Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Green Party wanting to legalise drugs.

217 replies

YorkieTheRabbit · 24/02/2026 15:46

Maybe I’m not thinking this through correctly, so could anyone explain to me how legalising heroin would work.

It’s highly addictive, causes physical dependency and can damage to the body.

Then, who is supposed to be paying for the supply? Would it be taxpayers basically paying for people to become addicted then paying to treat the addiction?
I know that people will take drugs regardless but I just can’t get my head around this.
Surely the Greens don’t think that drug dealers will just shrug their shoulders and go and get a proper job 🤷‍♀️

Will they be delivered by deliveroo, along with a KFC?
Or will people be able to buy drugs from dodgy Dom down the road, who’ll pop round in five minutes with whatever you fancy,. Plus Dom will need to fill in a tax return. Or will people need to catch a bus to the nearest dispensary? The mind boggles

Are they planning on charging VAT the same as alcohol or will it be free on prescription?
Please excuse my rambling as I’m sleeping deprived but this really has me pondering.

OP posts:
Dragonscaledaisy · 25/02/2026 13:45

38thparallel · 25/02/2026 12:49

Opioids can't be stopped without lifelong effects because their use causes permanent, non-reversible brain changes.

That’s interesting - what form do these brain changes take, and does the length of time that someone is addicted affect the changes?

I think they cause structural and functional changes in regions of the brain associated with regulation of affect and impulse control and reward and motivational functions. I would assume high doses and chronic pose greatest risk but I'm not sure at what dose and duration of use any changes become permanent.

Peonies12 · 25/02/2026 13:45

Fupoffyagrasshole · 24/02/2026 16:38

Well the current system of drugs being illegal doesn’t work does it - they are everywhere - people get them if they want them and it causes all sorts of issues with gangs etc supplying the drugs / drug mules etc

nothing will stop it

theres heaps of evidence that decriminalisation of drugs is a much better system.

Exactly this. many countries have began to decriminalize drugs. Alcohol is far more damaging to society that drugs yet noone blinks an eye at that. Many drugs could have medical benefit if there could be legal clinical trials done using them.

Riverflow6 · 25/02/2026 13:46

CraftyNavySeal · 24/02/2026 16:14

Decriminalisation is not the same thing as legalisation. Portugal did it but you still can’t go to a shop and buy heroin.

So heroin users won’t be prosecuted for having heroin on them but sellers can be.

Having said that I don’t think a lot of the supporters actually understand what Portugal did, having drugs is not illegal but it’s mandatory drug treatment iirc. You still not free to do drugs willy nilly.

This.

OP I was also super skeptical until I read an eye opening book

Chasing The Scream by Johann Hari

after reading this I feel I would be pro the decriminalisation of drugs. It takes the power away from the dealers and gangs and opens up the channel of commication to those at risk of taking drugs. Usually serious drug takers are people who’ve had awful childhood and are blanking out their pain. Thats the thing that needs focusing on, ensuring people haven’t got nothing to live for except for drugs.

Fufus · 25/02/2026 13:46

Erin1975 · 25/02/2026 13:22

For the same reason people drink alcohol. They get pleasure from the experience.

Shame people can't control themselves and want to poison their bodies to "feel good".

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 13:46

Playingvideogames · 25/02/2026 13:45

No, they won’t.

Right now it’s illegal for somebody to drive after taking drugs because they’re more likely to cause an accident.

If they are caught they are banned from driving.

If we legalise drugs, then everyone can presumably drive around high and not be arrested or banned UNTIL they cause an accident.

How is that a good idea????

Ummmm alcohol is legal but driving while drunk very much is not.

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 13:47

Fufus · 25/02/2026 13:46

Shame people can't control themselves and want to poison their bodies to "feel good".

You can say that about anything even mildly harmful. Do you eat chocolate? Drink coffee?

GasPanic · 25/02/2026 13:47

It's a weird thing to do given what they are doing in other areas.

Stamping down on alcohol use with minimum pricing and increased taxes. Same with cigarettes the cost is going through the roof. Junk food and sugar taxes.

All in the name of "improving public health".

Well if you are going to work on improving public health, surely legalisation of cannabis is just going to lead to worse outcomes. Without the issues to do with psychological problems cannabis can cause, what about the effects from smoking it, ie lung cancer ? And a lot of the time it is cut with tobacco.

Fufus · 25/02/2026 13:48

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 13:47

You can say that about anything even mildly harmful. Do you eat chocolate? Drink coffee?

They have some mild nutritional benefits. I know what is wrong and what is right.

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 13:49

Fufus · 25/02/2026 13:48

They have some mild nutritional benefits. I know what is wrong and what is right.

But in the long term, or large quantities, they’re harmful. Same as drugs and alcohol.

SerendipityJane · 25/02/2026 13:49

Playingvideogames · 25/02/2026 13:42

Because heroin, ecstasy, ketamine, spice etc weren’t even in circulation then?

The sharpest increase in recreational drug use lagged slightly behind their being banned.

Greens (and LibDems) have always had a policy of reviewing the UKs drugs laws It was quite amusing seeing Caroline Lucas having to swerve the issue - luckily political reporting in this country is so pisspoor it rarely happened.

The best place to start would be to put the 1971 MDA and the ACMD into alignment and follow the law as it was always intended to be used. It is a very clever and progressive piece of legislation. However that discussions is probably conducted elsewhere. Ideally in a clue factory.

Playingvideogames · 25/02/2026 13:49

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 13:46

Ummmm alcohol is legal but driving while drunk very much is not.

It’s completely different.

We would have to calculate the length of time each person would have to not drive for, according to the strength/quantity of drugs etc - it would be impossible to legislate and for people to interpret.

Alcohol is a poison but it’s a known quantity in society, and the process of drunkenness is slower and isn’t like a bomb of MDMA or similar, that hits all at one. Drugs are more likely to render you unconscious or have a seizure at the wheel.

It would be an absolute nightmare.

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 13:50

Playingvideogames · 25/02/2026 13:49

It’s completely different.

We would have to calculate the length of time each person would have to not drive for, according to the strength/quantity of drugs etc - it would be impossible to legislate and for people to interpret.

Alcohol is a poison but it’s a known quantity in society, and the process of drunkenness is slower and isn’t like a bomb of MDMA or similar, that hits all at one. Drugs are more likely to render you unconscious or have a seizure at the wheel.

It would be an absolute nightmare.

But again you’re incorrect. It would just be a blanket ban, like alcohol should be for driving.

Playingvideogames · 25/02/2026 13:51

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 13:50

But again you’re incorrect. It would just be a blanket ban, like alcohol should be for driving.

And seeing as legalising alcohol hasn’t resulted in lower drink driving, why do you think this would work?

HangingOutAtTheRialto · 25/02/2026 13:52

Playingvideogames · 25/02/2026 13:42

I work in an area that I see the consequences of drugs on people and society every day.

NO, NO and NO again.

The people wanting to make it legal are middle class idiots imaging their fellow Trustafarians having a quiet responsible smoke of an evening.

The reality is drug use leads to a LOT of crime - in particular shoplifting, assaults on shop workers (just lately I encountered somebody punched to the ground by an addict to the extent they had a serious head injury), burglaries, robberies, and more.

Not to mention road traffic collisions caused by drivers on drugs.

Do you want it to be legal for somebody to be high on crack cocaine on the bus with you and your children? Do you think people should be able to carry out their jobs, drive, etc while under the influence of drugs? Do you want people speeding along the motorway after taking heroin or ecstasy?

If not, how would we legislate around this to ‘make drugs legal’ but not increase the risk to the public? It’s impossible.

Trust me this is a brain dead ‘idea’ from the terminally thick ultra left. They have NO CLUE about the real world.

You've made some hefty leaps there. For example, alcohol consumption is legal but drinking and driving isn't, nor is being a public nuisance whilst under the influence (drunk and disorderly). Just because an element of the law regarding the possession or use of substance is changed, doesn't mean you can do whatever you like whilst under the influence of it.

Fufus · 25/02/2026 13:52

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 13:49

But in the long term, or large quantities, they’re harmful. Same as drugs and alcohol.

Drugs and alcohol - even minor quantities are damaging. And are intoxicants as well.

Water in large quantities kills.

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 13:53

Playingvideogames · 25/02/2026 13:51

And seeing as legalising alcohol hasn’t resulted in lower drink driving, why do you think this would work?

The intended effect of this legislation isn’t to reduce drug driving, is it?

Alcohol was never expressly illegal in modern history either?

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 13:53

Fufus · 25/02/2026 13:52

Drugs and alcohol - even minor quantities are damaging. And are intoxicants as well.

Water in large quantities kills.

Same as chocolate, palm oil, UPFs.

Fufus · 25/02/2026 13:57

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 13:53

Same as chocolate, palm oil, UPFs.

Ok?

Playingvideogames · 25/02/2026 13:58

Trust me, truly I know what I’m talking about, I have seen the effects of drugs daily now for many years.

Legalisation would be an absolute disaster, legally a nightmare and would result in far more ramifications than is being discussed here.

I would love to sit down and have a 2/3 hour chat about it but obviously that’s not an option. But for every simple ‘but they’ll do it anyway/it’ll be like alcohol’ there’s very good and extensive reasons why it would NOT be.

nodoubtinmind · 25/02/2026 14:00

Fufus · 25/02/2026 13:57

Ok?

If you want drugs to be totally illegal, rather than legalised within limits, you must apply that line of thinking to everything else - including alcohol.

Ncforthis2267 · 25/02/2026 14:02

LauraNorda · 24/02/2026 16:19

Don't they also want to legalise prostitution and porn?

The fact that anyone is giving them the time of day fills me with foreboding about the future.

Porn isn't illegal

Ncforthis2267 · 25/02/2026 14:05

Playingvideogames · 25/02/2026 13:45

No, they won’t.

Right now it’s illegal for somebody to drive after taking drugs because they’re more likely to cause an accident.

If they are caught they are banned from driving.

If we legalise drugs, then everyone can presumably drive around high and not be arrested or banned UNTIL they cause an accident.

How is that a good idea????

Lol, where did you get that idea?!!

Alcohol is legal now, but you're not allowed to drive around fine unless you cause a crash for fucks sake.

Erin1975 · 25/02/2026 14:07

Underthinker · 25/02/2026 12:21

How would a small amount of tax revenue make up for the inevitable harm to society done by making more people addicted to class A drugs?

There is evidence that legalising drugs doesn't result in increased drug use.

What it would do is remove the criminal behaviour associated with the supply and sale of drugs.

Fufus · 25/02/2026 14:13

Oh yes. I wouldn't mind it drugs and alcohol being banned. But drugs first.

The gulf states and east Asian states are very strict. I would not allow my kids to do drugs, I doubt many others would as well.

SerendipityJane · 25/02/2026 14:16

Not much critical thinking here, which is a shame.

No one has put forward any vaguely workable proposal for a mission statement for a drugs policy. And without that, any "measures" are a waste of time.

At least we know why the UKs productivity is so low.

"Here's our policy"
"What does it do ?"
"Fuck knows"
"How will we know it's working ?"
"Does that matter ?"
"Good point. Here's an every increasing sum of money to deal with it. See you next year"
"Thanks boss"