should be true if you're disabled or not.

Personally, I think only allowing controlled watering for fruit/veg and trees
is the only thing that sense.

BlueFahrenheit · 13/07/2026 20:58

And the draconian infrastructure will be upgraded?

justasking111 · 13/07/2026 20:59

BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 20:46

Please water your fruit and vegetables at the very least.

We do. It's just the lawn, trees, that have to fend for themselves.

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 21:00

BlueFahrenheit · 13/07/2026 20:58

And the draconian infrastructure will be upgraded?

That where you need to hold gov't's feet to the fire. 😔

Kamilaa · 13/07/2026 21:06

I am absolutely watering my plants who will die if I don’t. It’s good for the environment to have fruit trees etc I planted some this year so will give them water. The water companies needs to sort themselves out they way they operate. It’s not filling a paddling pool or water an apple tree which cause water shortages.

BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 21:07

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 20:58

Personally, I think only allowing controlled watering for fruit/veg and trees
is the only thing that sense.

Well I’m sure the previous CEO of Wessex Water, who was warning of hosepipe bans while collecting massive payouts despite multiple sewage failures over many years will have ensured his 40ft swimming pool was kept topped up throughout.

BelieveInCher · 13/07/2026 21:08

justasking111 · 13/07/2026 20:59

We do. It's just the lawn, trees, that have to fend for themselves.

Water them all. The water companies are killing enough fish and other marine life through their disgusting actions, don’t let them kill off even more wildlife.

godmum56 · 13/07/2026 21:17

Itchthescratch · 13/07/2026 20:53

Some supremely selfish attitudes on this thread. Unfortunately this is why Draconian measures often get introduced. People can't be trusted to do the right thing unless they are forced to do it. Personally I would be tempted to ban all people from using hosepipes for anything other than watering plants that would die without it. This should be true if you're disabled or not.

that is already the case in some areas.

ThreadGuardDog · 13/07/2026 21:40

BlueFahrenheit · 13/07/2026 19:13

Yes, you should be.

Subsidised housing is a privilege.

No. It’s really not. It’s there for whoever needs it providing that in many cases they’re prepared to put up with crap maintenance, dangerous conditions and LA’s responsible for overseeing adherence to the various rent acts for private landlords, but who actually pay scant attention to it themselves. You’re chatting shite.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 13/07/2026 21:44

What you need to do, OP, is build a brand new swimming pool in your garden. Maybe stick in a new lawn whilst you're at it.

Filling one of those with a hose or sticking the sprinkler on for 9 hours a day during a hosepipe ban is perfectly acceptable - and as it would mean you were wealthy, you wouldn't be deemed Guilty of harbouring notions of grandeur or, horror of horrors, entitlement, whilst in charge of disabled children.

Ratherhaveacupofteaandabiscuit · 13/07/2026 21:48

Mumtobabyhavoc · 13/07/2026 20:34

But, what are you watering? Access isn't meant for keeping grass green.
For example,
it only applies to domestic use of hosepipes for actions like filling paddling pools and hot tubs, washing cars and windows, and watering the garden. fruit/veg may be watered.

Plants

justasking111 · 13/07/2026 22:21

NeverDropYourMooncup · 13/07/2026 21:44

What you need to do, OP, is build a brand new swimming pool in your garden. Maybe stick in a new lawn whilst you're at it.

Filling one of those with a hose or sticking the sprinkler on for 9 hours a day during a hosepipe ban is perfectly acceptable - and as it would mean you were wealthy, you wouldn't be deemed Guilty of harbouring notions of grandeur or, horror of horrors, entitlement, whilst in charge of disabled children.

Some Hollywood celebrity bought a place near Clarkson pub. Her swimming pool took four days to fill. The water pressure was so reduced that properties above suffered until the pool was full. That was quite surreal.

Snugglemonkey · 13/07/2026 22:29

Coconutter24 · 11/07/2026 17:22

Why don’t you get a small paddling pool and carry buckets of water to fill the pool?

Why? Seriously, there is no need. Just use the hose!

Swipe left for the next trending thread