Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Wealthy banker wis arrested in hunt for notorious 'Putney Bridge Pusher'

674 replies

roses2 · 15/06/2026 11:15

Wealthy banker with connections to royalty is arrested in hunt for notorious 'Putney Pusher' | Daily Mail Online

I vividly remember this case which still haunts me and cannot believe it was ten years ago. Finally someone has been arrested who appears to be an ex army wealthy man.

I hope he is charged - so arrogant.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
TooBigForMyBoots · Yesterday 00:11

What's happening with this?

Are there riots in The City and Canary Wharf? Are people in £1million+ houses being targeted because of this scumbag?

DogAnxiety · Yesterday 00:15

TooBigForMyBoots · Yesterday 00:11

What's happening with this?

Are there riots in The City and Canary Wharf? Are people in £1million+ houses being targeted because of this scumbag?

Absolutely! I can’t move for flag-draped thick white bros beating down the doors of houses where these parasites live.

Oh. Wait.

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · Yesterday 00:32

ShamedBySiri · 16/06/2026 21:41

I am convinced that Mumsnet is awash with paid for posts from digital communications agencies, to drive social change. It may happen in a number of ways, eg start a thread, lets say pro Reform, then flood the thread with negative comments, which make those posters who might support the OP disinclined to comment and risk being criticised. Or it may just be flooding threads started by genuine posters. Following the budget there were (imo) an improbable number of posters who professed to be proud to pay lots of tax, regarded it as their social duty, indeed, frankly, wished they could pay more. Has anyone met such a person in real life? Not me. OP's who start threads about being anxious about male midwives or male nursery workers soon get shot down with posters claiming their male midwife was the best ever, that male nursery workers pose no more risk than female ones etc etc. Even on Royal threads - no doubt there are plenty of mumsnetters who are republicans, but I think there is a fair amount of paid for mischief making on those threads, perhaps simply stirring up anti-royal feelings. There is lots of pro-palestine type posts, which I believe are - if not paid for posts - from groups pushing their agenda.
I see some threads and I think "here we go" and don't even bother engaging.

"Earlier this summer, a journalist named Amun Bains received an unusual message on TikTok.
It was from an account named Good News Britain, which said it was working with a group called The Amplifiers to build “a network of digital producers countering the far right online”.
Bains was told The Amplifiers wanted to “work with producers whose progressive content can cut through the noise and counter the division and disinformation spread by the far right”.
He would be paid £50 a week to post at least five “progressive” videos on his social media accounts, with the potential for bonuses.
Was this something that he would be interested in?
Bains gave his email address to Good News Britain, and was contacted by The Amplifiers shortly after to arrange a call.
But after the call, Bains realised that The Amplifiers was being run by a little-known digital communications agency named 411...

411 was set up last September by former Labour party officers who describe themselves as “the team behind the… historic 2024 general election victory”. It is named after the number of seats won by Keir Starmer’s party.
Documents obtained by Declassified indicate how 411 is recruiting journalists and influencers to publish content which attacks Reform UK and promotes Labour’s political objectives.
411 doesn’t want the public to know who is sponsoring the content, and asks participants to sign non-disclosure agreements before joining The Amplifiers."

I don't pretend to understand the Israeli connection with the 411 agency if Labour is behind it, but it is obviously only one such agency, plus there appear to be "in house" civil servant departments doing the same. It's not just about attacking Reform, it is pushing particular social change or change of views on a range of policies.

www.declassifieduk.org/journalists-secretly-offered-cash-for-social-media-posts/

You have a very Interesting post.
I don't do a lot of Social Media threads or Facebook. But l have thought many of the same things about paid for posts.

The Media and TV companies have always been biased towards whatever political leaning they support and is in power.

Plus go back further to the press re Lord Beaverbrook and Rothermere and more lately the awful Rupert Murdoch.

Newspaper influence is now coming to an end. With dwindling circulations and
the relentless onward march of the Digital world

A lot of Media people in all sectors really seem to lack discretion and integrity to say the least. You get a few excellent investigative Journalists. But they are few and far between.

Forget most of the BBC.In spite of claiming they were created by God on the 8th Day. They are still part of the same London based clique of Media Luvvies

Let's face it l think many people can't really think for themselves and don't really question subjects at a very deep level. Plus years of declining educational standards and big screen time haven't helped

They are very easily influenced

They go along with what is seen to be hip, cool, trendy, fashionable, Liberal leaning and giving them status Or t he other end of the spectrum. Where being ignorant is applauded

Being manipulated by people who work in a Digital Media and have strategies to
design websites, threads, adverts etc. to hook and influence users to buy or support.

That will really grab the attention of users to Buy, buy, buy. Mountains of junk that they don't really need or want.
Think Skinner, Behavioural Science and our insecurities

Brands. Brands Brands. And more Brands.

These type of tactics have been used by sellers for years. But have been exploded by Digital Media .

Plus, we are all on the treadmill to some degree in everyday life and maybe just don't have the time or the education to understand what is really happening. Maybe we just don't care anymore.

God knows what AI will bring.

OtterLovesItsRock · Yesterday 03:53

DogAnxiety · 16/06/2026 23:20

And me. I’d be delighted if we could all pay a little bit more tax for better public services.

I don’t disagree with this poster’s general point that there is a whole load of social media manipulation going on now. It is everywhere, and it is very well financed - particularly the ultra right nationalists.

Mumsnet often pains me these days - it’s so obviously infiltrated by all sorts of propagandists in a way it really never was even 15 years ago. And Mumsnet seems powerless to challenge it. It’s super obvious to anyone with any sort of professional experience in this area.

Yes, I see the same.

Yokodoko · Yesterday 05:35

roses2 It was/is horrendous, but I cannot believe that ‘no further enquiries’ aborted the search back then. The video was clear and somebody knew him.

Yokodoko · Yesterday 05:37

NoCommentingFromNowOn It was the skill of the bus driver not luck?

SuratNuJaman · Yesterday 06:27

DumpyVictoria · 16/06/2026 07:44

I mean, he shoved her into the path of a huge bus. If that isn't intent to kill, I'm really not sure what is.

I read the key nuance @JulietteHasAGun has indicated here. His back was to the bus, he could not have pre-planned that the woman would fall under the bus.

MeltonInTheHeat · Yesterday 06:48

I'm interested in the release then re-arrest on drug charges. Does this mean:

  1. The police know they have the right guy, had to release him as could not charge him yet so arrested him on drug charges due to what they found in his flat as it then also gives them more time to question him (is that even allowed as it could be open to anything he says the second time round being chucked out)
  2. They don't know they have the right man but he pissed them off so much with his demeanour that they decided to get him anyway
  3. The drugs possession amount was so large that they couldn't ignore it as 'for personal use'

IANA-Criminal-L but would be interested in thoughts on that.

In any case- if the man arrested is NOT the man whose name is being bandied about on SM then a huge disservice is done to him in all this.

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 06:58

MeltonInTheHeat · Yesterday 06:48

I'm interested in the release then re-arrest on drug charges. Does this mean:

  1. The police know they have the right guy, had to release him as could not charge him yet so arrested him on drug charges due to what they found in his flat as it then also gives them more time to question him (is that even allowed as it could be open to anything he says the second time round being chucked out)
  2. They don't know they have the right man but he pissed them off so much with his demeanour that they decided to get him anyway
  3. The drugs possession amount was so large that they couldn't ignore it as 'for personal use'

IANA-Criminal-L but would be interested in thoughts on that.

In any case- if the man arrested is NOT the man whose name is being bandied about on SM then a huge disservice is done to him in all this.

I don’t think it means anything apart from drugs were found and they arrested him- the alternative was to ignore it, which the police wouldn’t do.

they wouldn’t be able to arrest him on drugs charges then interview him about something else. Because the possession charges aren’t that serious he might’ve just been cautioned and it’s over, especially if first arrest for drugs

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 07:00

Although thinking about it it may also provide more leverage to police on the GBH charge- exhausting him with more process, maybe stressing and scaring him (although he doesn’t seem the type tbh)

tommyhoundmum · Yesterday 07:09

Aluna · 16/06/2026 20:54

In Fulham it s a flat.

Not so wealthy then.

tommyhoundmum · Yesterday 07:10

SuratNuJaman · Yesterday 06:27

I read the key nuance @JulietteHasAGun has indicated here. His back was to the bus, he could not have pre-planned that the woman would fall under the bus.

I think he did it out of misplaced rage because of other things going on in his life.

SuratNuJaman · Yesterday 07:30

MeltonInTheHeat · Yesterday 06:48

I'm interested in the release then re-arrest on drug charges. Does this mean:

  1. The police know they have the right guy, had to release him as could not charge him yet so arrested him on drug charges due to what they found in his flat as it then also gives them more time to question him (is that even allowed as it could be open to anything he says the second time round being chucked out)
  2. They don't know they have the right man but he pissed them off so much with his demeanour that they decided to get him anyway
  3. The drugs possession amount was so large that they couldn't ignore it as 'for personal use'

IANA-Criminal-L but would be interested in thoughts on that.

In any case- if the man arrested is NOT the man whose name is being bandied about on SM then a huge disservice is done to him in all this.

Should the man whose names seems to be ever present on the Internet, come out and say "It isn't me"?

dapsnotplimsolls · Yesterday 07:32

SuratNuJaman · Yesterday 07:30

Should the man whose names seems to be ever present on the Internet, come out and say "It isn't me"?

It's interesting that he hasn't. I'd love to see a 24 Hours in Police Custody on this case.

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 07:50

One mistaken identity is too many. But at the end of the day people always point to the one example of Chris jefferies which was many years ago, well before modern “Internet sleuthing” and a high profile rare example. Everyday the internet identifies other suspects, despite the ethics

the reality is, I hate it when people say this but occams razor applies here

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 08:03

What is Occam’s razor?

BettyyB00 · Yesterday 08:05

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 08:03

What is Occam’s razor?

It's a twattish way of saying the simplest answer / explanation is the most likely.

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 08:28

BettyyB00 · Yesterday 08:05

It's a twattish way of saying the simplest answer / explanation is the most likely.

Edited

This - wanky but a short way of saying the obvious answer is most likely

powersthatbe · Yesterday 08:31

SuratNuJaman · Yesterday 06:27

I read the key nuance @JulietteHasAGun has indicated here. His back was to the bus, he could not have pre-planned that the woman would fall under the bus.

He had just run up towards the bus and then past the bus. If he was a regular runner and lived near Putney Bridge he would know it is always full of buses!! Of course he knew she might fall under the bus. FFS.

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 08:43

Even if he hadn’t seen the bus there is still no excuse to push anyone out of his way as roughly as that. All he had to do was move a little closer to the bridge and boom, he’d be at Royal Ascot this week.

FrankieMcGrath · Yesterday 08:57

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 08:43

Even if he hadn’t seen the bus there is still no excuse to push anyone out of his way as roughly as that. All he had to do was move a little closer to the bridge and boom, he’d be at Royal Ascot this week.

She wasn’t even close to being in his way though - he was just a nasty bully of a man.

BettyyB00 · Yesterday 09:02

FrankieMcGrath · Yesterday 08:57

She wasn’t even close to being in his way though - he was just a nasty bully of a man.

Yes - he actually went out of His way, to push her into the road, where there's moving traffic. It is very clear!

thistimelastweek · Yesterday 09:09

Re the drugs allegedly found in his flat, wouldn't it be strange if the pusher was also a pusher?

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 09:17

FrankieMcGrath · Yesterday 08:57

She wasn’t even close to being in his way though - he was just a nasty bully of a man.

Exactly

PrinnyMargot · Yesterday 09:18

Wouldn’t it be funny if it turned out that his flat had the Ring doorbell that videoed H wandering up and down his street.

Disclaimer: made this up completely. Awaits the deletion message.

Swipe left for the next trending thread