Henry Nowak

[rolloverbeethoven]

Heard of him? Probably not, because there seems to be an almost complete news blackout about him. Basically the police handcuffed him and let him bleed out because they thought he may have said something racist - he didn't, it was a lie told by his murderer. Henry was 18.

If the family helped cover it up, does anyone know if they faced charges for police obstruction or aiding and abetting a crime?

The police released the footage after 10pm which would be too late for the morning papers (probably on purpose).

Only GB News seemed to be covering it last night and even the ‘right wing’ newspapers didn’t seem to have a story on their websites for ages, or the footage was just added and buried to existing stories. If it wasn’t for X these stories would be even more hidden.

Funny how people who bang this drum take no interest whatsoever in cases involving white perpetrators, e.g. . Apparently rape doesn't count in those cases.

Only the mother for hiding the knife. She will be sentenced next month.

But ...but...human rights....

The killer, his brother and his mother should all be locked up for life. That poor poor boy.

I had no idea that laws of the land about carrying offensive weapons didn’t apply if you are religious. That’s insane.

As for the poster saying we don’t know whether Henry racially abused the killers - SHAME ON YOU.

The Guardian increasingly has become the lowest of the low … its reporting is worse than the BBC which is not easy.

The mother has. I hope the brother does too.

The dad apparently was kept in the dark and had no idea.

Anti-racism discourse has caused and continues to cause harm. We had it right before when we said skin colour doesn’t matter and we should judge people on who they are, their actions and values. Now we have a victim mentality with groups competing to be the most victimised and therefore more worthy, I personally think DEI is well meaning but flawed and does more harm than good.

Like a cross 😂😆
As far as I'm aware, people don't carry around crosses with the intention of crucifying someone they want to target while walking down the street. People who wear cross necklaces would find it rather cumbersome to use the pendant as a weapon against others. The Sikh kirpan is an actual blade, a weapon. So while it has symbolic meaning it is also a dangerous weapon. Your comparison is a tad facile and misleading.

It's the guardian what did you expect?

It took me all of 20 seconds to find it linked on the front page. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/may/28/vickrum-digwa-guilty-southampton-student-henry-nowak

It counts in all cases but you cannot deny that the vast majority of men involved in the rape gangs are Pakistani so stop being a denier

How did I guess! A mummy's boy, I knew it. Despicable. The mother as bad as the cold blooded, sly murderer.

@CaesarAugustathe piece is all about defending the police and Sikh community.

I’ve never heard of anyone being harmed by a necklace

It was dark. He was wearing a dark t-shirt. The bleeding that killed him was internal.

None of that excuses the police not checking him over more thoroughly, but it does help to explain it.

According to the judge he tried to help HN.

@CaesarAugustai also cannot see the story on the front page of the website

@JaneFondue you have stated you're not a sikh and have no need for any religion. Strange that suddenly you are able to state that virtually no sikhs carry dangerous knives, that this digwa is the only exception. How many sikhs do you actually know? Have you inspected the kirpans that they carry? You sure that from all the sikhs you know and all the kirpans you have inspected that in a moment of rage they wouldn't be used in an act of violence? Asserting yourself in this way is ridiculous. Your imagination is not evidence for such claims.

As I have said again and again, he wasn't killed with a kirpan.
But with a knife the killer was not obligated to carry, but did because he was a psychotic.

Where???!

I have just opened the app and I can’t see it shown as any one of the top stories.

Do you think the Guardian would show the same prominence if the police has handcuffed a dying Sikh man? Really?????

Yeah, just ignore that slash mark on his face, mention the blood but carry on ignoring it hey.

He literally told them several times he’d been stabbed. And that he couldn’t breathe. The footage shows someone else told the police when they arrived that he had blood in his mouth. It’s not like they weren’t told.

Were the police so dumb they didn’t think about the possibility of internal bleeding? Were they that inexperienced? They dragged him across the gravel and just wanted to handcuff him as soon as possible.

But was it widely reported when it happened in December? That’s the point that is being made