Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Wealthy banker wis arrested in hunt for notorious 'Putney Bridge Pusher'

674 replies

roses2 · 15/06/2026 11:15

Wealthy banker with connections to royalty is arrested in hunt for notorious 'Putney Pusher' | Daily Mail Online

I vividly remember this case which still haunts me and cannot believe it was ten years ago. Finally someone has been arrested who appears to be an ex army wealthy man.

I hope he is charged - so arrogant.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Lalgarh · Yesterday 12:45

Wonderlandpeony · Yesterday 12:35

I was deliberately pushed into by a then popular celebrity in a busy Bond Street in London some years ago. I mentioned it once on a news comments section and got down down arrowed.

Now years later he seems to be thought of as a bit of an obnoxious twat.

Name him if you can!

BettyyB00 · Yesterday 12:52

Lalgarh · Yesterday 12:45

Name him if you can!

Male celebrity. Obnoxious twat. Choices choices!!

KatherineParr · Yesterday 12:54

WhatTheHellsGoingOn · Yesterday 12:10

I posted about this yesterday - I’m assuming he entered into the privileged postcode area or place of work. If he’s aristocracy that explains why it’s taken A DECADE to trace him in the most surveilled city in Europe. Someone’s come forward and the powers that be know there will be uproar if nothing happens - particularly as his victim was a woman - think Sarah Everard and every other high profile case since Me Too.

The royal family aren’t going to want more scandal attached to them or friends/ relatives and after Andrew the last thing they’ll want to be seen doing is covering up for them.

Hopefully they’ll throw him to the wolves.

If it's the name circulating on the Internet, he's very very very distantly related to the British royals, he doesn't attend British royal events, and they probably wouldn't be able to pick him out of a line up. He may well have been protected by privilege, but I'm doubtful the royals themselves would be interested. Hopefully this will proceed to trial and the victim will get some answers as to why it took so long to identify him.

SurreyMumOfOne · Yesterday 13:24

If it is that name, his royalty and aristocracy links are so tenuous they may as well not exist. Wouldn’t be surprised if it was he himself who added him into the Wikipedia page where he’s mentioned. I would bet that there is no sort of “official” cover up, just close friends and family.

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 13:29

My point is that I wouldn’t really deliberately barge into someone but if IF I was feeling deliberately arsy then a bump on the shoulder is perfectly adequate and should not be escalated to THROWING SOMEONE UNDER THE BUS.

Caps are used to highlight the inappropriateness of the pusher’s behaviour.

Wonderlandpeony · Yesterday 13:38

Lalgarh · Yesterday 12:45

Name him if you can!

His surname rhymes with Lorden.

nomas · Yesterday 13:41

Wonderlandpeony · Yesterday 13:38

His surname rhymes with Lorden.

The twat who humiliated himself with restaurant serving staff.

SirChenjins · Yesterday 13:45

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 13:29

My point is that I wouldn’t really deliberately barge into someone but if IF I was feeling deliberately arsy then a bump on the shoulder is perfectly adequate and should not be escalated to THROWING SOMEONE UNDER THE BUS.

Caps are used to highlight the inappropriateness of the pusher’s behaviour.

It's really not though. A shoulder barge could easily knock someone off their feet, or could do them serious damage, or be bloody painful - and it would certainly cause a great deal of alarm or upset. There's no excuse or reason to do that to someone.

Wonderlandpeony · Yesterday 13:45

nomas · Yesterday 13:41

The twat who humiliated himself with restaurant serving staff.

Yes that's him. In his defence he seemed quite drunk, he'd just switched the lights on and booze was free flowing in the shops, but he's quite big and I'm really tiny. I made some comment to him and he muttered something with a smirk on his face. I was quite upset to be honest and it didn't help that my friend found it funny purely because it was him!

nomas · Yesterday 13:47

Wonderlandpeony · Yesterday 13:45

Yes that's him. In his defence he seemed quite drunk, he'd just switched the lights on and booze was free flowing in the shops, but he's quite big and I'm really tiny. I made some comment to him and he muttered something with a smirk on his face. I was quite upset to be honest and it didn't help that my friend found it funny purely because it was him!

Sorry that happened to you. The lack of apology or remorse always makes it worse.

PermanentTemporary · Yesterday 15:13

Do you really think that it’s ok to shoulder barge people?

When I had ds I was relieved that I’d been brought up not to smack babies, not because I’m virtuous but because I’d simply never felt rage like it. I think mental guardrails against resorting to violence even of a ‘minor’ sort are important.

DumpyVictoria · Yesterday 15:36

SuratNuJaman · Yesterday 06:27

I read the key nuance @JulietteHasAGun has indicated here. His back was to the bus, he could not have pre-planned that the woman would fall under the bus.

He could have heard it. And he should reasonably have known that pushing someone into traffic could kill them.

Talltreesbythelake · Yesterday 15:47

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 13:29

My point is that I wouldn’t really deliberately barge into someone but if IF I was feeling deliberately arsy then a bump on the shoulder is perfectly adequate and should not be escalated to THROWING SOMEONE UNDER THE BUS.

Caps are used to highlight the inappropriateness of the pusher’s behaviour.

In English law you take your victim as you find them, that means that if they are especially delicate but you don't know that, and your shoulder-barge causes unforseen injuries that is not a defence or mitigation. I didn't know he had a weak heart, for example, would not be acceptable to the court.

SerendipityJane · Yesterday 15:51

These two posts rather illustrate the confusion here.

    • you need intent to prosecute
    • intent is immaterial, it's the outcome that matters.

Really it's the 1.5 position where you try to remove intent from the (lack of) outcome.

Lawyers: fear not ! I'll stay in my lane.

Wealthy banker wis arrested in hunt for notorious 'Putney Bridge Pusher'
Agathassorethumb27 · Yesterday 17:00

DumpyVictoria · Yesterday 15:36

He could have heard it. And he should reasonably have known that pushing someone into traffic could kill them.

He’d just jogged past the bus hadn’t he?

Isitevensummer · Yesterday 17:03

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · Yesterday 00:32

You have a very Interesting post.
I don't do a lot of Social Media threads or Facebook. But l have thought many of the same things about paid for posts.

The Media and TV companies have always been biased towards whatever political leaning they support and is in power.

Plus go back further to the press re Lord Beaverbrook and Rothermere and more lately the awful Rupert Murdoch.

Newspaper influence is now coming to an end. With dwindling circulations and
the relentless onward march of the Digital world

A lot of Media people in all sectors really seem to lack discretion and integrity to say the least. You get a few excellent investigative Journalists. But they are few and far between.

Forget most of the BBC.In spite of claiming they were created by God on the 8th Day. They are still part of the same London based clique of Media Luvvies

Let's face it l think many people can't really think for themselves and don't really question subjects at a very deep level. Plus years of declining educational standards and big screen time haven't helped

They are very easily influenced

They go along with what is seen to be hip, cool, trendy, fashionable, Liberal leaning and giving them status Or t he other end of the spectrum. Where being ignorant is applauded

Being manipulated by people who work in a Digital Media and have strategies to
design websites, threads, adverts etc. to hook and influence users to buy or support.

That will really grab the attention of users to Buy, buy, buy. Mountains of junk that they don't really need or want.
Think Skinner, Behavioural Science and our insecurities

Brands. Brands Brands. And more Brands.

These type of tactics have been used by sellers for years. But have been exploded by Digital Media .

Plus, we are all on the treadmill to some degree in everyday life and maybe just don't have the time or the education to understand what is really happening. Maybe we just don't care anymore.

God knows what AI will bring.

The “who trolled Amber Heard” podcast is fascinating about how we are being manipulated.

DumpyVictoria · Yesterday 17:17

Agathassorethumb27 · Yesterday 17:00

He’d just jogged past the bus hadn’t he?

Actually yes, you're right.

Linencat · Yesterday 17:29

Essentially if you push someone over there is a high probability that they will be injured, bus or no bus, that implies intent

At the time of the AH/ JD case I argued until I was blue in the face that she was subject to trolling/ bullying on a mass scale and it would come out one day, will have a listen @Isitevensummer

tommyhoundmum · Yesterday 18:52

TopsieGreenwood · 16/06/2026 15:26

I notice people on social media are already claiming the woman kicked him or tried to trip him up 🙄

Outrageous

StasisMom · Yesterday 19:48

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 16/06/2026 22:49

What a weird thing this is. Tbh, l had never even heard of this. Live in the North. Haven't bought Daily Newspapers for years.

I know this is a terrible crime. But at the time l bet the Gutter Press had a field day about who did it. From the Ghost of Jack the Ripper to Lord Lucan.

Bet this man's high and mighty job and Social position will buy him the best Barristers and defence

The main thing is that the unfortunate victim has managed to identify to perpetrator. Excellent. Really hope he gets his just deserts.

People keep saying that he will pay for the best barrister, and I have no doubt he will. But this will be a high profile case and the CPS will also have a KC.

ETA d'oh sorry, quoted wrong post!

mintleavesandthyme · Yesterday 20:14

I bet he beats his wife

PaperSpider · Yesterday 22:05

tommyhoundmum · Yesterday 18:52

Outrageous

They’ve done that every time it’s been brought up since when it happened to now. It came up a few months ago on here and the same. The fact they’re saying that even if she did do that (she didn’t) that pushing her under a bus would be an appropriate response is 🙄

HereForTheFreeLunch · Yesterday 22:19

Yes, it's always this way. There is video evidence but still people are eager to throw the woman under the bus (quite literally in this case!) and minimise whatever it is that the man has done. And make all kinds of nonsensical excuses for the man.

WhatTheHellsGoingOn · Yesterday 22:29

Wonderlandpeony · Yesterday 13:38

His surname rhymes with Lorden.

I knew it! I was going to ask if it was him 😄He does sound like a monumental twat.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread