Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Nicola Packer case (trigger warning) late termination at 26 weeks.

119 replies

Nicolapack · 31/05/2025 08:21

I have just listened to the File on 4 podcast about this lady. She ordered abortion pills online during the pandemic. She then had a 26 week old stillborn baby. She hadn't realised that her pregnancy was so advanced when she took the pills. She went to hospital for medical treatment taking the baby with her and the nurses called the police.
File on 4 stated that the medical staff were under no obligation to call the police in this instance.
She was later put through the hell of a court case as they were trying to claim that she acted deliberately and knew her pregnancy was advanced when she took the pills. She was later found not guilty of knowingly terminating a pregnancy over 24 weeks.
I can't help thinking that the nurses should not have breached confidentiality rules by calling the police in the first place. The File on 4 podcast stated the nurses were certainly not required to do so. I cannot help but think that they should be held to account for their actions in this instance. It doesn't seem right that details of this person's medical care were passed to the police without this lady's knowledge or consent.

OP posts:
Reallybadidea · 31/05/2025 09:10

soupyspoon · 31/05/2025 09:07

Up to date on mandatory training. Well that trumps me who actually works in front line safeguarding I suppose.

I wont be listening to any GMC representative given how skewed some of their thinking on various matters has been over the last few years.

Yes, not listening to people you disagree with is a good way to be open-minded

doodleschnoodle · 31/05/2025 09:11

A friend of mine’s partner went into labour not knowing she was pregnant. We had seen them a week or two earlier, she looked as slim as ever, was in her normal clothes, not visibly pregnant in any way, so we were absolutely stunned (not as much as she and my friend!) Baby was small and back to back. So it’s entirely possible. Another friend went for her 12-week-scan to find out she was 30 weeks!

Renabrook · 31/05/2025 09:11

They should have a duty of care to the baby, somone has roo

dizzyperiods · 31/05/2025 09:13

So much hate towards an individual midwife who I expect was experienced and knew something was not right one way or another. The problem was a system that let this woman down she should have had access to a scan to check her dates. It’s not better for women and easier access to termination if flaws in the system lead to these kind of cases that’s the real issue and yet people are criticising one midwife .

Olderbeforemytime · 31/05/2025 09:15

Nicolapack · 31/05/2025 08:36

I personally did not feel baby movements in either of my pregnancies. Gave birth to two healthy babies.

I have felt what was exactly like baby movements when I wasn’t pregnant. I’m assuming just trapped wind.

This case is awful. The midwife sharing the info, the police for taking it to the CPS twice!, the CPS for prosecuting the case.

Abortion still remains ilegal in England except for in limited circumstances and access to abortion is not ease. I worry about changes in the law.

dizzyperiods · 31/05/2025 09:15

Renabrook · 31/05/2025 09:11

They should have a duty of care to the baby, somone has roo

Yes - duty of care to the mother to have verified her dates before prescribing and duty of care to a potential baby over the viability limit who may have felt pain due to what happened .

doodleschnoodle · 31/05/2025 09:18

A bit off topic but first pic is from a news story about someone at full term that didn’t know they were pregnant (cryptic pregnancy). This was four days before they gave birth. Does anyone think they look ‘obviously’ pregnant?

The second pic is someone who is 7 months pregnant and didn’t realise.

It’s entirely possible to not know full stop, and isn’t the sole domain of obese people.

Nicola Packer case (trigger warning) late termination at 26 weeks.
Nicola Packer case (trigger warning) late termination at 26 weeks.
TaggieO · 31/05/2025 09:19

Whiteflowerscreed · 31/05/2025 08:35

Well actually growing a baby IS the same science in every single woman’s body. It’s biology. You don’t get to identify with how you want your pregnancy to progress.

Sorry but this simply isn’t true. There are many, many variables that can have a huge effect on how the pregnancy is experienced. Uterine pregnancy has ectopic. Where the placenta is attached. Number of fertilised eggs, or the egg splitting. Growth restrictions or fetal abnormalities. Maternal size and health. Number of previous pregnancies.

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 31/05/2025 09:20

CrosstheDesert · 31/05/2025 08:58

(and @GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER) I’m not sure I agree.

My first scan revealed I was 22 weeks pregnant.

The teacher replacing me, who came in for her transition day and my handover to her ( I was 35 weeks pregnant) said she was looking forward to working with me and asked who was going on maternity leave!

I am 5ft 2 and a size 8.

Edited

Actually I can well believe that. Someone I know (tall and slim) didn’t look pregnant even when she was virtually full term. However she certainly knew that a baby was imminent!

I do wonder how a normal-weight, full term baby can fit in a slim body and not (or hardly) show, though. Presumably it’ll forever be one of Nature’s mysteries…

OverlyFragrant · 31/05/2025 09:27

Renabrook · 31/05/2025 09:11

They should have a duty of care to the baby, somone has roo

No.
The right to life begins at birth.
For a very good reason else you end up like USofA where women with no brain function are kept on ventilators to incubate a fetus that will have no parents to look after it and likely be very disabled.

dizzyperiods · 31/05/2025 09:30

OverlyFragrant · 31/05/2025 09:27

No.
The right to life begins at birth.
For a very good reason else you end up like USofA where women with no brain function are kept on ventilators to incubate a fetus that will have no parents to look after it and likely be very disabled.

The case in the US is very very different - was the woman 9 weeks pregnant when she was declared brain dead ? In this case the woman was healthy and the fetus 26 weeks - 2 weeks past the legal abortion limit and 2-4 weeks past a gestation where survival possible with NICU care. It’s in no way the same.

edited to add from what I’ve read the fetus was also healthy and not with any disabilities that could have made abortion up to term legal ?

OverlyFragrant · 31/05/2025 09:33

dizzyperiods · 31/05/2025 09:30

The case in the US is very very different - was the woman 9 weeks pregnant when she was declared brain dead ? In this case the woman was healthy and the fetus 26 weeks - 2 weeks past the legal abortion limit and 2-4 weeks past a gestation where survival possible with NICU care. It’s in no way the same.

edited to add from what I’ve read the fetus was also healthy and not with any disabilities that could have made abortion up to term legal ?

Edited

This is about someone saying they (HCP) had a duty of care towards the fetus in this case.
And I highlighting that The Right to Life begins at birth.

Shessweetbutapsycho · 31/05/2025 09:35

Whiteflowerscreed · 31/05/2025 08:27

I wouldn’t be buying that someone 24 weeks pregnant mistakenly thought they were under 10 weeks unless they were in coma or had a full lobotomy so I can see how medics thought she was aware.
ive just had dc3 and the difference in how your body is between 6 weeks vs 24 weeks is VAST. So yeah I totally understand why the medics acted as they did!!!

Edited

You understand that not every single pregnancy in the world is identical to yours?

drspouse · 31/05/2025 09:37

I have a friend who's a doctor and didn't know she was pregnant till over 20 weeks.
On the pill, got sick so it didn't absorb, irregular bleeds due to pill, slightly overweight.
Went for a scan and found it was not as early as she supposed.

dizzyperiods · 31/05/2025 09:37

OverlyFragrant · 31/05/2025 09:33

This is about someone saying they (HCP) had a duty of care towards the fetus in this case.
And I highlighting that The Right to Life begins at birth.

But to compare it when making that point to a totally different case just complicates the issue.

OverlyFragrant · 31/05/2025 09:45

dizzyperiods · 31/05/2025 09:37

But to compare it when making that point to a totally different case just complicates the issue.

No because someone in this discussion believed the HCPs had a Duty of Care towards the fetus delivered.
Which is inaccurate.

MissJeanBrodiesmother · 31/05/2025 09:46

Medical care should be just that. If women are frightened to come forward for care then they will die. The prosecution should not have happened.

dizzyperiods · 31/05/2025 09:48

OverlyFragrant · 31/05/2025 09:45

No because someone in this discussion believed the HCPs had a Duty of Care towards the fetus delivered.
Which is inaccurate.

The baby was 26 weeks and not under any circumstances where abortion was legal so I think they may have a point.

Marcipix · 31/05/2025 09:50

I didn’t look pregnant at 6 months (I knew I was because I had always had regular periods), but I had no morning sickness etc.
I was very slim but the baby didn’t show. People didn’t believe I was pregnant.
So I can see how someone with irregular periods might not realise.

RhaenysRocks · 31/05/2025 09:52

Viviennemary · 31/05/2025 08:58

I agree. That it even could happen in the first place is terrifying. Goodness knows where we will end up if this assisted dying becomes the norm.

It happened during Covid when rules were changed. They have never changed them back.

OverlyFragrant · 31/05/2025 09:52

dizzyperiods · 31/05/2025 09:48

The baby was 26 weeks and not under any circumstances where abortion was legal so I think they may have a point.

What you think and what the law says are very different things thankfully.

gotmyknickersinatwist · 31/05/2025 10:10

Whiteflowerscreed · 31/05/2025 08:27

I wouldn’t be buying that someone 24 weeks pregnant mistakenly thought they were under 10 weeks unless they were in coma or had a full lobotomy so I can see how medics thought she was aware.
ive just had dc3 and the difference in how your body is between 6 weeks vs 24 weeks is VAST. So yeah I totally understand why the medics acted as they did!!!

Edited

So then how is it possible that some women don't know they're pregnant until they're in labour?

HollyBerryz · 31/05/2025 10:11

How were the medical staff to know she was innocent though? It's not up to them to decide if someone is innocent or has committed a crime either. I think they did the right thing and this is really on the police/cps and the gov for reduced access to medical care during covid.

if she'd rocked up with a dead baby and it turned out she'd done it deliberately there would be uproar the nurses hadn't reported it so they can't win either way in this situation.

dizzyperiods · 31/05/2025 10:12

OverlyFragrant · 31/05/2025 09:52

What you think and what the law says are very different things thankfully.

At least it was reported and investigated

candycane222 · 31/05/2025 10:15

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 31/05/2025 08:32

I’ve never understood the odd case I’ve read about, where someone goes into labour (full term) and insists that they had no idea that they were pregnant.

Even if someone is seriously obese, you’d think they might realise that ‘something’ in there isn’t just fat! And what about the baby’s movements? Which are usually easily felt from about 20 weeks.

It happens. Happened to someone I know in fact - it was quite sad.