Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Would you want to survive a catastrophic event?

164 replies

notmynamenamename · 03/03/2026 07:11

The kind where groups of people are rebuilding from scratch?

I don’t, I’m too old to repopulate society. I have a prolapsed disc so heavy lifting/ uncomfortable sleeping and sitting would be a nightmare. I’m not brave or strong. I don’t have any skills that would make me an asset other that child care which I would not want to do.

OP posts:
Hungrycaterpillarsmummy · 03/03/2026 17:53

Yeah I would.

AgnesMcDoo · 03/03/2026 17:54

i think I could survive alright. I’m a scout leader so have some skills and im Gen Z so grew up with limited tech and can survive without it.

but I’m in Scotland so I’d have to trek further south to cope with winter without gas and electricity

IdrisElbow · 03/03/2026 17:55

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

FlatErica · 03/03/2026 17:56

No

XenoBitch · 03/03/2026 17:58

The whole "Blitz spirit" thing was just used as a way to tell people how pathetic they were for struggling to "stay at home and watch Netflix" during Covid.

lllamaDrama · 03/03/2026 18:00

No, I would prefer to die quickly with my kids close and unaware, in a disaster.

I have a horrible fear that my kids would be at school, locked down and terrified, and I couldn’t get to them to say goodbye and hold them close.

1000StrawberryLollies · 03/03/2026 18:01

It depends. If there were zombies on the loose, or everyone who had survived was suffering from the effects of nuclear fallout, no. Otherwise, possibly, especially if my dc and ds had survived. Dh would be very good in a survival situation. I'd be ok at some stuff, but I'm not physically that tough!

slaintebab · 03/03/2026 18:05

Fuck no. Any kind of event like that, zombies, nuclear war etc, I’d just want to be dead as soon as it starts.

piscofrisco · 03/03/2026 18:10

I used to have a brilliant house for surviving most sorts of apocalypse. It had a cellar, a high walled garden, a still pure ish well, and massive gates that shut out everyone else. If I still lived there I think I could survive a long while. Now I live in a normal house I probably wouldn’t last long at all.

Pearlstillsinging · 03/03/2026 18:21

Skybunnee · 03/03/2026 07:32

Yes - I could cook a squirrel!
I garden so would do my best to collect seed, store food.
we had many fewer home comforts 70 years ago with few cars snd fridges -we managed then -it was normal life, we’d be going back to the life of a peasant 100 years ago

Edited

Where were these peasants living 100 yrs ago?
In 1926, we were recovering from WW1, the stockmarket would soon crash, most people were either employed in industry or looking for industrial work. Farming was becoming more and more mechanised, there were very few 'peasants'.

WhereYouLeftIt · 03/03/2026 18:42

I'm another whose preference to be in the first wave of deaths was shaped by watching Threads in the 1980s, and Survivors in the 1970s. I don't feel I'd have anything to offer whatever was left of humanity and they'd have more chance of surviving without me being a deadweight.

But then, my child is an adult - I'd feel different if he wasn't.

Would you want to survive a catastrophic event?
Would you want to survive a catastrophic event?
RaininSummer · 03/03/2026 19:07

No not now I'm pretty old. I do have some useful domestic type skills though if I managed to survive the first crisis.

Meadowfinch · 03/03/2026 19:13

Yes. I'd always want to survive.

I'm a decent cook, a competent veggie gardener, and a reasonable shot. I'd want to be around to teach the younger people basics like cleaning fish, using everything available to make food. I hope I'd be an asset.

not sure about a nuclear event. If ds survived I'd want to be here.

SliceofTosst · 03/03/2026 19:24

Yes if there wasn't still overpopulation and people didn't have to rob and kill each other to survive.

MsWilmottsGhost · 03/03/2026 20:00

AshHeart · 03/03/2026 14:25

The people who don't have what you have. If you struggled to buy toilet roll during COVID it should show there's plenty of the type about. A catastrophic event is anything that stops civilization as we know it but doesn't kill everyone.

Don't know where you live, but round our way there wasn't any fighting over toilet roll. People were looking after their neighbours, and painting rainbows on stuff 🤷

There are good people as well as bad people, it true that hardship brings out both extremes.

MsWilmottsGhost · 03/03/2026 20:14

gamerchick · 03/03/2026 16:05

If civilization collapses people won't need to be psychopaths. You would have to do things that had never been a twinkle in your head.

We wouldn't all going to pull together as one big singing group. The survival instinct is very strong and most of us have never had it activated yet. Desperation makes us be someone we've never been before.

Including you.

Having grown up with CSA and nearly murdered at 18, bad scenarios don't need to twinkle in my head at all thanks Gamerchick

I'm well aware that it doesn't even require a catastrophe, psychopaths are everywhere and bad shit happens to people every single day.

But this is a thread about catastrophes, and history shows that it takes an awful lot to destroy civilisations. Even when a lot of people have died, the survivors tend to want to return to normality as soon as possible, though they may have to move somewhere else to do so.

Real life isn't a mad max movie.

Coconutter24 · 03/03/2026 20:23

Pearlstillsinging · 03/03/2026 18:21

Where were these peasants living 100 yrs ago?
In 1926, we were recovering from WW1, the stockmarket would soon crash, most people were either employed in industry or looking for industrial work. Farming was becoming more and more mechanised, there were very few 'peasants'.

When you say there were very few peasants… you do know in 1926 there was a very high percentage of peasants?

Coconutter24 · 03/03/2026 20:29

ItWasMyTurn · 03/03/2026 12:23

Found Covid easy? You mean when nobody went out and we had to queue for groceries - hardly an apocalypse 😂

But to some Covid was catastrophic, not an apocalypse no. For some covid wasn’t just queuing for groceries

XenoBitch · 03/03/2026 20:31

Coconutter24 · 03/03/2026 20:29

But to some Covid was catastrophic, not an apocalypse no. For some covid wasn’t just queuing for groceries

Yep, I know people who took their own life during Covid, and plenty of people who nearly did (including me).

HopSpringsEternal · 03/03/2026 20:36

XenoBitch · 03/03/2026 20:31

Yep, I know people who took their own life during Covid, and plenty of people who nearly did (including me).

It was pretty shite here. Lost 2 family members. DH worked in A&E, then got long covid (still has). 4 kids at home. Dont remember shopping being an issue other than taking ages. My point was despite it being shit, I found it manageable.

ImWearingPantaloons · 03/03/2026 20:37

Nope. As long as I had my husband and cat with me and we could all die together.

LilyBunch25 · 03/03/2026 20:50

Skybunnee · 03/03/2026 07:32

Yes - I could cook a squirrel!
I garden so would do my best to collect seed, store food.
we had many fewer home comforts 70 years ago with few cars snd fridges -we managed then -it was normal life, we’d be going back to the life of a peasant 100 years ago

Edited

You'd have to go back much further than that. You'd need to think how many resources there actually were in the 1920s. A major event would set us back much further than people realise.

LilyBunch25 · 03/03/2026 20:51

ImWearingPantaloons · 03/03/2026 20:37

Nope. As long as I had my husband and cat with me and we could all die together.

Exactly same here right down to the husband and cat. We've always said no point running or trying to survive, for example, a nuclear event.

labamba18 · 03/03/2026 21:04

If only women and children left yes. A world where men didn’t have law and order? No.

BrownSharpie · 03/03/2026 21:54

AshHeart · 03/03/2026 13:13

People would soon take all that from you. You'd need weapons to have a chance at stopping them.

So keep the fact I’m well stocked a secret, I already do that anyway outside of this site, obtain more weapons and increase security measures… easily doable. Still not putting me off

Swipe left for the next trending thread