Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What will Starmer do if Huntingdon...

1000 replies

Whyandwhenandwho · 02/11/2025 09:36

Stabbing turns out to be terror related or in a similar vein to incident to recent incidents that were related to immigration ? We don't know the identities yet of the perpetrators. But the fact the Home Secretary is brought in to comment in tabloids and the discussion on LK on BBC today makes me worried its a possibility. The poor people on the train - I cannot even imagine .. ..Starmer needs to tackle knife crime as its rife. What is the answer ? When is there a tipping point ? I don't know but something must be done - I've never paid as much attention other than feeling so terribly sorry for any victims and families. Now I'm starting to get angry when I see anything like this

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Makeitstop2025 · 02/11/2025 11:49

freakingscared · 02/11/2025 11:44

Because none of what police says is to be trusted ? They also said the same on previous terrorist attacks . Religion is a must in this case band cause Islamic crimes are the norm in the U.K. when it comes to terrorist art aks in the uk . This is not racist or xenophobic it’s a fact

If it's the norm then why does it matter so much that we must be told? As is evident from this thread, if it's not islamic rooted it doesn't change anybody's minds, they still have a problem with Islamic radicals (rightly so) and there's a general view of "oh well if it wasn't Muslims on this one, they will be on the next one" - so what is the benefit of you knowing right now that this was a religiously motivated attack?

Zonder · 02/11/2025 11:49

Alondra · 02/11/2025 11:43

The UK is becoming a country without the essential fabric of society to make it function at the most basic in a civil country. The NHS is in shambles, the police is in shambles, the economy is not growing and prices keep going up.

Don't put the blame on Starmer when 14 years of Tory's government underfunded services like the police,. He's inherited a poison chalice.

My condolences to the families affected by this attack

Well said.

Libellousness · 02/11/2025 11:50

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

EasternStandard · 02/11/2025 11:50

snughugs · 02/11/2025 11:48

I will be interested in after reading several of the eye witness statements on x. They only state one black man boarding at Peterborough station on his own. It’s hard to trust the media after they told us about the non terrorist attacker who was a Welsh born lad, we know now there was far more to this story of the young lad who committed a dreadful act in Southport. I wonder where the second man came into it? I don’t feel complete trust in what we are being told, may that’s wrong but let’s see. If they have done similar misleading like they did with the Southport case I will be disgusted but not at all surprised.

Yes I get what you mean. It’s very managed, as Southport was and then more information later.

Meadowfinch · 02/11/2025 11:50

hamstersarse · 02/11/2025 11:40

I agree that we can't go down that route but it is something that we have "British Nationals" here who have no loyalty, allegiance or goodwill towards Britain.

We set no parameters to say that immigrants had to, it is our fault.

And we are at a point where waving a British flag is seen as an act of aggression.

It means nothing to me that the police are saying they are British Nationals, because that doesn't imply loyalty to our country anymore.

You're right. I'm not sure the govt is in the clear.

The primary purpose of the government is to ensure the safety of its citizens. And they haven't. We aren't safe. These aren't drug dealers getting stabbed in a turf war. These are ordinary decent people sitting on a train or walking a dog or visiting a bank.

Whether the cause is extremism or drugs or terrorism or criminality, it's every week now. This govt is inept at best.

Also "nothing to suggest this is terror related" doesn't mean terrorism has been ruled out.

I suspect there is a lot still to be revealed. So far nothing said makes me feel safer.

AnareticDegree · 02/11/2025 11:51

cottonwoolie · 02/11/2025 11:46

They need to qualify that with "nothing to suggest it was extremism-related terror".

They don't because in this context they mean the same thing.

Virtually every accident/crime invokes terror because it is terrifying to have your life threatened.

They aren't, see the link I posted. Extremism is not the same as terrorism. There are lots of different forms of terrorism but whatever, call them what you want this is ridiculous.

WeCouldBeNiceToEachOther · 02/11/2025 11:51

EasternStandard · 02/11/2025 11:50

Yes I get what you mean. It’s very managed, as Southport was and then more information later.

this is only being said because you don’t like what they’ve said.

the same happened after the Liverpool attack. Then he was charged and a picture and name was released and everyone was promptly shut up.

cottonwoolie · 02/11/2025 11:51

this is ridiculous.

agreed

Pharazon · 02/11/2025 11:52

hamstersarse · 02/11/2025 11:40

I agree that we can't go down that route but it is something that we have "British Nationals" here who have no loyalty, allegiance or goodwill towards Britain.

We set no parameters to say that immigrants had to, it is our fault.

And we are at a point where waving a British flag is seen as an act of aggression.

It means nothing to me that the police are saying they are British Nationals, because that doesn't imply loyalty to our country anymore.

This is a strange take. British citizenship does not have anything to do with loyalty - in the vast majority of cases it is purely an accident of birth. The perpetrators in this case will have been British citizens purely through birth, as will their parents, grandparents and great grandparents before them - if they are of Caribbean origin they will not have had any choice in the matter, British subject-hood having been imposed on the population after emancipation.

But in any case the police are saying this is not a terrorist act so it is not an attack on the state and has nothing to do with loyalty to Britain, any more so than any other violent crime.

EasternStandard · 02/11/2025 11:52

WeCouldBeNiceToEachOther · 02/11/2025 11:51

this is only being said because you don’t like what they’ve said.

the same happened after the Liverpool attack. Then he was charged and a picture and name was released and everyone was promptly shut up.

Of course it’s managed carefully. And no to your first line.

ChocolateBoxCottage · 02/11/2025 11:52

Let's be totally honest. Stammer won't be here come next election like it or not. Vote for it or not.

Willyoujustbequiet · 02/11/2025 11:53

WeCouldBeNiceToEachOther · 02/11/2025 11:41

Why is their religion important when they’re British citizens and it’s not terror related?

if the police had said they were Muslim terrorists you’d be lapping it up.

Do not presume to tell me what I think. I have muslim family members who are terrified at the rise of radical Islam.

Of course its important. Why on earth wouldn't it be.

Tubestrike · 02/11/2025 11:53

This is all so awful, those poor people. What leads to people having so much hate for others that they don't even know?

EasternStandard · 02/11/2025 11:53

Meadowfinch · 02/11/2025 11:50

You're right. I'm not sure the govt is in the clear.

The primary purpose of the government is to ensure the safety of its citizens. And they haven't. We aren't safe. These aren't drug dealers getting stabbed in a turf war. These are ordinary decent people sitting on a train or walking a dog or visiting a bank.

Whether the cause is extremism or drugs or terrorism or criminality, it's every week now. This govt is inept at best.

Also "nothing to suggest this is terror related" doesn't mean terrorism has been ruled out.

I suspect there is a lot still to be revealed. So far nothing said makes me feel safer.

This sums it up.

Those who back Labour and Starmer of course are don’t talk about this.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 02/11/2025 11:54

They should NEVER have allowed the train companies to cut costs by cutting train security staff in the first place. I recall signing several petitions against this years ago and the petitions warned the companies and government that having only a driver + ticket conductor or on some routes driver only would result in high risk for stabbings, rapes, medical emergencies, theft/assault - the works.

Did they listen? No and now we have this.

TwistyTurnip · 02/11/2025 11:54

Meadowfinch · 02/11/2025 11:50

You're right. I'm not sure the govt is in the clear.

The primary purpose of the government is to ensure the safety of its citizens. And they haven't. We aren't safe. These aren't drug dealers getting stabbed in a turf war. These are ordinary decent people sitting on a train or walking a dog or visiting a bank.

Whether the cause is extremism or drugs or terrorism or criminality, it's every week now. This govt is inept at best.

Also "nothing to suggest this is terror related" doesn't mean terrorism has been ruled out.

I suspect there is a lot still to be revealed. So far nothing said makes me feel safer.

Well I don’t fell like they are doing much to keep us safe. I’m lucky that I don’t have to use trains. I remember feeling absolutely terrified when I had to use the London Underground a couple of years ago after the bombings.

Netcurtainnelly · 02/11/2025 11:55

People living in the 50s, 60s, 70s who are now deceased would be turning in their grave now seeing England today.
Everyday its something.
How many children did you hear about who were murdered at school by another pupil back then?
How many terrorist attacks did you hear of?
How many stories about migrant crossings did you hear of?
Hotels having to put asylum seekers up.
Having to hear that some of them have murdered people.
How many prisons were full?

Need someone with backbone to run the country.
It will only get worse if things dont change.

cottonwoolie · 02/11/2025 11:55

Those who back Labour and Starmer of course are don’t talk about this

don't talk about what?

Libellousness · 02/11/2025 11:56

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 02/11/2025 11:54

They should NEVER have allowed the train companies to cut costs by cutting train security staff in the first place. I recall signing several petitions against this years ago and the petitions warned the companies and government that having only a driver + ticket conductor or on some routes driver only would result in high risk for stabbings, rapes, medical emergencies, theft/assault - the works.

Did they listen? No and now we have this.

How would unarmed train security staff on minimum wage take down a crazed knifeman? Be realistic.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 02/11/2025 11:57

@Meadowfinch
The primary purpose of the government is to ensure the safety of its citizens. And they haven't. We aren't safe. These aren't drug dealers getting stabbed in a turf war. These are ordinary decent people sitting on a train or walking a dog or visiting a bank. Whether the cause is extremism or drugs or terrorism or criminality, it's every week now. This govt is inept at best.

The government allowed the train companies to cost cut away train security staff on these cross country routes. They are 100% responsible for leaving us at the mercy of anyone criminally inclined or seriously mentally unwell to the point of being a danger to others and themselves.
.

childofthe607080s · 02/11/2025 11:57

you will never get rid of all violence

to go form one incident to blaming the current government is much of a stretch - if you want to blame a government blame the tories who brought us austerity and Brexit , run the economy to the group and disenfranchised so many

you can’t fix over a decade of shit in a couple of years

and the more hate you push into society the more violence you will get back in return

LavenderBlue19 · 02/11/2025 11:57

attichoarder · 02/11/2025 11:23

Tourists have passports and that what happens in other countries - it's not xenophobic rubbish as you put it.

As far as I can work out only Spain require this, and only for long-distance, high speed routes. I had never heard of it though, so thanks for the education in Spanish high speed rail travel!

Lifesd · 02/11/2025 11:57

PandoraSocks · 02/11/2025 11:49

That is what the police investigations and subsequent court cases will establish. You expect the police to give you the full outcome of their investigations in under 24 hours?

Does “keen to understand” translate to “give me all that information in the next hour” - no it does not.

I understand judicial process but also do not think the information provided will do much to quell the tinderbox of public opinion right now.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 02/11/2025 11:58

Libellousness · 02/11/2025 11:56

How would unarmed train security staff on minimum wage take down a crazed knifeman? Be realistic.

These were not completely unarmed nor on minimum wage. They go through training and are licensed to carry nonlethal arms.
Good grief.
London average wages are £56k
ROK are £47k

taxguru · 02/11/2025 11:58

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 02/11/2025 11:54

They should NEVER have allowed the train companies to cut costs by cutting train security staff in the first place. I recall signing several petitions against this years ago and the petitions warned the companies and government that having only a driver + ticket conductor or on some routes driver only would result in high risk for stabbings, rapes, medical emergencies, theft/assault - the works.

Did they listen? No and now we have this.

I thought there were two staff members injured on the train, so there were at least two train staff on board. If it was an LNER, it would have several staff including the catering staff, train manager, stewards in first class, etc. How many more do you think they need? Surely it's a matter for British Transport Police to ride on trains or be more pro-active with searches etc on stations? It wasn't one of the small rural trains with no staff other than the driver.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.