Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

10 years since Brexit-would you vote the same?

209 replies

NoEffingWay · 05/07/2026 20:50

I was listening to a podcast today about this, and it was really interesting. They had a group of people who voted Leave at the time, and although most of them were unhappy about how it has panned out, only one would have changed his vote if they could have voted tomorrow.
I voted remain at the time, and would do so again. The loss of freedom to travel across the EU, and work without visas is a loss, most likely not to me, but to DS who would have loved to have travelled across Europe and work his way with ease.
What would you do, and why?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
38thparallel · 06/07/2026 15:26

I don’t see it as a benefit but I guess (on mumsnet, anyway) there will be an overlap of those who do and who voted remain.

Chocolatefreak · 06/07/2026 15:27

anon2026xyz · 06/07/2026 13:55

I voted leave at the time. I actually thought that the politicians promoting remain did an absolute shit job of promoting the benefits of being in the EU, and what we got out of it compared to the vast amounts of money the country was spending being part of it. They spent more time trying to take the piss out of the leave politicians than they did giving valid and constructive arguments that the general public would consider relevant to them and their daily lives. Lots of people saying about the opportunity to freely move countries- it's absolutely great, but do you know how out of reach that is for a large proportion of the country? For someone growing up in your typical 'deprived' area, they will probably grow up knowing no-one who has moved abroad, or done a few years working in Europe, or has 2 homes. Moving to the next city or even half an hour away from where you grew up is considered thinking you're better than everyone else.
It's no good acting like the idea of leaving is absolutely stupid, and the people who think it are idiots, which is absolutely how they acted, without giving the average person on the street a clear idea of what they could lose.
Yet again, politics were aimed at the middle and higher classes, thinking that the working class people wouldn't turn out to vote, as they usually don't.

Where the leave camp actually had a full campaign as to why it might benefit that appealed to a wide range of people. Yes, some- maybe lots- of it was bullshit, and some hasn't come to pass, but it's only with the benefit of hindsight that's known.
And in my view, that's why it came to pass. They told the average working class person, the person who hasn't got an option to pay for private care, that they might be able to get a NHS dentist again, or not be waiting for an operation, or that there might be more jobs available for them.
So the people who don't normally vote, voted to leave.

Would I vote the same now? No, knowing how badly it's been handled and that lots of benefits haven't come to pass. But again, that's with the benefit of hindsight.

I wouldn't vote to rejoin though, I don't think. I think the UK leaving has pulled a good few threads on the EU, and it's not as appealing as it was. I also think the world is a different place to 10 years ago, and what we would get now probably wouldn't be worth the money spent on it. And I don't trust that the shit show of politicians that we have would be able to pull a good deal, or that they wouldn't be taking back handers from various individuals to get certain restrictions or perks.

What I would like to see is a completely separate board for EU negotiations, and for the NHS, that transcends whichever political party is in power, to sort it out. And pay someone to be in charge. So we might get someone who is good at the job, who is going to do their best, who won't be leaving after 1 year, or 4, or 10, and can actually do a job properly and see it though.

I am going to name change for this, because unfortunately lots of people are dickhead about this subject, and just want to have a row with you, rather than seeing that every single person in the country had a vote, and that's just life.

Brave answer. I think this actually gets towards the root of much of the leave/remain campaign problem. Many policies of the EU (and incidentally Starmer's policies) have been on maintaining standards, progression on rights etc and these things are difficult to quantify as a lay person. It's only when they've gone that you realise the structures and institutions that maintained them, while bureaucatic and slow, are in fact crucial to preserving the things we take for granted.

The Leave campaign presented a fantasy of things that could happen, while all the Remain camp could do was really talk about things not getting worse, and hopefully incremental improvement. Leave didn't have to provide any evidence in 2016. Now it's 2026 they still can't provide any evidence, so they try to blame their failure on other factors (like immigration).

MNLurker1345 · 06/07/2026 15:32

Chocolatefreak · 06/07/2026 14:53

And my point was, with the examples i gave, the EU actually REINFORCES national democracy, in multiple invaluable ways. However, you seem to have formed an opinion and facts aren't going to change your mind.

As for EU supranationalism, there are key areas where this makes sense - economically better deals can be negotiated - critical during periods of fiscal downturn or increasingly, against unreliable trading partners, and defence - do the advantages of those need spelling out too?

Let’s do points then -

  • I do not dispute that supranational cooperation can bring economic or security benefits. My point has never been against cooperation.
  • My concern is where ultimate political authority lies. To me legitimacy lies with institutions that the British people can elect or remove.
  • You regard pooled sovereignty as strengthening democracy because of the institutional safeguards, fair enough.
  • I value shared cooperation over legislative sovereignty.
  • I further regard pooled sovereignty as reducing democratic accountability because authority is shared with institutions beyond direct national electoral control.

We disagree at a constitutional level,
a disagreement that I believe can’t be resolved simply by listing economic or legal benefits.

Thank you for your informed responses. I am now off to while away the rest of my day in the garden.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

CheltenhamLady · 06/07/2026 15:35

I voted remain and would vote the same.

Indaloo · 06/07/2026 15:38

Changingplace · 06/07/2026 13:12

I’ve just had to look this up, which head are you referring to?

The European Union has three primary presidents, each elected by different bodies: 1, ]

President of the European Commission: Nominated by the European Council (the heads of state or government of the EU member states) and elected by an absolute majority of the European Parliament.1, 2]
President of the European Parliament: Elected by the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) themselves in a secret ballot following European elections. 1]
President of the European Council: Elected directly by the European Council (the EU's 27 national leaders) using a qualified majority vote. 1, 2]

What manifesto? The EU doesn’t operate under a single manifesto.

The European Union does not have a single political manifesto, as it is governed by a coalition of institutions and elected political groups rather than a single party. However, the overarching political agenda for the current 2024-2029 mandate is driven by the European Council's Strategic Agenda and the European Commission's Political Guidelines.1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

lol, thank you for proving my point 😊

BadPennyReturns · 06/07/2026 15:42

People talk about the EU as if it's some sun lit economic utopia. In reality, most of its big members are dealing with stagnant growth, bad public finances, and the same mass asylum and illegal immigration pressures as everyone else, often worse.

France, Italy, Germany have debt problems, budget problems, social unrest and weak productivity. Spain has a huge housing crisis and has caused upset by granting residency to over 500k undocumented illegal immigrants.

The Dublin Agreement does not work.

This idea that the UK is miles behind is just comforting mythology.

How would the average Briton's life be improved by hooking us back up to the political bloc with the billions demanded by Brussels, uncapped immigration and Eurozone instability if we were forced to adopt the Euro?

MrSchubertWhiskers · 06/07/2026 15:46

EU figureheads have said publicly several times now that the UK would get favourable terms if we rejoined - what we had before if not better, and they wouldn't force the euro on us.

Other EU countries are struggling, true, but it's undeniable the UK is behind all of them. Brexit has been an absolute disaster for the economy.

Tontostitis · 06/07/2026 15:48

Changingplace · 06/07/2026 07:46

This never seems to get a solid answer, I’ve not seen one yet.

I only the other hand have seen and read loads but I am open minded and was on the fence about the vote. What I have seen is appalling behavior by remainers towards brexit voters massive attempts to overturn it and endless disingenuous threads like this pretending to ask for a reason, for answers but who just really want someone to abuse. As I'm sure you are about to prove

Chocolatefreak · 06/07/2026 15:49

MNLurker1345 · 06/07/2026 15:32

Let’s do points then -

  • I do not dispute that supranational cooperation can bring economic or security benefits. My point has never been against cooperation.
  • My concern is where ultimate political authority lies. To me legitimacy lies with institutions that the British people can elect or remove.
  • You regard pooled sovereignty as strengthening democracy because of the institutional safeguards, fair enough.
  • I value shared cooperation over legislative sovereignty.
  • I further regard pooled sovereignty as reducing democratic accountability because authority is shared with institutions beyond direct national electoral control.

We disagree at a constitutional level,
a disagreement that I believe can’t be resolved simply by listing economic or legal benefits.

Thank you for your informed responses. I am now off to while away the rest of my day in the garden.

My points directly proved where the EU strengthens constitutional democracy 😅

Blogswife · 06/07/2026 15:54

Without a doubt . I voted remain then and I would vote to return to the EU in a heartbeat

snurtifier · 06/07/2026 16:09

Then and now I think it was a choice between pragmatism and a certain kind of idealism. No-one thinks the EU is perfect. It has an obvious problem with democratic accountability, because so much power resides with unelected officials, especially the commissioners. It's corrupt and inefficient. It ignores its own rules when it finds it convenient to do so. The Common Agricultural Policy was awful.

So one of the two choices was to remain in the EU despite its flaws, perhaps with the hope of reforming it, but mainly because it was the easiest and least disruptive option. The other was to leave in order to re-establish sovereignty and return to a system where decisions that affect us all are made by people who are accountable to us all. That was always going to be a rocky road. In the event, the people who were charged with implementing it cocked it up massively and we landed in an ungodly mess. So I think the pragmatic option was probably the better one, but I still find it hard to feel much enthusiasm for it.

Chocolatefreak · 06/07/2026 16:12

BadPennyReturns · 06/07/2026 15:42

People talk about the EU as if it's some sun lit economic utopia. In reality, most of its big members are dealing with stagnant growth, bad public finances, and the same mass asylum and illegal immigration pressures as everyone else, often worse.

France, Italy, Germany have debt problems, budget problems, social unrest and weak productivity. Spain has a huge housing crisis and has caused upset by granting residency to over 500k undocumented illegal immigrants.

The Dublin Agreement does not work.

This idea that the UK is miles behind is just comforting mythology.

How would the average Briton's life be improved by hooking us back up to the political bloc with the billions demanded by Brussels, uncapped immigration and Eurozone instability if we were forced to adopt the Euro?

@BadPennyReturns

People talk about the EU as if it's some sun lit economic utopia. In reality, most of its big members are dealing with stagnant growth, bad public finances, and the same mass asylum and illegal immigration pressures as everyone else, often worse.

True. Although Brexit caused more non-EU immigration which, let's face it, Leavers didn't want.

France, Italy, Germany have debt problems, budget problems, social unrest and weak productivity. Spain has a huge housing crisis and has caused upset by granting residency to over 500k undocumented illegal immigrants.

Also true.

The Dublin Agreement does not work. This was to alleviate pressure on frontline countries (Greece, Italy) but can't enforce it when people enter via people smuggling etc.

This idea that the UK is miles behind is just comforting mythology. The idea was that Brexit would improve things - more money for the NHS, less immigration, more sovereignty over policy decisions. Well, immigration is up post Brexit, where is the money for the NHS?!, import & export fees and process cost more than the ease of access to our nearest and most important trading partner. So no, we're not miles behind, but we're worse off than pre-Brexit.

How would the average Briton's life be improved by hooking us back up to the political bloc with the billions demanded by Brussels, uncapped immigration and Eurozone instability if we were forced to adopt the Euro?

It would improve business through border-free access to trade, for import/export. This would be better for the economy. Ask the fishermen, farmers and SMEs! (with the caveat that fishing policies are unfair and environmentally destructive on both sides). Non-EU immigration would be down, and EU freedom of movement would exist in the UK again, yay! Adopting the Euro would be something to consider, maybe we could have a Swiss/Norwegian style agreement. Labour laws, living standards, all of these are protected under the EU.

The main thing is collaborative economic protection against big potentially rogue markets and defence and general security. Have you seen the state of the world outside the EU recently? We need to stick with the most stable, reasonable partners we can - our neighbours.

Chocolatefreak · 06/07/2026 16:14

Indaloo · 06/07/2026 15:38

lol, thank you for proving my point 😊

You do realise we don't elect our Prime Minister, or our King, don't you?

baroqueandblue · 06/07/2026 16:24

KrazyKatty · 05/07/2026 21:11

Brexit has been an unmitigated disaster and has affected my family very badly. We are financially much worse off than we were ten years ago as a direct result of the UK leaving the EU.

Sadly, the people who will still vote leave are the ones most likely to vote Reform, as they are still pretty clueless about international politics and think that the UK can live happily in its own little bubble, when in reality it will sink even further into oblivion.

Unfortunately, I think we’re heading towards WW3 with Russia manipulating a Reform govt.

Thankfully, as a family, we’ve now left the UK as I can’t see it ending well.

Your family were (apparently) almost ruined by Brexit, but you weren't made so badly off that you couldn't afford to relocate somewhere that isn't the UK, unlike many, many remain-voting families who have had to stay put and weather the storm. But what's worse (according to you) is that those of us who were impoverished by Brexit but could never afford to leave have only "oblivion", a Reform government, and (reading between your lines) nuclear annihilation by Russia to look forward to!

What was the point of your post, please, if not to rub our (frightened) faces in your smugness?

ShetlandishMum · 06/07/2026 16:37

Yes. I would vote the same.
We have left UK. Brexit has done nothing good for UK.

baroqueandblue · 06/07/2026 16:53

MNLurker1345 · 06/07/2026 14:44

I don’t claim Brexit has solved Britains problems. The reasons I would vote leave if there was another vote would not be primarily economic. My reasoning would be constitutional.

I do believe democratic sovereignty has value and that British voters should ultimately elect or remove our institutions of political authority.

Reasonable people can agree or disagree about whether it has been worthwhile, but it’s not irrational or uninformed to value constitutional self government over the economic advantages of more integration.

In other words, "Let them eat cake".

How fucking ironic 🙄

OP posts:
Olive123456 · 06/07/2026 18:07

I voted leave and would vote leave again. I don't miss the freedom of movement though since I have an Irish passport.

CoffeeCakeAndALattePlease · 06/07/2026 18:09

I voted remain and would still vote remain. I’m still pretty fed up about it now.

Olive123456 · 06/07/2026 18:10

SpottyAlpaca · 05/07/2026 20:58

I voted Remain, would do so again & would vote to rejoin.

Brexit was a mistake. However they may have voted back in 2026, most people now accept that.

Not one singgle person I know who voted leave would vote any differwntly now, including myself.

EarthlyNightshade · 06/07/2026 18:15

Olive123456 · 06/07/2026 18:07

I voted leave and would vote leave again. I don't miss the freedom of movement though since I have an Irish passport.

Ireland has been quite negatively affected by brexit.
Presumably you got your passport through a grandparent/parent rather than actually caring about Ireland itself.

Olive123456 · 06/07/2026 18:17

ParsonMaybold · 05/07/2026 21:36

I believe in all of those things. But studies show lower average cognitive test scores were associated with greater support for ‘leave’. It’s a fact.

Not a fact, in fact it's nonsense.

AmusedMaker · 06/07/2026 18:21

I can honestly say I haven’t noticed a single difference in my day to day life since we left the EU.
But I would still vote the same way.

Olive123456 · 06/07/2026 18:43

EarthlyNightshade · 06/07/2026 18:15

Ireland has been quite negatively affected by brexit.
Presumably you got your passport through a grandparent/parent rather than actually caring about Ireland itself.

I got my Irish passport because i'm an Irish citizen. Are you suggesting that despite being part of the marvelous EU, that Ireland is strugging?

Swipe left for the next trending thread