Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

16 yo son wants GF to sleep over

108 replies

Northmanchester · 08/01/2026 14:00

He's 16 next week and has always said he would not have sex with his 17 year old GF until it was legal. He has asked for her to sleep over or him to sleep @ hers next week. We are very uncomfortable with allowing this as although we've talked about precautions/bought condoms etc. we think the less times they have sex the less chance there is of pregnancy. We know we can't stop it from happening at all. It's a numbers thing. We know he will not be happy when we tell him. Any advice on how we do?

OP posts:
Puddingpiper · 08/01/2026 16:53

They are going to have sex regardless of it you ‘allow’ it. So either you can accept they are growing up and it will be in the safety of a home or wherever else they find.

Has she stayed before on the sofas etc - maybe start with that first. That is what we did to start eventually everyone got fed up of the farce.

giantsandgold · 08/01/2026 16:57

My parents were happy for me to stay at my boyfriend’s house when I was 16 because obviously at that age we wouldn’t be doing anything.
I had just turned 17 when they became grandparents.

DaisyChain505 · 08/01/2026 16:58

ThejoyofNC · 08/01/2026 16:20

No they won't. Not everyone follows the same culture you know

You're naive to think they won’t.

Culture aside, people have had their eyes opened to not waiting until marriage for sex.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with exploring your sexuality, finding out what you do and don’t like and who you’re compatible with before committing to marriage.

Purlant · 08/01/2026 17:02

If you’ve bought him condoms, you’re obviously envisioning him having sex soon. Where did you believe the sex was going to happen, at her house, in the woods, at your house?

Twoshoesnewshoes · 08/01/2026 17:05

Wow they’ve been together for a year and not had sex?
I think they need rewarding for their responsibility and maturity, not ostracised.
i generally allowed sleepovers if they seemed committed and respected and loved each other, at least six month relationship - I think my DD may have been late 15? Not sure if she had sex, didn’t ask and wasn’t told, but we talked about contraception a lot in general.

Pollqueen · 08/01/2026 17:09

At 16? No way would I have allowed this in my home

blankcanvas3 · 08/01/2026 17:23

I let my 17 year old son’s girlfriend stay over, we have an open and honest relationship and I would much prefer he was having sex in the house than in a bush. She came to me to ask about the pill and I know she’s still on it because I have fostered a good relationship with them both where they can come to me to talk about it if they need to. I’ve never heard them or walked in on them

sundaysurfing · 08/01/2026 17:26

No - let them have sex in the pub toilets or something. Only joking. I personally think you should let him. He’s got a steady girlfriend, seems sensible and will probably remember how you handled this forever. He will be having loads of sex soon. Just have a rule about steady girlfriends only.

user2848502016 · 08/01/2026 17:28

If you don’t feel comfortable with her sleeping over you are allowed to say no, I think just turned 16 is too young for sleepovers myself - it’s not just about sex it’s just a more grown up type of relationship.
You can’t really say no to him sleeping over at hers though if her parents are happy, just make sure he has condoms

Delatron · 08/01/2026 17:57

Ilovelurchers · 08/01/2026 16:43

This is very true.

But from OP's posts it sounds like she and her son are from a culture where sex before marriage is commonplace and expected, so it probably makes most sense to respond with these cultural expectations in mind.

My priority would be to make my child as safe as possible, and I personally believe this is best furthered by promoting honest communication.

If you show that you disapprove of your son having sex, and make active attempts to limit his opportunities to do so, won't he just very likely stop talking to you about it? And potentially seek less safe opportunities for sex (in the back of a car, etc).

Therefore I would speak to him honestly, share my concerns, attempt to persuade him to wait (if you think this is preferable, knowing him as an individual, his relationship etc). But ultimately I would allow the sleepover as the least worst option, if these young people are determined to have sex.

(I also wouldn't break my heart over it. While 16 is on the young side to become sexually active, at least it's in the context of a relationship with someone of a similar age, so less likely to involve coercive behaviour on either side. Plenty of us became sexually active at around this age and have grown into comparatively stable, well adjusted adults! Pregnancy is a lot less likely if you keep the conversation about contraceptives open and encourage him to tell you straight away if she DOES have a scare, so that you can talk to them both about options.)

This may appall a lot of you on here, but I keep a jar of condoms in plain view in my bathroom, and my daughter knows she is welcome to help herself for her or for friends, even though she is not yet 16 (and is currently in a relationship with another girl, and not sexually active at all as far as I am aware bar "making out") . I speak to my daughter openly about sex and she knows full well I would infinitely rather she wait until at the very least 16, and preferably longer. BUT if she, or one of her friends, chooses to have sex, in my experience they won't wait for lack of a condom. So I'd far rather they had it with one, than without!.

Agree! I have a box of condoms in full view in the bathroom cabinet.

Those that don’t allow it - they’ll just sneak off elsewhere, they won’t talk to you and it doesn’t help create a good relationship.

At 16 it’s perfectly legal. I can’t see the the issue if they’ve been together for a year. That’s very different to random girls. That’s the only rule I’d have. But DS wouldn’t bring a random girl home and has been in a relationship for 2 years…

Delatron · 08/01/2026 17:58

Pollqueen · 08/01/2026 17:09

At 16? No way would I have allowed this in my home

You’d rather them do it in a public park or something? And then lie to you. Great!

Delatron · 08/01/2026 17:59

giantsandgold · 08/01/2026 16:57

My parents were happy for me to stay at my boyfriend’s house when I was 16 because obviously at that age we wouldn’t be doing anything.
I had just turned 17 when they became grandparents.

I think we are all saying it’s obvious they’ll be doing something. And let’s have an open and honest conversation about safe sex. Rather than push them away and then they take risks.

Holidaytrees · 08/01/2026 18:00

Snowingtoday · 08/01/2026 15:24

It might be legal for them to have sex but they are still children in the eyes of the law.

I certainly wouldn't be happy with my 16 year old bringing his gf to my house to have sex just because they can.

It's your home, your rules. If you aren't happy with this then you are perfectly entitled to say no.

This we said over 18 and we had met them socially at least twice before coming and staying.

We also had the porn talk about no porn on any device even their own phone and certainly not using our WiFi. I didn’t want youngest to come across it and I take an anti porn stance as does DH.

GalaxyJam · 08/01/2026 18:01

zipadeedodah · 08/01/2026 15:55

Another one here echoing just say no.

Urgh, perish the thought of strangers sleeping in my house , teenagers I barely know. It was bad enough having my own teenagers here never mind someone elses lol.

As a pp said, first its this girlfriend, then the next one, then before you know it it's a string of them. Nah.

Did your teens never have sleepovers? We’ve always got friends staying over!

GalaxyJam · 08/01/2026 18:02

giantsandgold · 08/01/2026 16:57

My parents were happy for me to stay at my boyfriend’s house when I was 16 because obviously at that age we wouldn’t be doing anything.
I had just turned 17 when they became grandparents.

No one has said that they won’t be doing anything, though.

HairyToity · 08/01/2026 18:05

I didn't have a boyfriend stay over till I was 20, but he was my first serious relationship. First time I asked and parents said yes. My brother at 17 had his 16 year old girlfriend stay, again they said yes. No-one got pregnant before marriage. I think you need to do the safe sex talk and trust them.

I was having sex from 17 but they weren't serious boyfriends and I never took them home to meet the parents.

LlynTegid · 08/01/2026 18:05

You have decided no, I agree with you. Just because you will get a bad or hostile reaction makes no difference.

momtoboys · 08/01/2026 18:09

They are going to find a way to have sex no matter where they are, but it would be a cold day in hell before it would be in my house!

FourNaanJeremy · 08/01/2026 18:18

ThejoyofNC · 08/01/2026 16:20

No they won't. Not everyone follows the same culture you know

Culture does not prevent teenagers from having sex Confused
In every culture on the planet throughout the history of time there have been unmarried mothers, sex outside of marriage and unplanned pregnancies. Human beings do human things regardless of their culture

Mydadsbirthday · 08/01/2026 20:34

Following as we will be in exactly the same position very soon. I'm with some posters on here saying no. It's too young, it's not just about the sex but transitions to a much more adult relationship IMO - sharing a bed is an intimate and adult thing to do and personally my DS isn't mature enough for that kind of relationship. There was a similar thread a few days ago where some posters were saying this and I agree.

Kosenrufugirl · 08/01/2026 20:51

Ilovelurchers · 08/01/2026 16:43

This is very true.

But from OP's posts it sounds like she and her son are from a culture where sex before marriage is commonplace and expected, so it probably makes most sense to respond with these cultural expectations in mind.

My priority would be to make my child as safe as possible, and I personally believe this is best furthered by promoting honest communication.

If you show that you disapprove of your son having sex, and make active attempts to limit his opportunities to do so, won't he just very likely stop talking to you about it? And potentially seek less safe opportunities for sex (in the back of a car, etc).

Therefore I would speak to him honestly, share my concerns, attempt to persuade him to wait (if you think this is preferable, knowing him as an individual, his relationship etc). But ultimately I would allow the sleepover as the least worst option, if these young people are determined to have sex.

(I also wouldn't break my heart over it. While 16 is on the young side to become sexually active, at least it's in the context of a relationship with someone of a similar age, so less likely to involve coercive behaviour on either side. Plenty of us became sexually active at around this age and have grown into comparatively stable, well adjusted adults! Pregnancy is a lot less likely if you keep the conversation about contraceptives open and encourage him to tell you straight away if she DOES have a scare, so that you can talk to them both about options.)

This may appall a lot of you on here, but I keep a jar of condoms in plain view in my bathroom, and my daughter knows she is welcome to help herself for her or for friends, even though she is not yet 16 (and is currently in a relationship with another girl, and not sexually active at all as far as I am aware bar "making out") . I speak to my daughter openly about sex and she knows full well I would infinitely rather she wait until at the very least 16, and preferably longer. BUT if she, or one of her friends, chooses to have sex, in my experience they won't wait for lack of a condom. So I'd far rather they had it with one, than without!.

Well said.

When I was young we had lots of unsecured building sites around and the children would go and start small fires with rubbish and socialse and the parents were none the wiser. Thankfully, times were different and no child got hurt or raped in these secluded areas (to my knowledge).

My mum was the only parent who allowed their child to build fires. The only stipulation- it had to be in a spot from where she could see me out of our kitchen window. I built lots of fires and never got burnt.

I have 2 teenage boys. I would have no issues with sleepovers as long as schoolwork doesn't suffer

readingmakesmehappy · 08/01/2026 20:52

We would not allow this

Playingvideogames · 08/01/2026 21:08

It’s your house. Say no if you want to say no. I don’t get this whole ‘they’ll do it anyway..’ mentality. You could apply this to anything - smoking weed, getting blind drunk, watching pornography - but would you actively permit those under your roof? 16 is still very young. My parents were the groovy type who were all cool and liberal about me bringing boyfriends home. I wish they hadn’t been - I was under pressure to engage in a lot of sexual activity when looking back I was not ready for it; and barely legal.

Playingvideogames · 08/01/2026 21:10

Delatron · 08/01/2026 17:58

You’d rather them do it in a public park or something? And then lie to you. Great!

Why the fuck would they be doing it in a public park? How many people do you actually see having sex in public due to a lack of privacy? Total Mumsnet hysteria.

Delatron · 08/01/2026 21:42

Playingvideogames · 08/01/2026 21:10

Why the fuck would they be doing it in a public park? How many people do you actually see having sex in public due to a lack of privacy? Total Mumsnet hysteria.

Oh so much naivety on this thread! If a 16 year old and a 17 year old want to have sex they will find a way. A car, a park, a beach, the woods.

Personally I’d rather be an adult about this, stop clutching your pearls, and let them have sex in your house. I’m not the hysterical one here…

Swipe left for the next trending thread