Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why are governments putting women and girls at higher risk of sex crimes?

607 replies

Absentmindedsmile · 26/08/2025 12:37

Fact: Hundreds of thousands of men are entering Europe (as in the continent), from countries where women and girls are second class citizens.
**
Fact: The sex crime rate statistics associated with different nationalities living in the UK have been published. An example is provided below.
**
**Facts:
….the [sex crime] rates, based on convictions per 10,000 of the population put Afghans, with 77 convictions, at the top with a rate of 59 per 10,000 – 22.3 times that of Britons.
**
They were followed by Eritreans, who accounted for 59 convictions at a rate of 53.6 per 10,000 of their population.
**
Britons accounted for 12,619 sex offence convictions, representing a rate of 2.66 per per 10,000 of their population in England and Wales.
**
https://archive.md/6AXAy Archive version
**
Fact: This example data blows up any erroneous claims from people suggesting that British men commit more sex crimes when numbers in the population are accounted for / are more likely to commit a sex crime.
**
There’s above is factual data. It is not racist to provide it. To claim this, is quite simply, wrong. Perhaps it’s projection, the mind boggles.

To want ‘no debate’ and bleet on with incorrectly placed accusations of racism, is to shut down people’s valid concerns.

Tin hat on for the people who want no debate on this issue, and instead of protecting women and girls, insist on protecting men from countries where women and girls are treated as second class citizens.

More data has been promised.
**
**

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
CorneliaCupp · 31/08/2025 19:29

RingoJuice · 31/08/2025 13:26

You can’t just accept whoever shows up at the border and allow them to apply for
asylum. Irregular arrivals are likely going to be finished very soon in Europe, it’s just been a complete disaster from the start and incredibly unpopular with the public.

Why not?

bloodymary2025 · 31/08/2025 19:50

I'm very hopeful about the mummerings of epping redisdents questioning paying council tax.

Absentmindedsmile · 31/08/2025 20:01

YelloDaisy · 31/08/2025 17:55

Lately on radio 4 they’ve had various past politicians including Jack Straw and David Blunkett talking about immigration and basically they say do something now - tweak the echr or set up a new place to send them and get it done soon - they don’t want Labour back in the wilderness which is guaranteed as things stand

Yes. The Labour politicians of the past are a different class than the rabble we’ve been lumbered with today.

OP posts:
PandoraSocks · 31/08/2025 20:05

bloodymary2025 · 31/08/2025 19:50

I'm very hopeful about the mummerings of epping redisdents questioning paying council tax.

They are rather foolish, then. They won't like having attachment of earnings orders on their wages/pensions or deductions from their benefits.

TopPocketFind · 31/08/2025 20:21

bloodymary2025 · 31/08/2025 19:50

I'm very hopeful about the mummerings of epping redisdents questioning paying council tax.

Who do you think will get in to trouble for that?

hint, not the council

TopPocketFind · 31/08/2025 20:22

Leaving the ECHR won't stop the boats

It will affect the rights of women and girls.

pointythings · 31/08/2025 20:30

bloodymary2025 · 31/08/2025 19:50

I'm very hopeful about the mummerings of epping redisdents questioning paying council tax.

Me too, it'll land them in a heap of trouble and possibly jail.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread