Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Kemi badenoch now against autistic children

376 replies

Hunnymonster1 · 14/10/2024 13:30

What is wrong with her? Just read that the children commision is saying average wait like to get diagnosed as autistic is 4 years.
So kemi banging on about how parents are pushing gor diagnosis because they see how much extra money etc autistic children get at school is wrong.
The fact is I woukd think judging by lbc many kids are not getting the support that they need.
So js this about her saying the conservatives need to save tax by not helping people or children with autism and mental health issues.
Bare in mind she said similar about maternity pay last week makes me think she's like Liz truss wants to cut alot of stuff
How the hell can anyone support this?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/kemi-badenoch-autism-tory-leadership-buckland-b2628845.html

Kemi Badenoch faces backlash for ‘stigmatising’ autism

Tory leadership hopeful faces another row after endorsing report that suggested people with the condition get ‘economic advantages and protections’

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/kemi-badenoch-autism-tory-leadership-buckland-b2628845.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
User37482 · 14/10/2024 17:49

I do think especially for girls it seems autism is easy for teachers to miss. The children in my family are all boys who definitely need additional support but thats in the form of psychiatric interventions. Their mum however is clearly autistic, never diagnosed but an extremely well functioning person. So people do do well without diagnosis or intervention. But I’m not sure how many manage that.

pasta · 14/10/2024 17:49

I think she has no understanding of how society works. She didn't actually take maternity leave herself, she resigned instead because she didn't feel it was fair for her employer to fund it. Okay fine, if you want to do that and have a well paid partner. But it is fucking batshit to think that maternity leave is to generous and not to understand that if you don't fund it then women are even more vulnerable than they already are and the birthrate will fall even furhter

Allthecatseverywhereallatonce · 14/10/2024 17:50

As a parent of a child with chronic severe anxiety and depression I feel very worried for her future. Just when I thought they couldn't get any worse. My dd didn't get any extra help or money but, believe me, if she did she would give it back if it meant her crippling anxiety disappeared. I am sure parents of children with autism feel the same. How can they confuse the 2 conditions, they can't even be bothered to care about being correct.

Perzival · 14/10/2024 17:53

Reugny · 14/10/2024 17:16

Have you ever wondered why those with ND commonly also present with mental health needs?

The point I was making is that mental health needs are not autism needs, they are separate. You can have autism without mental health needs and have mental health needs without autism.

Those who have classical/ profoud/ severe autism and not severe mental health needs with an autism dx are a completely different group of people with different needs and as pointed out previously this group are having their services/ adaptations/ funding etc cut as autism is increasingly seen as an identity rather than a disability and those who are able to advocate for themselves are naturally going to advocate for their needs rather than those of others which can be vastly different to those who can't advocate.

I do believe there is an increasing dislike/ resentment of children with autism/ other nd and their families where their needs aren't obvious and they're asking for accommodations just due to the amount of children that fall into this category.

I think the general public are usually accepting of people with obvious disabilities receiving help but when it isn't obvious and they see it as putting them at disadvantage/ costing them money that's when it becomes a problem. The Disney ride pass in America is a great example of this. Disney have changed it so only those with autism and learning needs (I can't remember the exact wording but google it if you want) qualify and even then some don't who feel they should. This has caused huge bad feeling among people with various disabilities.

Just to point out again I believe all children should get their needs met. I'm trying to pull apart the situation, understand it and discuss the reasoning. This isn't agreeing.

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/10/2024 17:58

ContactNightmare · 14/10/2024 17:47

She is not a cognitive giant.

She is more like Liz Truss than people give her credit for. There is no vast cunning intellect behind these reductive statements. She is as simple as she appears.

That is the source of her appeal. There is no crack mind behind what she says

Totally agree.

Reugny · 14/10/2024 17:58

Perzival · 14/10/2024 17:53

The point I was making is that mental health needs are not autism needs, they are separate. You can have autism without mental health needs and have mental health needs without autism.

Those who have classical/ profoud/ severe autism and not severe mental health needs with an autism dx are a completely different group of people with different needs and as pointed out previously this group are having their services/ adaptations/ funding etc cut as autism is increasingly seen as an identity rather than a disability and those who are able to advocate for themselves are naturally going to advocate for their needs rather than those of others which can be vastly different to those who can't advocate.

I do believe there is an increasing dislike/ resentment of children with autism/ other nd and their families where their needs aren't obvious and they're asking for accommodations just due to the amount of children that fall into this category.

I think the general public are usually accepting of people with obvious disabilities receiving help but when it isn't obvious and they see it as putting them at disadvantage/ costing them money that's when it becomes a problem. The Disney ride pass in America is a great example of this. Disney have changed it so only those with autism and learning needs (I can't remember the exact wording but google it if you want) qualify and even then some don't who feel they should. This has caused huge bad feeling among people with various disabilities.

Just to point out again I believe all children should get their needs met. I'm trying to pull apart the situation, understand it and discuss the reasoning. This isn't agreeing.

Have you seen someone with autism advocating for themselves?

Reugny · 14/10/2024 18:00

pasta · 14/10/2024 17:49

I think she has no understanding of how society works. She didn't actually take maternity leave herself, she resigned instead because she didn't feel it was fair for her employer to fund it. Okay fine, if you want to do that and have a well paid partner. But it is fucking batshit to think that maternity leave is to generous and not to understand that if you don't fund it then women are even more vulnerable than they already are and the birthrate will fall even furhter

No she doesn't.

She didn't like being treated like everyone else when she was 16 and made to work for her pocket money.

If her children decide to slum it when they get to their older teenage/young adult years she's going to get a shock in how they are treated.

Saschka · 14/10/2024 18:02

ARichtGoodDram · 14/10/2024 13:56

The Tories are very good at this kind of thing when it comes to disability.

They are somehow able to convince people, repeatedly, that they aren't going after proper genuine disabled or sick people. Just the ones after the money.

Yes there was that woman on Question Time wasn’t there? “I voted for the Tories because they said they’d slash benefits, but I didn’t think they meant MY benefits!”

Todaywasbetter · 14/10/2024 18:26

You want low taxes. You get a Tory.

JohnTheRevelator · 14/10/2024 18:31

She's a Tory. What did everyone expect? They make a career out of demonising disabled people,whether it's a physical or mental disability.

pointythings · 14/10/2024 18:40

The point I was making is that mental health needs are not autism needs, they are separate. You can have autism without mental health needs and have mental health needs without autism.

You may wish to read up on comorbitity of mental ill health in people with autism. Mental illness rates are far, far higher in people with autism than in the general population. Epilepsy rates are the same. Nobody knows exactly why this is, but it is a fact. Your view of how autism and mental health work is overly simplistic.

Todaywasbetter · 14/10/2024 18:47

Which medical professionals do you think Prescribes medication for people with autism when needed?

SquirrelSoShiny · 14/10/2024 18:51

StrawberryWasp · 14/10/2024 15:36

I think her point is very muddled and doesn't make sense.

But what is true is that we have an unmanageable demand for diagnosis and we need a serious discussion about how how to deal with this because expanding the current services is neither realistic in terms of costs and staffing or actually addressing the needs of people even if we could.

I understand if your child needs an assessment you don't care about the wider system you just want your child seen but when so many feel like this the system as it exists cannot meet demand then it's the most vulnerable that suffer.

There are many issues here:

The number and severity of need has risen exponentially. We need to rethink how we manage the real and serious needs of a now much larger group of children. Resources isn't the only answer, we need different systems and services and schools.

But we should all be screaming ' what the hell is going on with this rise??' what is happening to children to be causing this? I don't understand why it's not a medical emergency for research.

The ND movement looks really positive on the surface but it is diluting real need to a personality type and an identity and being grouped alongside those with serious need. This is a problem for those with high level needs. It is and will undermine societal tolerance for resources and adjustments for ND as so many functioning people adopt it as an identity. I think this is driving KBs stance. You can shout at her but it represents a real growing intolerance with some people's demands for ND. If your child has high level needs you should be worried about how this ND positivity could undermine support for your child.

Doctors are feeling under pressure from some parents for a diagnosis. Diagnosis has a great deal of leeway for professional judgement and is not clear cut. So pressure does have an impact.

Many parents are getting private diagnoses and this is skewing the education system as they may not be the children with the greatest need.

I could go on with the issues they are multiple. I think this is what Kemi B might be trying to convey, but I think it's very unclear in the way she's done it.

100% this. And I'm ND and part of a ND family. I'm really concerned at lots of young people basically opting out of work 'because autism/ because ADHD.' It's creating a really unhelpful culture of victimhood and being used as a get out of jail free card.

I've said on other threads that I think the 'ND movement' is becoming really harmful to many ND people. It's becoming a grift that enables people rather than finding ways to help them live and function in the world.

Perzival · 14/10/2024 18:54

Reugny · 14/10/2024 17:58

Have you seen someone with autism advocating for themselves?

There's a lot of autism self advocates who do incredibly well.

pointythings · 14/10/2024 19:00

Perzival · 14/10/2024 18:54

There's a lot of autism self advocates who do incredibly well.

Right, and that's a valid reason to withdraw support from those who don't, of course.

The huge, huge problem with Badenoch's essay of rabid right wingery is her statement that by getting support, autistic people get an advantage.

They don't. What they get, if they get support, is a little levelling of the playing field. A little shot at equality of opportunity. Which is a thing Tories either don't understand, or don't want. Which begs the question: why don't Tories want everyone to get an equitable shot at success?

DogInATent · 14/10/2024 19:01

SquirrelSoShiny · 14/10/2024 18:51

100% this. And I'm ND and part of a ND family. I'm really concerned at lots of young people basically opting out of work 'because autism/ because ADHD.' It's creating a really unhelpful culture of victimhood and being used as a get out of jail free card.

I've said on other threads that I think the 'ND movement' is becoming really harmful to many ND people. It's becoming a grift that enables people rather than finding ways to help them live and function in the world.

I do a small voluntary role with schools helping find work experience placements. I really worry about the lack of coping/self-management skills that are being taught to ND children. There's an element of the ND Movement that genuinely expects the adjustments made in an education setting to automatically roll-over to an employment setting.

Mind you, I'm constantly surprised by some of the ones I'm warned will be the 'difficult' kids that do amazingly well in work placements. Like kids learning to ride a bike once the stabilisers are taken off.

Bignanna · 14/10/2024 19:02

JohnTheRevelator · 14/10/2024 18:31

She's a Tory. What did everyone expect? They make a career out of demonising disabled people,whether it's a physical or mental disability.

That could apply to any party!

Perzival · 14/10/2024 19:05

pointythings · 14/10/2024 18:40

The point I was making is that mental health needs are not autism needs, they are separate. You can have autism without mental health needs and have mental health needs without autism.

You may wish to read up on comorbitity of mental ill health in people with autism. Mental illness rates are far, far higher in people with autism than in the general population. Epilepsy rates are the same. Nobody knows exactly why this is, but it is a fact. Your view of how autism and mental health work is overly simplistic.

Being a comorbid condition doesn't mean that they go hand in hand. They can exist separately. Someone can have severe mental health needs as well as autism while someone else can have severe autism and no mental health needs. I would guess having severe autism without mental health needs is more common than severe mh with autism.

There has been cases of children locally being refused camhs intervention because they had an autism dx with a campaign to separate the two to make sure they had their needs met. Conflating the two can be harmful for those who need the support and those who have autism and don't have mh. Autism isn't a mh condition.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 14/10/2024 19:06

She resigned from The Spectator. Wonder what the agreed settlement was there?

She also collected maternity pay of 100% as a politician and received nearly eight grand (before going back eight weeks later/two weeks after the cutoff for paying back) severance pay in 2022.

I'd resign every three months if that was what I was going to get out of it, too.

SquirrelSoShiny · 14/10/2024 19:08

DogInATent · 14/10/2024 19:01

I do a small voluntary role with schools helping find work experience placements. I really worry about the lack of coping/self-management skills that are being taught to ND children. There's an element of the ND Movement that genuinely expects the adjustments made in an education setting to automatically roll-over to an employment setting.

Mind you, I'm constantly surprised by some of the ones I'm warned will be the 'difficult' kids that do amazingly well in work placements. Like kids learning to ride a bike once the stabilisers are taken off.

I always want to ask - what did ND people do BEFORE everyone was getting diagnosed? Lots of burnout and mental / physical health issues BUT we also showed extreme resilience and made lives for ourselves. Diagnosis is fantastic for learning adaptations and how to not fight against ourselves all the time but it was never designed to be a free pass at life. It should be about how to thrive instead of survive, for all but the small percentage who genuinely can't function even with adaptations.

wulves · 14/10/2024 19:10

It is estimated that rates of anxiety disorder amongst autistic people is around 40%. That is 2-3x higher than the NT population.

informationautism.org/issues/23/anxiety-and-autism/Statistics

Saschka · 14/10/2024 19:12

I think KB is speaking to an increasing proportion of the population who are getting fed up of autism being used as a reason for adaptations when previously they wouldn't

Yep, and don’t forget wheelchair users and blind people! All these disabled people, requesting their legal rights to reasonable adjustments, when previously you could just shove them in an institution and leave them to rot. How very dare they.

Notonthestairs · 14/10/2024 19:13

Well no, that's the point School transport and adaptations that improve education outcomes don't equal a free pass at life.

pointythings · 14/10/2024 19:41

SquirrelSoShiny · 14/10/2024 19:08

I always want to ask - what did ND people do BEFORE everyone was getting diagnosed? Lots of burnout and mental / physical health issues BUT we also showed extreme resilience and made lives for ourselves. Diagnosis is fantastic for learning adaptations and how to not fight against ourselves all the time but it was never designed to be a free pass at life. It should be about how to thrive instead of survive, for all but the small percentage who genuinely can't function even with adaptations.

That's very rose tinted of you. Sure, some people showed extreme resilience ( = having to work 10 times as hard to achieve the same thing as someone NT) and made lives for themselves. But what about the ones who couldn't, but who if they had had support from an early age could have achieved the same? What about the ones who would have succeeded without the struggle and the burnout if only they'd had support? Just because you were 'extremely resilient' and 'made a life for yourself', without support that does not mean that those who needed that support shouldn't get it. Again, levelling the playing field, equity for everyone. Kemi is basically saying that she does not want equality of opportunity.

And how is having some adaptations at work 'getting a free pass at life'?

Your position is basically 'well I did it, so everyone else should be able to do it too'. Life isn't like that.

CowboyJoanna · 14/10/2024 19:44

I do see where she's coming from.
Does feel like nowadays, some parents (not all, and for you real SN parents Im not talking about you before you lose your hair) do push for a diagnosis for their child to have autism/adhd/whatever to deflect responsibility for being a soft parent when theyve raised their children to be little shits. Or trying to diagnose their children with autism because theyre shy or an introvert or dont like loud noises.

And its very harmful to the parents with children that DO actually have special needs and it delays help for them.