yeah the sudden WFA outrage did strike me as odd, is it virtue signalling? or just wanting to complain cos Labour did it?
It does feel ... synthetic. Ultimately that's the final destination for algorithm driven "news". It will all end up being totally ignored because it's algorithmic.
The real problem is - unlike the old days - it's basically free-to-print. So spaffing a few billion whatevers has no financial risk. It really is "worthless". It's what "free" gets you.
If we still had to pay per minute or per byte (as anyone who remembers ISDN lines knows) then you would be a lot more choosy over what you let into your life. Imagine having to pay £10 a day to download whatever chuff GBNews are spouting today ?
Mathematically, if growth continues you will not - repeat not - see a top team of players directing the internet. The internet will become (if it hasn't already) a chaotic system where the output for any given input cannot be predicted. No matter who tweets it or who reads it.
You can see why scientists have always had to be careful around tyrannical twats.