Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Voting to 'Get the Tories Out'

1000 replies

DewHopper · 06/01/2024 09:55

Pro Labour posters are all over this platform telling posters to vote for whoever gets the Tories out. It does not seem to matter who it is as long as voting for them gets the Tories out nationally.

It's a worrying voting strategy from my pov but I tend to vote at constituency level. If I had an excellent Tory MP who cared about the things I cared about and served their constituents well, I would vote for them. Similarly Labour ( I would absolutely vote for Rosie Duffield) or Independent.

Do those people who will just vote for anyone as longs as this will oust the Tories - and what could be a very good MP - ever consider the effects of this locally? They may have got the Tories out at a national level but saddled themselves with a useless MP who does nothing for the locality.

Take for example women's rights. I am a gender critical woman and care very deeply about the erosion of women's single sex spaces etc. I am sure that many of the 'Tories out at all costs' people feel the same. The pro Labour people keep telling us that Starmer will be better for women's rights BUT if you vote on a single issue - getting the Tories out - you may well elect a hopeless constituency MP who is TWAW and who will be standing up to every pro woman move that Starmer makes. I worry that there will be a lot of these in the next parliament.

So should we be voting on the single issue - get the Tories out? I don't think so - AIBU?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
AdamRyan · 06/01/2024 17:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

It's because she's a Russian communist infiltrator paid for by Corbyn.
I know this because I work for CCHQ, being paid to make Labour look stupid, and we keep tabs on the opposition Wink

jasflowers · 06/01/2024 17:53

DewHopper · 06/01/2024 17:50

Those Labour voters who are keen that Labour support women and keep our sex based rights may want to check out:

Isn't it shameful that after 13 years of the Tories, women have to campaign for this all over again.

DewHopper · 06/01/2024 17:53

I actually thought he was a male poster rather than a she!

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 06/01/2024 17:54

AdamRyan · 06/01/2024 17:50

As I always say, the Conservatives have a majority and could strengthen the wording around sex in the EA quickly and easily. So why haven't they? In my opinion there are a few plausible reasons:

  1. They know they would face a rebellion from the trans sympathetic members of their own party and it wouldn't get through or
  2. they are hoping to use "updating sex based rights" as a trojan horse to replace the whole EA which will take ages and be extremely difficult as it is linked to so many other laws (most likely explanation) or
  3. it's all hot air to win votes from credulous supporters and they have no intention of changing anything because they don't care that much about it.

Maybe you have an alternative explanation (that avoids conspiracy theories about judges being captured etc).

It’s not quick I already posted below the response to the petition I won’t repost but scroll back.

But yes I noted a heavily invested male activist laughing Labour may be in first and he’s aware they will kill it

Which is true as they’ve stated this. So the one thing that’ll do it will be out. Maybe you’ll be pleased idk 🤷‍♂️

jgw1 · 06/01/2024 17:55

AdamRyan · 06/01/2024 17:52

It's because she's a Russian communist infiltrator paid for by Corbyn.
I know this because I work for CCHQ, being paid to make Labour look stupid, and we keep tabs on the opposition Wink

Excuse me, I am Ian Rishi bot Hislop Suank an american communist republican AI russian. Please do get it right.

AdamRyan · 06/01/2024 17:56

DewHopper · 06/01/2024 17:53

I actually thought he was a male poster rather than a she!

Yeah you are right, I did assume their gender. My bad. I personally find it impossible to tell if posters are men or women, except on threads where they are defending male bad behaviour (e.g. porn or prostitution threads. A certain type of man swarms to them)

EasternStandard · 06/01/2024 17:56

DewHopper · 06/01/2024 17:53

I actually thought he was a male poster rather than a she!

You’ll get deleted faster than anything. Dish it can’t deal springs to mind

DuncinToffee · 06/01/2024 17:56

As Margaret Thatcher said

“I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left.”

jgw1 · 06/01/2024 17:56

DewHopper · 06/01/2024 17:53

I actually thought he was a male poster rather than a she!

And that makes it alright for you to be insulting?

AdamRyan · 06/01/2024 17:57

EasternStandard · 06/01/2024 17:54

It’s not quick I already posted below the response to the petition I won’t repost but scroll back.

But yes I noted a heavily invested male activist laughing Labour may be in first and he’s aware they will kill it

Which is true as they’ve stated this. So the one thing that’ll do it will be out. Maybe you’ll be pleased idk 🤷‍♂️

Sorry, what will be out? Who is the activist? Not very clear....

EasternStandard · 06/01/2024 17:59

AdamRyan · 06/01/2024 17:57

Sorry, what will be out? Who is the activist? Not very clear....

The amendment in the EqA

It helps to know why an invested male thinks Labour squashing it is good for TRAs

jgw1 · 06/01/2024 18:00

AdamRyan · 06/01/2024 17:57

Sorry, what will be out? Who is the activist? Not very clear....

I think you are, since you admitted to working for CCHQ a few posts ago?

DewHopper · 06/01/2024 18:01

jasflowers · 06/01/2024 17:53

Isn't it shameful that after 13 years of the Tories, women have to campaign for this all over again.

They are trying to hold the LP to account and yes, I agree is shameful that they have to do this. Their focus is only the Labour party and Labour policy.
Labour has allowed the hounding and mistreatment of gender critical women and it STILL goes on with Rosie Duffield and Tonia Antoniazzi. Karen Ingala Smith was denied membership FFS.

It's a toxic environment for gc women in the Labour Party which is why many women left and gave rise to #labourlosingwomen

https://labourwomensdeclaration.org.uk/karen-ingala-smith-rejected-by-labour-party/

Karen Ingala Smith rejected by Labour Party

Karen Ingala Smith rejected by Labour Party - Labour Women's Declaration

"We wish to express our outrage that Karen Ingala Smith has been barred from membership of the Labour Party. Karen is a long-standing and well-respected

https://labourwomensdeclaration.org.uk/karen-ingala-smith-rejected-by-labour-party

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 06/01/2024 18:01

EasternStandard · 06/01/2024 17:59

The amendment in the EqA

It helps to know why an invested male thinks Labour squashing it is good for TRAs

… to @AdamRyan

Just a random male poster on FWR threads

There’s a couple who post. On the law etc

It helps to understand what women are up against

DewHopper · 06/01/2024 18:02

jgw1 · 06/01/2024 17:56

And that makes it alright for you to be insulting?

That's quite the leap!

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 06/01/2024 18:04

jasflowers · 06/01/2024 17:53

Isn't it shameful that after 13 years of the Tories, women have to campaign for this all over again.

Those who care are getting somewhere

The sad part is it could be lost soon and then it really will be tough

jgw1 · 06/01/2024 18:04

DewHopper · 06/01/2024 18:02

That's quite the leap!

Thank you, I appreciate your apology.

ginasevern · 06/01/2024 18:15

Desdemona44 · 06/01/2024 10:03

I'm so sick of the way some GC critical people on here are tying themselves in knots trying to justify voting tory when it's obvious another tory government will be disastrous for not only women's rights of everyone the entire country. The trans issue isn't the most pressing thing. Vote tory if you want because of it, but stop banging on about it to everyone else who doesn't want to vote on a single issue.

Agreed.

In fact, having read many posts from GC women they are increasingly sounding like Tory apologists who have simultaneously been sucked into a conspiracy theory website. I imagine them wearing blue rosettes and tin foil hats whilst chanting "my hill to die on!"

Meanwhile, in the real world the whole country is on it's arse whilst the rich get richer.

1dayatatime · 06/01/2024 18:19

@BIossomtoes

"Is it because the government spends it all on sending nobody except Home Secretaries to Rwanda and giving it to the likes of Lady Mone? Oh and the PM’s addiction to helicopters can’t be cheap."

+++

This post is a good example of the problem with democracy in that voters just look at the small scandalous stuff and can't see the bigger issues.

The reality is that the Government has "only" wasted £290 million on the Rwanda scheme and Baroness Mone "only" ripped off the taxpayers by £200 million.

Meanwhile the government is paying £120 billion (or £120,000 million) on just interest (not repayment) on the national debt.

jasflowers · 06/01/2024 18:20

DewHopper · 06/01/2024 18:01

They are trying to hold the LP to account and yes, I agree is shameful that they have to do this. Their focus is only the Labour party and Labour policy.
Labour has allowed the hounding and mistreatment of gender critical women and it STILL goes on with Rosie Duffield and Tonia Antoniazzi. Karen Ingala Smith was denied membership FFS.

It's a toxic environment for gc women in the Labour Party which is why many women left and gave rise to #labourlosingwomen

https://labourwomensdeclaration.org.uk/karen-ingala-smith-rejected-by-labour-party/

We must have read two different links.

The 7 declarations were about lost rights now, rights lost under a Tory Govt.

They are calling for Labour to reinstate these rights, thats not quite how you re framing it....

2 of the 7 refer to gender sex based rights ie safe spaces/sport (hope i ve worded that correctly)

However on Karen Ingala Smith, i read the tweets that apparently got her app refused, i don't agree, she should have been accepted, at first glance, doesn't seem too controversial.

Do you know if she re applied?

EasternStandard · 06/01/2024 18:21

ginasevern · 06/01/2024 18:15

Agreed.

In fact, having read many posts from GC women they are increasingly sounding like Tory apologists who have simultaneously been sucked into a conspiracy theory website. I imagine them wearing blue rosettes and tin foil hats whilst chanting "my hill to die on!"

Meanwhile, in the real world the whole country is on it's arse whilst the rich get richer.

Yes those pesky women speaking up. What website anyway?

JKR, Maya Forstator, Sharron Davies, Baroness Falkner

Conspiracy theorists who need to go away

Glad you’re there though

lifeturnsonadime · 06/01/2024 18:22

DewHopper · 06/01/2024 18:01

They are trying to hold the LP to account and yes, I agree is shameful that they have to do this. Their focus is only the Labour party and Labour policy.
Labour has allowed the hounding and mistreatment of gender critical women and it STILL goes on with Rosie Duffield and Tonia Antoniazzi. Karen Ingala Smith was denied membership FFS.

It's a toxic environment for gc women in the Labour Party which is why many women left and gave rise to #labourlosingwomen

https://labourwomensdeclaration.org.uk/karen-ingala-smith-rejected-by-labour-party/

I agree. It is shameful that women are being asked to turn a blind eye to this because the Tory party is worse.

Change doesn't happen when backs are turned and eyes are closed.

The Labour Party needs to work to earn back the trust of women who they want to vote for them. Or perhaps, and they have already indicated this to a degree, they don't really want our votes?

Women's rights to single sex spaces and sports are too important to be ignored. We owe it to the women of this country to make sure that the Left does the right thing by women.

Shutting up 'for the greater good' is unpalatable to me.

BIossomtoes · 06/01/2024 18:24

1dayatatime · 06/01/2024 18:19

@BIossomtoes

"Is it because the government spends it all on sending nobody except Home Secretaries to Rwanda and giving it to the likes of Lady Mone? Oh and the PM’s addiction to helicopters can’t be cheap."

+++

This post is a good example of the problem with democracy in that voters just look at the small scandalous stuff and can't see the bigger issues.

The reality is that the Government has "only" wasted £290 million on the Rwanda scheme and Baroness Mone "only" ripped off the taxpayers by £200 million.

Meanwhile the government is paying £120 billion (or £120,000 million) on just interest (not repayment) on the national debt.

That post is a good example of the poster’s tongue being firmly in her cheek. 🤷‍♀️

Cornettoninja · 06/01/2024 18:31

1dayatatime · 06/01/2024 18:19

@BIossomtoes

"Is it because the government spends it all on sending nobody except Home Secretaries to Rwanda and giving it to the likes of Lady Mone? Oh and the PM’s addiction to helicopters can’t be cheap."

+++

This post is a good example of the problem with democracy in that voters just look at the small scandalous stuff and can't see the bigger issues.

The reality is that the Government has "only" wasted £290 million on the Rwanda scheme and Baroness Mone "only" ripped off the taxpayers by £200 million.

Meanwhile the government is paying £120 billion (or £120,000 million) on just interest (not repayment) on the national debt.

It’s possible that a fair proportion of the electorate notice and take into consideration both.

1dayatatime · 06/01/2024 18:31

@BIossomtoes

"That post is a good example of the poster’s tongue being firmly in her cheek. 🤷‍♀️"

+++

OK fair point- you got me on that one 😗

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.