Katie Price you daft woman

[PeteAndre]

Apparently Lee is a millionaire/billionaire with a PhD from Cambridge (actually Lee they are called a DPhil from Cambridge). Apparently he works for the Labour party and the Kings Trust....both of whom have never heard of him. Apparently he's bought a house with 36 million cash but has to live in his dad's spare room. Apparently he knows Elon Musk (the images are AI). Apparently he's 41 ( going on 51). Apparently he's not got a travel ban ....but can't leave the UAE

He's a total bellend.

What's even more hilarious is that Katie believes all his lies.

Ignoring her past/present trauma is looking at her life in a superficial way as trauma informs behaviour. People and their behaviours are more complicated than you seem to know.

Interesting...on her Facebook page she's just posted a story about a romance scammer....has the penny dropped? It'll be a miracle if she's finally come to her senses.

I actually do understand- I have experienced plenty of trauma. Please do not assume I don’t.

She is just causing her kids trauma now and all for attention. Any reasons behind her behaviour do not excuse what she has done. Or is it okay if the person has been through stuff? Should abusive parents be allowed to continue looking after their kids because they have had a hard life?

And surely nobody believes anything staged for TV?

If she had killed someone when she was drunk driving would that be okay? It was only stupid luck that that didn’t happen

Different people can experience similar trauma and not react to it in the same way. The reason we don't all react the same way is due to factors often out of our control like age and support network etc. Just criticising someone on the little you see is not involving much thought.

Despite what you appear to think, I’m not actually thick. I know it affects different people in different ways.

In your opinion, are her actions excusable then? Is killing her pets etc acceptable? And bringing in new men every two minutes into her kids’ lives?

Just wondering how much is excusable because she’s had trauma? Should that be a ‘get out of jail free’ card? There’s usually reasons behind people being clusterfucks but surely we can condemn the behaviour?

And I wish I only knew a little about her but she’s everywhere

The behaviour is due to trauma and we can not agree with it but it does not make her a fundamentally bad person. It just makes someone who has grown up in the media and can't go and work in an office so is making money the only way the media will let her.

Look, you do you. You are happy to be understanding and concentrate on her issues. That’s fine - some people like to see the best in others.

But imo it DOES make her a fundamentally bad person. She is a grown woman who could access any level of help available.

The man that raped me when I was 15 had had a difficult upbringing - guess what, that doesn’t excuse his actions.

The woman who gave me a kicking had had a difficult upbringing - same again.

The men who have made my life hell over my life clearly had issues.

If someone on here mistreats their children and uses their past to excuse it, people would be kicking off.

If you decide to behave like she does, any empathy should be for the people who she is harming.

The trauma doesn't excuse her actions, but it does add context to them and a certain level of understanding. Her behaviour is not happening in a vacuum. She had trauma when she met Pete, and she made some questionable decisions, but she had good business sense, and her life was mostly under control.

There's been a marked decline in her mental health since being involved with PA, yet he's come out of it smelling like roses, and she is vilified. That's what posters are annoyed about (imo).

Not much consolation to her children or her pets though. If she had run someone over when drink driving, I’m sure it wouldn’t have been much consolation to them either.

Perhaps PA had been traumatised too? I am being facetious and I personally think they are both poisonous but where does it end?

To those who seem to want to defend her despicable actions, we will have to agree to disagree. Have a good evening.

Or maybe he’s just a nasty prick?
Some posters seem to be really hard of thinking. You can disagree with her behaviour and still note that her ex was a wanker too.

Maybe he has, although if you believe what he says in the press, he had a happy childhood. You cannot argue that the way he treated Katie was due to trauma, though. His actions were calculated and deliberate.

His career was largely over when he met KP, whereas she was at the top of her game. He used her fame to further his career, whilst bullying her for how she gained her fame, and once he'd gained all he could from her, he left her, stole her management team, and started a public smear campaign.

Very few women would come out of something like that undamaged.

Maybe she's just a nasty prick too.

How do you know his actions were calculated and deliberate? Do you know him? Were you there? Or are you basing your opinion on a very heavily edited TV show?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gThTJSsj36g&t=639s&pp=ygULa2F0aWUgcHJpY2XSBwkJrgoBhyohjO8%3D