Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What things are considered trashy if you’re poor but not if you’re wealthy?

360 replies

mummysmagicmedicine · 21/06/2025 12:13

As someone who has been both, I am intrigued to hear what people think!

OP posts:
NOTANUM · 21/06/2025 16:20

Secondhand furniture

Devastated999 · 21/06/2025 16:20

Kids with unbrushed dirty hair.
Kids wearing scruffy hand-me-down clothes.
Drug use.
Tax avoidance (poor:cash in hand work/rich:using an accountant to avoid tax)
Education not being viewed as important for the kids’ future (going into the family buiness/nepotism)
Lack o respect for teachers.
Conked out old car.

Steakbreake · 21/06/2025 16:23

Forgot to add. Giving children multiple names whether first middle or surname. It's either trashy or posh no in between

CtrlAltDlt · 21/06/2025 16:23

In one case you are directly taking money from the taxpayer’s pot.
In the other you are using money that has already been taxed and not taking anything from taxpayers.

It's not really that simple though is it. Wealthy people don't pay tax to anything like the same extent as working people. If you're truly rich, most of the money that falls into your hands hasn't been anywhere near the taxman. It's had generations of being allocated and squirrelled and re-assigned to the point that by the time it hits you, it's literally just free money.

And you can spend it and, crucially, leave it to accumulate further in vast quantities, with no need to request a by your leave from the state, because the state is absolutely disinterested in the affairs of the truly wealthy. They can do as they please and have no need to contribute to the society they benefit from living in. Even when their assets include houses and land worth hundreds of millions of ££££.

Contrast this with, say, a person with a life limiting disability whose parents die and leave them £10,000 in savings built up over a lifetime. The state will at the point of probate find that the disabled person has too much money and will stop their benefit payments.

Itallcomesdowntothis · 21/06/2025 16:24

mummysmagicmedicine · 21/06/2025 12:15

This!!

Sorry OP I think it’s trashy either way.

Olinguita · 21/06/2025 16:26

Redheadedstepchild · 21/06/2025 13:23

Being Roman Catholic. That's a very strange one, which kinds of follows on from the Boris Johnson theme.

This is such a good observation

ExpressCheckout · 21/06/2025 16:26

Voting Reform.

GonnaeNoDaeThatJustGonnaeNo · 21/06/2025 16:29

Ninkynonkpinkyponks · 21/06/2025 12:16

Doing drugs

Emotionally neglecting your children

Having a second language spoken at home

Drugs and neglect is trashy no matter what

iseethembloom · 21/06/2025 16:29

having big dogs, having big weddings, liking cheap sausages, naff ornaments.

AffableApple · 21/06/2025 16:32

Haven't RTFT, but flagrantly breaking lockdown rules drinking champagne, and not knowing how many children you have.

(Probably already come up.)

wastingtimeonhere · 21/06/2025 16:33

Offspring in their 20s with no work ethic living off parents.
Rich are a free spirit, poor a layabout.

Floogal · 21/06/2025 16:37

Being fat. Letting your children be loud in public.

TuttiFruittiSweets · 21/06/2025 16:38

GnomeDavid · 21/06/2025 13:45

I would also add mental illness to the list. It’s cool in some upper class circles to have bipolar but you distance yourself from the man shouting at pigeons in the park as he is clearly ‘mad’.

Rich folk - Bipolar

Poor folk - Personality Disorder

Bumpitybumper · 21/06/2025 16:42

CtrlAltDlt · 21/06/2025 16:23

In one case you are directly taking money from the taxpayer’s pot.
In the other you are using money that has already been taxed and not taking anything from taxpayers.

It's not really that simple though is it. Wealthy people don't pay tax to anything like the same extent as working people. If you're truly rich, most of the money that falls into your hands hasn't been anywhere near the taxman. It's had generations of being allocated and squirrelled and re-assigned to the point that by the time it hits you, it's literally just free money.

And you can spend it and, crucially, leave it to accumulate further in vast quantities, with no need to request a by your leave from the state, because the state is absolutely disinterested in the affairs of the truly wealthy. They can do as they please and have no need to contribute to the society they benefit from living in. Even when their assets include houses and land worth hundreds of millions of ££££.

Contrast this with, say, a person with a life limiting disability whose parents die and leave them £10,000 in savings built up over a lifetime. The state will at the point of probate find that the disabled person has too much money and will stop their benefit payments.

I think you're talking about a very small percentage of the super rich. Most of the simply rich pay an awful lot of tax. They will do what they can to perhaps avoid tax cliff edges etc but ultimately they are the net contributors that everyone relies upon.

The person on benefits is being supported wholly by the state. Fair enough, most would think this was reasonable if they genuinely can't work but everyone should be compelled to support themselves as much as possible and contribute where they can. If a disabled person comes into some money then it is absolutely fair that they use this to support themselves. The alternative is that they are basically never asked to contribute anything and they are wholly reliant on others no matter what. This isn't sensible or fair.

ARainyNightInSoho · 21/06/2025 16:43

Cerialkiller · 21/06/2025 14:57

Having lots of pets

Having lots of expensive tech in the house

Having a big house (council house)

Expensive Clothes labels

Going on holiday

Wearing lots of jewellery

Having more then one car

The upper classes don’t have lots of expensive tech in the house though. They’d regard that as flash and vulgar

Floogal · 21/06/2025 16:44

Also, society tends to be more forgiving of low intelligence or eccentricity if you are affluent, or rich or famous.

ARainyNightInSoho · 21/06/2025 16:45

Floogal · 21/06/2025 16:37

Being fat. Letting your children be loud in public.

Being fat? At my DCs private school all the kids and parents were rake thin

Maddy70 · 21/06/2025 16:46

Old cars
Cocktails

Redheadedstepchild · 21/06/2025 16:47

SirRaymondClench · 21/06/2025 15:57

Is this not just yet another bashing the middle/upper classes thread? 🙄

Sir Raymond! So pleased to see you here. Are you one of the Herefordshire Clenches or the the Derbyshire Clenches? Didn't I last see you at the Royal Lancs, exhibiting your Buttock Clench Beef Bull?

Anyway, as you now, I'm a bit of the old backstairs variety (see usermethiggermijig above) but aren't we seventeeth cousins, forcibly removed? We really must get back in touch. Your clenching buttock beef bull could sire a whole new category of cattle to make rump steak popular again.

I'm mainly in sheep these days, seeing as my gang is all ginger Fitzy-Fitzy, banished to all the far rocky corners...

Namechangerage · 21/06/2025 16:48

PrawnAgain · 21/06/2025 12:26

Receiving handouts and not contributing to society.

People on benefits are seen as scroungers but receiving inheritance and employing accountants to get out of paying as much tax as possible is fine.

THIS

ARainyNightInSoho · 21/06/2025 16:49

dontcomeatme · 21/06/2025 15:37

Very large TVs
Casual hoody style clothing. Very rich celebs often look homeless but it's okay cause they're rich

Posh people really don’t have large TVs though. It’s considered flashy and vulgar to do that

ARainyNightInSoho · 21/06/2025 16:51

GonnaeNoDaeThatJustGonnaeNo · 21/06/2025 16:29

Drugs and neglect is trashy no matter what

Of course drugs and neglect are trashy whoever does it. That’s the whole point of this thread

HeartandSeoul · 21/06/2025 16:55

Apologies if already mentioned, but there was a recent photo in the press of a well-to-do lady at an event (i.e Ascot). She had fallen asleep drunk in the hedge, with her filled champagne glass kept upright.

The lady was praised for her skills in keeping her drink intact whilst she was out for the count. I remember seeing a written comment, basically saying the scene would be viewed very differently if she were from a lower class, which I tend to agree with.

LuckyPeonies · 21/06/2025 16:55

Having several children who each have a different dad, or having fathered several children with different women.

Day drinking

Lots of cars on your property

Heavy makeup, spray tan, and copious hair extensions

WooleyMunky · 21/06/2025 17:01

CoubousAndTourmalet · 21/06/2025 12:33

Hot Tub.

Nasty sex pond.