Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Kemi badenoch now against autistic children

376 replies

Hunnymonster1 · 14/10/2024 13:30

What is wrong with her? Just read that the children commision is saying average wait like to get diagnosed as autistic is 4 years.
So kemi banging on about how parents are pushing gor diagnosis because they see how much extra money etc autistic children get at school is wrong.
The fact is I woukd think judging by lbc many kids are not getting the support that they need.
So js this about her saying the conservatives need to save tax by not helping people or children with autism and mental health issues.
Bare in mind she said similar about maternity pay last week makes me think she's like Liz truss wants to cut alot of stuff
How the hell can anyone support this?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/kemi-badenoch-autism-tory-leadership-buckland-b2628845.html

Kemi Badenoch faces backlash for ‘stigmatising’ autism

Tory leadership hopeful faces another row after endorsing report that suggested people with the condition get ‘economic advantages and protections’

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/kemi-badenoch-autism-tory-leadership-buckland-b2628845.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Normallynumb · 14/10/2024 17:05

She has no compassion or humility especially to those she considers worthless.
I'm on enhanced PIP myself.

pointythings · 14/10/2024 17:06

Icanthinkformyselfthanks · 14/10/2024 16:43

@TigerRag , lots of children need support for many reasons. Their parents should support them and teachers should always be able to adjust their teaching for different children as a matter of course. I think the point Kemi was making was that some children are receiving extra support at the expense of the nation and it is reasonable to ask if all of this is necessary.

It's already been pointed out that an autism diagnosis does not mean entitlement to free school transport, nor does it mean a school gets any extra funding. So this 'point' Kemi was making is what we in the biz would call 'a lie'. Colour me surprised.

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/10/2024 17:08

Icanthinkformyselfthanks · 14/10/2024 16:35

@pointythings , I have not said I don’t believe autism exists. I do believe that historically those on the mild end of the spectrum have largely gone on to have productive existences by learning to deal with the way they are.

They are more likely to do that if the get support at an early age. Not wait years for a diagnosis or have their support withdrawn because Kemi Bandenoch thinks they don't really need it.🙄

Perzival · 14/10/2024 17:08

Just to be clear I think any child with needs must have them met but I do believe many children needs are put down tond when they are mh needs or they are dx as nd but told that this presents as mh needs. I think this is more of an issue for those that wouldn't have previously recieved an autism dx (high fuctioing/ aspergers).

I wholly agree with the previous poster who said wrote about te nd movement being dangerous, it is and especially for those with severe or profound autism needs and no mh needs. I will welcome the break up of the dx and like the new use of profound autism to distinguish those with severe autism from those with autism and severe mh needs whichare vastly different things.

I think KB is speaking to an increasing proportion of the population who are getting fed up of autism being used as a reason for adaptations when previously they wouldn't.

TwigTheWonderKid · 14/10/2024 17:11

She's a Tory; why does this surprise you OP?

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/10/2024 17:13

I think KB is speaking to an increasing proportion of the population who are getting fed up of autism being used as a reason for adaptations when previously they wouldn't.

I would call that proportion of the population "ignorant fuckwits". When reasonable adaptions are not provided, autistic people end up not working or going to school.

Italiandreams · 14/10/2024 17:15

Perzival · 14/10/2024 17:08

Just to be clear I think any child with needs must have them met but I do believe many children needs are put down tond when they are mh needs or they are dx as nd but told that this presents as mh needs. I think this is more of an issue for those that wouldn't have previously recieved an autism dx (high fuctioing/ aspergers).

I wholly agree with the previous poster who said wrote about te nd movement being dangerous, it is and especially for those with severe or profound autism needs and no mh needs. I will welcome the break up of the dx and like the new use of profound autism to distinguish those with severe autism from those with autism and severe mh needs whichare vastly different things.

I think KB is speaking to an increasing proportion of the population who are getting fed up of autism being used as a reason for adaptations when previously they wouldn't.

The reasons adaption are made now when they previously wouldn’t is because we understand autism more now. It’s called progress. And I think further down the line if we got it right it would save a fortune in mental health issues! It’s why early intervention is important. I see the difference the right support makes to my child. How dare people who don’t know him say he doesn’t deserve it when so many professional have recognised that he does.

murasaki · 14/10/2024 17:16

There's also understanding retrospectively. I said to my youngest sister, who also has some traits and now sense checks some stuff with me and her friends , that i thought so re may dad , born 1947, had some autistic traits. Prime example, I phoned in distress to say I was getting divorced, his response was ' we don't do divorce in this family '. What he meant was that there hadn't been one, and my mum took over the phone after clonking him on the head with it.

His brother emigrated to Canada the year I was born, they rarely talked. My youngest sis goes out there a lot they like hiking. She suggested mid hike that he might be autistic. Uncle was silent for about a mile. Then agreed. They now talk much more as he has a different perspective on dad.
.
Entirely my fault, as I worked in a psychology dept for 17 years, but their new relationship pleases me.

Reugny · 14/10/2024 17:16

Perzival · 14/10/2024 17:08

Just to be clear I think any child with needs must have them met but I do believe many children needs are put down tond when they are mh needs or they are dx as nd but told that this presents as mh needs. I think this is more of an issue for those that wouldn't have previously recieved an autism dx (high fuctioing/ aspergers).

I wholly agree with the previous poster who said wrote about te nd movement being dangerous, it is and especially for those with severe or profound autism needs and no mh needs. I will welcome the break up of the dx and like the new use of profound autism to distinguish those with severe autism from those with autism and severe mh needs whichare vastly different things.

I think KB is speaking to an increasing proportion of the population who are getting fed up of autism being used as a reason for adaptations when previously they wouldn't.

Have you ever wondered why those with ND commonly also present with mental health needs?

PocketSand · 14/10/2024 17:17

@Icanthinkformyselfthanks the level of support needed by 'all children' that can be provided by parents is a world away from the level of support required by an ASD child.

Parents need specialist support from autism outreach LA programmes an IEP at the least, probably an ECHP and maybe specialist school.

The pamphlet puts anxiety first and therefore plants the idea that autism is maybe less of an issue. Of course because it is up to the individual to deal with it - nothing is serious and deserves state funding.

Autism is a life long disability. You can't take meds or meditate your way out of being autistic. I believe that figures show that less than 20% autistic adults are in employment. That includes my son. I am a carer. Do the tories want to pay me what I'm worth or cut disability payment?

PortiasBiscuit · 14/10/2024 17:20

She has a core audience that believes this shit.

“In my day it was known as teenage angst, clip round the ear and they soon got over it””.

That sort of thing.

Eve · 14/10/2024 17:21

my DF ( now deceased) undiagnosed severely dyslexic, no diagnosis or support in those days so left school at 14 after regular canings for being stupid and worked manual jobs and all his life and we needed benefits support.

My DS diagnosed severely dyslexic early in primary school , early intervention and support ( no additional funding received by school for him) throughout school, 1st class degree from top university now at 25 is a higher rate tax payer.

Support matters - and to those who say it was fine in my day - it wasn't.

UpTheMagicFarawayTree · 14/10/2024 17:22

More Tory lies and nonsense. Is anyone really surprised?!

Diomi · 14/10/2024 17:23

Hunnymonster1 · 14/10/2024 14:02

Surely though some of these tory members may have autistic kids themselves or grandkids. Or is it that many are wealthy so use private education and so don't care what she says. I mean the pensioners got pissed off over winter fuel allowance but yet when the tories aim stuff at the youth they don't care

Only around 5-6% of children go to private school in the uk. Relying on voters whose children are in private school would not get you very far in an election.

Beekeepingmum · 14/10/2024 17:23

I wouldn't put anything past Kemi "the thing that is wrong with this country is maternity pay is just too generous" Badenock.

Reugny · 14/10/2024 17:25

PortiasBiscuit · 14/10/2024 17:20

She has a core audience that believes this shit.

“In my day it was known as teenage angst, clip round the ear and they soon got over it””.

That sort of thing.

To be fair she wasn't educated in the UK before she was 16 therefore was unaware what was around for children with various disabilities in parts of London and Surrey including very close to where she was born and lived as a 16 year old.

She would have been horrified what Thatcher's government allowed to be funded in my area and would have decided that some of the children I went to primary and secondary school with needed no help. My primary school had a specialist unit for a particular disability while my secondary school knew who they could help e.g the kids who the secondary school with the specialist unit didn't.

FumingTRex · 14/10/2024 17:27

What i find astounding is the idea that not only autistic adults but autistic CHILDREN should “work on themselves” and not expect adaptations at school? I nean really who is she thinking will support this?

Nanny0gg · 14/10/2024 17:29

Icanthinkformyselfthanks · 14/10/2024 16:43

@TigerRag , lots of children need support for many reasons. Their parents should support them and teachers should always be able to adjust their teaching for different children as a matter of course. I think the point Kemi was making was that some children are receiving extra support at the expense of the nation and it is reasonable to ask if all of this is necessary.

Have you ever been in a primary school classroom? (or any classroom?)

Hunnymonster1 · 14/10/2024 17:30

TiredCatLady · 14/10/2024 16:57

It seems she thinks these “anti-woke” comments make her look strong and she’s being terribly clever. In reality they just out her as being thick.

I’m reminded of the Kathy Burke quote. “I like being woke. It’s much nicer than being an ignorant fucking xxxx” (removed the swear as I know some on here really don’t like it)

Edited

I love her quote I think there is nothing wrong with being woke

OP posts:
Hunnymonster1 · 14/10/2024 17:31

TwigTheWonderKid · 14/10/2024 17:11

She's a Tory; why does this surprise you OP?

I know right but man alive these lot just lately are really inept

OP posts:
pasta · 14/10/2024 17:33

I find Kemi Badenoch utterly terrifying, I think she really does believe this. She is a very small state Conservative. I also find it worrying that people on the right do genuinely think that she is an original thinker, I know some sensible people who really rate her. I think she is clever, but also a dangerous ideologue

Hunnymonster1 · 14/10/2024 17:35

Well the charity national autistic charity have said her comments are dangerous and offensive https://www.learningdisabilitytoday.co.uk/news/kemi-badenochs-views-on-autism-are-offensive-says-national-autistic-society-calls/

OP posts:
username3678 · 14/10/2024 17:36

pasta · 14/10/2024 17:33

I find Kemi Badenoch utterly terrifying, I think she really does believe this. She is a very small state Conservative. I also find it worrying that people on the right do genuinely think that she is an original thinker, I know some sensible people who really rate her. I think she is clever, but also a dangerous ideologue

Someone on here described her as a cognitive giant. There is something about some Tory women that send chills down your spine.

OP posts:
ContactNightmare · 14/10/2024 17:47

username3678 · 14/10/2024 17:36

Someone on here described her as a cognitive giant. There is something about some Tory women that send chills down your spine.

She is not a cognitive giant.

She is more like Liz Truss than people give her credit for. There is no vast cunning intellect behind these reductive statements. She is as simple as she appears.

That is the source of her appeal. There is no crack mind behind what she says

Swipe left for the next trending thread