Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Will you sign up to the new refugee sponsorship scheme?

645 replies

JoyousOpalLemur · 27/06/2026 07:51

The Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is apparently announcing next week a new refugee sponsorship scheme.

It would allow households to privately sponsor refugees from conflict zones.

Applications open this autumn, with the aim of resettling more than 10,000 people.

It’s modelled on Canada’s scheme and the Homes for Ukraine programme.

Sponsors would commit to providing financial, emotional and practical support.

What do people think? I just can't help thinking that with the current pressures on housing, schools, GPs and local services, how this will actually work in practice? Has anyone been involved in the Ukraine sponsorship scheme and can share what it was really like day-to-day?

Curious to hear everyone’s views.

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/home-secretary-announce-scheme-refugees-uk-lgdr8ff25

Ukrainian-style scheme to bring thousands of refugees to the UK

Shabana Mahmood will introduce a new sponsorship scheme offering safe and legal routes for migrants in an effort to deter small boat arrivals

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/home-secretary-announce-scheme-refugees-uk-lgdr8ff25

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Bullandbear · 27/06/2026 10:33

SadSandwich · 27/06/2026 08:36

I think it’s a great idea. Most of those folks claiming asylum have a claim becuase they have family members in the UK but the present system sees them kicked into the detention system. This sounds like a sensible route to enable those with family connections to be cared for through existing networks - providing a support network through family and wider community and an opportunity to disperse refugee communities throughout the country rather than have everyone living in barracks or hotels. I think is a dignified solution all round.

Good to hear - would you be able to house more than one person?

Just wondering how much space people have.

Fresdom · 27/06/2026 10:33

ToiletKaren · 27/06/2026 10:31

Speak for yourself

I am and many others who agree with me.

Lugol · 27/06/2026 10:35

ToiletKaren · 27/06/2026 10:31

Speak for yourself

How many will you be housing?

titchy · 27/06/2026 10:36

EasternStandard · 27/06/2026 08:40

Will you sign up to pay and support @SadSandwich?

Did you bother to read the post you responded to? I’m sure if the poster had relatives wanting to seek asylum in the UK she/he’d be more than happy to offer financial and emotional support.

if this is in fact the basis of the scheme it seems entirely sensible.

ScotiaLass · 27/06/2026 10:37

No, but not because I don't think we have a responsibility to welcome refugees into the UK but I think local authorities with oversight of the range of services that people need to support their integration should be take the lead on resettlement into their areas.

HonestLilacWriter · 27/06/2026 10:37

Lugol · 27/06/2026 10:27

So the question is if they don't think it's safe for them, why is that?
What is it about these men that makes them unsafe? 🤔

And why do they think it's ok for other people to live amongst that level of unsafety?

Exactly. Once Universities, businesses and church or community groups actually have to take responsibility for public safety in addition to committing to finding refugees education, work, health, benefits and emotional support we'll find there really isn't the public support for it because theyll say oh it's not safe or we can't provide x, y or a.

And will stop them from claiming people who have concerns about refugees and asylum seekers are racist because now it's become their problem.

SassyLemonFish · 27/06/2026 10:37

Given that 200,000 households signed up to house ukrainians (and not all were allocated ukrainians), I suspect there will be lots of people who will sign up to this. I think there are risks. I have a spare room or two. Theoretically, I could cut a deal with a crime gang to facilitate entry to the UK of a couple of their mates. ‘On paper’ they’d live with me, but they could easily disappear. Who would check? There are already tens of thousands who have disappeared from the system.

soddingspiderseason · 27/06/2026 10:39

This is a really good idea. Its very similar to the Ukrainian scheme. I find it shocking that we can’t support women escaping torture and rape in places like Sudan, Afghanistan. We used to be better as a country.

TheLandlordsAreFrowning · 27/06/2026 10:39

EasternStandard · 27/06/2026 10:25

You can offer a room now anyway. If you’re keen.

Yes I am aware of that scheme, thank you though.

CoffeeAndACroissant · 27/06/2026 10:39

Under the Tories, it became very difficult for anyone to claim asylum in the UK because the legal routes were closed up. Exclusions were programs like the Ukrainian scheme and a scheme set up for a limited number of Afghan refugees.

The result? Massive increase in illegal entries via small boats.

This scheme seeks to address that. It's providing a very limited number of spaces to try and reduce the amount of illegal entries that then require housing via Councils in hotels etc. The scheme is about enabling community groups and charities to support refugees so that the onus is removed from stretched council budgets, and make the risky crossing across the Channel (usually involving criminal gangs in France) less appealing.

It is NOT about asking the average Mumsnetter to open up her home for some random stranger. So all the posters gleefully shouting about how it's time for "lefties to put their money where their mouths are" just come across as a bit clueless.

Fresdom · 27/06/2026 10:40

I don't think we have any responsibility towards refugees now. I used to. But I've seen what issues have been caused since the crisis started. Priority is British citizens

Lugol · 27/06/2026 10:40

TheLandlordsAreFrowning · 27/06/2026 09:26

The articles make it clear it is not about individuals sponsoring refugees. Why are people ignoring that.

"The bill is due to be introduced within days and will include two safe and legal routes for refugees to open from the autumn – a sponsorship scheme allowing community groups to identify refugees to support, and a university student scheme – with applications taking place within months and refugees arriving next year. A third scheme will allow employers to sponsor refugees from next year"

Who will be funding the university places?

My daughter's fees are £10k a year and she will have to pay that back.

Then there is accommodation etc.

The tax payer?

This is going to cost billions and flood the universities with undocumented men.

Bullandbear · 27/06/2026 10:40

I have a suggestion - the government should provide immediate tax relief to those hosting a refugee.

That would rapidly bring an end to this latest harebrained initiative….

EasternStandard · 27/06/2026 10:41

CoffeeAndACroissant · 27/06/2026 10:39

Under the Tories, it became very difficult for anyone to claim asylum in the UK because the legal routes were closed up. Exclusions were programs like the Ukrainian scheme and a scheme set up for a limited number of Afghan refugees.

The result? Massive increase in illegal entries via small boats.

This scheme seeks to address that. It's providing a very limited number of spaces to try and reduce the amount of illegal entries that then require housing via Councils in hotels etc. The scheme is about enabling community groups and charities to support refugees so that the onus is removed from stretched council budgets, and make the risky crossing across the Channel (usually involving criminal gangs in France) less appealing.

It is NOT about asking the average Mumsnetter to open up her home for some random stranger. So all the posters gleefully shouting about how it's time for "lefties to put their money where their mouths are" just come across as a bit clueless.

How are you so sure? The Times doesn’t say that. They report it’s similar to the Ukrainian scheme.

Btw asylum rate was very high in 2002 when Labour was in. Just via lorries.

DBSFstupid · 27/06/2026 10:42

Lugol · 27/06/2026 08:24

So I'm guessing all the left wing MNetters who hate anyone who votes Reform or is concerned about the influx of rufugees and migrants will be signing up in droves to welcome one or two into your homes ❤️

FWIW I'm not a Reform voter 🙄 I'm a migrant myself.

Edited

Yes! Come on then, roll up! roll up!

Waiting....

😂

Lugol · 27/06/2026 10:43

CoffeeAndACroissant · 27/06/2026 10:39

Under the Tories, it became very difficult for anyone to claim asylum in the UK because the legal routes were closed up. Exclusions were programs like the Ukrainian scheme and a scheme set up for a limited number of Afghan refugees.

The result? Massive increase in illegal entries via small boats.

This scheme seeks to address that. It's providing a very limited number of spaces to try and reduce the amount of illegal entries that then require housing via Councils in hotels etc. The scheme is about enabling community groups and charities to support refugees so that the onus is removed from stretched council budgets, and make the risky crossing across the Channel (usually involving criminal gangs in France) less appealing.

It is NOT about asking the average Mumsnetter to open up her home for some random stranger. So all the posters gleefully shouting about how it's time for "lefties to put their money where their mouths are" just come across as a bit clueless.

No it's about getting the already financially decimated British public and businesses to personally fund an influx of yet more migrants themselves.

EasternStandard · 27/06/2026 10:44

soddingspiderseason · 27/06/2026 10:39

This is a really good idea. Its very similar to the Ukrainian scheme. I find it shocking that we can’t support women escaping torture and rape in places like Sudan, Afghanistan. We used to be better as a country.

So you’ll sign up?

Lugol · 27/06/2026 10:44

TheLandlordsAreFrowning · 27/06/2026 10:39

Yes I am aware of that scheme, thank you though.

So will you be doing?

TennesseeDreams · 27/06/2026 10:44

No way.

Too risky. And frankly COL and the fact that this Government seeks to tax net contributers like me into oblivion plus treating us like complete shit I don't see why I should step in for Government failings.

Fresdom · 27/06/2026 10:44

Lorries, boats, I don't care. The point is we should control who stays here . They cross here illegally, doesn't mean we have to accept them. Can someone ask how we benefit from having them here?

titchy · 27/06/2026 10:44

Lugol · 27/06/2026 10:40

Who will be funding the university places?

My daughter's fees are £10k a year and she will have to pay that back.

Then there is accommodation etc.

The tax payer?

This is going to cost billions and flood the universities with undocumented men.

Charity, scholarships will fund them eg https://universities.cityofsanctuary.org/

Home - Universities of Sanctuary

We are a national network of university staff, lecturers, academics and students. Together we are working to make Higher Education institutions places of safety, solidarity and empowerment for people seeking sanctuary. Higher Education Institutions in...

https://universities.cityofsanctuary.org/

38thparallel · 27/06/2026 10:45

And this isn’t about just immigration - these are REFUGEES. If I needed refuge from my country, I’d be hoping other countries would take me in.

@WheretheFishesareFrightening you expect others to take in refugees even though you won’t do so yourself?

Fresdom · 27/06/2026 10:46

I always find in the UK it's actually hard to get merit based scholarship for domestic students. But come here illegally and get university paid for.

AClassicTrenchcoat · 27/06/2026 10:47

This is going to be another immigration shitstorm.

SpareVanKeys · 27/06/2026 10:47

toolioo · 27/06/2026 09:05

I would only take a lone child. I'm a single parent and wouldn't be happy with a stranger in my house.

The definition of ‘child’ has proven to be somewhat flexible