Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Fancy cars for disabled people

1000 replies

LemaxObsessive · 16/11/2025 19:23

Motability.

I am sick to absolute death of seeing people saying on various threads, that Motability vehicles are “given” to us disabled people “for free”.

PIP is awarded in 2 separate elements.

  1. Daily Living (day to day care needs etc)
  2. Mobility
Each element is paid at different rates depending on how affected by your disability you are (and yes, medical evidence is required). However, to be eligible for Motability, you need to be getting the highest rate of the Mobility element. This is currently £77.05 per week (which works out at £308.20 per 4 weeks or £333.88 per month).

When you join Motability you agree for the DWP to give Motability that £77.05 per week instead of it being paid to your bank. If you also receive the Daily Living element of PIP then you will still receive that directly.

You ALSO, in most cases, have to pay an advance payment (AP) for the vehicle. The better the vehicle, the higher the AP. You do not get the AP back.
The £77.05 per week pays for the lease of the car, insurance, roadside assistance, tyres & windshield cover. Disabled people in receipt of the highest rate of the PIP mobility element are already exempt from road tax.

With regards to the ‘fancy’ cars such as BMW, Audi & Mercedes, as you can imagine all of these have a whopping great AP in the multiple thousands of pounds; Which as I said, you don’t get back.
The taxpayer is not paying a penny towards these vehicles besides the fact that Motability don’t currently pay VAT which I believe is up for discussion.

I think a really important point to make here is that PIP is categorically not means tested (even millionaires can claim it, provided their health meets the criteria) and is not paid to replace a disabled person’s income! In other words, people do not live off PIP instead of working, it is paid to cover the added costs associated with being disabled. Costs non-disabled people likely have never even considered, such as cleaners when we can’t do it, basic gardening when we can’t do it, extra electricity for when medical equipment is used at home, ready meals when we’re bed-bound, delivery charges for every single thing we buy because click & collect isn't possible, taxis to work because the bus always already has a wheelchair user on it, along with lots of other small but mounting costs we have zero choice but to pay because the alternative isn’t an option for us. The lowest rate of PIP is just £29.20 per week so we’re not talking big money!

Millions of PIP claimants work full time but crucially, couldn’t do so without PIP and in many cases, without Motability!

As I said above, even wealthy people are eligible to claim PIP to cover the added costs associated with their disability and they can, if they receive the highest rate of the Mobility Component of PIP choose to use Motability. If they want to spend £7,999 plus £77.05 per week to lease an Audi Q4 for 3 years then they can but not many do because it’s a lot of money to have nothing to show for it after 3 years.

So no, nobody is being ‘given free BMWs, Audis or Mercedes’ regardless of what’s being said by anyone!

Fancy cars for disabled people
Fancy cars for disabled people
Fancy cars for disabled people
OP posts:
Simonjt · 16/11/2025 21:00

ElizabethG81 · 16/11/2025 20:59

Agreed. I don’t know where this idea has come from that disabled people shouldn’t be expected to pay any of their own money for things. That their finances should remain completely unchanged and every single extra thing that they want or need should be paid for by someone else. Meanwhile, it looks like a lot of us WILL be facing losing more money to pay for all this, but that’s OK?

Either thats an idea you have made up, or my husband is due a refund of tens of thousands of pounds.

Happyjoe · 16/11/2025 21:00

Lsush · 16/11/2025 20:54

I just don’t agree with the welfare state being so all-encompassing. The original vision was for a safety net that would house the homeless and feed the starving. I don’t think the state should be funding the extra costs of disability for people who could fund them themselves. I also don’t think they should fund costs which are discretionary (like a car). There should just be a much higher expectation of individuals, families and communities looking after themselves and each other.

Does that mean childless people should get a reduction on taxes, so not to pay for schools and child benefit?
The list of these kinds of examples are plentiful. It's a mark of society how well we look after our vulnerable.

Minty25 · 16/11/2025 21:01

LemaxObsessive · 16/11/2025 20:56

That last part is incorrect, you CANNOT get the higher rate of the mobility component purely for ADHD! I’ve quite literally stated what the criteria is for that component of PIP an ADHD doesn’t cause either of them! They may also have ADHD alongside another disability but they do not get it for ADHD

But you can get enhanced mobility component for being too anxious to leave the house / not being able to go out alone etc. I see the enhanced rate awarded quite a bit for this.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Octavia64 · 16/11/2025 21:01

Lsush · 16/11/2025 20:54

I just don’t agree with the welfare state being so all-encompassing. The original vision was for a safety net that would house the homeless and feed the starving. I don’t think the state should be funding the extra costs of disability for people who could fund them themselves. I also don’t think they should fund costs which are discretionary (like a car). There should just be a much higher expectation of individuals, families and communities looking after themselves and each other.

I do think offering to swop benefits for leasing a car is very useful.

i am disabled and I live in a village. The buses are not wheelchair accessible. The trains are but only if I ring the station a couple of days in advance and even then they’ll cancel me if they’re busy.

motability will adapt cars and vans for the needs of disabled people. Most of the second hand wheelchair accessible vehicles on the market were originally motability.

it’s very hard to get a normal car adapted - I tried to find someone to do my xc90 which on theory can be done.

the aim is to give disabled people the ability to get out of their homes and access healthcare, work and social opportunities that otherwise they would not.

I do think that is worthy of some subsidy.

LemaxObsessive · 16/11/2025 21:02

ThejoyofNC · 16/11/2025 19:59

It is free though. Choosing a free car instead of free money doesn't change the fact that it's free.

Disabled people need cars so I agree that there should be some kind of a motability system in place. However nobody needs a BMW and if you can afford the £££££ down payment for it then do you actually need a motability car?

So you’re saying that the food a disabled person eats, the tissue they wipe themselves with, the shampoo they use, the toast they spend in a morning is all free as well then, is it? Just because our money comes from the government does not make it free!
If I went out and found a lease separate to Motability which included insurance, would you be saying that was a “free car” then?! If not, why not?

OP posts:
Kirbert2 · 16/11/2025 21:03

Simonjt · 16/11/2025 21:00

Either thats an idea you have made up, or my husband is due a refund of tens of thousands of pounds.

I was going to say.

My finances are absolutely changed and the reality is that DLA doesn't come to close to covering all of my son's needs due to his disability.

PandoraSocks · 16/11/2025 21:03

@LemaxObsessive good for you for trying, but honestly I think it is a waste of time. The hate towards disabled people on MN is massively upsetting.

Moonlightfrog · 16/11/2025 21:03

OP, this makes me very angry too. We have a mobility car, my dd is severely autistic (non verbal) with some mobility issues. To have a mobility car we lose all of her mobility component…so £77 a week (not £77 a month as someone else said in their post), so £308 a month.we had to also paid a deposit for the car….I think it was around £500 which was for the most basic car without adaptions. I have lost friends and family members because they assume we are getting a nice new car for free. Without a mobility car my dd would not be able to access her placement, she wouldn’t be able to attend hospital appointments or enjoy any trips out. We live in a rural area and when we applied for the mobility car we were unable to afford a buy a car. The mobility car has been a gold send but it’s not free, it’s a similar price to renting a car or getting a car in finance.

LadyKenya · 16/11/2025 21:03

Happyjoe · 16/11/2025 20:52

I have absolutely no idea how it works, never claimed and I apologise if I sound totally ignorant... We have a wonderful security guard who works nights and I chat to him often while walking the pet. He was telling me a few weeks ago his daughter in law (adult, mum of two) had severe OCD and it was all about keeping the house clean. Security guard was rear ended a few weeks ago, so we talked about needing a new car, the high costs involved in the 2nd hand market.. and he talked about his DIL again - turned out she had a mobility car provided.

I don't think I have the wrong end of the stick, because I asked how OCD over cleaning meant she had a disability that she needed wheels for. He couldn't answer.

I thought mobility cars were to help those who had troubles physically walking, getting public transport too difficult?

You can find all about the information, about who is eligible for higher rate for mobility PIP, online, the information is all there. This lady may have other issues that your security guard has no knowledge of, as well.

WeepingAngelInTheTardis · 16/11/2025 21:05

Lsush · 16/11/2025 21:00

We’re talking about welfare. That’s not just disability, it’s also joblessness and old age. Education and health are a different kettle of fish. If I were PM I would slash welfare and invest hugely in education, particularly early years and things like sure start.

Well thank goodness your not because then you would end up with a major housing & poverty crisis.

LemaxObsessive · 16/11/2025 21:06

youalright · 16/11/2025 20:01

Also if your element changes at any point you lose your car.

Yes unfortunately but Motability give you 4 weeks with it first and very kindly give you £2/3,000 (unsure of exact amount) to help you get another vehicle which is amazing. Also, prior to this, they allow you to keep driving it whilst you go through the appeal process which can be up to a year. They’re really kind actually and very understanding people. They have special training in handling disabled customers and it really shows. Buts regular ‘customer service’ to shame!

OP posts:
legspain · 16/11/2025 21:07

I don’t have an issue with motability but I have an issue with fraud around it
my neighbours get it for their child, she uses a power chair and won’t live independently. Fine, she needs it
but they have a car she can’t ever go in as she/her chair won’t fit
that’s not right to me as it’s not really for her benefit as they never take her anywhere

ElizabethG81 · 16/11/2025 21:07

LemaxObsessive · 16/11/2025 21:02

So you’re saying that the food a disabled person eats, the tissue they wipe themselves with, the shampoo they use, the toast they spend in a morning is all free as well then, is it? Just because our money comes from the government does not make it free!
If I went out and found a lease separate to Motability which included insurance, would you be saying that was a “free car” then?! If not, why not?

I genuinely don’t understand what you’re saying. If the money that someone gets is all from government benefits, then that makes all the things they buy with it free. How can it not be?

And yes I know a lot of disabled people work, but that doesn’t seem to be what you’re saying here. The money someone gets in benefits is free.

LemaxObsessive · 16/11/2025 21:14

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/11/2025 20:08

I think the problem is so many people are now falling under ‘disabled’ criteria. I don’t think any taxpayer minds providing the necessary help for those severely impacted by their disability. It’s the woolly stuff around the edges that’s starting to stick in the craw.

There is no woolly stuff! The criteria hasn’t changed since 2013! What has changed however, is the bloody media saying the type of bullshit I detailed above! That people are getting cars for bedwetting etc it’s NOT TRUE!

You can ONLY get a Motability if you are entitled to the Enhanced Rate (highest rate) of the Mobility Component of PIP or DLA (or the Scottish equivalent) or the Armed Forces/War Pensioner’s equivalent. This is a well known fact and has never changed.

You can ONLY get the higher rate of the mobility component of PIP if you
A. struggle to walk 20 metres unaided without severe, debilitating pain
or B. Cannot go out alone without getting into danger. That’s it. There’s no other physical way to get that Enhanced Rate of the Mobility Component. Fact.

I don’t care what The Sun or the Daily Mail said, or Nick Ferrari or what you read on X or Reddit. These are not my opinions these are facts.

OP posts:
NeverDropYourMooncup · 16/11/2025 21:15

MidnightPatrol · 16/11/2025 20:15

This is the problem with these discussions. It’s straight to ‘do you think disabled people should be poor’ etc - emotional stuff, at an extreme.

And no - obviously, people don’t think that.

Bit, do you not think there is something a bit questionable about 860,000+ people needing a state-funded, taxed, insured, maintained car - a figure which has increased by 150% in 5 years (and continues to rise).

Is there anything at all about that situation which might raise eyebrows?

They aren't taxed.

The 860,000 includes people who lease powerchairs and mobility scooters.

If they didn't have access to these safe, insured, maintained vehicles, they'd be using the money they are entitled to receive to spend on meeting their mobility needs in other ways. Or not having them met. Or making Uber even more than they receive at present.

As the company says themselves, 'the median income for a typical Motability Scheme customer household is around £18,400 - half the national average.
Our data also shows that around 30% of customers would be unable to secure vehicle cover at an affordable price elsewhere, meaning they could lose access to mobility altogether'.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 16/11/2025 21:17

legspain · 16/11/2025 21:07

I don’t have an issue with motability but I have an issue with fraud around it
my neighbours get it for their child, she uses a power chair and won’t live independently. Fine, she needs it
but they have a car she can’t ever go in as she/her chair won’t fit
that’s not right to me as it’s not really for her benefit as they never take her anywhere

The power chair is likely to be the vehicle that's being paid for through it, not the car.

Zapx · 16/11/2025 21:17

I really hope they do something about motability. Because the scheme as it stands is mad imo. And no, I don’t think everyone should lose their motability cars. There are loads of examples in this thread where people are dependent on them. But the facts are clear - people are using the motability scheme to get very luxury vehicles. These are VAT exempt. Yes, you pay towards it, but it is nowhere close considering the insurance etc so that is being picked up by the public purse. BMW held a motability event in my area(!) Considering how the other welfare benefits are likely to take a battering or already have been reduced massively, I’d be very surprised if the system couldn’t be run in a better way and the money saved redirected to support disabled people better.

LemaxObsessive · 16/11/2025 21:17

ElizabethG81 · 16/11/2025 21:07

I genuinely don’t understand what you’re saying. If the money that someone gets is all from government benefits, then that makes all the things they buy with it free. How can it not be?

And yes I know a lot of disabled people work, but that doesn’t seem to be what you’re saying here. The money someone gets in benefits is free.

What a vile attitude to have… Nobody asks to be born disabled or to lose their career like I did and end up sedentary unable to do a job I loved so much I would’ve done for free. I payed into the system for decades as many have!

OP posts:
Portakalkedi · 16/11/2025 21:18

ThejoyofNC · 16/11/2025 19:59

It is free though. Choosing a free car instead of free money doesn't change the fact that it's free.

Disabled people need cars so I agree that there should be some kind of a motability system in place. However nobody needs a BMW and if you can afford the £££££ down payment for it then do you actually need a motability car?

Agree with this. Nobody 'needs' the flash expensive cars - I see the need for the expense of specially adapted vehicles for wheelchair users etc, but otherwise no. What's wrong with a standard car? I wonder how much the range of cars is determined by the Motability company themselves, who make massive profits from reselling the cars after the 3 years is up (when the client gets to choose another brand new car).

fluffy333 · 16/11/2025 21:21

legspain · 16/11/2025 21:07

I don’t have an issue with motability but I have an issue with fraud around it
my neighbours get it for their child, she uses a power chair and won’t live independently. Fine, she needs it
but they have a car she can’t ever go in as she/her chair won’t fit
that’s not right to me as it’s not really for her benefit as they never take her anywhere

Absolutely! I’ve worked for 20 plus years in the motor trade and predominantly for one of the ‘fancy’ brands. The amount of motability vehicles Ive dealt with that are being driven by young people - as named drivers for motability requirements is shocking. There is no way these cars are being used for the intended recipient - seats so far back almost horizontal, upgraded bass speakers in the boots, played loud enough to rattle teeth, and don’t get me started on the smell of weed emanating from the cars - you get the picture. I don’t have an issue with motability but the system is flawed.

Stigsmother · 16/11/2025 21:22

OP, thanks so much for your post, you have said everything i have wanted to say, but more eloquently. Another nugget that many people are unaware of: Motability (running the scheme) is a charity.

HellsBellsAndCatsWhiskers · 16/11/2025 21:23

I have a motability car. The £77 per week is given to the motability scheme in exchange for the vehicle. It also covers my fully comp insurance. There is nowhere i could get a brand new Audi plus insurance for £77 a week. So there is a chunk that is 'free' above and beyond my £77 weekly contribution.

The advance payment - I took my car out almost 3 years ago now. The advance payment didn't fully come out of my pocket, I got £750 towards it. If it had been less, I'd have got it fully funded, however I think the AP for my car was £1000 so I paid £250 towards it. Didn't you get the same OP? Maybe it's changed now?

Just posting to be fully transparent about the scheme.

Vivi0 · 16/11/2025 21:23

legspain · 16/11/2025 21:07

I don’t have an issue with motability but I have an issue with fraud around it
my neighbours get it for their child, she uses a power chair and won’t live independently. Fine, she needs it
but they have a car she can’t ever go in as she/her chair won’t fit
that’s not right to me as it’s not really for her benefit as they never take her anywhere

I don’t have an issue with motability but I have an issue with fraud around it

Agree.

There are far too many people applying for Motability only for a relative to have sole use of the vehicle (son, daughter, grandchild etc). The relative pays the upfront cost for a “nicer” vehicle and the reimburses the applicant the benefit payment they forego in exchange for the vehicle.

As with any kind of benefit, there are those only too happy to take advantage of it.

LadyKenya · 16/11/2025 21:23

Portakalkedi · 16/11/2025 21:18

Agree with this. Nobody 'needs' the flash expensive cars - I see the need for the expense of specially adapted vehicles for wheelchair users etc, but otherwise no. What's wrong with a standard car? I wonder how much the range of cars is determined by the Motability company themselves, who make massive profits from reselling the cars after the 3 years is up (when the client gets to choose another brand new car).

A standard car, what is that exactly?

sashh · 16/11/2025 21:23

ElizabethG81 · 16/11/2025 20:05

So if people getting the higher end cars are paying £8k upfront for them, why can they not put that money towards their own needs before claiming PIP? From what you’re saying, that £8k would fund 2 years worth of the weekly £77 payment. This is what pisses people off.

Because they still have a disability (maybe more than one) and they still have the additional costs of that disability.

Oh and the person that mentioned a grant, I have never had a grant for an AP, grants are difficult to get.

Also if the car needs adaptations, you might be lucky and get a grant, or you may have to pay for your own.

I don’t know much about cars but WHY does someone need an Audi not a Kia Stonic or Dacia spring (picked purely because they look a similar size. If you want the Audi keep the cash and put it towards the Audi or if you want it for free have the Dacia?

You don't know much about disabilities either do you? Lots of things high end cars have are disability friendly. Things like getting a smoother ride can mean the difference between working and not. Whether the car has 2 or 4 doors can make a huge difference as can how wide they open.

Things that are fairly standard now used to be only in luxury cars / high end models e.g. electric windows and AC.

Higher end cars often have better protection for the driver and passengers, if your spine is crumbling and someone runs in to you then that can save your life, at a minimum it hopefully doesn't make your disability worse.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.