On Monday, the news broke that the Ministry of Justice had ordered the deletion of the UK’s single largest court reporting archive. Courtsdesk, a private company which entered into an agreement with the Government in 2020, holds records from millions of magistrates’ court cases. These records can be accessed by journalists, ensuring that the public has some way of finding out about what’s happening in our justice system.
But if the Government gets their way, journalists and investigators will lose access to millions of historic magistrates’ cases. The same goes for the upcoming national inquiry into grooming gangs, which will no longer be able to use these records to make links, identify patterns, or uncover networks of grooming and abuse.
The Government initially said that this was because of data rules. Then, in the House of Commons, Justice Minister Sarah Sackman claimed that Courtsdesk had shared sensitive data with an AI company, in breach of their agreement with the Government.
It turns out that none of this is true. In a truly damning blog post, the CEO of Courtsdesk totally took apart these claims. It turns out that the firm never shared sensitive information for commercial purposes, had never breached the agreement made with the Government, and spent months trying to speak to officials after they made the initial claim.
Most damningly, it turns out that the Ministry of Justice didn’t even consider this so-called breach to be worth reporting to the Information Commissioner’s Office. If it had been as serious as Ms Sackman claimed, she would have needed to report it within 72 hours.