Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread 24 Starmer -Casting the net wider

1000 replies

DuncinToffee · 20/05/2025 15:15

Previous thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5329855-thread-23-starmer-reflux-remedy?page=40&reply=144419737

OP posts:
Thread gallery
87
SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 14:04

pointythings · 05/06/2025 12:33

The staged theatrics of PMQ do not equate to overall condescension towards women.

Some may remember the point that the stock market is not the economy.

PMQs is not politics. It's pantomime.

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 14:06

The whole point of PMQ's is to belittle one's political opponent. Should Starmer put the kid gloves on for Badenoch?

And if he did, would that be misogynistic ?

TwoFeralKids · 05/06/2025 14:06

BIWI · 04/06/2025 22:59

Just came to post about the extension of FSM. Just waiting to hear what the right wing backlash will be.

Go and the read the comments on the BBC article. 🫣

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 14:09

I don't think (and other posters didn't think) Labour should be grovelling to Reform voters

When the Tories were in power, almost all posters here said they should not pander to Reform and tried to advise them not to destroy their party. Hardly the attitudes of partisans ?

bombastix · 05/06/2025 14:10

Kemi is rubbish. PMQs takes no prisoners, she’s got six questions to skewer Keir Starmer and without exception every week she fluffs it. I note Keir Starmer is increasingly treating her as an irritant, which clearly drives her crazy.

She needs a better team. Or to listen to the one she has.

Kemi does have a problem that other opposition leaders have not. That’s because of Reform where Labour are trying attack them, not the Tories. Keir is treating her as an irrelevance because one it suits him and two, Reform at most get one question. Farage is barely in the Commons.

It suits both Labour and Reform to dismiss the Tories and their leader. They want her to be old news.

bombastix · 05/06/2025 14:13

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 14:04

Some may remember the point that the stock market is not the economy.

PMQs is not politics. It's pantomime.

Quoted for truth. It’s theatre for MPs. They watch and judge their leader by how it’s done.

Alexandra2001 · 05/06/2025 14:20

derxa · 05/06/2025 12:12

So you only want to hear from people with identical views. In broad terms I have more in common with posters on here than I disagree with. I’m a Remainer (but cynical about the EU). I don’t like Reform and would never vote for them. I wasn’t worried about Labour getting in. I thought it would be a dull socialist administration. However,.,,I’ll never forget driving up the A1 listening to the budget. The announcement about the farm tax. It felt like a declaration of war against farmers. Details started to trickle through like Rachel Reeves’ husband works at DEFRA. The appointment of a numpty like Steve Reed as ‘Environment’ minister. I could go on and on. There’s only so many hits my industry can take. An industry which puts food on your plate.

The MH crisis in Farming has been on-going for decades, it can be a tough and lonely business, yet despite F&M, Bird Flu, Brexit, the loss of CAP and of EU markets, Ukraine and input costs... nothing not a peep from you or anyone else about Farmers MH.

Only when the blame can be put on a Tax that Labour introduce, & one that most wont pay, do we get a focus on Farmers MH.

It should also be remembered that in almost all of our life times, IHT, for Farms, was at 40% and had to be paid within 6 months.... yet Farming was probably in a better place back then than it is now, certainly for new entrants and we had the lovely Intervention Board buying up anything you couldn't sell.

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 14:41

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 14:04

Some may remember the point that the stock market is not the economy.

PMQs is not politics. It's pantomime.

OH YES IT IS !

Vipers, you disappoint me.

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 14:43

bombastix · 05/06/2025 14:10

Kemi is rubbish. PMQs takes no prisoners, she’s got six questions to skewer Keir Starmer and without exception every week she fluffs it. I note Keir Starmer is increasingly treating her as an irritant, which clearly drives her crazy.

She needs a better team. Or to listen to the one she has.

Kemi does have a problem that other opposition leaders have not. That’s because of Reform where Labour are trying attack them, not the Tories. Keir is treating her as an irrelevance because one it suits him and two, Reform at most get one question. Farage is barely in the Commons.

It suits both Labour and Reform to dismiss the Tories and their leader. They want her to be old news.

Seems quite effective. Could they want for me to win the lottery too ?

DuncinToffee · 05/06/2025 15:01

TwoFeralKids · 05/06/2025 14:06

Go and the read the comments on the BBC article. 🫣

I am guessing 'if you can't afford kids' made an appearance

edit to add that I just had a quick look and it is also full of 'I don't pay tax to feed children' Hmm

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 05/06/2025 15:05

Always does, like you can just pop them back if you fall on hard times.

itsgettingweird · 05/06/2025 15:15

Piggywaspushed · 05/06/2025 13:33

It’s been that way for the past few PMs.

It's ALWAYS been that way. Since TV came to HoC we now see it but it's a 'tradition'. Should it change? Probably.

But the last few PMs didn't invent it.

I’ve only been watching it for a few years. Doesn’t surprise me it’s a very old tradition by the tone of it.

Id like a better system - including the ability to call a lie a lie.

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 15:17

DuncinToffee · 05/06/2025 15:01

I am guessing 'if you can't afford kids' made an appearance

edit to add that I just had a quick look and it is also full of 'I don't pay tax to feed children' Hmm

Edited

Whilst you wonder what would appear on a bingo card for these discussions, it's hard to avoid the felling that if you scratched one it would smell of racism.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/06/03/white-british-minority-in-40-years-report-claims/

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 15:22

itsgettingweird · 05/06/2025 15:15

I’ve only been watching it for a few years. Doesn’t surprise me it’s a very old tradition by the tone of it.

Id like a better system - including the ability to call a lie a lie.

I'd rather the penalty for lying was enforced.

It's hard to overstate just how serious an act is is to deliberately lie in the highest court in the land. An act that would result in severe penalties - likely prison - if it happened in any other court (unless you are MI5, of course)

So the act of calling someone a liar in parliament is so serious and grave, it needs to be restricted. Otherwise it just loses it's importance.

DuncinToffee · 05/06/2025 15:25

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 15:17

Whilst you wonder what would appear on a bingo card for these discussions, it's hard to avoid the felling that if you scratched one it would smell of racism.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/06/03/white-british-minority-in-40-years-report-claims/

Edited

I read that yesterday 😂

Because I am a foreigner, my children are classed as non-white British. (as is the king)

OP posts:
SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 15:38

DuncinToffee · 05/06/2025 15:25

I read that yesterday 😂

Because I am a foreigner, my children are classed as non-white British. (as is the king)

Edited

Don't fret. We're all foreigners.

itsgettingweird · 05/06/2025 15:49

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 15:22

I'd rather the penalty for lying was enforced.

It's hard to overstate just how serious an act is is to deliberately lie in the highest court in the land. An act that would result in severe penalties - likely prison - if it happened in any other court (unless you are MI5, of course)

So the act of calling someone a liar in parliament is so serious and grave, it needs to be restricted. Otherwise it just loses it's importance.

100% agree.

If fact checking is against the order it seems a pointless order!

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 16:47

If I had known, I would have waited for this before I flounced off the Brexit board 😂

Thread 24 Starmer -Casting the net wider
DuncinToffee · 05/06/2025 16:51

I'll post it on your behalf Wink

OP posts:
LlynTegid · 05/06/2025 17:27

bombastix · 04/06/2025 22:36

I am told they never wanted her in the first place. Apparently at the last election there was a candidate who ran to deliberately split the Conservative vote so she lost. The local party hated her that much it was tolerated

Her initial selection was challenged because her affair with a Tory MP was not disclosed initially, if I recall correctly.

Piggywaspushed · 05/06/2025 17:38

And Zia Yusuf has gone...

cardibach · 05/06/2025 17:39

Yusuf has resigned. Apparently getting Reform elected isn’t ’good use of his time’.

SerendipityJane · 05/06/2025 17:42

Piggywaspushed · 05/06/2025 17:38

And Zia Yusuf has gone...

Wasn't that predicted when Ol' Nige democratised Reform ? Sometime around the Ben Habib hissy fit ?

You can tell I have a "Things I no longer need to know" approach to storing facts.

bombastix · 05/06/2025 17:45

The curse of Farage!

I claim my five pounds

bombastix · 05/06/2025 17:46

LlynTegid · 05/06/2025 17:27

Her initial selection was challenged because her affair with a Tory MP was not disclosed initially, if I recall correctly.

You recall correctly. They hated her from the outset

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.