The point I was making is that mental health needs are not autism needs, they are separate. You can have autism without mental health needs and have mental health needs without autism.
Those who have classical/ profoud/ severe autism and not severe mental health needs with an autism dx are a completely different group of people with different needs and as pointed out previously this group are having their services/ adaptations/ funding etc cut as autism is increasingly seen as an identity rather than a disability and those who are able to advocate for themselves are naturally going to advocate for their needs rather than those of others which can be vastly different to those who can't advocate.
I do believe there is an increasing dislike/ resentment of children with autism/ other nd and their families where their needs aren't obvious and they're asking for accommodations just due to the amount of children that fall into this category.
I think the general public are usually accepting of people with obvious disabilities receiving help but when it isn't obvious and they see it as putting them at disadvantage/ costing them money that's when it becomes a problem. The Disney ride pass in America is a great example of this. Disney have changed it so only those with autism and learning needs (I can't remember the exact wording but google it if you want) qualify and even then some don't who feel they should. This has caused huge bad feeling among people with various disabilities.
Just to point out again I believe all children should get their needs met. I'm trying to pull apart the situation, understand it and discuss the reasoning. This isn't agreeing.