Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

If you voted Reform, I would love to know why?

914 replies

AplineDaisies · 09/05/2026 00:58

I am not here to judge so would just like to hear from Reform voters for their reasoning.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
Ticktockk · 09/05/2026 10:36

hairbearbunches · 09/05/2026 09:57

I know! It’s just semantics, isn’t it? It’s not 100-200 a day, it’s 41,000 a year. “Oh, ok then. I’ve been getting it wrong all this time, mea culpa, it’s not nearly as big a problem as i thought.”

And people genuinely wonder why Reform are marching to No.10.

I do understand, as I said in my post, that the number is enormous. I also said previously that I can see why people might vote reform even though I don’t. But the optics change when you say 100-200 a day. For many people, they envision this constant stream of boats, constantly being processed. The reality is different.

ilovesleep6 · 09/05/2026 10:37

Ticktockk · 09/05/2026 10:36

I do understand, as I said in my post, that the number is enormous. I also said previously that I can see why people might vote reform even though I don’t. But the optics change when you say 100-200 a day. For many people, they envision this constant stream of boats, constantly being processed. The reality is different.

As I said, it doesn’t matter if it’s a constant stream with little numbers or a less regular stream with big numbers. It still costs the same and what’s what people care about.

Plus we very rarely have a week with no crossings, even in winter. We may have 4-5 days with nothing and then a huge number to make up for it. The numbers are published here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/migrants-detected-crossing-the-english-channel-in-small-boats/migrants-detected-crossing-the-english-channel-in-small-boats-last-7-days

Goldenphoenix · 09/05/2026 10:37

I live in a local council area run by Reform. And I work at the council with Reform Councillors. It isn't going well here and some truly bad decisions have been made.

Inexperienced Councillors are being manipulated by council workers who are firmly in charge and are using the Councillors to push through all sorts of unpopular decisions. Residents are starting to catch on here that this Reform council hasn't made the changes they said they would.

I think the more local councils that Reform win the less support they will have for a General Election when it comes. At a local level Reform are really messing it up where I live and are losing support by their voters quite vocally via social media and in the press.

Farage (for some at least) holds some charisma and that is dangerous. We have seen throughout history how a charismatic leader who can tell good stories, have a good bluster and get people to believe them should not be under estimated. No idea what the other political parties can do to shut that down now. As above I hope that at a local level Reform councils help the scales fall from the eyes of Reform voters because it's all just words and no real positive change.

Piglet89 · 09/05/2026 10:39

Northermcharn · 09/05/2026 10:24

Exactly. And agreed - responses on this thread demonstrate it perfectly. Labour especially, have done a grand job in this regard.

Edited

And Labour is not listening. I and my son’s consultant have tried to engage with two different cabinet ministers on two different issues affecting my life. Lammy ignored me. Wes Streeting (the other example) replied to our consultant AND ANOTHER on this thread basically with derision and the latter of those emails was to praise him.

That’s contempt for the electorate, folks. And it really pisses us off. We feel powerless to tackle it day to day: our vote is the only way.

And that’s why Labour’s fucked: they literally do not listen.

TheSnootiestFox · 09/05/2026 10:39

LoveHearts69 · 09/05/2026 08:22

I’m honestly baffled that anyone could think Reform would be of any benefit to us. Farage is all for the 1% rich. He gets more donations than any other party and is bought out by oil and gas companies etc. He is so far removed from being for the working class and would sell off and privatise absolutely everything!

I also don’t think anyone voting understands the devastating impact a USA based healthcare system would have on us. Insurance does NOT pay out for everything. Even after insurance payments, people are still having to pay out £10,000 for giving birth for example. I’m a member of a homebirth group and there’s so many women from the US on there opting for a free birth (no midwife present) because they physically can’t afford the costs. People are losing their homes and going into horrendous debt.

If anyone really thinks that immigration is impacting them more on a daily basis than a Farage government would then I don’t know what more to say tbh. I’m just devastated so many people have lost their minds.

Well, I lost my home in 2022. I had to sell it to fund surgery that the NHS wouldn't provide as they deem my disease 'cosmetic.' I was keeping myself out of a wheelchair. Ironically the NHS will support me once I become disabled but will offer no help in trying to keep me mobile. The third surgery I had was more minor and I travelled to Germany for that as the surgeon was much better. Noone should have to leave the country for healthcare when we have a so called NHS that I as a higher rate taxpayer for the bulk of my career, contributed towards. Fortunately I inherited and was able to buy another home but I should not have been put in that revolting position initially.

Anyway, in terms of a US system, I'd be intrigued to know how many people have experienced the US healthcare system first hand. I did an internship in upstate New York in my 20s and was involved in quite a nasty road accident. The care I received over there was sensational and I could claim back everything through either my insurance or the insurance of the woman who caused the accident. Even my taxi fares to hospital appointments were reimbursed.

Compare and contrast with my more recent NHS experiences where I'm waiting an hour and a half after my alloted appointment time for my gynae appointment and watching all the non English speaking young women come out with their consent forms for surgical abortions. They sat down around me and placed their forms on the coffee tables so I could see clearly what was on them every time I swapped reading material.

Before anyone comes for me, yes I do have private healthcare but I needed to be more local for this treatment due to work, the private hospital my provider deals with is over an hour away.

If a vote for Reform stops that and allows me to pay insurance for the treatment that I need, in pleasant and efficient surroundings, and without having effectively to pay twice through NI, they have my vote all the way!

Catwalking · 09/05/2026 10:47

cannynotsay · 09/05/2026 03:09

I don’t know how any woman can vote reform when they actually want to get rid of the equality act. As above in that long ridiculous post, it shifts from illegal immigration to just immigrants. Nothing wrong with immigrants coming into the country. Kinda glad, wouldn’t have met my husbands or been born myself. May even shock you to hear I’m white, he’s Asian tho. So that might mess with your head. Our families all work, pay our taxes and contribute to society.

the amount of money spent on illegal immigration, is probably less than all the undeclared tax from the billionaires backing reform!

I agree with the fact criminals should stay in the UK and seek refuge, as should any criminal like prince andrew and his buddies!

anyway regardless of all this, what are you reform voters going to do when we lose our rights as women? Our NHS?

& that’s why YOU voted reform?
soz, you’re just lazy, couldn’t be bothered to start your own thread & thought you’d hijack this one!

Lizzypet · 09/05/2026 10:48

SalmonOnFinnCrisp · 09/05/2026 04:49

Jesus this thread...
I said it before and I will say it again.

Inability to have basic discourse and to dismiss alternate views as people being "morons" is how we ended up with brexit.

@caringcarer answered the thread in presumably good faith and like absolute morons you all want to jump down their throat and berate the lack of paragraphs...

👍👍👍

My DH may well have voted reform in the local bielections because he is so utterly fucking jaded by Labour and for his own reasons hates the Conservatives (Boris based). We both find green alarming.
I was more than mildly shocked. My dh is oxbridge educated and not a stupid man.

I told him a protest vote wasnt the answer.... i voted Conservative...nit sure who he went for in the end.

If you want to change opinions you need to be open and hear what people are saying.

Theres another thread on here about potholes. Reform are platforming on this and gaining ground. People in the uk are very unhappy and discontent.

A lot of this current economic strife stems from labour wages, taxation bands and benefit levels. A significant portion of this current situation should arguably be laid at Gordon browns feet. He was warned extensively by economists about long term implications of working tax credits but he didn't give a shit neither did Tony

A lot of people in the uk feel very disappointed and diseffected... they are essentially looking for love in all the wrong places. (Imo Reform is the equivalent of charming rich good looking guy who is telling you what you want to hear... its very tempting hes full of all the promises and you want to believe its true and are ignoring the red flags in the background)

Edited

Absolutely. For a bunch of people who I would imagine like to see themselves as tolerant and inclusive, some are remarkably judgemental of someone who doesn't write quite as well as they'd like.
I will never vote Reform, I find them terrifying. But I'm so sick of the virtue signalling & calling others morons & knuckle draggers. If we (and the major parties) don't start listening to people's concerns we'll end up with a Reform Govt & we all lose.

Sadcat22 · 09/05/2026 10:50

People need to understand that people lives aren’t the same so they vote for what they think will help them.

Do conservative voters get called uneducated? The party that caused brexit,austerity mortgage hikes etc that have caused so many of the countries difficulties we face today.
Why would educated people choose that? Or were they tricked into believing what they said?
laughable when they are outraged about the uneducated stupid people voting for reform.

I didn’t vote as I don’t trust any of the parties.
Boris wasn’t exactly great
Starmer is useless
Teresa May and all the rest of them I wouldn’t trust them as far as I could throw them.
But that’s just my opinion which I’m entitled to have
the same for everyone.

cannynotsay · 09/05/2026 10:50

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

27TimesAway · 09/05/2026 10:51

Piglet89 · 09/05/2026 10:39

And Labour is not listening. I and my son’s consultant have tried to engage with two different cabinet ministers on two different issues affecting my life. Lammy ignored me. Wes Streeting (the other example) replied to our consultant AND ANOTHER on this thread basically with derision and the latter of those emails was to praise him.

That’s contempt for the electorate, folks. And it really pisses us off. We feel powerless to tackle it day to day: our vote is the only way.

And that’s why Labour’s fucked: they literally do not listen.

Edited

Absolutely. I was that other poster who Streetings office responded to with disinterest and scorn at best.

Abd yet a PP accused YOU @Piglet89 of being a Maga bot with what you said.

THIS is why the Labour government is toast. This is why people who make knee jerk reactions to posters explaining why they voted the way they do are just - embarrassingly stupid themselves.

CharlotteStreetW1 · 09/05/2026 10:52

climbintheback · 09/05/2026 04:19

To give the other 2 stagnant corrupt parties a good old fashioned kicking. Hope for common sense and fairness and that things will never be the same again and it’s exciting.

Be careful what you wish for...

Maiyakat · 09/05/2026 10:54

I live in a Labour stronghold, saw no campaigning by Labour and had no leaflets from them. The majority of the Labour councillors lost their seats on Thursday. Labour need to stop taking areas like this for granted, actually engage with the electorate and listen to their concerns, and not just dismiss any questions about immigration as racism.

(And no, I didn't vote Reform)

Sonato · 09/05/2026 10:54

Ticktockk · 09/05/2026 09:28

It’s not actually 100-200 arriving daily. It averages out to that number so it’s used as it looks good in the media. It’s 41000 a year. It’s obviously still a huge number but I think it’s misleading to say they’re coming every day.

Ok then.

Are we adequately equipped for the number arriving annually

Goodness me its hard to pin down an answer to this question.

juldan · 09/05/2026 10:58

ilovesleep6 · 09/05/2026 10:29

We are a much smaller country than France, Germany, Spain etc. If we didn’t have the channel and you could get here by land, no doubt UK would have more migrants than Germany and France.

I don’t think so. It is far easier to build a wall/ fence on the mainland border than in the sea. The only way would be to put something all around our coast line blocking access to the sea. It is also easier to catch people on the land than in the middle of the sea.
I do not think migrants are biggest problem this country has. Yes, the cost of housing asylum seekers is a big issue and I think their claims should be processed faster.
However, vast majority of people who come here want to work. They will contribute to our society by paying taxes and purchasing goods and services.
I know that some of them want to claim benefits but this could be controlled by putting the same restrictions which people from Central Europe had when they joined EU- no access to public funds for specific amount of time.

Reform is cynically using immigrants issue to manipulate the vulnerable members of the society. “You are poor because of immigrants”. “You can’t get a council house because of immigrants”.
In reality people are poor because their employers get away with paying them low wages. They cannot get a council house because there aren’t enough built.

Reform is not proposing to resolve any of these issues. They are not going to raise wages or build more affordable homes. In fact they are proposing to take away many of the protections workers currently have.

Silenceplease · 09/05/2026 11:01

I think ,a lot of people were voting reform , because restore didn't have anyone standing.

MissyMooPoo2 · 09/05/2026 11:01

NorthXNorthWest · 09/05/2026 09:55

How difficult it was to read is my first argument. It might not be valid to you, but it was to me. For me, it felt like trying to read one long sentence in one long breath without punctuation. It was awful to read, let alone unpack.

I actually would go as far as saying that it would be unreasonable to challenge anyone who started their first post with “TLDR” or “I didn’t read the full opening post...”. Maybe we need an acronym for that!

For you, it was clear.

I get to decide for me, and you get to decide for you.

It wasn't one long sentence, though. We have a convention in the English language known as 'full stops' - as used by the poster.

It is not the case that you CHOSE to find it too difficult to read? For example, if the text completely converged with your political opinion, do you think you'd somehow manage to overcome your difficulty with comprehending written English?

MattDillonsEyebrows · 09/05/2026 11:02

SalmonOnFinnCrisp · 09/05/2026 04:49

Jesus this thread...
I said it before and I will say it again.

Inability to have basic discourse and to dismiss alternate views as people being "morons" is how we ended up with brexit.

@caringcarer answered the thread in presumably good faith and like absolute morons you all want to jump down their throat and berate the lack of paragraphs...

👍👍👍

My DH may well have voted reform in the local bielections because he is so utterly fucking jaded by Labour and for his own reasons hates the Conservatives (Boris based). We both find green alarming.
I was more than mildly shocked. My dh is oxbridge educated and not a stupid man.

I told him a protest vote wasnt the answer.... i voted Conservative...nit sure who he went for in the end.

If you want to change opinions you need to be open and hear what people are saying.

Theres another thread on here about potholes. Reform are platforming on this and gaining ground. People in the uk are very unhappy and discontent.

A lot of this current economic strife stems from labour wages, taxation bands and benefit levels. A significant portion of this current situation should arguably be laid at Gordon browns feet. He was warned extensively by economists about long term implications of working tax credits but he didn't give a shit neither did Tony

A lot of people in the uk feel very disappointed and diseffected... they are essentially looking for love in all the wrong places. (Imo Reform is the equivalent of charming rich good looking guy who is telling you what you want to hear... its very tempting hes full of all the promises and you want to believe its true and are ignoring the red flags in the background)

Edited

Thank you! I only got down the first page and thankfully saw your post before I commented as you have put exactly what I wanted to say!

I wouldn’t vote Reform, but immediately dismissing everyone who does as stupid or racist is exactly the kind of attitude that fuelled Brexit in the first place.

People should be able to talk about the pace of change in their towns and cities without automatically being labelled racist. Concern about immigration, integration, or cultural change does not necessarily come from hatred or prejudice.

I’m from Leicester, which has been a multicultural city for decades. Growing up, visitors would often comment on how diverse the city centre was, but to us it was normal. Immigration happened gradually over generations, and as second-, third-, and fourth-generation families grew up here, communities mixed naturally. Leicester, along with places like Bradford and Leeds, became known as cities where many British Asian families settled and built lives.

What some people are reacting to now is not diversity itself, but the speed and scale of change in other parts of the country over the last 15–20 years. In Leicester when I was a child, many families spoke other languages at home, but English was still the common language in public life. Today, in some places, cultural change has happened very quickly, and that can (understandably) create fear, uncertainty & discomfort for some residents.

We should be able to discuss integration, community cohesion, and immigration honestly and respectfully without assuming the worst motives in everyone who raises concerns or tries to do something about it by voting in a party who has it as their main objective.

ilovesleep6 · 09/05/2026 11:03

juldan · 09/05/2026 10:58

I don’t think so. It is far easier to build a wall/ fence on the mainland border than in the sea. The only way would be to put something all around our coast line blocking access to the sea. It is also easier to catch people on the land than in the middle of the sea.
I do not think migrants are biggest problem this country has. Yes, the cost of housing asylum seekers is a big issue and I think their claims should be processed faster.
However, vast majority of people who come here want to work. They will contribute to our society by paying taxes and purchasing goods and services.
I know that some of them want to claim benefits but this could be controlled by putting the same restrictions which people from Central Europe had when they joined EU- no access to public funds for specific amount of time.

Reform is cynically using immigrants issue to manipulate the vulnerable members of the society. “You are poor because of immigrants”. “You can’t get a council house because of immigrants”.
In reality people are poor because their employers get away with paying them low wages. They cannot get a council house because there aren’t enough built.

Reform is not proposing to resolve any of these issues. They are not going to raise wages or build more affordable homes. In fact they are proposing to take away many of the protections workers currently have.

Edited

Do you not understand that employers can get away with paying lower wages because of immigration?

There are more people out there who want and need jobs. It’s supply and demand. Employers can advertise jobs with low salaries and know people will apply as there are so many people who need work. And sometimes (though not always) an immigrant will be willing to work for less. I am not talking about the doctors and engineers here. I’m talking about those in low paying, traditional ‘working class’ jobs.

In the past, trade unions would be against immigration for this reason. It pushed wages down and made it harder to bargain for better workers’ rights when there were more people willing to work for less.

Same with housing, supply and demand. Lots of People want housing so sellers can increase their prices. Landlords can put up their rent as there’s so much competition.

Dontbeatwat · 09/05/2026 11:04

Strawberrydelight78 · 09/05/2026 05:45

Just proves the level of intelligence of reform voters.😂😂😂

What a nasty, unnecessary post. Believe me, a post like this says far more about you than it does about the voters you are mocking - even if you think you're so clever and well-educated.

Menopausalsourpuss · 09/05/2026 11:07

People in this country are so naive. I couldn't care less if illegals want to work etc. They are unidentified and that is why we have passports. If I was an enemy government I would be sending soldiers on these boats to cause havoc and I suspect that is what Russia, Iran etc are doing.

MissyMooPoo2 · 09/05/2026 11:07

OneFunBrickNewt · 09/05/2026 10:01

TLDR: I can't use paragraphs.
I don't like immigrants.

You need to learn how to paraphrase.

D-

NorthXNorthWest · 09/05/2026 11:08

TheSnootiestFox · 09/05/2026 10:39

Well, I lost my home in 2022. I had to sell it to fund surgery that the NHS wouldn't provide as they deem my disease 'cosmetic.' I was keeping myself out of a wheelchair. Ironically the NHS will support me once I become disabled but will offer no help in trying to keep me mobile. The third surgery I had was more minor and I travelled to Germany for that as the surgeon was much better. Noone should have to leave the country for healthcare when we have a so called NHS that I as a higher rate taxpayer for the bulk of my career, contributed towards. Fortunately I inherited and was able to buy another home but I should not have been put in that revolting position initially.

Anyway, in terms of a US system, I'd be intrigued to know how many people have experienced the US healthcare system first hand. I did an internship in upstate New York in my 20s and was involved in quite a nasty road accident. The care I received over there was sensational and I could claim back everything through either my insurance or the insurance of the woman who caused the accident. Even my taxi fares to hospital appointments were reimbursed.

Compare and contrast with my more recent NHS experiences where I'm waiting an hour and a half after my alloted appointment time for my gynae appointment and watching all the non English speaking young women come out with their consent forms for surgical abortions. They sat down around me and placed their forms on the coffee tables so I could see clearly what was on them every time I swapped reading material.

Before anyone comes for me, yes I do have private healthcare but I needed to be more local for this treatment due to work, the private hospital my provider deals with is over an hour away.

If a vote for Reform stops that and allows me to pay insurance for the treatment that I need, in pleasant and efficient surroundings, and without having effectively to pay twice through NI, they have my vote all the way!

A few internet seaches will set you free. If you had to sell your home you won't be able to afford the type of insurance you are imagining.

BerryTwister · 09/05/2026 11:08

People are voting reform because of immigration. That’s the bottom line, and successive governments are ignoring this clear statement by the electorate. But if Labour don’t acknowledge this and address immigration, then at the next general election Reform will be getting in.

charliehungerford · 09/05/2026 11:10

ilovesleep6 · 09/05/2026 08:55

I very much doubt many people who come via small boat are net contributors to our economy. You generally need to earn over £41k minimum to be a net contributor, which is above the average wage. But happy to be proved wrong if you have a source.

If they had the earning power to be net contributors, they wouldn’t have come via small boat. They could have come via a legal channel.

You do realise many people lie in order to get asylum, don’t you? Helped by human lawyers who advise them to say they’re gay, or Christian, or another persecuted minority. It’s usually bollocks.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c937wldkkw8o

Edited

Here here, Skilled immigrants can apply for jobs in the uk and obtain work visas to come here, many who work in the NHS come to the UK in this way. NHS Dr’s and nurses don’t have to come here on boats from France.

Why were there so many men arriving on boats from Albania, 18000 over five years, They clearly weren’t genuine asylum seekers, there is no war in Albania. Why pay someone £££ to bring you across the channel when you can simply buy a plane ticket from Tirana to London for £100. Admittedly most of them were denied asylum, but how much money was spent on processing them, accommodation, appeals etc?

NorthXNorthWest · 09/05/2026 11:11

MattDillonsEyebrows · 09/05/2026 11:02

Thank you! I only got down the first page and thankfully saw your post before I commented as you have put exactly what I wanted to say!

I wouldn’t vote Reform, but immediately dismissing everyone who does as stupid or racist is exactly the kind of attitude that fuelled Brexit in the first place.

People should be able to talk about the pace of change in their towns and cities without automatically being labelled racist. Concern about immigration, integration, or cultural change does not necessarily come from hatred or prejudice.

I’m from Leicester, which has been a multicultural city for decades. Growing up, visitors would often comment on how diverse the city centre was, but to us it was normal. Immigration happened gradually over generations, and as second-, third-, and fourth-generation families grew up here, communities mixed naturally. Leicester, along with places like Bradford and Leeds, became known as cities where many British Asian families settled and built lives.

What some people are reacting to now is not diversity itself, but the speed and scale of change in other parts of the country over the last 15–20 years. In Leicester when I was a child, many families spoke other languages at home, but English was still the common language in public life. Today, in some places, cultural change has happened very quickly, and that can (understandably) create fear, uncertainty & discomfort for some residents.

We should be able to discuss integration, community cohesion, and immigration honestly and respectfully without assuming the worst motives in everyone who raises concerns or tries to do something about it by voting in a party who has it as their main objective.

The OP started the thread provocatively.