Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Labour isn't working - Thread 5

1000 replies

TheNuthatch · 29/07/2025 14:33

A chat thread for those who don't like this Labour government. Labour isn't working!

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

Previous thread
www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5356291-labour-isnt-working-thread-4?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

OP posts:
Thread gallery
54
EasternStandard · 08/08/2025 09:28

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 08/08/2025 08:16

I’m not sure exactly how to put this, but I’ve always thought that governments attract simply expressed ‘personalities’. A sort of single phrase to sum them up.

The one that stands out for Starmer’s Labour is ‘hypocrisy’. After this latest embarrassment with the homelessness minister chucking out tenants it’s overwhelming.

I can’t understand why the gross hypocrisy of a party that in opposition argued loudly non-stop against so much that they’re now doing in government or in their private lives hasn’t taken hold in the public mind more strongly. Labour’s preachiness in opposition looks like a bad joke now.

Everyone detests hypocrites. They’re usually very dishonest generally. And it all began on day one - it’s not even as though they’ve been forced into bad conduct or doing in government what they previously condemned, because events and facts changed. They’re just shameless, self-regarding hypocrites.

Completely agree and welcome. The hypocrisy stinks.

ThePhantomoftheEcobubbleOpera · 08/08/2025 09:32

Yes, I was always worried that they would engineer the performance of change in the absence of any money to make any meaningful changes to give the impression of 'doing something'.

But I think this might be a misstep. People don't like change when they feel impoverished. It just gives them the feeling that their lives are precarious.

CinnamonSquirrels · 08/08/2025 09:35

twistyizzy · 08/08/2025 07:21

Yeh this was snuck under about 8 months ago. I will LMAO if all the smug champagne socialists on here who support VAT on education, get allocated shit schools because of their postcode.

I did post it a few times but then quite predictably got shot down for being hyperbolic and dramatic 🤣 because Labour would never do that!

So okay for you to be 'LMAO' at the smug parents who are 'champagne socialists on here and support vat' when it is the children who would suffer getting 'shit' schools? Yet individuals who want to sock it to the parents when it is the children who suffer are the worst kind of humans. Hypocritical much.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Arrearing50 · 08/08/2025 09:38

I’m completely against all of labour’s education changes so far - not a single one is good. But this is what labour has created, pitting people against each other…

TheNuthatch · 08/08/2025 09:41

Arrearing50 · 08/08/2025 09:38

I’m completely against all of labour’s education changes so far - not a single one is good. But this is what labour has created, pitting people against each other…

Yes, exactly.
It's not any of the posters on this thread forcing children to suffer, and enjoying it, it's Labour.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 08/08/2025 09:41

ThePhantomoftheEcobubbleOpera · 08/08/2025 09:32

Yes, I was always worried that they would engineer the performance of change in the absence of any money to make any meaningful changes to give the impression of 'doing something'.

But I think this might be a misstep. People don't like change when they feel impoverished. It just gives them the feeling that their lives are precarious.

Agree. If all we see is a levelling down it’s not going to be the positive change they presumably sold in.

It was easy to see pre GE but many did believe the lies.

OP posts:
CinnamonSquirrels · 08/08/2025 09:49

TheNuthatch · 08/08/2025 09:41

Yes, exactly.
It's not any of the posters on this thread forcing children to suffer, and enjoying it, it's Labour.

It's no better than other posters' socking it to the rich jibes.

TheNuthatch · 08/08/2025 09:50

MrsGuyOfGisbo · 08/08/2025 09:19

Was there at some point a protocol whereby if x number of constituents asked for it that any election could be forced? I might be thinking about another country. Would be so sweet if the Jezza party supporters in H&SP could do that 😂😂😂😂

Imagine if that happened in the PM's constituency 🙈

OP posts:
ThePhantomoftheEcobubbleOpera · 08/08/2025 10:06

CinnamonSquirrels · 08/08/2025 09:35

So okay for you to be 'LMAO' at the smug parents who are 'champagne socialists on here and support vat' when it is the children who would suffer getting 'shit' schools? Yet individuals who want to sock it to the parents when it is the children who suffer are the worst kind of humans. Hypocritical much.

Now, come on. Everyone likes to see the schadenfreuders eat a bit of their own misfortune crumble.

EasternStandard · 08/08/2025 10:11

ThePhantomoftheEcobubbleOpera · 08/08/2025 10:06

Now, come on. Everyone likes to see the schadenfreuders eat a bit of their own misfortune crumble.

At least we have agreement it’s a shit policy from Labour.

And I’m not even sure they have the support of the people it’s aimed at, it’s mostly MC public sector who are their base. They are more likely to rely on good state schools.

Totally agree they need to spin change but due to fiscal incompetence it’s damaging stuff like this instead. What a mess.

Arrearing50 · 08/08/2025 10:24

Yet again reducing a parent’s ability to help their kids - I can’t see how it’ll be popular. The government, LEA, schools, they don’t have your kids best interests at heart like almost all parents do.

it’s as though all policy is aimed at centralising due to make up for awful and absent parenting…at the expense of ones doing their best.

EasternStandard · 08/08/2025 10:36

I’d say a fair few at the BBC and universities rely on good state schools too. It’s a weak line but not even for those who support them.

twistyizzy · 08/08/2025 10:40

CinnamonSquirrels · 08/08/2025 09:35

So okay for you to be 'LMAO' at the smug parents who are 'champagne socialists on here and support vat' when it is the children who would suffer getting 'shit' schools? Yet individuals who want to sock it to the parents when it is the children who suffer are the worst kind of humans. Hypocritical much.

Hoisted by their own petard. That's just a more polite way of saying schadenfreude.

twistyizzy · 08/08/2025 10:42

CinnamonSquirrels · 08/08/2025 09:35

So okay for you to be 'LMAO' at the smug parents who are 'champagne socialists on here and support vat' when it is the children who would suffer getting 'shit' schools? Yet individuals who want to sock it to the parents when it is the children who suffer are the worst kind of humans. Hypocritical much.

Oh I've stopped playing nice now! Ever since Labour targeted children like mine and posters on MN cheered them on! The same posters who spend ££ on tutors + houses in best catchments.

CinnamonSquirrels · 08/08/2025 10:47

twistyizzy · 08/08/2025 10:40

Hoisted by their own petard. That's just a more polite way of saying schadenfreude.

So okay for you to say that then given all your outrage at others doing exactly the same thing? Righto

twistyizzy · 08/08/2025 10:51

CinnamonSquirrels · 08/08/2025 10:47

So okay for you to say that then given all your outrage at others doing exactly the same thing? Righto

Yeh pretty much in the sense that I've constantly been attacked on here. I spent 12 months being nice, respectful and polite in the face of some really horrific comments just because of the type of school I send my child to.

So I stopped playing nice on MN cos it gets you nowhere.

The very posters who smugly buy their own kids advantages and who have been attacking me for the last 18 months may now feel the spite of Labour.

It's called karma and I make no apologies.

EasternStandard · 08/08/2025 10:55

twistyizzy · 08/08/2025 10:51

Yeh pretty much in the sense that I've constantly been attacked on here. I spent 12 months being nice, respectful and polite in the face of some really horrific comments just because of the type of school I send my child to.

So I stopped playing nice on MN cos it gets you nowhere.

The very posters who smugly buy their own kids advantages and who have been attacking me for the last 18 months may now feel the spite of Labour.

It's called karma and I make no apologies.

Don’t worry about it. Some posters have been relentless with the attacks.

At least we’re past pretending this is a good policy.

twistyizzy · 08/08/2025 10:56

EasternStandard · 08/08/2025 10:55

Don’t worry about it. Some posters have been relentless with the attacks.

At least we’re past pretending this is a good policy.

Oh I'm not worried 😊 the majority of the press also agree it's a shit policy now and we have both Tories + Reform who have promised to over turn it.

ThePhantomoftheEcobubbleOpera · 08/08/2025 11:01

I mean, I'm one of those people who bought into the best school catchment, forking out for the premium that came with the house.

Fortunately, I've just got my youngest into secondary so we'll have outrun this bit of labour destruction - although it might still bite financially.

But I don't think TwistyIzzy would be popping the champagne if I was one of those whose children was in the firing line though- because I wasn't one of those twats who cheered on the Vat policy changes - knowing the disruption to children, knowing that it wouldn't net the treasury much more than pocket money - and, iirc, still insulting her and her child as they did so.

So 🤷🏼‍♀️ put your pointy finger away CinnamonSquirrels because it's ridiculous.

EasternStandard · 08/08/2025 11:01

twistyizzy · 08/08/2025 10:56

Oh I'm not worried 😊 the majority of the press also agree it's a shit policy now and we have both Tories + Reform who have promised to over turn it.

Good the damage by Labour on education from both policies is astounding. And we’ll have the SEN part too.

So bad. I’m glad two of my dc will be through. The last is in a good state rn for a few more years.

twistyizzy · 08/08/2025 11:04

ThePhantomoftheEcobubbleOpera · 08/08/2025 11:01

I mean, I'm one of those people who bought into the best school catchment, forking out for the premium that came with the house.

Fortunately, I've just got my youngest into secondary so we'll have outrun this bit of labour destruction - although it might still bite financially.

But I don't think TwistyIzzy would be popping the champagne if I was one of those whose children was in the firing line though- because I wasn't one of those twats who cheered on the Vat policy changes - knowing the disruption to children, knowing that it wouldn't net the treasury much more than pocket money - and, iirc, still insulting her and her child as they did so.

So 🤷🏼‍♀️ put your pointy finger away CinnamonSquirrels because it's ridiculous.

Edited

Exactly 🎯 I don't want any child to be impacted but, for the posters who were merrily cheering on this policy, I wouldn't object to some schadenfreude.

EasternStandard · 08/08/2025 11:05

ThePhantomoftheEcobubbleOpera · 08/08/2025 11:01

I mean, I'm one of those people who bought into the best school catchment, forking out for the premium that came with the house.

Fortunately, I've just got my youngest into secondary so we'll have outrun this bit of labour destruction - although it might still bite financially.

But I don't think TwistyIzzy would be popping the champagne if I was one of those whose children was in the firing line though- because I wasn't one of those twats who cheered on the Vat policy changes - knowing the disruption to children, knowing that it wouldn't net the treasury much more than pocket money - and, iirc, still insulting her and her child as they did so.

So 🤷🏼‍♀️ put your pointy finger away CinnamonSquirrels because it's ridiculous.

Edited

Same and agree. Both policies are destructive to education.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 08/08/2025 11:06

Can somebody explain this new school intake policy please? I’ve googled and been to the BBC and Sky sites but I can’t see anything.

Is it actually new? Is it genuine policy, within a bill etc? Who announced/promoted it? What’s proposed and where?

Thanks - I did have a good look before asking.

ThePhantomoftheEcobubbleOpera · 08/08/2025 11:29

It's the plan to update the equality act which would necessitate a remodelling of public services to flatten advantages achieved by socio-economic class - the consequences of which would include leapfrogging working class kids into schools in middle class catchment areas and displacing local middle class kids.

The article includes other flattenings in public services, including the NHS or public services employment

These are policies that are being explored by the labour party and consultation for that change came to a conclusion in June.

Given the speed with which some ideologically charged ideas have been jettisoned through the policy stages with this government without much time for a cautionary, 'hang on a minute', I wouldn't be take false comfort from it's current lack of development.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread