Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Would you send your baby to nursery if you were a stay at home mum ?

140 replies

Senseibility · 24/11/2025 16:32

If you were a stay at home mum and could afford to happily send your baby to nursery one or two days a week would you? I do because we can afford to im chronically ill my husband is self employed working long unpredictable hours and we have no family help unless it was an emergency as they work. I just feel guilty about sending him even though he loves it. It’s helped cure my PPD and my home life is so much better because of it. I just feel like a bad mum and I desperately wanted to be a stay at home mum

OP posts:
Needmorelego · 24/11/2025 20:11

Mrsnothingthanks · 24/11/2025 19:30

Well no - if you're a SAHM and it's your role e.g. you don't the work, the clue is in the title really. Surely the free childcare is meant to facilitate parents going out to work?

I don't think she's getting it for free.
She wouldn't be entitled to any free hours.

Sirkeir · 24/11/2025 20:14

My eldest was an only child for a long time. No cousins. I sent him for the 15 free hours they get when they’re 2 so he could play with other children

TomatoSandwiches · 24/11/2025 20:19

Mrsnothingthanks · 24/11/2025 19:30

Well no - if you're a SAHM and it's your role e.g. you don't the work, the clue is in the title really. Surely the free childcare is meant to facilitate parents going out to work?

Op said her household can afford to pay for this so she is not using free childcare.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Sirkeir · 24/11/2025 20:20

Needmorelego · 24/11/2025 17:00

As you are ill then it makes sense for you to have a break and use childcare
If you weren't ill then I wouldn't see the point.
Nursery before the age of 3 is childcare. If a parent is a SAHM they don't need childcare.
But your circumstances are different so it's perfectly fine for you to send your child 💐

Children get 15 free hours from age 2 for socialising. Not every child has siblings or cousins.

Bitzee · 24/11/2025 20:21

SarahAndQuack · 24/11/2025 19:33

I think, with respect, if a nursery isn't beneficial for a young toddler, then it is not a good nursery.

Obviously some of us have to make hard decisions and end up with a nursery we know is the best option but still not wonderful. But a genuinely good nursery ought to be beneficial for a child old enough to be enjoying interacting with other children/adults than its parents.

Young toddlers i.e. 1-2 year olds are still in the solitary play phase. Onlooker/spectator play doesn’t start until age 2 and associate play is typically from 3. Therefore there’s no benefit of them socialising with peers before around age 2. Which is the main benefit of nursery, along with the EYFS curriculum but that’s also 3+. The other stuff is just basic care and you’d be hard pushed to argue there’s any actual benefit of that being done by nursery staff at a 1:3 ratio than 1:1 by the primary caregiver UNLESS there’s something going on with the family i.e. chronic illness. So yes absolutely I’d consider even the best nursery neutral for a child under 2 because it is literally just childcare, there’s no value add that you couldn’t do at home yourself, if you were able to have them at home. My eldest went to nursery from 1, I have no issue with it whatsoever, but it was so I could work not for her benefit.

Sirkeir · 24/11/2025 20:22

Mrsnothingthanks · 24/11/2025 19:30

Well no - if you're a SAHM and it's your role e.g. you don't the work, the clue is in the title really. Surely the free childcare is meant to facilitate parents going out to work?

The free childcare is for the child to learn to socialise. This is like saying school is meant to facilitate parents going to work

Needmorelego · 24/11/2025 20:23

Sirkeir · 24/11/2025 20:20

Children get 15 free hours from age 2 for socialising. Not every child has siblings or cousins.

From 2 isn't universal (unless it changed in the last year or two).
All 3 year old get 15 hours from the academic school term after they turn 3.
Some 2 year olds get 15 if it's decided they need extra support.
(that's in England anyway).

SarahAndQuack · 24/11/2025 20:24

Bitzee · 24/11/2025 20:21

Young toddlers i.e. 1-2 year olds are still in the solitary play phase. Onlooker/spectator play doesn’t start until age 2 and associate play is typically from 3. Therefore there’s no benefit of them socialising with peers before around age 2. Which is the main benefit of nursery, along with the EYFS curriculum but that’s also 3+. The other stuff is just basic care and you’d be hard pushed to argue there’s any actual benefit of that being done by nursery staff at a 1:3 ratio than 1:1 by the primary caregiver UNLESS there’s something going on with the family i.e. chronic illness. So yes absolutely I’d consider even the best nursery neutral for a child under 2 because it is literally just childcare, there’s no value add that you couldn’t do at home yourself, if you were able to have them at home. My eldest went to nursery from 1, I have no issue with it whatsoever, but it was so I could work not for her benefit.

I think you've misunderstood what 'solitary play' means (or how it relates to children's needs). It means children at this age don't play with each other (playing with another child is quite a sophisticated skill).

That doesn't mean that children aged 1 and up don't need to interact with people other than their parents for stimulation. A good nursery, obviously, allows a child to interact with other people, and this is beneficial.

It's not that anyone thinks one-year-olds are playing ball together. It's that a child sees and notices what other people (children and adults) are doing, and that's very good for them.

allpartofthefun · 24/11/2025 20:25

No I wouldn’t and I didn’t. But your situation is entirely different and doesn’t need to be justified to anyone. Look after yourself OP and enjoy the breaks. Your baby will thrive.

sunkissedandwarm · 24/11/2025 20:26

I wouldn't and didn't but that doesn't mean other people's circumstances don't make it the best choice for them.

Sirkeir · 24/11/2025 20:27

Needmorelego · 24/11/2025 20:23

From 2 isn't universal (unless it changed in the last year or two).
All 3 year old get 15 hours from the academic school term after they turn 3.
Some 2 year olds get 15 if it's decided they need extra support.
(that's in England anyway).

My 8 year old went to nursery from age 2 for 15 hours here in England no extra support needs

Needmorelego · 24/11/2025 20:30

Sirkeir · 24/11/2025 20:27

My 8 year old went to nursery from age 2 for 15 hours here in England no extra support needs

Were you on a low income?
It's not universal so not all 2 year olds get it.
Basically low income (and recieving specific benefits) or possible SEN is the main criteria.
It's not totally universal until 3.

Sirkeir · 24/11/2025 20:35

Needmorelego · 24/11/2025 20:30

Were you on a low income?
It's not universal so not all 2 year olds get it.
Basically low income (and recieving specific benefits) or possible SEN is the main criteria.
It's not totally universal until 3.

No SEN not poor. Loads of other 2 year olds also there. It was great for getting him out his shell as he had no siblings at the time or cousins and I had no friends with kids (had him super young even now none of my friends my age have had kids).

Nursery isn’t just about the parent it’s good for the kids too

Twilightstarbright · 24/11/2025 20:36

I did, very similar to you I had multiple chronic illnesses and needed time for medical appointments. We had moved abroad and had no family or friends to help us. I wouldn’t have survived without it and in all honesty I was too ill to do a great job parenting (I was good not great) and they were amazing with DS.

user593 · 24/11/2025 20:42

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

user593 · 24/11/2025 20:42

Yes, and I do. I wasn’t going to start DC until 2 but DC saw their sibling going and really wanted to go too, so he’s been going 2-3 days a week since 1 year old and he absolutely loves it. Elder DC had started nursery when I still worked.

Needmorelego · 24/11/2025 20:43

Sirkeir · 24/11/2025 20:35

No SEN not poor. Loads of other 2 year olds also there. It was great for getting him out his shell as he had no siblings at the time or cousins and I had no friends with kids (had him super young even now none of my friends my age have had kids).

Nursery isn’t just about the parent it’s good for the kids too

You must have qualified under some scheme because it's really not universal for all 2 year olds (maybe you qualified because you were a young parent 🤔)
But anyway...the OP was talking about a baby - not a toddler (which is what a 2 year old is).
I agree that's nursery is good for the child - which is why my girl went at age 3 when she became entitled to the universal 15 free hours.

MrsSkylerWhite · 24/11/2025 20:44

Until they were three, no. Sorry.

Sirkeir · 24/11/2025 20:50

Needmorelego · 24/11/2025 20:43

You must have qualified under some scheme because it's really not universal for all 2 year olds (maybe you qualified because you were a young parent 🤔)
But anyway...the OP was talking about a baby - not a toddler (which is what a 2 year old is).
I agree that's nursery is good for the child - which is why my girl went at age 3 when she became entitled to the universal 15 free hours.

Edited

Had a scheme because I was 16 so I could go to college when he was a baby and he went to the college nursery.
But the nursery he went to at 2 was a different one just phoned them up and got him in there they didn’t know how old I was

Pineapplewaves · 24/11/2025 20:53

In normal circumstances no as the whole idea of being a stay at home parent is that you get the privilege of looking after your own child but in your circumstances I would due to your chronic illness - I’m a fit and healthy SAHM and it’s hard work for me.

Wishiwasatailor · 24/11/2025 20:59

I'm a SAHM and my little girl goes to our village preschool 1 morning a week since she turned 2. We've been going to their baby group once a week since she was a few months old so we know how the staff are. SAHM need a break too

HelloDarknessmyoldfrenemy · 24/11/2025 20:59

Not until 3. Having worked in several nurseries there really is no benefit for the children until 3, and even then a SAHM could easily replicate it with a class or two a week (gymnastics/ football/ ballet - something where they are expected to listen to a teacher) and going to playgroups/ having play dates with friends.

Nothing special happens at nurseries and many are dreadful.

For three year old the ratio is 8 children to one adult. How could that be better than one to one/ however many children to one parent?

ThankYouNigel · 24/11/2025 21:00

YANBU because you mentioned you are also ‘chronically ill’ with very limited support from anyone else. Managing your own ill health whilst caring for babies/toddlers must be extremely demanding, so it’s good to hear you’ve found a supportive Nursery for you all 💐

FreebieWallopFridge · 24/11/2025 21:01

I would and did with all my children from the age of 2, because it was beneficial for them.

In your circumstances, I wouldn’t hesitate.

Don’t give it any further thought.

Sequinsoneverythingplease · 24/11/2025 21:02

No I wouldn’t & didn’t. We went to play groups, soft play and toddler groups etc but there was no need for them to be away from their main carer. I never wanted a break from them, I loved being with them.