Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Tax TAx TAX!!!!!! Fuming at our government!

1000 replies

Baldylovingbeard · 26/11/2025 13:29

please try and convince me otherwise…..

What a joke this government are!!! ( UK)

Let’s just tax everyone who earns a bit of cash!!! Oh and while we’re at it… go on have loads more children it’s ok others will pay for them!!! Cutting the 2child benefit cap! If you decide to have multiple children you should be able to afford to provide for them. NOT expect others too!!!!! If you fall on hard times and you’ve worked and contributed to paying tax than you are within your rights to claim tax this is what benefits were made for, it’s not a means to not work, have more kids….etc!

Oh and if you work really hard and want to put some money by for you later days in life…. You’ll be taxed!

My situation:
Part time work, full time mum to 1 child. I work for myself and earn around 10k this money usually pays for things our daughter needs… clothes, clubs, any treats.
Husband works long hours, his under a lot of stress with his job, he has worked his way to and earns a very good salary 100k he gets taxed 60% you do the maths on that! We live in a 3 bed around £280k so nothing crazy but live within our means. We have one car! One holiday a year! Put money into savings! Pension! our daughter goes to one after school club. My husband got kicked out of home at 16…. He has worked with no help from family or friends and I believe he has worked very hard to get to where he is now. we are generous with charity’s and try our best to help out when we can if we can!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Stillpoor · 26/11/2025 14:15

ledmeup · 26/11/2025 14:12

@Stillpoor can you post to evidence for your statement? This will not lead to more babies.

I dont have paper evidence it common sense.
In a few months just look around your see it for yourself.

HairsprayBabe · 26/11/2025 14:15

@SpaceRaccoon ooh could I borrow that magic ball you are using please? There are few things I would LOVE the answer to...

Also I already said I would be happy to pay towards more welfare - I don't like children in poverty - weird that you do.

ScholesPanda · 26/11/2025 14:16

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 26/11/2025 13:57

Probably. I don't care. My husband voted for them on my behalf in protest (I don't vote, that's a man's job), not because he wants them in power.

😂😂😂😂😂😂

Bloody suffragettes! That's where the rot set in, let me tell you.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Damnd · 26/11/2025 14:16

Pricelessadvice · 26/11/2025 14:02

Exactly. And the chances of the kids from the benefit families growing up and becoming meaningful members of society is far lower. So the cycle continues.

This country is a mess.

Meaningful members of society?! Absolutely! No place for these people in our society! They are meaningless!

CJones11 · 26/11/2025 14:17

Baldylovingbeard · 26/11/2025 13:29

please try and convince me otherwise…..

What a joke this government are!!! ( UK)

Let’s just tax everyone who earns a bit of cash!!! Oh and while we’re at it… go on have loads more children it’s ok others will pay for them!!! Cutting the 2child benefit cap! If you decide to have multiple children you should be able to afford to provide for them. NOT expect others too!!!!! If you fall on hard times and you’ve worked and contributed to paying tax than you are within your rights to claim tax this is what benefits were made for, it’s not a means to not work, have more kids….etc!

Oh and if you work really hard and want to put some money by for you later days in life…. You’ll be taxed!

My situation:
Part time work, full time mum to 1 child. I work for myself and earn around 10k this money usually pays for things our daughter needs… clothes, clubs, any treats.
Husband works long hours, his under a lot of stress with his job, he has worked his way to and earns a very good salary 100k he gets taxed 60% you do the maths on that! We live in a 3 bed around £280k so nothing crazy but live within our means. We have one car! One holiday a year! Put money into savings! Pension! our daughter goes to one after school club. My husband got kicked out of home at 16…. He has worked with no help from family or friends and I believe he has worked very hard to get to where he is now. we are generous with charity’s and try our best to help out when we can if we can!

Why are people struggling to understand who will be impacted by lifting the two child cap on the child element of UC🤯

This is unlikely to benefit people who have no intention for working and spit out child after child. It will, however, benefit low income workers with more than 2 children who rely on UC. It will benefit WORKING people predominantly.

The overall benefit cap is still in place.

So if your husband decided to leave you and you had 4 children together, you would now be able to continue working part time, receive adequate UC and provide for them.

We have become a society that begrudges contributing to the whole of society and its depressing.

TheCountessofLocksley · 26/11/2025 14:18

Cynic17 · 26/11/2025 13:37

You're not wrong , OP, but sadly anyone who remembers the 1970s pretty much knew that this would happen..... and yet the electorate voted them in 🤷‍♀️

its not like the neoliberal politics of the Thatcher government and subsequent Tory administration have been a rip roaring success is it?! Happy to see the poorest in society suffer, but not happy to pay a fair share.

I remember the 1970’s, ….the 3day week was legislation enacted by the Tories and ended by Labour in 1974. I remember the Winter of Discontent too when Labour stood firm against escalating union demands for pay rises. Cost them an election…..only for the Tories to do the same by decimating the unions…. So what was your point about bad nasty Labour and the 1970’s?

MidnightPatrol · 26/11/2025 14:18

TheSmallAssassin · 26/11/2025 14:00

Just a reminder that only 4% of working people earn over £100k and you don't get your whole income taxed at 60%, it's a progressive tax, surely you know that @Baldylovingbeard ?

How is it progressive for the tax rate to go up to 62%, then drop to 47%?

Outside9 · 26/11/2025 14:18

I can't understand how people who have an issue with high-levels of immigration, also are against scrapping the child benefit cap.

You can't have low immigration and disincentivise poor people having children.

ledmeup · 26/11/2025 14:18

@Stillpoor its not common sense at all.

No country has reversed birth rates once they are below replacement rate and you think this will do it?

AlexandraBee · 26/11/2025 14:19

As Kemi Badenoch said - they’re taxing everyone doing the right thing. Labour only support people being on benefits, as KB said Labour are the benefits party. They tax everyone else and quash growth.

Hellohelga · 26/11/2025 14:19

You are the second person on here today whose household earns well over 100k and has their own home, car, holidays every year moaning about money.
someone will be along in a minute crying about the mansion tax on her £2m house.

Doggielovecharlotte · 26/11/2025 14:19

Chewbecca · 26/11/2025 13:37

He doesn't get taxed at 60% by the way.
First 12k free of tax, then basic rate up to 50k, then 40% beyond that. Between 100-125 is also at 40% but because you gradually lose your PA in that space, the effective rate is higher.
But please don't think he pays £60,000 tax on his £100,000 salary, he doesn't.

Also you must be gifting him 10 % of your personal allowance as married couples are entitled to do

NoSoapJustUseShowerGel · 26/11/2025 14:19

MidnightPatrol · 26/11/2025 13:42

The effective tax rate between £100-125k is 62.5% inc NI.

No matter how you paint it, every extra penny you earn over £100k up to £125k is taxed at this rate.

Edited

It’s true but OP makes it sounds like the whole £100k is taxed at 60% which is a long way from the truth, but many are ignorant to this (maybe including the op).

If he’s on “£100k” to quote the op then considering the effective 60% tax rate only kicks in at 100k he’s probably only paying 60% on a very small amount of income.

FreeTheOakTree · 26/11/2025 14:19

If you are going to make such a post OP, at least be truthful.

Your husband isn't paying 60% tax on 100k.

But don't worry @Baldylovingbeard, given that you don't pay tax, your own hard earned money isn't going to feckless breeders.

ledmeup · 26/11/2025 14:19

Outside9 · 26/11/2025 14:18

I can't understand how people who have an issue with high-levels of immigration, also are against scrapping the child benefit cap.

You can't have low immigration and disincentivise poor people having children.

Stupidity?

ledmeup · 26/11/2025 14:20

AlexandraBee · 26/11/2025 14:19

As Kemi Badenoch said - they’re taxing everyone doing the right thing. Labour only support people being on benefits, as KB said Labour are the benefits party. They tax everyone else and quash growth.

Yes because the Tories didn’t increase taxes…

RedTagAlan · 26/11/2025 14:20

Nowdontmakeamess · 26/11/2025 14:02

Anything over £100k is effectively taxed at 60% due to the reduction in the tax free allowance

How does that work ? Sky news says tax thresholds are frozen. Surely OPs DH income tax won't rise ?

"Tax thresholds will be frozen for an additional three years
The point at which people start paying higher rates of tax will be held. It can mean earners will be dragged into higher tax bands when they get a pay rise."

SpaceRaccoon · 26/11/2025 14:21

HairsprayBabe · 26/11/2025 14:15

@SpaceRaccoon ooh could I borrow that magic ball you are using please? There are few things I would LOVE the answer to...

Also I already said I would be happy to pay towards more welfare - I don't like children in poverty - weird that you do.

If you think giving money direct to feckless parents is going to benefit the children then fair enough - I don't.

National debt is 95% of GDP - there will be no lavish spend on public services.

ilovesooty · 26/11/2025 14:22

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 26/11/2025 13:57

Probably. I don't care. My husband voted for them on my behalf in protest (I don't vote, that's a man's job), not because he wants them in power.

Is that a serious comment?

Hellohelga · 26/11/2025 14:22

Outside9 · 26/11/2025 14:18

I can't understand how people who have an issue with high-levels of immigration, also are against scrapping the child benefit cap.

You can't have low immigration and disincentivise poor people having children.

I think you’ll find it’s mainly immigrant families that have the big families. And before you leap in I’m not anti immigrant. However an immigrant friend has 6 children and gets a lot of benefits already. Will be more now.

ledmeup · 26/11/2025 14:23

Damnd · 26/11/2025 14:16

Meaningful members of society?! Absolutely! No place for these people in our society! They are meaningless!

What an awful thing to say

AlexaStopAlexaNo · 26/11/2025 14:24

She’s not wrong though is she.

HairsprayBabe · 26/11/2025 14:25

@SpaceRaccoon So a mother who had three children with a man who left her or died and is struggling to juggle single parenthood and working is feckless?

Ok cool - because that is exactly the type of person this change will benefit most. Working single parents.

Or did you just not bother to look at the details when the red mist of benefits rage descended.

I didn't say lavish at any point either, weird that you are making things up.

Winteriscoming80 · 26/11/2025 14:25

What I don’t get is a lot of the taxes she is bringing in don’t come into effect until 28/29/30?can’t whoever wins the next general election just put a stop to it?

ledmeup · 26/11/2025 14:25

@AlexaStopAlexaNo I think she is, growing up in a council house etc doesn’t mean you are meaningless. Why would you think that?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread