It's not OK to openly abuse a woman just because she's only one woman, or because you disagree with her political views.
Kemi Badenoch deserves to be treated with a minimum of respect, just like everyone else.
If you're comfortable with someone being abusive to Kemi Badenoch because you personally disagree with her politics, are you also comfortable with someone being abusive to JK Rowling and Rosie Duffield because of their views on women's rights? (JK Rowling has received "enough death threats to wallpaper her house with" and Rosie Duffield was advised not to attend the Labour party conference due to concerns about her personal safety.) Was it OK for Brexit supporters to threaten Anna Soubry to the point where it was no longer safe for her to return to her house? If no, what's the difference between the former and the latter?
And what's the common factor here? Can we think of any male politicians, authors or public figures who have had to deal with abuse and threats to their personal safety because of their political opinions? How many death threats has Richard Dawkins received for having the same opinion as JK Rowling?
If you can't see the problem here then you are part of the problem.
And for what it's worth, Kemi Badenoch has greater legitimacy to speak on behalf of women than most other people, because she is both a woman and a democratically elected MP.
Who the fuck is David Tennant? An actor with an over inflated sense of his own self importance, and allegedly the father of a "trans child".
There's an excellent clip of Helen Joyce being interviewed, where she says that the "trans child" is a phenomenon that is responsible for the ideological capture of a huge number of our institutions. It only takes one person, somewhere high up, who has or is rumoured to have a "trans child" and the entire organisation is frozen in the headlights, unable to do or say anything that might upset this VIP with a "trans child". And the parents of "trans children" will defend this ideology to the death, even when it has become clear to everyone else that it is indefensible, because the alternative would be to admit that they have harmed their own child.