Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Gregg Wallace responds with “A handful of comments from middle class women of a certain age”

1000 replies

Conniebygaslight · 01/12/2024 09:04

Just heard his comments on the news….unbelievable.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
AnnieSnap · 02/12/2024 19:25

Ha, he now apologises for those comments, saying he was “in a bad place at the time”. So being in a bad head space makes a man a raging misogynist. I didn’t know that 🤷‍♀️ Twat!

toooldforbrat · 02/12/2024 19:29

Puzzledandpissedoff · 02/12/2024 19:12

They often do when it's too late, and given the roll call of sex offenders the BBC has employed as presenters - and this is just the publicly known ones - it can surely only be that they're bendable to government will which keeps them being funded by the taxpayer

Rolf Harris
Mark Page
Jimmy Savile
Stuart Hall
Peter Rowell
Chris Denning
Huw Edwards
Jonathan King
Tony Wadsworth
Ben Thomas
Gregg Wallace

How many more? More to the point how many more are known, but kept in place because they make the BBC a great deal of money?
We'll probably never know ...

Tim Westwood
Dave Lee Travis
George Riley
John Peel

off the top of my head..

SheilaFentiman · 02/12/2024 19:31

“ it can surely only be that they're bendable to government will which keeps them being funded by the taxpayer”

The government wanted Gregg Wallace et al to have jobs on TV?

RedToothBrush · 02/12/2024 19:31

EdithBond · 02/12/2024 19:00

Thanks for sharing. But argh! Yet another commentator diagnosing that GW didn’t keep up with cultural shifts in a post Me Too world. As I keep saying, those cultural shifts happened decades ago.

The first industrial tribunal case on sexual harassment in the workplace (behaviour at a work party) was in 1983. And the first court ruling (lewd comments and nude photos in a school lab) was in 1986. Both LONG before GW started his broadcasting career in the early 2000s.

He’s a similar age to me and everyone knew sexual harassment at work was unlawful in the late 1980s. He knew! He was just allowed to get away with it, which may have been part of the thrill.

It's funny because parliament and legislation is usually the reactionary thing compared to culture. Culture tends to go ahead and then the law catches up.

But sexual harassment in the workplace predates me too by decades and it's those who produce culture who seem to be amongst the worst offenders in recognising the actual law.

Ellerby83 · 02/12/2024 19:33

Russell Brand
Philip Schofield

Puzzledandpissedoff · 02/12/2024 19:35

SheilaFentiman · 02/12/2024 19:31

“ it can surely only be that they're bendable to government will which keeps them being funded by the taxpayer”

The government wanted Gregg Wallace et al to have jobs on TV?

No - the BBC wanted Wallace to have a job on the TV, and the BBC are bendable to government will because they're the ones who set the licence fee

And you're quite right, @toooldforbrat, I forgot those four Confused

RedToothBrush · 02/12/2024 19:35

Hmm. I think there's a couple of posts here straying in libelous ground.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 02/12/2024 19:38

Ellerby83 · 02/12/2024 19:33

Russell Brand
Philip Schofield

Oh god I've made a mess of this haven't I? Blush
Though maybe forgetting some among the throng goes to show just how grim tthis is - as in if there were only three we'd all remember them only too well

Spaffitupthewall · 02/12/2024 19:46

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Kilofoxtrot99 · 02/12/2024 19:49

I’m guessing his PR team may have had a taste of what he has apparently dished out over the years and clearly hate him if they’ve advised this type of response. To say he was in a bad head space because of these women of a certain age were saying displays a staggering lack of both insight and empathy for anyone who has been made to feel uncomfortable due to unpleasant sexualised comments. Gaslighting and narcissistic come to mind, total lack of accountability that is sadly commonplace still in this day and age.

JawsCushion · 02/12/2024 19:51

AnnieSnap · 02/12/2024 19:25

Ha, he now apologises for those comments, saying he was “in a bad place at the time”. So being in a bad head space makes a man a raging misogynist. I didn’t know that 🤷‍♀️ Twat!

The man who abused me was under stress in his marriage and at work. The Judge was not impressed with him trying to justify it.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 02/12/2024 19:59

Simonjt · 02/12/2024 18:18

Maybe he could use all his newly found spare time to parent his son for once.

Doubt it. That's what one keeps a wife for in Greg-land.

DearDenimEagle · 02/12/2024 20:03

On the plus side I can watch Masterchef again, Never liked him. I’m not surprised by the allegations..he had 3 very short lived failed marriages so there was something iffy somewhere IMO .

RedToothBrush · 02/12/2024 20:04

Apparently GGreg has unfollowed John and Lisa's social media whilst he was having his little hissy fit and is upset neither has come out to say what a charming sexy victim he is.

Suchasonganddance · 02/12/2024 20:33

Those stripped to the waist gym shots of this Adonis (not) with his soft sagging skin, drooping boobs - and specs 🤢
What a sad little man.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 02/12/2024 20:36

RedToothBrush · 02/12/2024 20:04

Apparently GGreg has unfollowed John and Lisa's social media whilst he was having his little hissy fit and is upset neither has come out to say what a charming sexy victim he is.

I'm aware this all sounds so playground but strange that they didn't unfollow him first, especially as we keep getting told from "sources" that they don't get on.

"charming sexy victim he is".
Careful, he doesn't understand irony or sarcasm apparently so if he sees this you could be lined up to be wife number 76, or whatever number he's up to now!

SheilaFentiman · 02/12/2024 20:36

Kilofoxtrot99 · 02/12/2024 19:49

I’m guessing his PR team may have had a taste of what he has apparently dished out over the years and clearly hate him if they’ve advised this type of response. To say he was in a bad head space because of these women of a certain age were saying displays a staggering lack of both insight and empathy for anyone who has been made to feel uncomfortable due to unpleasant sexualised comments. Gaslighting and narcissistic come to mind, total lack of accountability that is sadly commonplace still in this day and age.

I expect he barrelled onto Insta without taking advice, and now he has, he’s backtracked.. a bit.

Eyestothehorizon558 · 02/12/2024 20:47

SheilaFentiman · 02/12/2024 17:47

Years ago, the production companies could have quietly replaced him OR years ago the BBC (and Channel 5) could have suggested to the production companies that they would prefer to buy GW-free shows.

The BBC do not employ him.

The BBC may not employ him, but they should still have oversight over their “products” if you ask me. Its not as if Masterchef is a minor show!

GW’s PR person has obviously advised him to shut up and told him that every word he says is making the situation worse and costing him money but imho it’s too late.

He had one chance to accept responsibility and he bogged it! This latest comment is really more of the same.

First he blames middle class, older women. And now he is blaming stress and feeling alone!

His tv career is over and unfortunately he’s not bright enough to see it.

SheilaFentiman · 02/12/2024 20:53

The BBC may not employ him, but they should still have oversight over their “products” if you ask me. Its not as if Masterchef is a minor show!

It’s a tough one. Waitrose, for example, doesn’t have control over whether Yeo Valley fires or sidelines employees who sexually harass. I agree it’s a bit different but it’s not 100% different.

EdithBond · 02/12/2024 21:05

RedToothBrush · 02/12/2024 19:31

It's funny because parliament and legislation is usually the reactionary thing compared to culture. Culture tends to go ahead and then the law catches up.

But sexual harassment in the workplace predates me too by decades and it's those who produce culture who seem to be amongst the worst offenders in recognising the actual law.

Very good point. As I said on one of the Gregg threads, seems to be a problem in broadcasting, the arts, fashion etc compared to business. Likely due to lack of employment rights due to freelance and competitive nature of the work. But also perhaps bad behaviour is brushed off as the personality of various creative types.

I wonder if GW partly wasn’t challenged because people were worried about being classist to him, when (as PPs have said) this hadn’t been tolerated in more working class workplaces for years, perhaps because they can sometimes be more heavily unionised. Interesting he initially suggested some sort of classism, before his more scripted apology today.

Lalgarh · 02/12/2024 21:11

"I ad that Greggs Wallace in the back of my cab the other day..."

x.com/LBC/status/1863513890077708506

RainbowZebraWarrior · 02/12/2024 21:39

Lalgarh · 02/12/2024 21:11

"I ad that Greggs Wallace in the back of my cab the other day..."

x.com/LBC/status/1863513890077708506

There was a lady on Jeremy Vine's Radio 2 show today who said she encountered GW in Selfridges café The Brass Rail recently. He was ahead of her alone, and she was with her female friend and grandmother. There were two tables left. One with two seats and one with four. He took the table for four to himself and looked at them as they squeezed into the table for two. He then said "I'll give you my table if you pay for my lunch" She apparently thought he was joking, but he said he wasn't.

C8H10N4O2 · 02/12/2024 21:56

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 02/12/2024 19:59

Doubt it. That's what one keeps a wife for in Greg-land.

Nah - that is what the in-laws are for. Wife is for sexy time with Gregggggg!

(with apologies to those who are still eating)

SheilaFentiman · 02/12/2024 22:04

seems to be a problem in broadcasting, the arts, fashion etc compared to business. Likely due to lack of employment rights due to freelance and competitive nature of the work. But also perhaps bad behaviour is brushed off as the personality of various creative types.

I am not sure that’s true. See Al Fayed, for example. Or Crispin Odey. It’s just that it draws more attention if the perpetrator is famous.

There are settlements and NDAs and quiet sackings every day of the week in business, but most of them don’t make the press.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.