Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What will Starmer do if Huntingdon...

1000 replies

Whyandwhenandwho · 02/11/2025 09:36

Stabbing turns out to be terror related or in a similar vein to incident to recent incidents that were related to immigration ? We don't know the identities yet of the perpetrators. But the fact the Home Secretary is brought in to comment in tabloids and the discussion on LK on BBC today makes me worried its a possibility. The poor people on the train - I cannot even imagine .. ..Starmer needs to tackle knife crime as its rife. What is the answer ? When is there a tipping point ? I don't know but something must be done - I've never paid as much attention other than feeling so terribly sorry for any victims and families. Now I'm starting to get angry when I see anything like this

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
localnotail · 02/11/2025 14:41

IFartAlot · 02/11/2025 14:38

Then what makes someone British? If I moved to Japan and had kids there would that make them as Japanese as the emperor's family?

Not a good comparison as Japanese are notoriously racist, they hated it when a Chinese actress played Geisha because she had a wrong hair line...

They are also paying for it by having an increasingly aged population and not enough young people to support them.

jasflowers · 02/11/2025 14:42

LaserPumpkin · 02/11/2025 14:38

It depends on how the votes are spread, though. Labour won the last election with a large majority but only got 33.7% of the votes.

My point was that the vast majority don't support Reform, they see through the fraudster.

Not a comment on our out of date voting system.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 02/11/2025 14:42

mrsjoyfulprizeforraffiawork · 02/11/2025 13:42

I worked in one of the big department stores in Oxford St in the 1970s. My recollection is that, at the height of the London bombing campaign the public were sufficiently wary that Oxford Street was largely empty of the public apart from the staff of the businesses (we were all required to work normally even though there were only a mere handful of customers most days). Quite often I had to find an alternative way to work as Oxford Circus station (or other central stations or sections of the streets) were closed by another bomb threat. When the store received a bomb threat (and there were a fair number of hoaxers), we received a coded tannoy message and had to search our own departments for suspicious packages and call to confirm when we had not found anything. The real warnings were quite short notice. They bombed a fast food chain place nearby just off Oxford Street and people were injured. To the best of my knowledge every department store was bombed more than once, I think all those were fire bombs. My place of work would not publicise any bombs found,( there were some), such that when customers ventured back, some of them were suspicious about the seeming unbombed nature of our store and suggested the management must be bribing the IRA to leave us alone. I assume the "political" reason of this bombing was to disrupt trading and damage the UK economy but it still injured and killed innocent members of the public (who were not politicians or members of the military).

Sobering. My Dad was the manager of a city centre bookshop. When they got bomb threats (pretty common at one point) he and his staff were also expected to search the shop, which meant pulling books off each shelf. I was in my teens and I remember being very frightened by all of this.

The idea that all was quiet and calm in the 1970s is laughable. We also had the Cold War and the ever present threat of nuclear war.

Reminds me of this (image will show up in a few seconds).

What will Starmer do if Huntingdon...
KateBAnd3 · 02/11/2025 14:43

Vaninees · 02/11/2025 12:43

Every time there’s an attack like this it pushes GB closer to a Reform govt.

Why, because Farage uses it to whip up speculation online? I would hope that there are enough intelligent people in this country to see Reform for the danger that they are.

2dogsandabudgie · 02/11/2025 14:43

cardibach · 02/11/2025 14:31

Yes.
They don’t have the same cultural experience of being British, but they are just as British as I am.

I don't agree with you there. If someone has migrated here and has British citizenship then they are classed as being that, a British citizen, but they don't have the same cultural experience as someone born here so they can't be "as British". That would be like trying to erase that part of them that isn't British if that makes sense, so if they were Indian born, denying that they were of Indian descent which is insulting to them.

WeCouldBeNiceToEachOther · 02/11/2025 14:44

jasflowers · 02/11/2025 14:40

Isn't that all in progress? its a 1 year jail sentence atm, not 2.

Look at the speed that guy was deported to Ethiopia - obv the messed up with his release but i do wonder if that was done deliberately to embarrass the Govt.

Once again, you can only deport someone if their country of origin will accept them back, in many cases, they refuse.

Most of the companies in charge of this type of thing are owned by close mates of the Tory leadership, who are now largely in favour of a reform government, so it wouldn’t surprise me.

EasternStandard · 02/11/2025 14:44

WeCouldBeNiceToEachOther · 02/11/2025 14:41

The entire issue is though people are coming here and disappearing before their claims can be processed because, shock horror, the tories didn’t fund the services properly. Speeding up their claims doesn’t mean accepting their claims.

No that’s not the entire issue. And unless the criteria is changed the grant rate will be the same whether sped up or not. Not having to wait as long is a better sell.

WearyExLondoner · 02/11/2025 14:45

MyNimbleBrickCritic · 02/11/2025 14:15

I think people want an easy outlet.

By any social definition, someone randomly stabbing someone has poor mental health.

But that isn't the same as someone having a mental illness that could be diagnosed and hopefully, treated.

Nor that someone with an illness that could be diagnosed and treated committed a crime BECAUSE of their mental illness.

They're distinct.

The majority of people in secure MH facilities in my experience of almost 30 years in psychiatry, were violent offenders who happened to have a mental illness so require care in a MH unit.

The number who committed a violent offence purely 'because' of their mental illness is small.

Which the public usually doesn't want to understand because it's much easier and reassuring to claim 'mental illness'

I think there’s also an element of not wanting to face up to what is going on.

Mental illness, real mental illness, means that the sufferer is not wholly accountable for what they do - at some level it’s beyond their control and they can’t help it.

The murder of Jonathan Zito springs to mind.

By assuming that any horrific act of violence against a random stranger is an episode of ‘mental health’, we don’t have to confront the fact that sometimes these things are done with intent by people who truly do mean us harm and want to inflict as much damage as possible.

On one level planning mass murder of any sort does, I feel, indicate an unsound mind - normal people wouldn’t think about doing that. But carrying out such an act doesn’t have to be the result of a ‘mental health episode’. If it was, then all wars could be attributed to a breakdown in mental health.

Fatlittlefruits · 02/11/2025 14:45

Speculation online last night was really disheartening. Ignorant little people with flags by their names doing some stirring.

Gloriia · 02/11/2025 14:46

localnotail · 02/11/2025 14:41

Not a good comparison as Japanese are notoriously racist, they hated it when a Chinese actress played Geisha because she had a wrong hair line...

They are also paying for it by having an increasingly aged population and not enough young people to support them.

You get the posters point. If you moved to Germany, Sweden, Australia wherever had kids they are then not German Swedish or Australian are they?

MrsSkylerWhite · 02/11/2025 14:47

pointythings · 02/11/2025 14:38

One could argue they are more so, because they actively chose to be British, and put in a lot of work to get there...

How many generations do you think someone needs to be British to be considered 'British enough'? And are you or are you not disturbed by the way Britishness is now being equated with skin colour?

Absolutely, this.

Interesting that the poster you were replying to chose an Indian example, rather than say, Australian or Canadian. Of course, there are many black and brown Australians and Canadians but I think that poster’s point was very telling.

ttcat37 · 02/11/2025 14:47

landlordhell · 02/11/2025 10:59

They caused terror on that train therefore it’s an act of terror.

That’s not how legal definitions work…

MyNimbleBrickCritic · 02/11/2025 14:47

Willyoujustbequiet · 02/11/2025 14:30

To be fair Souhport wasn't deemed terrorist related but then he was later charged under terrorism legislation.

We simply dont know enough atm.

Police don't always know in the early stages.

But official statements are often designed to reduce public reaction.

After the initial false social media reports about Axel Radabaknu , there was an early official report saying he was Welsh.

As he had been born in Wales. But by no definition of most people, he wouldn’t be considered Welsh just by virtue of being born there by Rwandan parents.

MrsSkylerWhite · 02/11/2025 14:48

Gloriia · 02/11/2025 14:46

You get the posters point. If you moved to Germany, Sweden, Australia wherever had kids they are then not German Swedish or Australian are they?

If the kids are born in those countries, of course they are!
A good friend’s two sons were born in Italy to his Italian wife. They very much consider themselves Italian.

Gloriia · 02/11/2025 14:48

Fatlittlefruits · 02/11/2025 14:45

Speculation online last night was really disheartening. Ignorant little people with flags by their names doing some stirring.

Or, scared 'little people' sick and tired of these frequent atrocities that are usually caused by people with fucked up ideologies. We aren't allowed to say that though because the government tells us to be quiet.

Gloriia · 02/11/2025 14:49

MrsSkylerWhite · 02/11/2025 14:48

If the kids are born in those countries, of course they are!
A good friend’s two sons were born in Italy to his Italian wife. They very much consider themselves Italian.

To his Italian wife yes that would do it.

MrsSkylerWhite · 02/11/2025 14:51

Gloriia · 02/11/2025 14:49

To his Italian wife yes that would do it.

Had they been born in London to their English father, I’m pretty sure they would consider themselves English.

MrsSkylerWhite · 02/11/2025 14:51

It’s where you are born that dictates your nationality.

WeCouldBeNiceToEachOther · 02/11/2025 14:52

EasternStandard · 02/11/2025 14:44

No that’s not the entire issue. And unless the criteria is changed the grant rate will be the same whether sped up or not. Not having to wait as long is a better sell.

But surely granting asylum to genuine asylum seekers isn’t a bad thing?

MrsSkylerWhite · 02/11/2025 14:53

WeCouldBeNiceToEachOther · 02/11/2025 14:52

But surely granting asylum to genuine asylum seekers isn’t a bad thing?

Unfortunately, some people will always disagree with you.
Sincerely hope they never find themselves in that situation.

LaserPumpkin · 02/11/2025 14:54

MrsSkylerWhite · 02/11/2025 14:51

It’s where you are born that dictates your nationality.

Nationality, yes, but not necessarily culture.

I know people born here to immigrant parents who very much consider themselves British.

I also know people born here to immigrant parents who very much don’t - they consider themselves to be the nationality of their parents’ home country.

It seems to depend on how much the parents are integrated - which goes back to the point a pp was making, I think.

MyNimbleBrickCritic · 02/11/2025 14:54

pointythings · 02/11/2025 14:38

One could argue they are more so, because they actively chose to be British, and put in a lot of work to get there...

How many generations do you think someone needs to be British to be considered 'British enough'? And are you or are you not disturbed by the way Britishness is now being equated with skin colour?

But it is.

In every way that could be designed to improve things for people who are non-white.

How do YOU define Britishness for a young black man who says he is disproportionately effected by the education or criminal justice system?

Do you say they're just British now so their race and heritage doesn't matter and they are not being discriminated against?

localnotail · 02/11/2025 14:54

Gloriia · 02/11/2025 14:46

You get the posters point. If you moved to Germany, Sweden, Australia wherever had kids they are then not German Swedish or Australian are they?

They are! Why not?

JustSomeRandomOnTheInternet · 02/11/2025 14:54

cardibach · 02/11/2025 14:31

Yes.
They don’t have the same cultural experience of being British, but they are just as British as I am.

Does that work the same way for a white British person moving to Nigeria, China, or Egypt in their 30s, 40s or 50s and getting citizenship from those countries?

They would be just as Nigerian, Chinese or Egyptian as the indigenous population?

OldBalkanNationalistGrumpy · 02/11/2025 14:55

ethnicity of the people who did the crime, please? Not the nationality

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.