Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

If you voted Reform, I would love to know why?

914 replies

AplineDaisies · 09/05/2026 00:58

I am not here to judge so would just like to hear from Reform voters for their reasoning.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
Dappy777 · 09/05/2026 15:42

Because mass immigration has completely destroyed my sense of identity. Also, multiculturalism has been IMPOSED on us. There was no vote, no referendum. And then the left have the nerve to call Farage a fascist! THEY’RE the fascists. Imagine a small tribe in the Amazon, with its own sense of history and culture. If that tribe allows in one or two people from outside, they can maintain their identity. If they let in hundreds, their identity will disappear. Simple.

On top of that, this country is overcrowded. My local woods have been hacked down and replaced with two new estates, and now we’ve been told another massive estate is going to be built in the centre of the village. But no matter how many of these horrible rabbit hutches we jam together, we always need more, more, more. Judging by the languages, I’d say the majority of people who’ve moved onto those estates were not born in the U.K.

Then there is the question who we are letting in. Not every immigrant ‘enriches’ you. They can do, of course (T. S. Eliot and Henry James were both immigrants), but they can also make your country much worse. My neighbour recently told me he no longer feels safe taking his 12-year-old daughter into town, and I don’t blame him. My home town has gone from a quiet market town to a violent, overcrowded dump, and that is largely due to the people who have moved here.

DrasticAction · 09/05/2026 15:43

@ilovesleep6

But many people do all of that I love? Enjoy their money and leave some ?

Of course many people don't care what ends up with their money but many wealthier money savvy people very much do.
Hence paying private school fees directly to avoid it and all sorts of ruses

Kulwinder54 · 09/05/2026 15:43

So many virtue signallers out here today

TheSnootiestFox · 09/05/2026 15:45

SleeplessInWherever · 09/05/2026 15:41

My home is the product of my own work, and I’ve never claimed benefits in my life. Despite not having a wealthy parent or grandparent to ensure that didn’t happen.

If an individual had 600k, and did use residence allowance, they’re leaving £560k. That’s assuming they’re not using the £1m allowance for married couples.

That is not hardship, and it’s not assault either.

Frankly if you’re complaining about only getting £560k, you’re incredibly out of touch, and even more ungrateful.

Well, as I said above, the house that was the product of my work (and that of my ex husband) was sold and my half taken on medical treatment that the NHS wouldn't provide. Because no matter now much I stamped my feet and demanded support from the state it wouldn't be available to be, so I cracked on and prolonged my own working life through private surgery.

Maybe I should have just sat back, become disabled and then claimed everything under the sun....

Katypp · 09/05/2026 15:45

SeriaMau · 09/05/2026 15:26

Poverty - a terrible thing. My commiserations.

Envy - a terrible thing

SleeplessInWherever · 09/05/2026 15:49

TheSnootiestFox · 09/05/2026 15:45

Well, as I said above, the house that was the product of my work (and that of my ex husband) was sold and my half taken on medical treatment that the NHS wouldn't provide. Because no matter now much I stamped my feet and demanded support from the state it wouldn't be available to be, so I cracked on and prolonged my own working life through private surgery.

Maybe I should have just sat back, become disabled and then claimed everything under the sun....

Depends what you mean by “everything under the sun,” top rate PIP is £778, so I’m assuming you don’t mean that?

TeenagersAngst · 09/05/2026 15:49

ilovesleep6 · 09/05/2026 15:33

Assets that have escalated in value due to a crazy housing market. It’s unearned wealth and should be taxed accordingly.

I don't think people would mind this so much if gains were index linked. But they're not.

Katypp · 09/05/2026 15:51

EasternStandard · 09/05/2026 14:41

This is a pretty small group, even if committed to Labour on here. That loyalty really doesn’t reflect the voting that just happened.

I think you misunderstand. I said the reason many poorer areas had embraced reform was they have lived through harder times themselves and objected to paying for benefits going to people living what they percieve is an easier life than them.
As opposed to MC anti-Reform voters who have no real-life experience just a lot of 'sympathy'

DrasticAction · 09/05/2026 15:54

The things happen

TheSnootiestFox · 09/05/2026 15:55

SleeplessInWherever · 09/05/2026 15:49

Depends what you mean by “everything under the sun,” top rate PIP is £778, so I’m assuming you don’t mean that?

UC, free everything that goes with it because my income would be under the 7k ish to qualify, Motability car with free tyres etc, plus PIP......

EasternStandard · 09/05/2026 15:57

Katypp · 09/05/2026 15:51

I think you misunderstand. I said the reason many poorer areas had embraced reform was they have lived through harder times themselves and objected to paying for benefits going to people living what they percieve is an easier life than them.
As opposed to MC anti-Reform voters who have no real-life experience just a lot of 'sympathy'

Fair enough, I think I probably agree with you anyway.

Kitte321 · 09/05/2026 15:57

I would never vote reform because I just find some of the language they have used, and the policies announced, too extreme and ideologically focused. It all feels incredibly divisive and that makes me deeply uncomfortable. I also think Farage is all fur coat and no knickers.

BUT I do think that those in the centre of politics who are not idealistic but pragmatists are feeling politically homeless. So, many of us are left trying to choose the better of the shit options.

SleeplessInWherever · 09/05/2026 15:57

TheSnootiestFox · 09/05/2026 15:55

UC, free everything that goes with it because my income would be under the 7k ish to qualify, Motability car with free tyres etc, plus PIP......

Go for it, if you qualify?

That’s what those benefits are for, people that need them.

If you need them, and would qualify for them, I’m sure your more reasonable tax payer wouldn’t begrudge you of them.

hairbearbunches · 09/05/2026 15:58

sunshinehappydays · 09/05/2026 14:25

We are not left with 1.9m. The money will be split between my DH and his brother so it will be halved. We will need to sell the house to pay IHT liability which needs to be paid within 6 months. If we want to draw money from the remaining pension be will be taxed at 40%. Then if we die our son will be taxed again on this.

Yes because, for each generation that inherits, it’s a windfall. And it should be taxed. £1.9m divided by 2 is still a lottery win for most people. Have a word with yourself.

localnotail · 09/05/2026 15:59

TheSnootiestFox · 09/05/2026 10:39

Well, I lost my home in 2022. I had to sell it to fund surgery that the NHS wouldn't provide as they deem my disease 'cosmetic.' I was keeping myself out of a wheelchair. Ironically the NHS will support me once I become disabled but will offer no help in trying to keep me mobile. The third surgery I had was more minor and I travelled to Germany for that as the surgeon was much better. Noone should have to leave the country for healthcare when we have a so called NHS that I as a higher rate taxpayer for the bulk of my career, contributed towards. Fortunately I inherited and was able to buy another home but I should not have been put in that revolting position initially.

Anyway, in terms of a US system, I'd be intrigued to know how many people have experienced the US healthcare system first hand. I did an internship in upstate New York in my 20s and was involved in quite a nasty road accident. The care I received over there was sensational and I could claim back everything through either my insurance or the insurance of the woman who caused the accident. Even my taxi fares to hospital appointments were reimbursed.

Compare and contrast with my more recent NHS experiences where I'm waiting an hour and a half after my alloted appointment time for my gynae appointment and watching all the non English speaking young women come out with their consent forms for surgical abortions. They sat down around me and placed their forms on the coffee tables so I could see clearly what was on them every time I swapped reading material.

Before anyone comes for me, yes I do have private healthcare but I needed to be more local for this treatment due to work, the private hospital my provider deals with is over an hour away.

If a vote for Reform stops that and allows me to pay insurance for the treatment that I need, in pleasant and efficient surroundings, and without having effectively to pay twice through NI, they have my vote all the way!

I have a family in the US who pay huge amount in health insurance (they run their own business) and still have to pay thousands on top of that in additional costs if insurance does not cover it, especially for medication that their insurance does not cover.

Any private healthcare scheme can still deny you treatment and make you pay full price, so if the NHS thought your issue was "cosmetic" it could have been the same story with the private insurance. I was denied treatment on BUPA previously for a painful shoulder as they decided it was unnecessary and I had to pay for it myself.

ilovesleep6 · 09/05/2026 16:01

hairbearbunches · 09/05/2026 15:58

Yes because, for each generation that inherits, it’s a windfall. And it should be taxed. £1.9m divided by 2 is still a lottery win for most people. Have a word with yourself.

@sunshinehappydaysif you’re worried about your son being taxed on the money ‘again’, you could ask your in-laws to bypass your husband and leave it to your son instead. That way it will only be taxed once. Win win?

Fluffypuppy1 · 09/05/2026 16:01

Monty36 · 09/05/2026 13:21

Reform must be cheering. The fool Starmer has brought Gordon Brown back to the fold as a consultant. He must have lost his mind.

OMG!!!

Gordon Brown who sold off over half of the UK gold reserves, and knocked £5 billion a year off pension funds? He also brought in tax credits, when everyone said it was a terrible idea. Not forgetting he failed to regulate the banks properly which was a disaster in the 2008 financial crisis. His overuse of PFI also cost billions more than traditional government borrowing.

Let’s just hope that he’s not advising Rachel Reeves 😱

TheSnootiestFox · 09/05/2026 16:02

SleeplessInWherever · 09/05/2026 15:57

Go for it, if you qualify?

That’s what those benefits are for, people that need them.

If you need them, and would qualify for them, I’m sure your more reasonable tax payer wouldn’t begrudge you of them.

I'm not begrudging anybody anything, do keep up!

I was told I should be grateful because I used inherited money to but my house as I'd sold my own property to fund medical care. This was done to keep me mobile and working from my mid 40s onwards and I was stating that the alternative to taking responsibility for my own medicL treatment was to become disabled and cost the state a fortune.

Of course I'm not going to 'go for it.' How silly. I'm doing quite the reverse.

Honestly if you can't be bothered to read posts properly then don't bother commenting either!

eyeballer · 09/05/2026 16:02

There is a world of difference between living in leafy Dulwich or Oxford for example and living in a sink estate in a rough part of town. You know that of course. You will also know that immigration hotels do not tend to be plonked on Kensington High Street.

But it’s completely wrong to pretend every Labour voter lives in Dulwich or Oxford and that all parts of those areas are the same.

Wage stagnation has hit all brackets, but the higher your income, the less catastropic that will be. Clearly.

Higher income earners on PAYE here are paying tax in line with other European countries it’s lower and middle earners who pay less. Plus the cliff edges affect the higher PAYE earners.

You're just being silly now and i don't know what point you are making. That no one gets UC because i didn't??

I think by point is clear…

It’s simply ludicrous to claim the majority of labour voters are high earners who live in the best parts of Dulwich or equivalent.

NoNewsisGood · 09/05/2026 16:04

Menopausalsourpuss · 09/05/2026 10:24

This is all rubbish. The Tories didn't have austerity they tried to cut public spending after the banking crisis, sometimes in the wrong places but ended up with massive public spending, alot more than the Blair govt which is why we are now nearly 3 trillion in debt (and nothing to do with "billionaires" not paying their way. The massive quantative easing they engaged in caused alot more damage. And the fact that you think you know alo to more about the Reform plans (probably all with a negative spin) is a product of where you get your info -probably the BBC/Guardian - am I right?

So your argument is to try to judge me by what news outlets you think I read? Cute.

I am not sure why you think the Tories didn't implement austerity measures. A simple investigation such as typing it into Google will tell you they did. It was widely known about and understood and documented and all that.

There is also plenty of evidence of billionaires not paying their way. Have a google about Farage's recent 5m donation for example.

Also, hot tip - you can find out about Reform's plans directly from Reform, no need to use trusted news sources if you don't wish to. It's how I do know about it... I don't just think I know...I educate myself so that I actually do know. I find that is a great way to learn and know things.

Katypp · 09/05/2026 16:06

eyeballer · 09/05/2026 16:02

There is a world of difference between living in leafy Dulwich or Oxford for example and living in a sink estate in a rough part of town. You know that of course. You will also know that immigration hotels do not tend to be plonked on Kensington High Street.

But it’s completely wrong to pretend every Labour voter lives in Dulwich or Oxford and that all parts of those areas are the same.

Wage stagnation has hit all brackets, but the higher your income, the less catastropic that will be. Clearly.

Higher income earners on PAYE here are paying tax in line with other European countries it’s lower and middle earners who pay less. Plus the cliff edges affect the higher PAYE earners.

You're just being silly now and i don't know what point you are making. That no one gets UC because i didn't??

I think by point is clear…

It’s simply ludicrous to claim the majority of labour voters are high earners who live in the best parts of Dulwich or equivalent.

Can you show me where i said that?
Clue: i didn't.

eyeballer · 09/05/2026 16:06

and objected to paying for benefits going to people living what they percieve is an easier life than them

I think the key word is perceive

LoyalMember · 09/05/2026 16:06

Dappy777 · 09/05/2026 15:42

Because mass immigration has completely destroyed my sense of identity. Also, multiculturalism has been IMPOSED on us. There was no vote, no referendum. And then the left have the nerve to call Farage a fascist! THEY’RE the fascists. Imagine a small tribe in the Amazon, with its own sense of history and culture. If that tribe allows in one or two people from outside, they can maintain their identity. If they let in hundreds, their identity will disappear. Simple.

On top of that, this country is overcrowded. My local woods have been hacked down and replaced with two new estates, and now we’ve been told another massive estate is going to be built in the centre of the village. But no matter how many of these horrible rabbit hutches we jam together, we always need more, more, more. Judging by the languages, I’d say the majority of people who’ve moved onto those estates were not born in the U.K.

Then there is the question who we are letting in. Not every immigrant ‘enriches’ you. They can do, of course (T. S. Eliot and Henry James were both immigrants), but they can also make your country much worse. My neighbour recently told me he no longer feels safe taking his 12-year-old daughter into town, and I don’t blame him. My home town has gone from a quiet market town to a violent, overcrowded dump, and that is largely due to the people who have moved here.

I hear you. I live a few miles from Glasgow and you ought to see the state of the city centre. It's like a third world shanty town, and at weekends it's like an open air asylum. That's what happens when a city council takes in over 400% more immigrants and asylum seekers than it's obligated to. Virtue signalling that's gone completely, certifiably insane.

Edited for spelling.

shuggles · 09/05/2026 16:07

@SleeplessInWherever People who are “anti authority” don’t tend to do too well in the workplace.

Do you seriously think I act anti-authority in the workplace?

Drugs fair enough, they’re not for me either. But unless you’re working 16hr days every day, that’s not why you’re not socialising. Get yourself outside or go for a pint or something.

Working 16 hours a day? Do you survive on 4 hours of sleep or what? Obviously there's time needed for commuting, eating, and doing general "life admin" tasks.

”The system” (🤷🏻‍♀️) has also not been designed to trample working class men.

Bullshit.

Burritoplease · 09/05/2026 16:08

ThisDandyWriter · 09/05/2026 15:12

Well how is Labour helping working people? Pray tell.

Increased minimum wage for starters. Breakfast clubs in schools. Just two things off the top of my head. Tbf I actually didn’t mention Labour or say I was a Labour voter, but elitist Nigel who just accepted £5 million from a foreign donor doesn’t give af about working people.