Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Will you sign up to the new refugee sponsorship scheme?

645 replies

JoyousOpalLemur · 27/06/2026 07:51

The Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is apparently announcing next week a new refugee sponsorship scheme.

It would allow households to privately sponsor refugees from conflict zones.

Applications open this autumn, with the aim of resettling more than 10,000 people.

It’s modelled on Canada’s scheme and the Homes for Ukraine programme.

Sponsors would commit to providing financial, emotional and practical support.

What do people think? I just can't help thinking that with the current pressures on housing, schools, GPs and local services, how this will actually work in practice? Has anyone been involved in the Ukraine sponsorship scheme and can share what it was really like day-to-day?

Curious to hear everyone’s views.

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/home-secretary-announce-scheme-refugees-uk-lgdr8ff25

Ukrainian-style scheme to bring thousands of refugees to the UK

Shabana Mahmood will introduce a new sponsorship scheme offering safe and legal routes for migrants in an effort to deter small boat arrivals

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/home-secretary-announce-scheme-refugees-uk-lgdr8ff25

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
CoffeeAndACroissant · 27/06/2026 10:50

EasternStandard · 27/06/2026 10:41

How are you so sure? The Times doesn’t say that. They report it’s similar to the Ukrainian scheme.

Btw asylum rate was very high in 2002 when Labour was in. Just via lorries.

From the actual Home Office instead of a newspaper not exactly known for its lack of bias...

"New safe and legal routes for refugees to come to the UK will begin to rollout in the autumn, giving genuine refugees a pathway to rebuild their lives.Our new community sponsorship scheme will allow approved groups to choose the refugees they sponsor, taking responsibility for their housing, integration and supporting them into work. Trusted universities will be able to directly sponsor refugees through a new refugee study route.A new refugee work sponsorship route is expected to open next year.All arrivals will have refugee status, undergo strict biometric screening, criminality checks and health assessments before arrival, to ensure support reaches those in genuine need.Numbers will start small and build over time, ensuring the routes remain controlled and sustainable while public confidence is restored in Britain's immigration system.The first refugee arrivals are expected by autumn 2027."

And oh, I wonder what happened in 2002 that caused a massive increase in people seeking asylum....

Crosorbled · 27/06/2026 10:50

Absolutely not ! They often come from cultures that have no respect for women/ girls . The potential consequences of this have already been demonstrated.

CoffeeAndACroissant · 27/06/2026 10:51

Lugol · 27/06/2026 10:43

No it's about getting the already financially decimated British public and businesses to personally fund an influx of yet more migrants themselves.

Nobody is forcing them...

anterenea · 27/06/2026 10:51

HermioneWeasley · 27/06/2026 07:59

Absolutely not. I don’t know anyone who had a positive experience hosting Ukrainians, and the people coming are likely to have needs I would t be able to support.

Really? I know a few who've successfully hosted Ukrainians

Phonicshaskilledmeoff · 27/06/2026 10:51

HermioneWeasley · 27/06/2026 07:59

Absolutely not. I don’t know anyone who had a positive experience hosting Ukrainians, and the people coming are likely to have needs I would t be able to support.

I had a very positive experience hosting a mother and child. They were wonderful people and I’m proud to have been able to help them.

BeeCucumber · 27/06/2026 10:53

Absolutely not.

WildClover · 27/06/2026 10:53

Fresdom · 27/06/2026 10:44

Lorries, boats, I don't care. The point is we should control who stays here . They cross here illegally, doesn't mean we have to accept them. Can someone ask how we benefit from having them here?

Because they are all doctors or highly educated

EasternStandard · 27/06/2026 10:53

CoffeeAndACroissant · 27/06/2026 10:50

From the actual Home Office instead of a newspaper not exactly known for its lack of bias...

"New safe and legal routes for refugees to come to the UK will begin to rollout in the autumn, giving genuine refugees a pathway to rebuild their lives.Our new community sponsorship scheme will allow approved groups to choose the refugees they sponsor, taking responsibility for their housing, integration and supporting them into work. Trusted universities will be able to directly sponsor refugees through a new refugee study route.A new refugee work sponsorship route is expected to open next year.All arrivals will have refugee status, undergo strict biometric screening, criminality checks and health assessments before arrival, to ensure support reaches those in genuine need.Numbers will start small and build over time, ensuring the routes remain controlled and sustainable while public confidence is restored in Britain's immigration system.The first refugee arrivals are expected by autumn 2027."

And oh, I wonder what happened in 2002 that caused a massive increase in people seeking asylum....

Whatever happened you still had high numbers under Labour.

Funny how annoyed people are at the suggestion they could help out with refugees in their homes. Why not?

blackrabbitwhiterabbit · 27/06/2026 10:54

HermioneWeasley · 27/06/2026 07:59

Absolutely not. I don’t know anyone who had a positive experience hosting Ukrainians, and the people coming are likely to have needs I would t be able to support.

My friend at work has had a positive experience hosting two Ukranian ladies. She talks about it quite a lot.

LasVegass · 27/06/2026 10:55

We wanted to help with the Ukrainian scheme. Then not when the expectation was for a minimum of six months. 1-2 months while something suitable was found, we could have done it, I think. Nowadays, no. I knew of one person who did this. She was a bleeding heart right winger (they exist) and she had a bad experience. But then she often falls out with people anyway.

Phonicshaskilledmeoff · 27/06/2026 10:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Heyhelga · 27/06/2026 10:57

Will be interesting to see if any Labour MPs lead by example and sign up to their own scheme......

HonestLilacWriter · 27/06/2026 10:57

SassyLemonFish · 27/06/2026 10:37

Given that 200,000 households signed up to house ukrainians (and not all were allocated ukrainians), I suspect there will be lots of people who will sign up to this. I think there are risks. I have a spare room or two. Theoretically, I could cut a deal with a crime gang to facilitate entry to the UK of a couple of their mates. ‘On paper’ they’d live with me, but they could easily disappear. Who would check? There are already tens of thousands who have disappeared from the system.

Well yes to your last paragraph.

That was Ukraine, an Eastern European mostly Christian country after the country was invaded by Russia and due to several factors, only about half of that number were supported under the scheme, many who already had family members living in the UK who couldn't house them but vouched for them.

There wouldn't be anywhere near that number of take up for refugees of other nations or if the nation was unidentified.

There's a big difference between people seeing a European country invaded by Russia, a threat to Europe itself and thinking that's horrific, I want to help and agreeing to take any refugees from anywhere around the world.

Cockerpoomom · 27/06/2026 10:59

Notice all the posters mentioning having a positive experience with the last housing the Ukraine's are all mentioning having a woman come stay with them..

Would it be the same if it had been a man???

NoWordForFluffy · 27/06/2026 11:00

HumberSquid · 27/06/2026 09:55

Yes I would. But then our family have taken in refugees before and never had a bad experience.

Would or will?

Here you go: refugeesathome.org/

TheLandlordsAreFrowning · 27/06/2026 11:00

Lugol · 27/06/2026 10:44

So will you be doing?

Read my other posts.

As I said, some posters just want to use this scheme as a "gotcha" to bully those of us who don't automatically hate all refugees.

Hosting a refugee isn't something anyone should leap into without a lot of careful thought and research. @RedToothBrush wrote a very good post about potential pitfalls.

And if a person decides hosting a refugee isn't for them, that doesn't mean they can't still support the UK accepting refugees. It doesn't mean they can't offer help in other ways. It also doesn't mean they can't object to some of the very negative rhetoric that is bandied about.

5MinuteArgument · 27/06/2026 11:02

SassyLemonFish · 27/06/2026 10:37

Given that 200,000 households signed up to house ukrainians (and not all were allocated ukrainians), I suspect there will be lots of people who will sign up to this. I think there are risks. I have a spare room or two. Theoretically, I could cut a deal with a crime gang to facilitate entry to the UK of a couple of their mates. ‘On paper’ they’d live with me, but they could easily disappear. Who would check? There are already tens of thousands who have disappeared from the system.

Exactly this. Its a recipe for fraud, corruption and scamming.

Trouble is the left if the Labour Party are now in charge, so we can expect more of this.

EasternStandard · 27/06/2026 11:04

TheLandlordsAreFrowning · 27/06/2026 11:00

Read my other posts.

As I said, some posters just want to use this scheme as a "gotcha" to bully those of us who don't automatically hate all refugees.

Hosting a refugee isn't something anyone should leap into without a lot of careful thought and research. @RedToothBrush wrote a very good post about potential pitfalls.

And if a person decides hosting a refugee isn't for them, that doesn't mean they can't still support the UK accepting refugees. It doesn't mean they can't offer help in other ways. It also doesn't mean they can't object to some of the very negative rhetoric that is bandied about.

It’s not surprising at all people have said no. Of course it’s for others to do.

MrsPapillon · 27/06/2026 11:04

We hosted a Ukrainian mum and 2 DCs for a couple of years, and it was an amazing experience. Yes, it can be difficult having guests in your home for a long period, but the positives far outweighed the negatives. They were very traumatised when they arrived, speaking no English. It’s been a privilege to watch them settle and grow.

We’re like grandparents to them now, we still see them all the time, babysit, go on holiday together. Mum works full-time and goes to college, and they’re renting a house local to us. The children are excelling in school. I’m so proud of them, we live them to bits.

I would absolutely host another refugee family, but only a woman with children.

oliviaAustin · 27/06/2026 11:07

No… I am trying to achieve my own goals and dreams not pay to support someone else’s. Sorry. And I couldn’t do it in good conscience with my children in the house.

TennesseeDreams · 27/06/2026 11:07

Cockerpoomom · 27/06/2026 10:59

Notice all the posters mentioning having a positive experience with the last housing the Ukraine's are all mentioning having a woman come stay with them..

Would it be the same if it had been a man???

Well that's the thing. Ukraine sent away their women and children to safety.

Many migrants coming in are men. Sometimes young single men from coutnries that do not value women or respect democracy and human rights, and not all of whom are truly escaping a life or death situation. It's not 'racist' to say that- it's a fact.

We very temporarily hosted an elderly Ukrainian woman. (and I mean weeks, not months because her more permanent placement was not yet ready). Despite the fact I have spent most of my life in Eastern Europe and speak Russian I still would have hesitated it if it were a single man.

oliviaAustin · 27/06/2026 11:08

WheretheFishesareFrightening · 27/06/2026 08:01

I wouldn’t partake (but I wouldnt volunteer to host friends or family overnight either so I definitely wouldn’t have a stranger for a long period of time) but I think it’s a good idea.

To those worried about doctors etc, the uptake will be low - and are you suggesting people don’t have babies, or at least multiple babies to reduce pressure on public services too? Many of these refugees might be doctors and bus drivers etc that can help provide more services.

We don’t need more doctors! There are thousands of British doctors waiting for training places as we speak…

Buttonmoon45 · 27/06/2026 11:09

Hell no

Fresdom · 27/06/2026 11:09

Who anyone here willingly house a male aghani or Somalian or Sudanese migrant?

TheLandlordsAreFrowning · 27/06/2026 11:09

EasternStandard · 27/06/2026 11:04

It’s not surprising at all people have said no. Of course it’s for others to do.

Were you supportive of the UK accepting Ukranian refugees?

Swipe left for the next trending thread