This thread raises all sorts of questions. I'm not invested in this story but a banker jogger on his morning run - was this not his daily routine? Wouldn't loads of people have spotted him and maybe hazarded a guess as to who he was, or at least known his start and end points, narrowing it down?
Yes, CCTV is often bad quality but that one isn't, at least not too bad. Nobody did a circuit of the local gyms anywhere to see if he was a regular?
Posters talk about how his family or friends wouldn't want to dob him in it as if that is normal behaviour. I'm not saying the posters are okay with this, I'm just saying that surely it isn't that normal? Most of us who live fairly blameless lives would know of a couple of associates who'd gladly throw us under a bus, no wit intended, and certainly have no truck with that sort of thing.
I jog a bit myself in my suburban Surrey town. No chance anyone would not know me if I popped up on CCTV in those circs.
Or are we to assume the culprit was a police officer or Mason so they all closed ranks?
As for the Met being under investigation over the car driver in Wimbledon, well, the Met is in the news today on the BBC website over the FabSwingers website, they're the only police force not responded to a FoI request by the BBC, they really are a charming lot aren't they. How is it al Fayed went for decades undiscovered for his misconduct.