Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Wealthy banker wis arrested in hunt for notorious 'Putney Bridge Pusher'

674 replies

roses2 · 15/06/2026 11:15

Wealthy banker with connections to royalty is arrested in hunt for notorious 'Putney Pusher' | Daily Mail Online

I vividly remember this case which still haunts me and cannot believe it was ten years ago. Finally someone has been arrested who appears to be an ex army wealthy man.

I hope he is charged - so arrogant.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Treylime · Yesterday 09:22

Im surprised there wasn't more CCTV footage to track where he went to after the bridge

BettyyB00 · Yesterday 09:27

Treylime · Yesterday 09:22

Im surprised there wasn't more CCTV footage to track where he went to after the bridge

There definitely would have been

stayathomegardener · Yesterday 09:28

I wish someone would put up a hefty reward for more information, someone knew who this man was surely.

FlorenceAndTheVagine · Yesterday 09:29

Class As in his house and he’s got a 3 year old who lives there part time? Hope social services get involved.

dapsnotplimsolls · Yesterday 09:48

FlorenceAndTheVagine · Yesterday 09:29

Class As in his house and he’s got a 3 year old who lives there part time? Hope social services get involved.

Good point!

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 09:59

FlorenceAndTheVagine · Yesterday 09:29

Class As in his house and he’s got a 3 year old who lives there part time? Hope social services get involved.

Doubtful- him and half of London!

GwendolineFairfax8 · Yesterday 10:00

SuratNuJaman · Yesterday 06:27

I read the key nuance @JulietteHasAGun has indicated here. His back was to the bus, he could not have pre-planned that the woman would fall under the bus.

Anyone who runs/walks/drives across Putney Bridge will know with 100% certainty that the road is constantly packed with buses and cars. There is absolutely no ignoring the danger of pushing a person in the direction of traffic.

Thank goodness for the incredible bus driver's reflexes - the video is shocking to watch. It is also shocking how anyone could have shielded the man's identity for all these years.

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · Yesterday 10:00

BettyyB00 · Yesterday 09:02

Yes - he actually went out of His way, to push her into the road, where there's moving traffic. It is very clear!

Yes, anyone who hasn’t seen the footage, do watch it.
It’s all emptier and more specific than you might imagine. I don’t think a jury would buy that he didn’t know the bus was there.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 10:07

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · Yesterday 10:00

Yes, anyone who hasn’t seen the footage, do watch it.
It’s all emptier and more specific than you might imagine. I don’t think a jury would buy that he didn’t know the bus was there.

It’s so sparse. There’s hardly anyone there.

Namechangingregularly · Yesterday 10:28

SerendipityJane · 16/06/2026 12:13

It's well known a lot of arsonists not only return to the fire they started,but often try to assist putting them out.

True, good point. And he may not have known whether he had managed to throw her under the bus, so returning to innocently check would fit the psycho behaviour.

Agathassorethumb27 · Yesterday 10:56

SuratNuJaman · Yesterday 06:27

I read the key nuance @JulietteHasAGun has indicated here. His back was to the bus, he could not have pre-planned that the woman would fall under the bus.

Happily, I don’t think that is any excuse under the law, as people who have killed someone with one punch have discovered.

ThisMeansNothingToMe · Yesterday 11:03

I think crossing the bridge in the opposite direction 15 minutes later is more likely to be the usual return leg of his run home than a deliberate return to the scene of the crime.

DontStopMe · Yesterday 11:08

Was he on the other side when he re-crossed the bridge? I agree he's likely to have been on his way home as it would be a long way round via another bridge, but he'd also have to cross the busy road (multiple sets of traffic lights) to get to the other side.
But he did push her into the bus lane, so no surprise that there was a bus there.

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 11:15

In my role as Queen of the Passive Aggressors, if that had been me and I was annoyed that someone was in MY WAY I would have pointedly run into them and knocked their shoulder with my shoulder then shouted “sorry” as I actually thought “fkem.”

There is no way I would have reached out with both hands and shoved her so hard like that.

That move was done in anger and entitlement. What a dangerous knob.

igelkott2026 · Yesterday 11:41

GingerBeverage · 16/06/2026 17:48

To me, I would assume someone jogging fast might be wearing a smartwatch or tracking their runs somehow too.

I suspect he deleted that run years ago.

Garmin or Strava might still have the records though, I don't know if deleted for the user means deleted altogether.

igelkott2026 · Yesterday 11:42

Treylime · Yesterday 09:22

Im surprised there wasn't more CCTV footage to track where he went to after the bridge

Actually that's a really good point but maybe it wasn't very good or the cameras were switched off at a critical point.

nomas · Yesterday 11:43

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 11:15

In my role as Queen of the Passive Aggressors, if that had been me and I was annoyed that someone was in MY WAY I would have pointedly run into them and knocked their shoulder with my shoulder then shouted “sorry” as I actually thought “fkem.”

There is no way I would have reached out with both hands and shoved her so hard like that.

That move was done in anger and entitlement. What a dangerous knob.

I don’t get it? Why would you run into someone going about their business? Why not just run around them?

SirChenjins · Yesterday 11:55

nomas · Yesterday 11:43

I don’t get it? Why would you run into someone going about their business? Why not just run around them?

Same. That's not passive aggressive, that's plain old aggression. I can't imagine having so much aggression within me that I would feel the need to run straight into someone rather than simply altering my direction slightly 🤷‍♀️

thistimelastweek · Yesterday 12:00

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 11:15

In my role as Queen of the Passive Aggressors, if that had been me and I was annoyed that someone was in MY WAY I would have pointedly run into them and knocked their shoulder with my shoulder then shouted “sorry” as I actually thought “fkem.”

There is no way I would have reached out with both hands and shoved her so hard like that.

That move was done in anger and entitlement. What a dangerous knob.

That sounds just plain aggressive.
And wouldn't you be equally in their way?

SerendipityJane · Yesterday 12:04

igelkott2026 · Yesterday 11:41

I suspect he deleted that run years ago.

Garmin or Strava might still have the records though, I don't know if deleted for the user means deleted altogether.

Very little ever gets "deleted". Quite aside from what is secured in backups, things can hang around in caches (which themselves can be backed up) for a very long time.

And that is before you look at various distributed platforms where there is no single copy of the truth.

This is the technical reality, not the legal fiction.

WhatTheHellsGoingOn · Yesterday 12:04

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

WhatTheHellsGoingOn · Yesterday 12:10

igelkott2026 · Yesterday 11:42

Actually that's a really good point but maybe it wasn't very good or the cameras were switched off at a critical point.

I posted about this yesterday - I’m assuming he entered into the privileged postcode area or place of work. If he’s aristocracy that explains why it’s taken A DECADE to trace him in the most surveilled city in Europe. Someone’s come forward and the powers that be know there will be uproar if nothing happens - particularly as his victim was a woman - think Sarah Everard and every other high profile case since Me Too.

The royal family aren’t going to want more scandal attached to them or friends/ relatives and after Andrew the last thing they’ll want to be seen doing is covering up for them.

Hopefully they’ll throw him to the wolves.

Londonmummy66 · Yesterday 12:21

Ex army working in the City might also be a spook.....

Wonderlandpeony · Yesterday 12:35

I was deliberately pushed into by a then popular celebrity in a busy Bond Street in London some years ago. I mentioned it once on a news comments section and got down down arrowed.

Now years later he seems to be thought of as a bit of an obnoxious twat.

Swipe left for the next trending thread