“Lol. There's a big difference between having an interest from far away and creeping around the victims in real life. I'm interested in the mindset of someone like Lucy and why she did it. I try to read as little as possible about the actual crimes, it's more the psychology of it. Think I've said that before.”
You’re being so silly here. You are judging someone else for the banal minutiae of their life, imagining yourself as some mindhunter profiling genius while you are apparently unable to do the basic work of putting yourself in the situation and examining whether or not your behaviour would be construed as creepy. It damn well would be by your measure. In these threads alone you’ve exhibited far more salacious interest in murder than Letby ever did in all of the extensive digging that was done on her entire life and search histories.
“It's a report from the actual trial. I'm not talking about "LD" or whatever it was, I mean the actual babies initials”
The actual babies initials were not in her diary Firefly. It was literally just nursing shorthand and you’ve been reading too many tabloids and/or too many tattle threads.
“I don't really care about the PJs. I just said that's why the prosecution probably brought it up.”
Yes, because the prosecution will do literally anything to make a defendant look suss. Nick Johnson would string you up as a murderer tomorrow, before breakfast, no problem. Would it make you a murderer? No. But you continue to appear totally unable to understand that prosecution allegations are not facts.
“I also don't care what you consider to be PJs”
Why not? Is it evidence of compulsive lying to call something not sold as pyjamas “pyjamas” or not? Pick one!
“I don't recall Lucy saying her tracksuit was PJs”
Probably because you only take in tabloid stories and whatever Liz hull regurgitates. She didn’t claim to be “wearing a nightie”. From the transcripts this is exactly what she said:
LL: They told me that I was being arrested for multiple counts of murder and attempted murder, and then they quickly handcuffed me and took me away.
BM: All right. And you were taken to a police station, is that right?
LL: In my pyjamas, yes.
This is evidence of compulsive lying? Describing a tracksuit you’re wearing when asleep at 6am and the police come knocking as “pyjamas”? Arrest me now then. Ffs.
By the way, I don’t think a young woman being pursued, as she clearly was judging by the doctor’s own texts, is “evil”. No one with any sense and empathy would. If anything he is “evil”. Why is he, the married father chasing a junior employee young enough to be his daughter, escaping your judgement here? If you don’t care about it why did you present it as evidence of a malevolent nature?
“Only because you are blind to her do you think Lucy is "just like everyone else"
That isn’t what I said. This is what I said:
For someone who thinks she is a brilliant student of human behaviour you’re only ever showing again and again that you’re extremely bad at exactly that. Humans are complex and messy. It doesn’t make us all serial killers. If anything Lucy Letby was a lot cleaner than most of us, you included if you were completely honest and examined your own behaviour through this same puritan lens.
I don’t think anybody is “just like everyone else” do you expect that they should be?
I’m still waiting for you to show any evidence of this superior ability to understand human nature that you claim to have btw. It appears to be severely lacking thus far.