This is nonsense, I am sorry. We have had multiple Ed Psych reports for the younger generation of my family, in one case, following a diagnosis of SpLDs including manifestations of Dyslexia and Dyspraxia, in Year 3, 6, 9, 11 and 13. In that case there were also hospital attendance for broken bones in Year 2, 4, and 6. Not one of those reports was shared with medical practitioners, or anyone apart from the parents and schools.
Even when sharing that diagnosis with hospital doctors they showed zero interest. As I said in my post one orthopaedic surgeon, who was absolutely brilliant and was involved in treating a horrible complex displaced break of a tibia more recently, commented that Dyspraxia had only been mentioned once in his training and development. He was questioning how they might have sustained such a serious injury from a fall as it was the sort of injury you would normally sustain skiing or being hit by a bus. I do know one case of a peer with Dyspraxia where medical professionals were involved but that was because it co- presented with epilepsy. It isn’t that the diagnosis shouldn’t be shared with GPs and others, not least because there are implications of a diagnosis for mental as well as physical health, and that they should have a greater level of understanding and support, but it just does not happen.
That is now, let alone in the 80s when even the school refused to accept and act on an Ed Psych diagnosis of Severe Dyslexia in a family member who was not able to read at 11. As I quoted above their response was “ the trouble with you middle class parents is that you can’t accept that your child is stupid”. Ironically I suspect our old fashioned family doctor might have known of that diagnosis because of the mental health implications for the parent but whether he would have put it in either the parents or child’s notes I doubt.
There does seem to be a scary level of ignorance about the challenges faced by those with SpLDs even now. Even getting schools to act on an Ed Psych diagnosis can be a battle with school resources so stretched. The report in Year 13 was prompted by the government changing the rules on extra time in exams from a record of evidence of need plus Ed Psych report to a score in the bottom 10 per cent for Working Memory and Processing, regardless of ability, thus depriving more able pupils of a level playing field who still had scores well below average and faced considerable challenges.