Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Labour suspends seven MPs over two-child benefit cap

201 replies

EasterIssland · 23/07/2024 22:54

Several labour mps have voted in favour of snps request to remove the 2 child benefit cap and now they’ve* *had the whip suspended for six month.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c978m6z3egno

not the best beginning for this new government

Rebecca Long-Bailey and John McDonnell

Labour suspends seven rebel MPs over two-child benefit cap

The government comfortably won the vote despite growing pressure from some of its own MPs to scrap the policy.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c978m6z3egno

OP posts:
DramaLlamaBangBang · 24/07/2024 15:02

TheWhalrus · 24/07/2024 13:27

My understanding was that labour didn't want to commit to ending the cap but is committed to bringing children out of poverty but not necessarily in this way...presumably either because they can't be certain of affording removing the cap, or they prefer to disincentivize low-income households from having loads of children. I also note that these 7 MPs are mostly part of the hard left of the labour party and might have been seeking a chance to lay down a mark on the new regime anyway.

Now I've seen who the 7 are, I think you are correct. They have been voted in as Labour MP's and are trying to stake their claim. The Tory press are just waiting for an excuse to say the Hard Left is still in charge of the Labour Party and these MP's are itching to prove them right. These have been slapped down not even a month into the new government.

justasking111 · 24/07/2024 15:11

dollybird · 24/07/2024 10:23

I didn't vote Labour, but I agree with Keir on this. There must be other ways to help with child poverty whilst also discouraging people from having more children that they can't afford.

Wales has done free school meals for all children, no stigma just feed the children. That's a good thing.

DramaLlamaBangBang · 24/07/2024 15:12

There is something you don't know about this family. You're judging without having all the facts. The partner isn't not in work just because he's father to 9 DC and doesn't have time! That's not acceptable in the rules. So either he's looking but can't find work because he's unemployable in some way, or he doesn't have to work because he's too unwell or because he's a carer for someone. She's not working because her youngest is too young so she doesn't have to, but that will change as she stops having DC
Those are all reasons not to have 9 children! This is not just about punishing adults for having children, it's about not paying people to pile problem after problem on the heads of their own children. Do 9 children have the space to sit and do their homework? To play? To have someone sit and spend time with them when they are doing homework, be ferried around to extra curricular activities? Or even be fed properly? Their parents are condemning their children to a life of poor outcomes, having to struggle to reach their potential and having to work 100x harder than a child with one sibling, even one in a poor household that wants to break the cycle of poverty that their parents are in.

AvrielFinch · 24/07/2024 15:12

HRTQueen · 24/07/2024 15:01

how long is this ridiculous worship of Corbyn going to carry on for

Two elections he was leader of Labour and both elections he lost, the second one spectacularly. He did absolutely nothing for the people of this country and in less than three weeks changes are being made to improve peoples lives under a Labour government led by a sensible intelligent leader.

Starmer has to be tough he has a lot of MP's to manage that he needs behind him to push through the changes that will make peoples lives better. It was absolutely no surprise to see who was on the list of suspended mp's.

and the left starting with their spiteful insults no surprise there we know what so many of them are about

I 100% agree with this. I despair of the extreme left. They prefer to posture rather than actually im-prove peoples lives.

DramaLlamaBangBang · 24/07/2024 15:18

HRTQueen · 24/07/2024 15:01

how long is this ridiculous worship of Corbyn going to carry on for

Two elections he was leader of Labour and both elections he lost, the second one spectacularly. He did absolutely nothing for the people of this country and in less than three weeks changes are being made to improve peoples lives under a Labour government led by a sensible intelligent leader.

Starmer has to be tough he has a lot of MP's to manage that he needs behind him to push through the changes that will make peoples lives better. It was absolutely no surprise to see who was on the list of suspended mp's.

and the left starting with their spiteful insults no surprise there we know what so many of them are about

Totally agree. Go and join the Socialist Workers Party or the Green Party if you don't agree with the Labour government. The Left have done nothing but ensure the Tories have been in power for most of the past 50 years.

HRTQueen · 24/07/2024 15:22

Absolutely agree with AvrielFinch and DramaLlamaBangBang

They wouldn't have a seat in parliament if they stood for the Socialist Workers Party but its certainly inline with their politics

justasking111 · 24/07/2024 15:22

So many people using food banks is it time for food stamps.

The government with the best intentions offer financial help to poor families but can't control where it's spent. I've friends who feed and provided uniform to kids because others in the village spent it at the one pub in the village.

It stood out because it's an isolated Welsh village so they know who are the neglected children. In larger more anonymous areas these children slip through the cracks.

One boy with huge issues aged nine. Is attacking smaller children in the playground. His language and bearing threatening
Recently he beat up a seven year and slashed his body with a long nail.

But when he goes home he's sent to his room after school where he uses X box until he falls asleep. Only stopping to eat. The language he uses towards his parents especially his mother is appalling even the C word.

His parents are broken,

AvrielFinch · 24/07/2024 15:24

Most people use food banks because there is a delay in paying benefits or they have been sanctioned. They need money, not this nonsense on this thread.

whataclownshow · 24/07/2024 15:26

DramaLlamaBangBang · 24/07/2024 15:02

Now I've seen who the 7 are, I think you are correct. They have been voted in as Labour MP's and are trying to stake their claim. The Tory press are just waiting for an excuse to say the Hard Left is still in charge of the Labour Party and these MP's are itching to prove them right. These have been slapped down not even a month into the new government.

Agree. They knew the consequences. KS has made it clear eliminating the two-cap is a long term goal but it wasn't in the manifesto.

If they genuinely cared about Labour making the structural changes needed to actually changing children's lives for the better, they would have used their nous and put that before the attention-seeking optics of a suspension. Led by the politically inept Richard Burgon who cares more about getting a back-pat from Jeremy Corbyn than he does the welfare of his constituents.

robovacsareepic · 24/07/2024 15:27

There're the labour equivalent of Truss - quite happy to see the IMF trashing the UK again as 'we can afford' whatever policies they want. I do have faith that Starmer will get rid of the two child policy when it's feasible.

justasking111 · 24/07/2024 15:28

AvrielFinch · 24/07/2024 15:24

Most people use food banks because there is a delay in paying benefits or they have been sanctioned. They need money, not this nonsense on this thread.

We've working people using food banks in Wales. I can't talk about England, Scotland, Ireland because I really don't know.

Do they need money or food @AvrielFinch ?

Luio · 24/07/2024 15:31

SerendipityJane · 24/07/2024 10:21

  1. She is possibly the most odious of the most odious Tories I have even seen. If you are advancing her as proof of anything, you have already lost.

  2. she can say what the fuck she likes. It's not like she has any power here.

  3. why wasn't she she saying this 4 weeks ago ?

and ... most pertinently

  1. Why the fuck did she vote for it then ?

Oh relax! You can still think she is a witch that you have nothing in common with. I imagine she is worried about low birth rates and would rather home grown babies rather than immigration.

blackcherryconserve · 24/07/2024 15:37

IDoLikeToBeByTheSea · 23/07/2024 23:12

Wish the media would get it right- there isn’t a two child cap on child benefit. It’s a two child cap on the universal credit child element and child tax credit.

Absolutely! The only place that I've read the accurate description was in the BBC website this morning!

dollybird · 24/07/2024 16:35

When Labour were in power last time, 9 out of 10 families were entitled to tax credits and I didn’t see any of them complaining.

Really? That many?

I expect this includes the childcare part, which was help towards the cost of childcare (I think it effectively gave back the equivalent tax that was paid on the cost of the childcare).

We used to get this, but not any other part of tax credits.

Wendyway76 · 24/07/2024 17:15

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SerendipityJane · 24/07/2024 17:34

One take on things ...

Labour suspends seven MPs over two-child benefit cap
TomeTome · 24/07/2024 17:42

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Because the children are who it’s for not the parents.

Emmanuelll · 24/07/2024 17:52

dollybird · 24/07/2024 16:35

When Labour were in power last time, 9 out of 10 families were entitled to tax credits and I didn’t see any of them complaining.

Really? That many?

I expect this includes the childcare part, which was help towards the cost of childcare (I think it effectively gave back the equivalent tax that was paid on the cost of the childcare).

We used to get this, but not any other part of tax credits.

No it was a separate award. Nearly everyone used to get it - I remember.

The last government has used division so that some people who really are squeezed and need a bit of extra support don't get it. It makes them feel resentful for those that do.

Ilovetowander · 24/07/2024 17:52

I think it is right not to scrap the two child limit on benefits, if you cannot afford to support more than two children then you should ensure you don't have more children. I think that in order to help the children where there happen to be support should be tied to them ie free school meals, school uniform. It's not the money to support children I object to but it is the way that some people then use the money for other things.
Everyone has to make choices in life and we can't all do everything we want to - the same is true for the number of children.

Emmanuelll · 24/07/2024 17:57

I've listened to a podcast today about this. Apparently, people who work closely with government have revealed that Labour will remove the cap but right now they can't because they have to prioritise nurses and schools. Which is fair.

But nobody in politics agrees with this two child cap, even Nigel Farage apparently(!) It's widely accepted to be the main reason that so many children are in poverty. And that is unacceptable in a developed country.

Emmanuelll · 24/07/2024 18:00

Why is it awful? It seems perfectly reasonable to me. I work hard in a job I hate. Why should I hand over money to people who contribute nothing?

Don't worry, I would bet that the majority of your taxes don't even touch vulnerable children. But that's who it is for. This plan doesn't seem to be working either, because we have a problem with population decline.

TizerorFizz · 24/07/2024 18:06

A benefit isn’t the reason children are born! It’s down to parents to make choices. Some have more dc than they can afford. Others have difficulties after they lose a job or some other catastrophic thing happens and they deserve support. They can help alleviate it but so can breakfast clubs, fsm, uniform charities and similar. Most people used to think benefits were a short term helping hand. Now they are a way of life and we have so many jobs available. Why cannot part time workers of teenagers be full time? No one ever endures this happens or ensures training is given.

Emmanuelll · 24/07/2024 18:33

They are not a way of life. People in receipt of benefits have to prove they are applying for lots of jobs.

Emmanuelll · 24/07/2024 18:34

Also we don't have loads of jobs available - my daughter is on the summer break from university and despite a decent CV and a good set of A Levels she's found it impossible to get a job. Nobody even replies to her.

Ilovetowander · 24/07/2024 18:41

The two child cap cannot be the cause of child poverty. The child poverty is caused by the parent(s) being unable to afford the costs they have.

For some I totally agree this is to sudden changes in their life be it loss of job, DV etc etc whilst for others having more children was irresponsible. In both cases any support should be tied to expenditure on children.

Swipe left for the next trending thread