Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Can I ask about Russia?

122 replies

EarsUpTailUp · 04/03/2025 14:32

The more I see about Trump, Vance and Zelenskyy, and Putin and Ukraine, the more I’m seeing comments crop up that Zelenskyy is the problem, that Putin “has it right”, and I’m so confused as to why. I’ve seen a couple of comments on MN about this, but they’re slammed down (understandably) before sharing any info.

I don’t believe it, but I’d like to know what information people are getting to give them this opinion.

I know a couple of people irl who are clear that they’re team Putin, but beyond spouting sound bites about Zelenskyy being an entertainer and a propagandist, how toxic Ukraine is wrt trafficking, and that Putin is misunderstood, I don’t understand where they’re coming from, and if there is clear evidence of their beliefs.

I can’t dictate how this thread goes, but I would like to understand where this other side is seen from, with links and evidence if possible, and would love this to be a civil conversation.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
RubyTuesday48 · 04/03/2025 20:48

BigSilly · 04/03/2025 15:53

In exactly the same way that people were persuaded that Jews were the problem 80 odd years ago

And are again now.

kungfoofighting · 04/03/2025 20:48

InNeedofAdvice1234 · 04/03/2025 20:24

As reported by The Guardian at the beginning of the war: when the Soviets brought the nukes to Cuba and Americans protested, the Soviets withdrew. Why did the Americans believed they would get away with setting their military bases so close to the Russian borders? The answer: because they are Americans

Also, read The Most Expensive Psychotherapy in History by The Guardian. BTW, The Guardian is the only the major UK newspaper that it's owned by a rich white man

Did you mean to say that isn’t owned by a rich white man?

(I’m guessing you know the Guardian is owned by the Scott Trust Limited)

C152 · 04/03/2025 20:55

EarsUpTailUp · 04/03/2025 17:44

No idea. Maybe no gain at all, but a sense that we’re being lied to for some reason.

I work with one and the other is a school mother. Both well educated (one to PhD level) and have respected positions.

I don’t get it, but sometimes wonder if I’m missing some vital information if it’s so obvious to them.

Perhaps they are sleepers...

Allswellthatendswelll · 04/03/2025 20:58

You gov polling showed that 4% of UK respondants surveyed had a favourable view of Putin. So unless they are all very vocal online I think we can safety say a lot of the pro putin voices on social media are bots or not in the UK. I know we are not meant to troll hunt on here but I am always suspicious of "I'm just curious about...," threads on things to do with Russia/ Ukraine.

kungfoofighting · 04/03/2025 22:57

Allswellthatendswelll · 04/03/2025 20:58

You gov polling showed that 4% of UK respondants surveyed had a favourable view of Putin. So unless they are all very vocal online I think we can safety say a lot of the pro putin voices on social media are bots or not in the UK. I know we are not meant to troll hunt on here but I am always suspicious of "I'm just curious about...," threads on things to do with Russia/ Ukraine.

Edited

Yep! There’s another thread I’m on where the OP stopped even trying to hide it ten pages in

Tomikka · 05/03/2025 07:05

InNeedofAdvice1234 · 04/03/2025 20:24

As reported by The Guardian at the beginning of the war: when the Soviets brought the nukes to Cuba and Americans protested, the Soviets withdrew. Why did the Americans believed they would get away with setting their military bases so close to the Russian borders? The answer: because they are Americans

Also, read The Most Expensive Psychotherapy in History by The Guardian. BTW, The Guardian is the only the major UK newspaper that it's owned by a rich white man

That’s nice
However if the invasion of Ukraine had anything to do with US bases or NATO near to Russia then :

  1. Why did Putin ask for Russia to have NATO membership ?
  2. Why did Putin sign up Russia into and take part in NATO initiatives ?
  3. Why did it take 10 years between 2004s Eastern European membership sign ups and the 2014 invasion of Ukraine ? (Or 5 years after the Baltic memberships of 2009 further away from Russia?
  4. Why didn’t Putin complain about the 2023 & 2024 new NATO memberships of neutral countries on his doorstep?

Could it perhaps have nothing to do with former Soviet occupied countries opting to join an alliance ?

You don’t think that it has something to do with the Ukrainian people complained that they thought their president was going to renege on promises to them - which he then did and they then protested, resulting in him ordering security forces to shoot protesters.
The killing of protestors resulted in the expansion of the protests, the president doing a midnight flit to Russia and the country being invaded by mysterious little green men who turned out to be mercenaries (illegal in Russia but OK if they are pretend mercenaries acting as Putin’s ‘deniable’ army who also base in Russian army camps) plus ‘soldiers on holiday’borrowing the army’s vehicles to go on holiday with their weapons

NATO membership by year
1949 Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, and United Kingdom.
1952 Greece and Turkey.

1955 West Germany (became Germany in 1990).

1982 Spain.

1999 Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland.

2004 Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia.

2009 Albania and Croatia.

2017 Montenegro.

2020 North Macedonia.

2023 Finland.

2024 Sweden.

Llttledrummergirl · 05/03/2025 08:30

Tomikka · 05/03/2025 07:05

That’s nice
However if the invasion of Ukraine had anything to do with US bases or NATO near to Russia then :

  1. Why did Putin ask for Russia to have NATO membership ?
  2. Why did Putin sign up Russia into and take part in NATO initiatives ?
  3. Why did it take 10 years between 2004s Eastern European membership sign ups and the 2014 invasion of Ukraine ? (Or 5 years after the Baltic memberships of 2009 further away from Russia?
  4. Why didn’t Putin complain about the 2023 & 2024 new NATO memberships of neutral countries on his doorstep?

Could it perhaps have nothing to do with former Soviet occupied countries opting to join an alliance ?

You don’t think that it has something to do with the Ukrainian people complained that they thought their president was going to renege on promises to them - which he then did and they then protested, resulting in him ordering security forces to shoot protesters.
The killing of protestors resulted in the expansion of the protests, the president doing a midnight flit to Russia and the country being invaded by mysterious little green men who turned out to be mercenaries (illegal in Russia but OK if they are pretend mercenaries acting as Putin’s ‘deniable’ army who also base in Russian army camps) plus ‘soldiers on holiday’borrowing the army’s vehicles to go on holiday with their weapons

NATO membership by year
1949 Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, and United Kingdom.
1952 Greece and Turkey.

1955 West Germany (became Germany in 1990).

1982 Spain.

1999 Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland.

2004 Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia.

2009 Albania and Croatia.

2017 Montenegro.

2020 North Macedonia.

2023 Finland.

2024 Sweden.

Are you fucking joking me. I don't even know where to start with this blatant Kremlin propaganda.

RubyTuesday48 · 05/03/2025 08:44

Llttledrummergirl · 05/03/2025 08:30

Are you fucking joking me. I don't even know where to start with this blatant Kremlin propaganda.

It's disgusting. MNHQ need to look into this Russian troll/bot.

SwedishEdith · 05/03/2025 08:50

RubyTuesday48 · 05/03/2025 08:44

It's disgusting. MNHQ need to look into this Russian troll/bot.

Yep. Trying so hard to understand.

PandoraSox · 05/03/2025 08:53

Bloody hell. MNHQ please get a grip on this.

RubyTuesday48 · 05/03/2025 08:57

PandoraSox · 05/03/2025 08:53

Bloody hell. MNHQ please get a grip on this.

Have reported the post.

PandoraSox · 05/03/2025 08:58

RubyTuesday48 · 05/03/2025 08:57

Have reported the post.

Thanks.

eurochick · 05/03/2025 09:01

Russians are masters of disinformation. They run massive troll farms and operate bots designed to cause dissent and make people like your foolish friend believe what she believes. It's psychological warfare.

kungfoofighting · 05/03/2025 09:05

eurochick · 05/03/2025 09:01

Russians are masters of disinformation. They run massive troll farms and operate bots designed to cause dissent and make people like your foolish friend believe what she believes. It's psychological warfare.

Yup, this this this. I think this sort of thing, including how to evaluate sources and take a critical approach to online discourse, needs to be taught in school. Not just in history – as an every day skill.

PandoraSox · 05/03/2025 09:06

Do you still work for the MOD @tomikka?

Tomikka · 05/03/2025 09:14

PandoraSox · 05/03/2025 09:06

Do you still work for the MOD @tomikka?

I do

But what part of contradicting Russian claims is Russian propoganda

Pointing out that Russia were not complaining about Eastern Eurpopean NATO membership - and over a decade later blaming the US / NATO

Or that the Ukrainian people protested and were killed by Putin’s puppet president?

My post was a response to the reference that the US are to blame for ‘expanding’ towards Russia - that is Russian propoganda

kungfoofighting · 05/03/2025 09:16

Tomikka · 05/03/2025 09:14

I do

But what part of contradicting Russian claims is Russian propoganda

Pointing out that Russia were not complaining about Eastern Eurpopean NATO membership - and over a decade later blaming the US / NATO

Or that the Ukrainian people protested and were killed by Putin’s puppet president?

My post was a response to the reference that the US are to blame for ‘expanding’ towards Russia - that is Russian propoganda

I always assume that the supposed paranoia and unease about NATO is just used to justify aggression motivated in fact by imperialist ambitions

CatStoleMyChocolate · 05/03/2025 09:24

If you actually want to know more about the Russian mindset, try some books.

Nothing is True and Everything is Possible (Peter Pomerantsev) - disinformation.

The Long Hangover (Shaun Walker) - good outline of how Russia has politicised history and historical memory to further its ends and lay the ground for what’s happened in Ukraine (it was published before the war but very relevant and covers up to around 2018).

Goodbye Russia (Sarah Rainsford) - ex-BBC correspondent who knows the country very well and was expelled in 2021. Outlines how Russia has changed in the last 20 years or so.

PandoraSox · 05/03/2025 09:25

Tomikka · 05/03/2025 09:14

I do

But what part of contradicting Russian claims is Russian propoganda

Pointing out that Russia were not complaining about Eastern Eurpopean NATO membership - and over a decade later blaming the US / NATO

Or that the Ukrainian people protested and were killed by Putin’s puppet president?

My post was a response to the reference that the US are to blame for ‘expanding’ towards Russia - that is Russian propoganda

Hang on. Which president are you talking about? Have we all misunderstood your post?

Tomikka · 05/03/2025 09:27

PandoraSox · 05/03/2025 09:25

Hang on. Which president are you talking about? Have we all misunderstood your post?

Viktor Yanukovych. (Euromaiden protests etc)

((((and there could have been too much of a sarcasm slant in my post))))

and the ‘little green men’ being Wagner Group, FSB and the Russian army with their badges off. (2014 invasion)

PandoraSox · 05/03/2025 09:31

Tomikka · 05/03/2025 09:27

Viktor Yanukovych. (Euromaiden protests etc)

((((and there could have been too much of a sarcasm slant in my post))))

and the ‘little green men’ being Wagner Group, FSB and the Russian army with their badges off. (2014 invasion)

Edited

Oh, dear. Yes I think so!

PandoraSox · 05/03/2025 09:34

Your post now makes sense @tomikka!

R053 · 05/03/2025 09:54

EarsUpTailUp · 04/03/2025 20:17

I try to look at things with an open mind, I don’t want to miss things because my bias is getting in the way, and that usually stands me in good stead and means I trust my opinions.

With all the Putin-love I feel like I’m missing something as I can find no reliable evidence that I trust, but it makes me wonder why my incredibly clever work colleague has fallen for it. Not only that but tries to make out I’m a bit stupid for not getting it.

She’s anti vax, careful about immigration, thinks chemtrails are a thing, thought the fog after Christmas was evidence of weather manipulation, yet she’s ridiculously clever. It doesn’t make sense.

After seeing the awful interview she was aghast at Zelenskyy threatening USA - I watched that particular part several times and still can’t see a threat.

I have a clever work colleague like that too. But he stays up late watching You Tube and that’s how he became brainwashed. Somehow the people he follows convinced him not to look at or trust the news, so he is in an echo chamber,

He has progressed down the far right pipeline - become anti vax, anti fluoride, hates trans people, thinks feminism is the cause of DV, very pro Trump etc - this guy was popular and likeable at work before but I notice people are getting sick of him. When I mocked Trump for claiming the air crashes were due to severely cognitively disabled DEI air control staff, my colleague said “but what if it’s true?”

I do have a dear friend who is Russian and she is very anti Putin. She doesn’t dare go home to visit her family as it’s likely she’d be arrested there.

wholettheturnipsburn · 05/03/2025 10:03

@Tomikka Really confused why you're getting flack for your factual post

Of course it's not Kremlin propoganda.