As a general principle yes, I know that principles were/are in short supply
, if we're going to have an unelected second house in the HoL (with or without hereditary peers), then the minimum that we, the electorate and taxpayers who fund the institution, should expect is the nomination document/justification for new peers to be published.
Ie, why are they being made a peer.
I'd accept that that nominations that don't pass the vetting committee don't need to be made public so we can't find out about Nadine Dorries supposedly failed elevation, much as we'd like to 