Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Trump’s text message to the Norwegian PM

352 replies

TortoiseshellTabby · 19/01/2026 14:35

“Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America."

This is why he’s justified in taking Greenland - apparently. How is this giant man-child in charge of the free world?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 07:53

EasternEcho · 20/01/2026 07:23

How does Trump's administration getting rid of women's reproductive rights, which arguably affect a far larger proportion of women, fit into this? I hardly think Trump is anything about women's rights. He's a convicted sex offender to begin with.

Women lost reproductive rights under Biden.

How do you protect women’s reproductive rights if you can’t even discuss them as a women’s rights issue? How do you look credible when you make it taboo to acknowledge facts about sex?

Havanananana · 20/01/2026 07:55

lifeonmars100 · 19/01/2026 18:50

Anyone else filled with dread about the potential for really bad trouble at the World Cup?

The way things are going there won't be many spectators or teams at the World Cup.

He's already banned fans from 4 participating countries and stopped processing visas for residents of numerous countries. If he invades Greenland then the USA would be at war with the EU and NATO countries, so logically no European teams could participate. Apart from in a few dictatorships in South America, he's not particularly popular in that part of the world, and he's already threatened that after Venezuela, Columbia is his next South American target.

Perhaps it's all part of his cunning plan - ban everyone else and the US team might have a chance of being World Cup winners by default.

EasternEcho · 20/01/2026 07:58

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 07:53

Women lost reproductive rights under Biden.

How do you protect women’s reproductive rights if you can’t even discuss them as a women’s rights issue? How do you look credible when you make it taboo to acknowledge facts about sex?

That's rather disingenous. The justices were appointed by Trump and the wheels were in motion during Trump's first term. Trump campaigned on getting rid of abortion rights. Nothing to do with Biden. Furthermore, it's not about discussing women's rights issue, it's about blaming the Democrats that they lost the election to the MAGA lot because of women's rights, as if Trump is all for it. That's simply not true. The fact remains that Trump is not at all about women's rights, no matter which way you twist it. Trump is not for anything really, other than what enriches him and keeps him in power.

LlttledrummergirI · 20/01/2026 08:04

The fight for women's rights in America was lost when they voted for 'grab en by the pussy',best mates with Epstein, pay for pageant to see girls naked Trump. Right now they need to fight for their basic Human rights, then they can pick up the fight for women's rights and equality.
Without Human rights, they have no rights, only illusions.

Walkaround · 20/01/2026 08:04

TooBigForMyBoots · 20/01/2026 00:07

I wish that was true. But it isn't.
Vladimir Putin bears much of the blame.
Elon Musk bears much of the blame.
Fox News bears some of the blame.
The cowardice of the Republican Party is to blame.

Trump voters were sucked in. Bought or fooled, the result is the same.

Edited

You only really have yourself to blame if you choose to live in an echo chamber. You only have yourself to blame if you vote based on a single issue and turn a deliberate and ludicrous blind eye to everything else. You only have yourself to blame if you vote for someone who is blatantly misogynistic, abusive, corrupt and has a personality disorder. Many leaders have undesirable characteristics, but it did not take a genius to notice before the election that Trump had multiple undesirable characteristics magnified colossally. And as for people who didn’t vote - far better that than voting for Trump, imvho. The problem is, people are being groomed to become as narcissistic as Trump - they always need someone else to blame for their own mistakes, selfishness and stupidity.

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 08:16

EasternEcho · 20/01/2026 07:58

That's rather disingenous. The justices were appointed by Trump and the wheels were in motion during Trump's first term. Trump campaigned on getting rid of abortion rights. Nothing to do with Biden. Furthermore, it's not about discussing women's rights issue, it's about blaming the Democrats that they lost the election to the MAGA lot because of women's rights, as if Trump is all for it. That's simply not true. The fact remains that Trump is not at all about women's rights, no matter which way you twist it. Trump is not for anything really, other than what enriches him and keeps him in power.

Edited

I think you might have misunderstood my point.

If voting for a Democrat didn't save abortion rights in 2020, why would it save abortion rights in 2024?

In fact many people who voted for Trump voted down ballot to protect abortion rights in their state.

Furthermore, it's not about discussing women's rights issue, it's about blaming the Democrats that they lost the election to the MAGA lot because of women's rights, as if Trump is all for it

Again, you miss the point. Nobody thinks Trump is a feminist, but if the Democrats aren’t standing up for women’s rights either, what is there to choose between them?

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 08:18

Walkaround · 20/01/2026 08:04

You only really have yourself to blame if you choose to live in an echo chamber. You only have yourself to blame if you vote based on a single issue and turn a deliberate and ludicrous blind eye to everything else. You only have yourself to blame if you vote for someone who is blatantly misogynistic, abusive, corrupt and has a personality disorder. Many leaders have undesirable characteristics, but it did not take a genius to notice before the election that Trump had multiple undesirable characteristics magnified colossally. And as for people who didn’t vote - far better that than voting for Trump, imvho. The problem is, people are being groomed to become as narcissistic as Trump - they always need someone else to blame for their own mistakes, selfishness and stupidity.

And as for people who didn’t vote - far better that than voting for Trump, imvho. The

Do you not understand how elections work?

Kendodd · 20/01/2026 08:24

Walkaround · 20/01/2026 08:04

You only really have yourself to blame if you choose to live in an echo chamber. You only have yourself to blame if you vote based on a single issue and turn a deliberate and ludicrous blind eye to everything else. You only have yourself to blame if you vote for someone who is blatantly misogynistic, abusive, corrupt and has a personality disorder. Many leaders have undesirable characteristics, but it did not take a genius to notice before the election that Trump had multiple undesirable characteristics magnified colossally. And as for people who didn’t vote - far better that than voting for Trump, imvho. The problem is, people are being groomed to become as narcissistic as Trump - they always need someone else to blame for their own mistakes, selfishness and stupidity.

Yes, I agree.
I'm as twanw as they come but the idea that this one issue trumps everything and anything else is madness. Once people adopt that position though there's no reasoning and no arguing with them.
Presumably if they were in Russia they would be big fans of Putin over some woke opposition (if there was one). Personally I'd rather lose my son to transgenderism than war.

Kendodd · 20/01/2026 08:28

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 08:16

I think you might have misunderstood my point.

If voting for a Democrat didn't save abortion rights in 2020, why would it save abortion rights in 2024?

In fact many people who voted for Trump voted down ballot to protect abortion rights in their state.

Furthermore, it's not about discussing women's rights issue, it's about blaming the Democrats that they lost the election to the MAGA lot because of women's rights, as if Trump is all for it

Again, you miss the point. Nobody thinks Trump is a feminist, but if the Democrats aren’t standing up for women’s rights either, what is there to choose between them?

Ok, let's say both sides hate women, so no loss voting Trump on women's rights. What was it that persuaded voters he was the best option?

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 08:35

Kendodd · 20/01/2026 08:24

Yes, I agree.
I'm as twanw as they come but the idea that this one issue trumps everything and anything else is madness. Once people adopt that position though there's no reasoning and no arguing with them.
Presumably if they were in Russia they would be big fans of Putin over some woke opposition (if there was one). Personally I'd rather lose my son to transgenderism than war.

I don’t think women’s rights were a deciding issue.

I think that for some voters the Democrat position on this issue neutralised Trump’s nuttiness and reduced his flaws. It’s the same trick that he pulled inviting Clinton’s accusers to the debate, except the Democrats did it to themselves.

Trump says they are eating cats and dogs. The Dems think men are women. Trump doesn’t respect women. The Dems don’t respect women. It all becomes noise.

EasternEcho · 20/01/2026 08:41

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 08:16

I think you might have misunderstood my point.

If voting for a Democrat didn't save abortion rights in 2020, why would it save abortion rights in 2024?

In fact many people who voted for Trump voted down ballot to protect abortion rights in their state.

Furthermore, it's not about discussing women's rights issue, it's about blaming the Democrats that they lost the election to the MAGA lot because of women's rights, as if Trump is all for it

Again, you miss the point. Nobody thinks Trump is a feminist, but if the Democrats aren’t standing up for women’s rights either, what is there to choose between them?

I'm not missing your point, but rather looking very hard to fine one.

Your sentence about Democrats saving abortion rights in 2020 neatly sidesteps Trump's first term entirely and the groundwork set in place that cannot be reversed. Biden cannot un-appoint supreme court justices.

As to "what is there to choose between them", really, if that's your question after all that's transpired during Trump's first and second terms, I see that further engagement is an absolute waste of time.

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 08:48

Kendodd · 20/01/2026 08:28

Ok, let's say both sides hate women, so no loss voting Trump on women's rights. What was it that persuaded voters he was the best option?

Some people were always going to vote Republican and Trump always had his base, so (as with all elections) Democrats had to convince swing voters and non voters and ensure their own supporters bothered to vote.

I think Democrats failed to convince voters that Trump would be an existential disaster (and I fully agree that their worst concerns appear to be coming true) because he had already been president and many people didn’t think their lives were that bad in 2017-2021.

It was always going to be hard to come back from the Biden fiasco, which was arguably a betrayal of the American people, and Kamala Harris was not the right candidate to do that. If she were she would have done better when she tried to run for President the first time.

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 08:53

EasternEcho · 20/01/2026 08:41

I'm not missing your point, but rather looking very hard to fine one.

Your sentence about Democrats saving abortion rights in 2020 neatly sidesteps Trump's first term entirely and the groundwork set in place that cannot be reversed. Biden cannot un-appoint supreme court justices.

As to "what is there to choose between them", really, if that's your question after all that's transpired during Trump's first and second terms, I see that further engagement is an absolute waste of time.

Biden cannot un-appoint supreme court justices.

So, again, why would voting Democrat save abortion rights?

As to "what is there to choose between them", really, if that's your question after all that's transpired during Trump's first and second terms, I see that further engagement is an absolute waste of time

Yet clearly many Americans were not convinced that Trump was the worse option, so if you actually care about what has transpired, it might be worth trying to understand why.

EasternEcho · 20/01/2026 09:06

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 08:53

Biden cannot un-appoint supreme court justices.

So, again, why would voting Democrat save abortion rights?

As to "what is there to choose between them", really, if that's your question after all that's transpired during Trump's first and second terms, I see that further engagement is an absolute waste of time

Yet clearly many Americans were not convinced that Trump was the worse option, so if you actually care about what has transpired, it might be worth trying to understand why.

The simple answer is that seeing what Trump started during his first term, appointing sychophantic supreme court justices that will do as he wants - In fact they gave him complete immunity on his second term - his January 6 debacle that gave a very clear picture of what his attitude towards democracy itself is...and many many more - the voters STILL voted him back in so that he can continue his destruction of democratic institutions and make himself wealthy. The abortion rights are just an indication that the doesn't give a shit about women's right, and losing abortion right doesn't mean there's not many more women's rights to lose. I find your arguments so naive, or deliberately disingenous, that I truly do find it of no use. If you think comparing Biden and the democrats to Trump and MAGA is equal, then that kind of thinking doesn't bear logical challenge, because the base premise itself is illogical.

Kendodd · 20/01/2026 09:21

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 08:48

Some people were always going to vote Republican and Trump always had his base, so (as with all elections) Democrats had to convince swing voters and non voters and ensure their own supporters bothered to vote.

I think Democrats failed to convince voters that Trump would be an existential disaster (and I fully agree that their worst concerns appear to be coming true) because he had already been president and many people didn’t think their lives were that bad in 2017-2021.

It was always going to be hard to come back from the Biden fiasco, which was arguably a betrayal of the American people, and Kamala Harris was not the right candidate to do that. If she were she would have done better when she tried to run for President the first time.

And these same voters sat and watched Jan 6th unfold and STILL voted for Trump.

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 09:21

EasternEcho · 20/01/2026 09:06

The simple answer is that seeing what Trump started during his first term, appointing sychophantic supreme court justices that will do as he wants - In fact they gave him complete immunity on his second term - his January 6 debacle that gave a very clear picture of what his attitude towards democracy itself is...and many many more - the voters STILL voted him back in so that he can continue his destruction of democratic institutions and make himself wealthy. The abortion rights are just an indication that the doesn't give a shit about women's right, and losing abortion right doesn't mean there's not many more women's rights to lose. I find your arguments so naive, or deliberately disingenous, that I truly do find it of no use. If you think comparing Biden and the democrats to Trump and MAGA is equal, then that kind of thinking doesn't bear logical challenge, because the base premise itself is illogical.

The abortion rights are just an indication that the doesn't give a shit about women's right, and losing abortion right doesn't mean there's not many more women's rights to lose..

Women have many rights to lose (not that American women have some basic rights in the first place) and you can’t defend any of them if you can’t clearly define sex in legislation.

I find your arguments so naive, or deliberately disingenous, that I truly do find it of no use.

Snap!

If you think comparing Biden and the democrats to Trump and MAGA is equal, then that kind of thinking doesn't bear logical challenge, because the base premise itself is illogical.

It doesn’t matter what I think. The question is what American voters think.

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 09:24

Kendodd · 20/01/2026 09:21

And these same voters sat and watched Jan 6th unfold and STILL voted for Trump.

The Democrats successfully neutralised the argument that Trump was trying to overthrow democracy.

EasternEcho · 20/01/2026 09:27

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 09:21

The abortion rights are just an indication that the doesn't give a shit about women's right, and losing abortion right doesn't mean there's not many more women's rights to lose..

Women have many rights to lose (not that American women have some basic rights in the first place) and you can’t defend any of them if you can’t clearly define sex in legislation.

I find your arguments so naive, or deliberately disingenous, that I truly do find it of no use.

Snap!

If you think comparing Biden and the democrats to Trump and MAGA is equal, then that kind of thinking doesn't bear logical challenge, because the base premise itself is illogical.

It doesn’t matter what I think. The question is what American voters think.

Edited

Try addressing all my posts in its entirely instead of cherry picking sentences so it can go off on a tangential argument. If you find my arguments illogical you shouldn't want to keep engaging. I won't be responding to your cherry picked sentences anymore, but feel free to carry on. As for it matters what Americans think, it isn't the American electorate defending their position here on this forum, it's you.

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 20/01/2026 09:35

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 19/01/2026 16:54

Trump's empire will no doubt be the biggest and best empire that the world has ever seen. Obviously.

Silly me, it already is!

YourBrickTiger · 20/01/2026 09:36

Listening to the news this morning and a supporter of Trump has said 'Trump is making the world a safer and better place'.

I can't anymore.

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 09:37

EasternEcho · 20/01/2026 09:27

Try addressing all my posts in its entirely instead of cherry picking sentences so it can go off on a tangential argument. If you find my arguments illogical you shouldn't want to keep engaging. I won't be responding to your cherry picked sentences anymore, but feel free to carry on. As for it matters what Americans think, it isn't the American electorate defending their position here on this forum, it's you.

What did I miss?

Both parties make partisan appointments to the Supreme Court.

Is there something in particular you would like me to address?

We can agree all day long that Trump is awful.

PerkingFaintly · 20/01/2026 09:46

Woke this morning to a nice derail of this thread...Hmm

Back on topic, Russia is, of course, absolutely thrilled at Trump's behaviour in blowing up NATO and picking a serious fight with European countries. They're publicly actively encouraging him.

'Europe is at a total loss': Russia gloats over Greenland tensions
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c17zpvkddpzo

"If Trump annexes Greenland by July 4 2026, when America celebrates the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, he will go down in history as a figure who asserted the greatness of the United States," writes Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hand with Russian President Vladimir Putin, as they meet to negotiate for an end to the war in Ukraine, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, U.S - the two men are shaking hands with Putin using his...

'Europe is at a total loss': Russia gloats over Greenland tensions

The BBC's Russia editor Steve Rosenberg analyses why pro-Russian government papers are full of praise for Donald Trump's desire to buy Greenland.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c17zpvkddpzo

nicepotoftea · 20/01/2026 09:55

PerkingFaintly · 20/01/2026 09:46

Woke this morning to a nice derail of this thread...Hmm

Back on topic, Russia is, of course, absolutely thrilled at Trump's behaviour in blowing up NATO and picking a serious fight with European countries. They're publicly actively encouraging him.

'Europe is at a total loss': Russia gloats over Greenland tensions
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c17zpvkddpzo

"If Trump annexes Greenland by July 4 2026, when America celebrates the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, he will go down in history as a figure who asserted the greatness of the United States," writes Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

Edited

The only way we get out of this mess is if the American electorate chooses a better President.

u3ername · 20/01/2026 09:56

Honestly, I blame the citizens of the USA for sitting quietly after electing him. There must be legal ways for them to stop this madness. People in his party, democrats, lawyers, police, and just ordinary citizens. This is supposed to be a free, democratic country with many mechanisms in place to prevent totalitarianism. Are they really so apathetic to what is happening, so ignorant of the consequences, all so greedy? Millions and millions of people…

PerkingFaintly · 20/01/2026 10:00

Trump is so easily played by flattery, and the Russians have him just where they want him.

And it seems Vance has the same buttons to be pressed. While the rest of us were mortified for him when he attacked Zelensky in the Oval Office, Vance himself bragged about it as "the most high profile thing he'd ever done". <shrug>

So they're incredibly easy prey for the Russians fluffing their egos, patting them on the head and giving them a biscuit.