totally. All the posts on this thread:
“oh there is no news story so there must be a (super) injunction” (no less).
Well, just maybe, after Weinsteins / others constant use of NDAs and injunctions used to cover up rape, the courts aren’t that keen on granting them to stop a woman telling her truth?
and the reason there is no story is because it’s not true, or because the woman doesn’t want to sell it and the papers don’t want to publish it?
These constant references to injunctions make him sound like some litigious powerhouse who uses the law to get his way.
Well savile actually did do that, and post his exposure it’s also not such a great look for anyone.