Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What age would you consider young to be a first time dad?

128 replies

YachtALot · 25/03/2024 18:38

Just that really!

OP posts:
Hangingupnow · 28/07/2024 14:02

A lot will depend on the age of the poster replying. I would think someone who was 25/26 was a young parent.

Kitkat1523 · 28/07/2024 14:10

Purplecatshopaholic · 28/07/2024 13:33

Under 30. Utterly bonkers to tie yourself down in your twenties imo.

Horses for courses….I had mine young….living my own life again in my 40s ….my DD had her first at 21 then 24…..she’s 30 now…..by her early 40s mortgage will be paid off and kids all grown and flown…..who wants to be doing school runs in their 40s? No one I know that’s for sure

Charlie2121 · 28/07/2024 14:16

Kitkat1523 · 28/07/2024 14:10

Horses for courses….I had mine young….living my own life again in my 40s ….my DD had her first at 21 then 24…..she’s 30 now…..by her early 40s mortgage will be paid off and kids all grown and flown…..who wants to be doing school runs in their 40s? No one I know that’s for sure

I’ll be more than happy to be doing school runs well into my 50’s. It is much easier than working!

FizzySnap · 28/07/2024 14:47

Purplecatshopaholic · 28/07/2024 13:33

Under 30. Utterly bonkers to tie yourself down in your twenties imo.

Not everyone feel the same, clearly. I've had several people tell me - unprovoked - that they wish they had children earlier (20s).

Whether it's 'bonkers' or not really comes down to factors like relationship stability, education, career, housing situation, family support and more.

I think it's bonkers to infantilise everyone (including late 20s).

Hangingupnow · 28/07/2024 14:53

Obviously everyone has different opinions but if I had my dc in my 20s I would have missed out on a lot. Yes I could do them in my 40s but unless your friends have done similar who do you do things with. I also don’t think you have the same carefree abandon once dc are on the scene regardless of their age.

Hangingupnow · 28/07/2024 14:57

who wants to be doing school runs in their 40s? No one I know that’s for sure

That must be unusual though to not know anyone who had dc in their 30s .

Interestingly the average age of a FTM today is in line with to the late 1930s.

FizzySnap · 28/07/2024 15:12

Hangingupnow · 28/07/2024 14:53

Obviously everyone has different opinions but if I had my dc in my 20s I would have missed out on a lot. Yes I could do them in my 40s but unless your friends have done similar who do you do things with. I also don’t think you have the same carefree abandon once dc are on the scene regardless of their age.

You make friends with other adults with kids...? Or people who don't ditch you for having a different lifestyle.

RampantIvy · 28/07/2024 15:23

FizzySnap · 28/07/2024 15:12

You make friends with other adults with kids...? Or people who don't ditch you for having a different lifestyle.

You make friends with people at the same stage of life as you, regardless of age.

Hangingupnow · 28/07/2024 15:28

I think you misunderstood. What has it got to do with ditching friends? Logically if my friends have babies they are unlikely to be able to come on a Machu Picchu trek with me. Of course I could find new friends but all the research suggests it’s harder to make friends as you get older & I would still want to invest time in my old friendships. I
think it’s pretty normal in a friendship group to go through life stages in similar timeframes. Next week I’m off to a Eurocamp with a few families, we are in our 40s with dc ranging from 4-11. The same friends I trekked the sights with in my 20s. I don’t think I’d be so up for the holiday if I didn’t have young dc! 😆

K0OLA1D · 28/07/2024 15:47

Hangingupnow · 28/07/2024 14:53

Obviously everyone has different opinions but if I had my dc in my 20s I would have missed out on a lot. Yes I could do them in my 40s but unless your friends have done similar who do you do things with. I also don’t think you have the same carefree abandon once dc are on the scene regardless of their age.

Very few of our peers have waited until 30 to have dc

alwaysmovingforwards · 28/07/2024 15:49

Dacadactyl · 25/03/2024 18:46

I disagree. Having a child young can 100% give you the impetus to do all those things. We mightve been the youngest of all our friends to become parents, but we were the first to get on the property ladder.

Yup, and you’re the first to get your house back when they move out!

GinBlossom94 · 28/07/2024 16:11

I was 23, DH was 25 when we had DS1. Times have changed though, DS1 is now 21, still living at home and I can't see that changing any time soon. Incidentally my "cut off" for having any more kids was 30, I had DC3 at 29

RuthW · 28/07/2024 16:35

Under 28.

Charlie2121 · 28/07/2024 16:45

K0OLA1D · 28/07/2024 15:47

Very few of our peers have waited until 30 to have dc

I think it depends on a wide range of social factors. The youngest person in our wider friendship group to have a child was 34. More were over 40 than under 40.

When we were in our 20’s and 30’s we were building careers and travelling the world. Most of us waited until we were in senior roles and had fewer financial constraints such as mortgages before we had children.

There’s no right or wrong way to do it but based purely on financial measures having children later in life makes a lot of sense. I also quite like the idea of being retired during most of my DS’s childhood.

PuttingDownRoots · 28/07/2024 16:53

My dad was considered "old" when My brother and I were children. He was 35&37 at our births! My mother was 29 and 31
(And we only had two living grandparents by the time I was born)

LBOCS2 · 28/07/2024 16:55

DH was 22 when he had his first, with his ex. We had our two when I was 27 and 30. In our peer group, he was exceedingly young (i.e ten years younger) than all of our friends to have a child, and I was having my second when the first of our friends were having their firsts.

Now approaching 40, I have FAR more friends with toddlers than I do with secondary aged children.

It definitely really depends on your peer group. We live London/Home Counties borders, most of our friends went to uni, they almost all started families well into their 30s.

SnapdragonToadflax · 28/07/2024 17:05

I'd say under 30 is young. I only know one couple who intentionally had kids under 30 (and actually, I think they were 29 when baby arrived). I met someone recently who has a five year old and it was his 30th birthday, and I was honestly astounded by how young he was to have a kid. Why would you do that to yourself?! At 25 I had only just moved out into a shared house.

Literally all my friends are doing school runs in their 40s. That's completely normal.

K0OLA1D · 28/07/2024 17:09

SnapdragonToadflax · 28/07/2024 17:05

I'd say under 30 is young. I only know one couple who intentionally had kids under 30 (and actually, I think they were 29 when baby arrived). I met someone recently who has a five year old and it was his 30th birthday, and I was honestly astounded by how young he was to have a kid. Why would you do that to yourself?! At 25 I had only just moved out into a shared house.

Literally all my friends are doing school runs in their 40s. That's completely normal.

Because we wanted to?

I'd lived alone since 18. I wanted dc. I had dc. If I hadn't had them when I did i wouldn't have been able to have any at all due to disability.

Beezknees · 28/07/2024 17:10

SnapdragonToadflax · 28/07/2024 17:05

I'd say under 30 is young. I only know one couple who intentionally had kids under 30 (and actually, I think they were 29 when baby arrived). I met someone recently who has a five year old and it was his 30th birthday, and I was honestly astounded by how young he was to have a kid. Why would you do that to yourself?! At 25 I had only just moved out into a shared house.

Literally all my friends are doing school runs in their 40s. That's completely normal.

Because we are all different and not everyone thinks the same as you?

Cangar · 28/07/2024 17:12

who wants to be doing school runs in their 40s? No one I know that’s for sure

Why are school runs any more fun in your 20s or 30s than your 40s? Secret life hack: if the idea of having children is something unpleasant to get out the way you could just….not have children? It’s not compulsory.

FizzySnap · 28/07/2024 17:15

SnapdragonToadflax · 28/07/2024 17:05

I'd say under 30 is young. I only know one couple who intentionally had kids under 30 (and actually, I think they were 29 when baby arrived). I met someone recently who has a five year old and it was his 30th birthday, and I was honestly astounded by how young he was to have a kid. Why would you do that to yourself?! At 25 I had only just moved out into a shared house.

Literally all my friends are doing school runs in their 40s. That's completely normal.

It comes down to life stage. Planning a baby when living in a shared house would be ridiculous- but not everyone is. I rented a 2-bed flat with a garden at 19 with partner. In cheaper areas, you can get a 4 bedroom house for the same.

Stumped7 · 28/07/2024 17:16

19

Beezknees · 28/07/2024 17:17

Charlie2121 · 28/07/2024 16:45

I think it depends on a wide range of social factors. The youngest person in our wider friendship group to have a child was 34. More were over 40 than under 40.

When we were in our 20’s and 30’s we were building careers and travelling the world. Most of us waited until we were in senior roles and had fewer financial constraints such as mortgages before we had children.

There’s no right or wrong way to do it but based purely on financial measures having children later in life makes a lot of sense. I also quite like the idea of being retired during most of my DS’s childhood.

Yes, this. I move in vastly different circles to you. Nobody I know could ever pay off the mortgage before they had children and certainly could not afford to retire before state pension age, so if your financial situation isn't going to change hugely there's no reason to wait.

SnapdragonToadflax · 28/07/2024 17:28

FizzySnap · 28/07/2024 17:15

It comes down to life stage. Planning a baby when living in a shared house would be ridiculous- but not everyone is. I rented a 2-bed flat with a garden at 19 with partner. In cheaper areas, you can get a 4 bedroom house for the same.

That probably does make a huge difference, to be fair. I grew up in a very expensive touristy city. I could only afford to move out once I had a career-type job. But by contrast, I went to uni in a very cheap Northern city where four of us rented a big old five bed Victorian house with a garden. There were no jobs in that town though, so I moved home!

Stumped7 · 28/07/2024 17:29

SnapdragonToadflax · 28/07/2024 17:05

I'd say under 30 is young. I only know one couple who intentionally had kids under 30 (and actually, I think they were 29 when baby arrived). I met someone recently who has a five year old and it was his 30th birthday, and I was honestly astounded by how young he was to have a kid. Why would you do that to yourself?! At 25 I had only just moved out into a shared house.

Literally all my friends are doing school runs in their 40s. That's completely normal.

Lots of reasons. Lower risk births in early 20s. Lower likelihood of children having disabilities. Pregnancy is easier on your body. You can get all your childrearing out the way and still have decades and decades to pursue other projects once they're grown up. You're more likely to live to see your grandchildren grow up, and be fit enough to play with them. I started having my children at 26 and aim to have had all of them by the time I'm 32.

Swipe left for the next trending thread