Absolutely this!
It would brilliant for this to spark a wider conversation about how the children of celebrities might suffer from the constant exposure of the press and social media.
There is a real need to protect the privacy of children online. So many parents use their children as SM merch, as marketing currency. Some children's relationship with their parents becomes one in which they are first and foremost, a commodity.
If you're a child growing up in a famous family which literally subsists on constant exposure to the world, then it has to be very difficult. I remember doing research on the correlation between narcissism and social media posting. There's no doubt in my mind that for some famous families that are constantly exposing themselves to the world in order to remain in the spotlight and keep social currency, narcissism is the driving force.
A narcissist parent for whom love is conditional on maintaining an image, and on remaining a useful utility is toxic. It redirects the hierarchy of the relationship from predominantly parent to child to Child to parental image. Validation is dependent upon your PR utility. Which, if so, tallies with his story about his mother insisting his first wedding dance being with her so the press could supposedly report on it and getting the primary attention.
I'm totally unsurprised to hear that Victoria B might be that image conscious.
Very, very sad. But good on Brooklyn for finally telling his side.
Here's a short video showing a little bit of what it might feel like to be constantly exposed online
Edited for clarity