Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Can you really not move to Australia with Autism?

350 replies

sandygrapes · 27/05/2024 11:32

Just that really.

I follow a midwife on there from the UK. She is open and honest, and is paid so much better with amazing working conditions. That's just one example of a profession

Is it really true families who have someone who's autistic cannot move out there or is it far more complex than that?

This is just out of interest.

I have family in NZ and know they're quite strict there

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
MrsKeats · 27/05/2024 15:51

WhereYouLeftIt · 27/05/2024 15:43

Australia has the right to say who may move into their country, and who may not. They don't allow immigration for the benefit of the immigrants, they allow it to serve the needs of the country, to plug shortages in particular professions like doctors and nurses.

Shouting "discrimination!" because they have no interest in letting people in who will not serve the needs of their country isn't going to matter one whit to them. Their country, their choice.

Agree with this.

Hermittrismegistus · 27/05/2024 16:07

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 27/05/2024 15:44

Because some posters are suggesting it’s right that Australia looks after its own citizens. I’m suggesting they don’t even do that eg indigenous Australians.

Or is that ok?

Just because they treat one section of their society poorly doesn't mean that Australia isn't, overall, working in its citizens best interests.

mactire · 27/05/2024 16:12

Using indigenous Australians as a gotcha is a strange choice. What’s the continuation of the logic?

”The people whose ancestral homeland this is aren’t treated well…so we’re going to import more people that will cost us money and divert more funds that could have gone to the indigenous population”

Doesnt really add up, does it

Perfectlystill · 27/05/2024 16:13

It's true.

Australia is so behind the rest of the civilised world. It's like the 1950s there.

ClairemacL · 27/05/2024 16:17

Not sure why so many people are so upset about a couple of countries choosing who they want to allow to immigrate there and who they don’t. It’s not “fair” but it doesn’t have to be. It’s not a right to live wherever in the world you might please.

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 27/05/2024 16:17

Hermittrismegistus · 27/05/2024 16:07

Just because they treat one section of their society poorly doesn't mean that Australia isn't, overall, working in its citizens best interests.

How can that be the case though? If indigenous Australians are ignored?

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 27/05/2024 16:20

mactire · 27/05/2024 16:12

Using indigenous Australians as a gotcha is a strange choice. What’s the continuation of the logic?

”The people whose ancestral homeland this is aren’t treated well…so we’re going to import more people that will cost us money and divert more funds that could have gone to the indigenous population”

Doesnt really add up, does it

No. My logic is a counter to the argument that Australia is right to
look after their own. When clearly they don’t.

Not letting in those with disabilities is discriminatory.
Using an individual’s skill set for a few years then saying no
you can’t stay as your child is autistic is cruel.

Hermittrismegistus · 27/05/2024 16:23

How can that be the case though? If indigenous Australians are ignored?

Do you have any idea of how GRT people are treated in the UK? Does the poor treatment of GRT mean the UK should allow all and sundry in? Does it mean that we don't look after our citizens on a mass scale?

mactire · 27/05/2024 16:25

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 27/05/2024 16:20

No. My logic is a counter to the argument that Australia is right to
look after their own. When clearly they don’t.

Not letting in those with disabilities is discriminatory.
Using an individual’s skill set for a few years then saying no
you can’t stay as your child is autistic is cruel.

And so what, like? Autism is not an attractive prospect for them, therefore the visa doesn’t get approved. Neither is old age, I don’t see Oz clamouring to import pensioners either. They’re not keen to take on additional costs if they can be avoided, that’s understandable.

If you look hard enough you can find a way in which every country neglects some of their own. It’s a nonsensical argument to say “ok well you must take these people with undesirable conditions also” as some kind of penance.

S0livagant · 27/05/2024 16:27

WalkingaroundJardine · 27/05/2024 12:14

Yes but on the other hand when people migrate to Australia, the country is gaining healthy, young, skilled people that other countries paid taxes to educate over many years - the cream of the world, so to speak. I have read of examples where both the parents are doctors, the other kids are neurotypical and it’s one child with autism and the family is rejected. A bit more balance is needed in such cases.

Then the children may well go through school on Australian taxes then move back to be closer to extended family. No guarantee they will stay.

mactire · 27/05/2024 16:27

Hermittrismegistus · 27/05/2024 16:23

How can that be the case though? If indigenous Australians are ignored?

Do you have any idea of how GRT people are treated in the UK? Does the poor treatment of GRT mean the UK should allow all and sundry in? Does it mean that we don't look after our citizens on a mass scale?

To go back a little bit, think of how Catholic nationalists in Northern Ireland were treated by the UK government. How many people with disabilities should be imported to atone for that one? Perhaps there’s a scale we can use.

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 27/05/2024 16:28

It’s a counter to those saying looking after their own.

And no I don’t believe the U.K. looks after all its citizens equally.

Hermittrismegistus · 27/05/2024 16:31

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 27/05/2024 16:28

It’s a counter to those saying looking after their own.

And no I don’t believe the U.K. looks after all its citizens equally.

Which country, in your opinion , can say it looks after its own?

TeenLifeMum · 27/05/2024 16:32

Dh and I looked at emigrating to Australia years ago but couldn’t due to our careers not being what they needed. They are very selective, putting the country’s priorities above the priorities of individuals wanting to move there.

NewtonGig · 27/05/2024 16:34

Nowanextraone · 27/05/2024 15:09

Totally agree

But you wouldn’t be trying to emigrate if you couldn’t work. Lots of people with autism work.Hope they don’t ever run out of software coders.

NewtonGig · 27/05/2024 16:34

I’d much rather emigrate to a more inclusive country.

Toddlerteaplease · 27/05/2024 16:36

SilverBranchGoldenPears · 27/05/2024 11:54

Countries have to ensure that their citizens aren’t left paying taxes to support non-nationals with disabilities. Otherwise you can end up with what is essentially benefit or health tourism. If a person has a child that will always require care then how can they, barring wealth ensure that the state won’t have to step in at some point. And yes I don’t disagree it’s discrimination but countries have to put their own citizens and residents first. This is reasonable and expected.

Edited

I've known several families from Eastern Europe with profoundly disabled children come to the UK, just for healthcare. The children have needed major surgical intervention.

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 27/05/2024 16:36

Hermittrismegistus · 27/05/2024 16:31

Which country, in your opinion , can say it looks after its own?

Edited

You’re right not many if any.

EasternStandard · 27/05/2024 16:37

I find the approach there different to here. The electorate are bipartisan on the type of immigration policy the U.K. struggles with

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 27/05/2024 16:38

I am curious as to whether a person with disabilities in a shortage area would meet visa reqs.

Sorrybutnot · 27/05/2024 16:41

Rainbows89 · 27/05/2024 11:51

It doesn’t make sense. It’s discrimination!

Canada used to be the same. But it changed relatively recently.

It’s also extremely short sighted of them. They could be excluding people who would be a huge asset to the country.

CurlsnSunshinetime4tea · 27/05/2024 16:42

the usa also has health requirements when immigrating.
my two children had to be assessed in order to access a green card/visa. any sign of cognitive issues would have barred them.

NewtonGig · 27/05/2024 16:47

CurlsnSunshinetime4tea · 27/05/2024 16:42

the usa also has health requirements when immigrating.
my two children had to be assessed in order to access a green card/visa. any sign of cognitive issues would have barred them.

You can emigrate to the USA with autism though.

CurlsnSunshinetime4tea · 27/05/2024 16:50

i'm sure it depends on the level of disability @NewtonGig

TheWayTheLightFalls · 27/05/2024 16:53

As an immigrant to the UK - most countries discriminate as to who is allowed in. That’s “bears shit in woods” territory. Countries don’t tend to seek out large numbers of people who will be an economic cost. I jumped through a dozen hoops to stay in the UK, some much more arbitrary than mental health diagnoses.