Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Reaction emojis- why has mumsnet removed the laughing reaction?

137 replies

Onlyharmony · 02/06/2025 13:07

Has anyone else noticed that it's gone?

Some posts are genuinely funny so I like to react to them.

I also suggested once we have a wow face and a sad one.

Does anyone use them much? What reactions would you like to see?

OP posts:
BluebellCrocus · 02/06/2025 15:49

No one is stopping anyone using a laughter emoji. They are still there to post as a reply if you want to. You've lost nothing. You don't need to laugh secretly. Just put it on a post.

BluebellCrocus · 02/06/2025 15:51

Penthrowingsurvivor · 02/06/2025 15:48

that's when a 😂emoji would work better than a lengthy reply

There you go then. You were still able to use a laughter emoji.

Penthrowingsurvivor · 02/06/2025 15:53

BluebellCrocus · 02/06/2025 15:51

There you go then. You were still able to use a laughter emoji.

and that's when threads get clogged up with unnecessary posts.

Short and sweet emoji is so much more efficient.

BluebellCrocus · 02/06/2025 15:55

Penthrowingsurvivor · 02/06/2025 15:53

and that's when threads get clogged up with unnecessary posts.

Short and sweet emoji is so much more efficient.

It'll be fine. Don't worry

lnks · 02/06/2025 15:59

Penthrowingsurvivor · 02/06/2025 15:39

Without knowing exactly what you wrote and how you wrote it, at most I would call them a twat.

I wouldn't call them a bully frankly.

Maybe not, but it certainly isn't just a disagreement

FlirtsWithRhinos · 02/06/2025 16:00

Penthrowingsurvivor · 02/06/2025 15:43

it is a public forum, but it's an anonymous one. You can make any nasty dig anonymously anyway.

You see a laughing emoji on one of your posts, so what? Complete non-issue, either you made someone laugh because it was funny, or you touched a nerve with someone.

It's not about anonymity, it's about visibility and accountability. If something is worth saying it is worth saying out loud. Posters who use backchannels (DMs, PA laughing) to dig at others are adding nothing to the discussion or the MN community.

Sure it might not "matter" or be a "non-issue" in that people can just ignore it, but no one is forced to use MN and if people feel that backchannel nastiness degrades the quality of their experience and undermines what they value about MN then they may just stop coming at all, and that is bad for MN. So MN have reason to take their users' feedback seriously.

theDudesmummy · 02/06/2025 16:02

I am on balance glad it has gone although have used it myself a couple of times. The reason for me is not because anyone sent me a laugh on a sad post, but because when I am on MN on my phone, as I scroll messages my finger seems to always go over the "react" button and the line of emojis comes up time and time again. The laughing one was the most eye catching in the line and it felt really jarring to me to see it popping its jaunty face on the screen when I was reading about something like a bereavement or illness.

dudsville · 02/06/2025 16:04

I think it's interesting that this may have been removed because of bullying. Personally, I found it a helpful response to a person who seemed to be intentionally misunderstanding me. Before that emoji, if someone seemed to be trying to be provocative, I would just ignore them. The laughing emoji game me a way of saying "I see your comment, but I'm not playing that game with you".

BluebellCrocus · 02/06/2025 16:06

I used to prefer it when people posted laughing emojis on posts as it draws your attention to funny posts you might have missed. I didn't used to see it done in a mocking, bitchy way much as people that do that would prefer to do it secretively as they know they are being cunty.

feelingbleh · 02/06/2025 16:06

Good i had someone do a laughing faces on everything i wrote for weeks

Onlyharmony · 02/06/2025 16:09

People do it on facebook too. They use emoji reactions for all sorts. How do you all feel about those?

There they have an anger one as well.

Or do you not use them as much as they are not anonymous?

Social media wants our reactions otherwise they wouldn't be there.

I guess I'll just laugh in my head at a witty post like a normal person. 🤣

OP posts:
Onlyharmony · 02/06/2025 16:10

feelingbleh · 02/06/2025 16:06

Good i had someone do a laughing faces on everything i wrote for weeks

Well that's very deliberate then and odd.

OP posts:
GarlicMile · 02/06/2025 16:13

Username2151 · 02/06/2025 15:16

I think it's less about Mumsnet wanting it removed, as it is Mumsnetters themselves, the posters who must have complained over the many months to the point where it was just simpler to remove it.
Yes Mumsnet can and has removed insulting public posts, but that takes time.
The reaction emojis were from one poster to another, not made public.
I'm glad it's gone too.
I only used it once, and it was a genuine response to a well-written and amusing post.
You don't get too many of those on here.
To those who are disappointed, and have used it to be rude, have you never heard of "if you have nothing good to say, then say nothing at all." ?
That's how people who aren't overtly rude handle things IRL.

Ignoring stuff you don't like works both ways, you know. I'd suggest that those who cry 'bully' if anyone laughs at them are singularly ill-qualified to tell others what to ignore.

They could SO easily have just concluded the person is an arsehole / found the phrasing absurd, not the sentiment / hit the wrong button.

But, no, they have to make so much extra work for MNHQ that everybody loses the facility to quickly share amusement. Way to go, sadfeels.

BluebellCrocus · 02/06/2025 16:22

GarlicMile · 02/06/2025 16:13

Ignoring stuff you don't like works both ways, you know. I'd suggest that those who cry 'bully' if anyone laughs at them are singularly ill-qualified to tell others what to ignore.

They could SO easily have just concluded the person is an arsehole / found the phrasing absurd, not the sentiment / hit the wrong button.

But, no, they have to make so much extra work for MNHQ that everybody loses the facility to quickly share amusement. Way to go, sadfeels.

Never mind, I'm sure you'll get over it.

GarlicMile · 02/06/2025 16:26

nocoolnamesleft · 02/06/2025 15:18

It was being used by bullies to mock posters, without the peer pressure of being visible to third parties.

Someone you've never met emoji-laughed at something you wrote.

I'm astonished you're so very easily upset, and even more astonished you'd go crying to HQ about it. Sometimes (possibly most times) that stranger may have misunderstood you, or you un/intentionally used a witty turn of phrase, or they simply hit the wrong button. Or they're just a bit of a twat - but you don't know them and they haven't posted an actual reply. Shrug and move on, perhaps?

GarlicMile · 02/06/2025 16:27

BluebellCrocus · 02/06/2025 16:22

Never mind, I'm sure you'll get over it.

😂

GarlicMile · 02/06/2025 16:29

BluebellCrocus · 02/06/2025 15:55

It'll be fine. Don't worry

😂

Shitmonger · 02/06/2025 16:31

I liked using it when someone cracked a particularly good joke so that they knew it was appreciated without me clogging up the thread with emojis.

Sometimes I did also use it on posters that were clearly trying to incite a pile-on against the OP. Frankly if you’re going to 🧌 and be obnoxious you have to expect that people will laugh at you.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 02/06/2025 16:39

I'm not sure posters being nasty to prove that some posters can still be nasty is the win they think it is, but it's definitely showing that forcing someone who wants to be nasty to do it openly changes how that poster is perceived.

Personally I think this is much better. I'm enjoying watching the melt down.

(I am expecting a PA reaction here obviously, don't let me down!)

GarlicMile · 02/06/2025 16:42

lnks · 02/06/2025 15:59

Maybe not, but it certainly isn't just a disagreement

As there aren't any negative reacts (rightly, imo), it's one way to convey disagreement if you found the OP's position absurd. I don't think I've ever used it that way, but I am aware some people have found my amusement offensive.

FFS, I hate the 2020s! This is all reminiscent of the Great MN New Year's Eve Debacle, when the board was shut down because drunk people were being sarcastic about celebrities on the telly. I don't believe it's possible to get through life without hurting someone's feelings or having our feelings hurt, and the effort to avoid it at all costs is unwise.

GarlicMile · 02/06/2025 16:43

FlirtsWithRhinos · 02/06/2025 16:39

I'm not sure posters being nasty to prove that some posters can still be nasty is the win they think it is, but it's definitely showing that forcing someone who wants to be nasty to do it openly changes how that poster is perceived.

Personally I think this is much better. I'm enjoying watching the melt down.

(I am expecting a PA reaction here obviously, don't let me down!)

Happy to oblige 😂

BertieBotts · 02/06/2025 16:45

Laugh/Wow/Sad are used frequently on FB to bully people.

It's fair enough not to have them on here. The reactions are a bit pointless anyway. Just talk to each other if you want to say something.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 02/06/2025 16:47

GarlicMile · 02/06/2025 16:42

As there aren't any negative reacts (rightly, imo), it's one way to convey disagreement if you found the OP's position absurd. I don't think I've ever used it that way, but I am aware some people have found my amusement offensive.

FFS, I hate the 2020s! This is all reminiscent of the Great MN New Year's Eve Debacle, when the board was shut down because drunk people were being sarcastic about celebrities on the telly. I don't believe it's possible to get through life without hurting someone's feelings or having our feelings hurt, and the effort to avoid it at all costs is unwise.

FFS! No one is saying you can't hurt someones' feelings if for some reason you feel they need to be hurt, just now you have to do it in the sunlight and own it.

MN have every right to set the site up the way they think will best preserve/create the type of environment they want it to be, and if they felt the issues being caused by the private laughing reaction outweighed its benefit to the site then fair enough.

I used it for things I found funny and I'll miss it, but I'm not going to get all butthurt about it.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 02/06/2025 16:47

GarlicMile · 02/06/2025 16:43

Happy to oblige 😂

😂

FlirtsWithRhinos · 02/06/2025 16:49

BertieBotts · 02/06/2025 16:45

Laugh/Wow/Sad are used frequently on FB to bully people.

It's fair enough not to have them on here. The reactions are a bit pointless anyway. Just talk to each other if you want to say something.

Damn you gave me a quandry there - I agreed with your post then worried you'd take that as a dig since you's said the reactions are a bit pointless 😂.

Anyway, I agree :)