Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

When will people realise that pensioners have paid for their state pension.

758 replies

notsafeanymore · 19/06/2026 09:13

Every time there is a debate about the cost of living pensioners get a bashing.
And some have also paid for a private pension.
It's people who have never worked that should be targeted first.
I'm not on about the disabled. It's people who are benefit cheats and have never worked.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
ThreadGuardDog · 19/06/2026 22:00

Justthethingsthatyoudointhisgarden · 19/06/2026 21:53

This is surely a ragebait post.

Yep. One of many. Brings out the very best of MN don’t you think ?

ThreadGuardDog · 19/06/2026 22:04

Cerbonny · 19/06/2026 19:03

😂 You're welcome! 😂

Yep. And given that this is how state pension works, why do today’s pensioners not deserve theirs after paying for those who came before ?

Zigoo · 19/06/2026 22:07

ThreadGuardDog · 19/06/2026 21:55

My take home pay after tax and NI in 1980 was £200 a month. DH’s slightly higher at around £250 a month. Our first house cost £16000. Refused for a mortgage twice based on earnings. Had to save for a 15% deposit before they would consider us. By the time we had saved interest rates were 15%. I’m absolutely not saying that things aren’t difficult now but everything is relative and the notion that mortgages were handed out like sweeties is just nonsense.

Yes we also had to put a 15% deposit and they’d only give it for 20 years because of the age of the house. I think. (Long time ago!) It took a lot of effort to afford to pay the mortgage and other bills each month. Definitely no luxuries, or even a washing machine (I hated going to the bendix each week with all the washing 🤣).

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

ThreadGuardDog · 19/06/2026 22:09

DrRylandGrace · 19/06/2026 19:16

How does people deluding themselves about something (which you admit has never been the position in law and “is not real” i.e. does not exist) amount to a “moral obligation” on anybody else? Just because someone silly doesn’t understand how something works doesn’t mean everyone else is obligated to go along with their misconception. A “contract” requires both parties to agree something, not for one to assume something false and the other then forced to fulfil their false expectations that were never agreed. It’s such a bizarre and nonsensical argument.

Nope. It’s the social contract. Not a delusion. You pay into the system via NI for a certain number of years and you receive a state pension. The amount of contributions you need for a full pension are stated clearly and the provision exists to buy back up to six years if you’re short.

Zigoo · 19/06/2026 22:13

Crikeyalmighty · 19/06/2026 21:52

My FIL at 86 has a totally non contributory and non public service pension that pays him more than the state pension , plus of course owning his nice home outright that was bought as a result of originally buying on a 2.5 times single salary in a good area- however what I will say is he realises all of this and is very generous in helping us and his grandson when help is needed and actually offers. I think what many resent is the total lack of empathy by some- the fact pensions aren’t usually non contributory, student money isn’t grants, overtime is often expected and unpaid, houses in even a just ok area can often be7 times single salary or 4 times joint and companies coming and going are more common -

I’m wondering if those like your FIL are in certain professions to have had such generous pensions. Is his pension final salary? I don’t know anyone who has or had such a pension. Not disbelieving you but I honestly don’t think those sorts of pensions were offered to “ordinary workers” in plain old jobs.

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · 19/06/2026 22:17

Zigoo · 19/06/2026 22:13

I’m wondering if those like your FIL are in certain professions to have had such generous pensions. Is his pension final salary? I don’t know anyone who has or had such a pension. Not disbelieving you but I honestly don’t think those sorts of pensions were offered to “ordinary workers” in plain old jobs.

My dad has a very generous final salary pension scheme and he worked as a professor, so was obviously in the industry that paid these.

I don't think anyone else I know had the same type of pension, but then I don't know many other retired professors! 😄😅

ThreadGuardDog · 19/06/2026 22:18

Zigoo · 19/06/2026 22:07

Yes we also had to put a 15% deposit and they’d only give it for 20 years because of the age of the house. I think. (Long time ago!) It took a lot of effort to afford to pay the mortgage and other bills each month. Definitely no luxuries, or even a washing machine (I hated going to the bendix each week with all the washing 🤣).

Agree. This is what really gets up my nose. Boomers are apparently the root of all evil in society. When we moved into our first home in 1980 we were skint. We moved in with a couple of deck chairs to sit on, a basic table and two chairs, and a gas fire, a bed and a wardrobe. The kitchen was basic and tiny with no appliances - we had to provide those ourselves. The mortgage provider wouldn’t cover the cost of a new build with central heating so it was what it was.

We had no carpets or curtains until we had saved for them because you couldn’t get credit as ridiculously easy as you can these days. I remember taking every bit of overtime and my DH having two extra jobs so we could make ends meet. I’m not suggesting that today’s young people don’t have it hard, but everything is proportional to its time. Something that MN tends to forget in it’s hatred of boomers.

Crikeyalmighty · 19/06/2026 22:26

Zigoo · 19/06/2026 22:13

I’m wondering if those like your FIL are in certain professions to have had such generous pensions. Is his pension final salary? I don’t know anyone who has or had such a pension. Not disbelieving you but I honestly don’t think those sorts of pensions were offered to “ordinary workers” in plain old jobs.

BBC !!

Zigoo · 19/06/2026 22:32

ThreadGuardDog · 19/06/2026 22:18

Agree. This is what really gets up my nose. Boomers are apparently the root of all evil in society. When we moved into our first home in 1980 we were skint. We moved in with a couple of deck chairs to sit on, a basic table and two chairs, and a gas fire, a bed and a wardrobe. The kitchen was basic and tiny with no appliances - we had to provide those ourselves. The mortgage provider wouldn’t cover the cost of a new build with central heating so it was what it was.

We had no carpets or curtains until we had saved for them because you couldn’t get credit as ridiculously easy as you can these days. I remember taking every bit of overtime and my DH having two extra jobs so we could make ends meet. I’m not suggesting that today’s young people don’t have it hard, but everything is proportional to its time. Something that MN tends to forget in it’s hatred of boomers.

Yep I can identify with a lot of your experience. It was just expected and normal to have no money when you were new home owners so it wasn’t something to really complain about. I would have quite liked to go on holiday though!

Zigoo · 19/06/2026 22:34

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · 19/06/2026 22:17

My dad has a very generous final salary pension scheme and he worked as a professor, so was obviously in the industry that paid these.

I don't think anyone else I know had the same type of pension, but then I don't know many other retired professors! 😄😅

UK university professor definitely would have public sector excellent final salary pension!

ThreadGuardDog · 19/06/2026 22:35

suburburban · 19/06/2026 13:47

Yes and that’s what is really unfair

So you’d begrudge mums claiming maternity allowance, disabled people unable to work and those who are carers - and saving the tax payer a small fortune in social care fees? Really ?

Snoopymayhem · 19/06/2026 22:39

Crikeyalmighty · 19/06/2026 21:29

Yep however I think one big debate in the mix has to be people who simply haven’t paid in over the years and expect the same outcome as people having paid in full -

If you look back over the thread you’ll see
dependant on personal savings
and any other pension etc income
If they aren’t receiving the full state pension because they haven’t paid in for enough years they then get pension credit
This tops up to within £3 a week of the full state pension
Then they get free eye tests and all sorts of other stuff inc the winter fuel allowance
Which means whilst they get £156/year less than the full state pension they end up with far more financially with all the pc extras

ThreadGuardDog · 19/06/2026 22:40

BunfightBetty · 19/06/2026 19:46

Wow, this is a surprising read. It's a totally topsy-turvy take in relation to the way things are actually done here, and have been the agreement for decades. Do you live in the UK? Because this is a huge misrepresentation of the social contract, and what has been promised to people. It reads as if you are new here and don't get the deal.

The deal is that if you pay your NI over the years, when you retire, you get a pension.

This has been an explicit promise to people. For decades. It hasn't been a misapprehension on there part of some pensioners. It has been factored in to government spending plans and individual retirement planning. Because it has been government policy, and an explicit promise - if you pay your share of NI now, you in your turn get your pension when it is your turn.

The fact that the money you pay in goes to pay for pensioners now, rather than sitting in a savings account, is neither here nor there. You can't pull the rug out from under people when they have spend decades believing you are not lying when you have promised them a pension in retirement. That would not only be incredibly mendacious, it would be financially catastrophic for government finances, as overnight nobody would save for their pension or future.

This. Well said.

ThreadGuardDog · 19/06/2026 22:41

Snoopymayhem · 19/06/2026 22:39

If you look back over the thread you’ll see
dependant on personal savings
and any other pension etc income
If they aren’t receiving the full state pension because they haven’t paid in for enough years they then get pension credit
This tops up to within £3 a week of the full state pension
Then they get free eye tests and all sorts of other stuff inc the winter fuel allowance
Which means whilst they get £156/year less than the full state pension they end up with far more financially with all the pc extras

Depends on why they haven’t paid in though doesn’t it ?

Mrssagt · 19/06/2026 22:50

Linencat · 19/06/2026 09:46

Absolutely this
Sick of hearing about " greedy pensioners"
Ive worked since I was 13/14 baby sitting, paper round, holiday jobs etc

The issue we have is the mass unemployed who cant possibly work due to some random fabricated illness , perhaps we can come up with a new one " lazyitis" ?
They know the system and are milking it
Bring in a universal salary, everyone gets it, no top ups
What they dont realise though is this
Vote for pensions to be slashed, then when its your turn they will turn round and say " but you voted for this"

Turkeys and christmas ...

it doesn’t matter how we vote, why do you think auto enrollment into workplace pension is a thing? I don’t expect to ever get a state pension

Phoenixfire1988 · 19/06/2026 22:53

You're either a bit dim or very bored

Portakalkedi · 19/06/2026 22:55

Isitevensummer · 19/06/2026 10:19

Give over. Today’s pensioners benefited from things younger generations can only dream of, mostly because today’s pensioners pulled up the bridge after themselves.

How did pensioners do that? Market forces, politics, the economy etc is not decided upon by some committee of pensioners...

KeepDancing1 · 19/06/2026 23:46

Portakalkedi · 19/06/2026 22:55

How did pensioners do that? Market forces, politics, the economy etc is not decided upon by some committee of pensioners...

No - but many of their generation worked for companies like the one I joined in the mid-90s, benefitting from things like final salary pensions, a staff mortgage subsidy, free lunches in the staff canteen, and even an extra week’s holiday in the year(s) you married! All of which had been taken away from new starters by the time I joined - by the very people who had made the absolute most of all those benefits for years.

crackofdoom · 19/06/2026 23:55

Portakalkedi · 19/06/2026 22:55

How did pensioners do that? Market forces, politics, the economy etc is not decided upon by some committee of pensioners...

They consistently voted for governments who promised to coddle their demographic and punish other people.

Cerbonny · Yesterday 00:10

Crikeyalmighty · 19/06/2026 21:56

Yep, but so do the rest of us who are still paying NI as well - I fail to see why this whole tranche of people are suddenly exempt from paying into what was meant to be for health care and pensions - well if they vote Farage in they certainly won’t be - state health care in Germany of several hundred Euros is paid in full, even asa pensioner if he goes down that route- oh and I’m in that bracket too and still working full time

Edited

I agree. There is absolutely no good reason why people above state pension age should not pay National Insurance. Anyone who has sufficient income to attract income tax should also be paying NI.

Of course, better still would be for the government to abolish NI as a separate tax for individuals and just include it in income tax.

MikeRafone · Yesterday 00:11

What do you class as “work”

Besafeeatcake · Yesterday 00:35

banmusk · 19/06/2026 11:55

A stay at home parent has worked, being a parent, raising children is necessary work which makes a vital contribution to society.

Sure. But they don’t pay money into the state to draw a pension no matter valuable their contribution.

Colourfulfairylights · Yesterday 00:55

Scotiasdarling · 19/06/2026 15:54

The new state pension, which you have to be 66, or is it 67 to receive may be £12,000 a year but anyone who retired at 60 will be in receipt of the old state pension which is considerably less. Making things up to support your claims is pointless.

There are people in receipt of the new state pension of £12,000 a year who received it as young as 63, not many ppl but nonetheless ppl could easily receive it 20 years including those who only receive it at 66 or 67.

I'm not making anything up to say ppl could receive up to £240,000 from pension income in their lifetime. That's entirely possible under new or old pension.

The old state pension is a max of £9600 from what I've read. If people have received that from 60, while it may not make 240k, it's highly likely it that it will reach a point where the pension income far exceeds what they've paid into the system. That's before you even consider other payments and services. Most ppl receiving any kind of pension have probably got the tax they paid back within just a few years of receipt of pension

Most ppl are not net contributors, pensioners or otherwise as I said previously. My maths may not be perfect but the point is entirely valid - in direct response to the OP, most pensioners haven't paid for their state pension, same way most tax payers haven't paid for the services they use.

Not sure being obtuse to miss the overall argument I'm making helps your point either.

Colourfulfairylights · Yesterday 00:58

@Scotiasdarling it's behind a paywall but if you're interested, if you live beyond 73 to 76, you are likely to receive more than youve paid in according to this