Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Brooklyn bloody Beckham though

1000 replies

trustedadult · 19/01/2026 21:32

Bloody hell, I'm loving it

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
Gloriia · 20/01/2026 07:44

bakebeans · 20/01/2026 06:51

“My wife and I do not want a life shaped by image, press or manipulation”.
He says whilst posing in matching outfits to draw attention.

The irony is off the scale.

Gloriia · 20/01/2026 07:46

OvernightBloats · 20/01/2026 07:44

You live by the sword, you die by the sword.

David and Victoria have put their children's lives on social media all their lives, Brooklyn has every right to make this statement on social media to defend himself. I feel sorry for Brooklyn and the other children being paraded around in public like a handbag accessory.

Edited

They've put their kids on social media so it's fine for him to write speeches on social media of private discussions. Isn't it all a bit kettle and pot?

MrsMitford3 · 20/01/2026 07:46

First of all there is no way I think Brooklyn wrote that himself.

Just like Megan and Harry's Oprah interview (where at least 17 statements they made-such as the poor Archbishop marrying them in the garden-have been proven not to be true) Brooklyn says exactly what he wants and the media are running with it. No verification required and it's all over the papers in multiple articles. It is his version-doesn't have to be true as it is a great headline.

There are always 3 sides to a story, theirs, his and the truth.

The stylist from their wedding has already come out to say the wedding dress was a year in the making. I seem to remember they sacked 3 wedding planners and they are being sued etc so not a smooth run up to the big day.

Do I agree with the Beckhams (Brand Beckham) posting so much of their kids-not really.
Do I think Brooklyn is being entitled-didn't mind using his famous name repeatedly for all of his ventures-books, cooking shows etc etc yes I do.

I am concerned that he has also cut off all of his friends-some of whom have been friends since childhood and his siblings as well and is fairly isolated in America and now susceptible to other strong influences...

Has he gone from the frying pan to the fire???

Elbone · 20/01/2026 07:46

Makingadecision · 20/01/2026 05:58

This.
if his parents were so awful he should have left them and become independent but he went where the money was

I went NC after I was married.
It took me until then to realise the difference between being loved unconditionally (by my husband) and the “love” I received from my family. My husband gave me the strength and clarity I needed.
He also offered a safety net. It’s terrifying going NC with your parents. It’s all you ever known and if they don’t care about you that much, how much worse will the people out there be?

Your rhetoric is no different to “Why doesn’t she just leave him?”

Abuse changes how your brain works. Even if you know you’re being abused, sometimes the alternative can be even scarier. There are lots of studies and research on why victims don’t immediately leave. I would suggest you both look into it if it’s a point of interest for you.

HK04 · 20/01/2026 07:47

Brooklyn and Nicola seem genuinely in love and more natural as a couple. For me that’s the difference. Good luck to them and hoping VB/DB leave them alone now. Suspect the brothers will inflame it though.

DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 20/01/2026 07:48

Elbone · 20/01/2026 07:46

I went NC after I was married.
It took me until then to realise the difference between being loved unconditionally (by my husband) and the “love” I received from my family. My husband gave me the strength and clarity I needed.
He also offered a safety net. It’s terrifying going NC with your parents. It’s all you ever known and if they don’t care about you that much, how much worse will the people out there be?

Your rhetoric is no different to “Why doesn’t she just leave him?”

Abuse changes how your brain works. Even if you know you’re being abused, sometimes the alternative can be even scarier. There are lots of studies and research on why victims don’t immediately leave. I would suggest you both look into it if it’s a point of interest for you.

Well said. I also didn't manage to go NC until I'd been married for 5 years and had a 7 year old; I'd normalised how they treated me and ignored DH when he was trying to tell me. It was only when it started affecting DD that I woke up and removed us all from the situation.

Missohnoyoubetterdont · 20/01/2026 07:49

I don’t think his marriage to Nicola-whatever her name is-multi-millionaire lady will last 5 minutes and I’m pretty sure there will be a pre-nup involved. Where will boy Beckham be then? I imagine it’s 6 of one and half a dozen of the other regarding what has gone on between families and the truth will lie somewhere in between. As it is, who really cares? Apart from the Meghan haters who like to froth about everything.

Gloriia · 20/01/2026 07:50

Thr thing is people who are being controlled and pushed to be estranged from their family never see it.
So yes the dance, weird, the many gripes all possibly valid but someone is stirring the pot.

He's clearly an emotionally damaged man and I think therapy would be a better way forward than social media rants.

LauraNorda · 20/01/2026 07:53

Why on Earth do people bother with this manufactured crisis nonsense?

I can see all the Beckhams, sat on the sofa in the evenings, laughing at all the braindeads debating who is right and who is wrong and they don't even know the Beckhams, all whilst coining it in from clickbate ads.

SisterTeatime · 20/01/2026 07:54

I think there is real pain in BB’s statement - it has the ring of truth.

I think it’s psychologically normal for someone to feel ‘safe’ to detach from parents when they marry. It’s not fair to say that Brooklyn ‘should’ have cut off his parents before he met his wife if it was so awful etc. 1) his parents’ behaviour towards his wife seems to be a significant factor; 2) being in a close relationship with someone who treats you differently from your own family can really shine a light on things; 3) he may be afraid of his parents and need support to stand up to them. He’s only gone for the nuclear option after trying other ways to detach.

HopSpringsEternal · 20/01/2026 07:54

NewGirlInTown · 20/01/2026 00:37

He is awful to put this into the public domain. What a loser. Does he have a job yet? His wife wouldn’t have looked at him twice if his name wasn’t Beckham.
He reminds me of that little shit Harry.

I find it fascinating that you would see him as the issue not his parents. He had no choice but be famous, as did Harry. Forced into the public eye as a baby.
No decent role models. Fathers very publically had affairs. Their families making up the family narrative for the press.
It must be stifling.
I have older teens/young adults and theyve had failed attempts at careers and love, taken drugs,been fired made mistakes as have many of their friends. I've helped them navigate this and its ben tough on them.

But if your parents are the royal family, all the beckhams, you would get such shit advice, and that is advice would all be about protecting "the family" not you. It has all played out in public with gossip hungry, on empathetic, people willing you to fail, baying at your door. Making judgements and posting shit like this thread everywhere. It like modern day stoning.

I do judge but it's people like you, not some fucked up rich kids who had no choice to be famous.

OvernightBloats · 20/01/2026 07:55

Gloriia · 20/01/2026 07:46

They've put their kids on social media so it's fine for him to write speeches on social media of private discussions. Isn't it all a bit kettle and pot?

Brooklyn is putting a statement out on social media because he knows that this is the most hurtful way to deal with this. Two wrongs don't make a right, of course. However, he knows that 'Brand Beckham' is everything to his parents so by making it public he knows it will harm them.

There is no going back from this though. Brooklyn has burned his bridges by doing this.

dottiehens · 20/01/2026 07:55

NameChangeElaine · 20/01/2026 07:21

I don’t understand what he was on about with the last name business.

ALLEGEDLY the Beckham’s didn’t want Brooklyn hyphenating his name to Beckham-Peltz as they didn’t want the name Peltz associated with “Brand Beckham” due to the Peltz’s connection to Epstein (and Weinstein); they supposedly wanted him to sign a legal document to say he’d either drop Beckham completely or use Beckham only, not Peltz. Brooklyn allegedly felt this was not only disrespectful to his wife and in-laws but also his parents putting business / brand before family and them being controlling (his two other complaints).

Brooklyn allegedly also felt dropping the Beckham name would affect his career (thus the complaint about it affecting his wife and future kids) because while the Peltz’s are billionaires, it’s the Beckham name that’s higher profile where fame is concerned. It was allegedly this refusal that caused D&V to distance themselves from Brooklyn as they felt he was hurting their brand and allegedly the real reason Victoria opted out of making Nicola’s wedding dress (so as to not associate her fashion label with the Peltz name) which B&N took as a further kick in the teeth as they had gone out of their way to support her at her fashion shows (hence that particular complaint).

It’s an interesting rumour as it seems at the beginning of B&N’s relationship, everything was hunky dory, the Beckham’s and Peltz’s were socialising together but then something caused the Beckham’s to distance themselves (by Brooklyn’s own admission) and coincidentally, at the exact same time more and more was coming out about Epstein.

Supposedly it was D&V wanting to separate the Beckham and Peltz names that caused the whole Nicola (and the Peltz’s) aren’t blood, put the family and family business / brand first (hence that particular complaint).

I heard this rumour a while ago but didn’t really believe it until now but everything Brooklyn has said seems to fit; I also think it’s very interesting that he was quite detailed about all his gripes but then purposefully vague about the name one (possibly to avoid mentioning Epstein or having people wonder what they had against the Peltz name?).

While I’m sure D&V are toxic (no pun intended), I don’t think the Peltz’s are whiter than white either in my opinion.

Being interesting to see if anything comes of the Epstein connection.

Most of the US successful society, celebrities and politicians were linked to Epstein. It doesn’t mean they were all pedophiles. However, what you said makes sense. It is hard to find a sensible reason as to why they would sabotage the wedding and relationship this way. The name business and all that.

Genuineweddingone · 20/01/2026 07:57

OvernightBloats · 20/01/2026 07:55

Brooklyn is putting a statement out on social media because he knows that this is the most hurtful way to deal with this. Two wrongs don't make a right, of course. However, he knows that 'Brand Beckham' is everything to his parents so by making it public he knows it will harm them.

There is no going back from this though. Brooklyn has burned his bridges by doing this.

Most children of abusive families do this - over explain, try desperately to get their side across. They already have no family support so they may want support of others and to just for once be heard. Sadly with his family social media is the only way if his parents are refusing to adhere to boundaries set in place.

WildFlowerBees · 20/01/2026 08:00

I don’t understand this need to air all in public, really unnecessary. If he’d married a woman who had a regular job with an average income he’d never have cut off his parents, when they get divorced we’ll see how much he needs his awful parents then. Another Harry & Meghan. No class and no decorum.

MrsElijahMikaelson1 · 20/01/2026 08:00

JH0404 · 19/01/2026 21:43

I believe him, really feel for them both. Nicola has had to put up with horrible attacks on her character. And the bits about the wedding are awful, it brings out the worst in people. I remember at the time it was all over the press that VB was snubbed as she wasn’t wearing her wedding dress, very disappointing that it was the other way around. So sad that image managing has made them turn on their child.

Whilst VB is reported as saying her atelier didn’t have time, it was hardly 11th hour. There was an interview in Vogue where Nicola discusses a year long process with Valentino including 2 trips to Rome and numerous fittings in the US.

when you lie about one thing, unfortunately it calls everything else into question whether or not it’s true.

tbf it sounds like a fairly fucked up situation but Brooklyn is an entitled shit who was happy to bank in on his name before he won literal bank when he married Nicola 🤷‍♀️

Ceramiq · 20/01/2026 08:01

David Beckham was a talented footballer with the looks to attract a lot of attention and develop a celebrity brand. Victoria was a manufactured pop singer in a girls band. Not the same level of talent. They are these days famous for being famous - they communicate what a certain large segment of the population find compelling but it's vacuous and self-serving. Growing up as their children, constantly served up to the press in pursuit of family brand fame, is not a recipe for balanced happy adulthood.

berlinbaby2025 · 20/01/2026 08:01

LauraNorda · 20/01/2026 07:53

Why on Earth do people bother with this manufactured crisis nonsense?

I can see all the Beckhams, sat on the sofa in the evenings, laughing at all the braindeads debating who is right and who is wrong and they don't even know the Beckhams, all whilst coining it in from clickbate ads.

You sound very naive. Like it or not, this is major news that is damaging to the brand. This is on a whole other level compared to previous scandals.

DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 20/01/2026 08:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Gloriia · 20/01/2026 08:03

'when you lie about one thing, unfortunately it calls everything else into question whether or not it’s true.'

Exactly it's the Sussexes all over again. What next an Oprah moan and a Netflix reality show? Ugh silly man complains about over exposure in the media by gossiping about others to the media.

luckylavender · 20/01/2026 08:04

NewGirlInTown · 20/01/2026 00:37

He is awful to put this into the public domain. What a loser. Does he have a job yet? His wife wouldn’t have looked at him twice if his name wasn’t Beckham.
He reminds me of that little shit Harry.

Me too

LowdermilkPark · 20/01/2026 08:05

My sympathies lie with Brooklyn.

I’ve long thought David and Victoria’s parenting was questionable at best. If they’d been effective parents, their children might have made meaningful use of the extraordinary opportunities afforded to them and built genuine careers, rather than drifting aimlessly through the vapid celebrity ecosystem.

And his confirmation that she’s something of a bitch is not remotely surprising.

luckylavender · 20/01/2026 08:06

Ceramiq · 20/01/2026 08:01

David Beckham was a talented footballer with the looks to attract a lot of attention and develop a celebrity brand. Victoria was a manufactured pop singer in a girls band. Not the same level of talent. They are these days famous for being famous - they communicate what a certain large segment of the population find compelling but it's vacuous and self-serving. Growing up as their children, constantly served up to the press in pursuit of family brand fame, is not a recipe for balanced happy adulthood.

Although Victoria has proved herself in fashion. Done the hard yards and come out on top.

the80sweregreat · 20/01/2026 08:06

The daily mail have moved on from Harry and Meghan to this saga.
The thread below is hi lighting the problems with our NHS , this is far more worrying and important than some very rich people having a public fall out.

LauraNorda · 20/01/2026 08:08

berlinbaby2025 · 20/01/2026 08:01

You sound very naive. Like it or not, this is major news that is damaging to the brand. This is on a whole other level compared to previous scandals.

Geez, I hope that response is parody. 'Major news', 'brand', 'previous scandals'.

Its a family squabble (if it is even 'real') that has zero impact on anyone outside that family.

It pales into insignificance compared to the right ding-dong that went on at number 8 at the weekend.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.