I think very differently.
Teaching is a prime example where AI can pay dividends as it can tailor "lessons", activities and worksheets/tasks personalised to the ability of the pupil based on prior answers and engagement. It can build up a personality profile as to how the pupil learns best, i.e. listening, reading, watching, etc., and what type of teaching medium suits them, i.e. reading a chapter of a text book, or watching a video, or listening to an "old fashioned" style of lecture, etc. It could be a game changer to scrap the "one size fits all" approach of 30 kids crammed into a noisy classroom all having to learn the same thing in the same way. It would also open up a more flexible curriculum where pupils would be free to explore different options within subjects and a much broader range of subjects. It would also scrap the need for examinations as the AI "Bot" could build up a full history of the pupil's work and achievements and progress, and give "grades" akin to GCSE and A level exams, at the end of the courses or specific ages, etc (could also be extended to some professional qualifications, degrees, etc)
The issues you mention are more of a social care and security type of role, so instead of traditional teachers, the AI could "teach" children in the home under supervision of adult family members to feed, toilet and water them or in a "school" setting it could be paid security style staff to ensure that they are safe in school, don't go wandering off, are in the right place at the right time, alongside "caring" staff dealing with food, water, toileting etc depending on age.
It's never really been a good use of qualified teacher time to deal with classroom disruption, "caring" activities, etc.
We'd still need "teachers" for more practical, hands on and technical skills requiring pupils to actually "do" things, so maybe alongside AI, we beef up school laboratories (woodwork, metalwork, mechanics, science labs, robotics, etc) to train people how to use their hands alongside computerised equipment.