To the OP & their daughter:
If the issues are arising in the context of assessed group work (being summative assessment that counts towards your actual grade, not formative work which is just for feedback), such that you can't just "opt out" of providing assistance, then it sounds like you need to raise this in writing with the convenor of that module/subject (copying your lecturer, if that person is different from the convenor). Please be polite in writing to this person, as they will not be responsible for the admissions decisions of the university. Frame your email in terms of the stress this is putting you under, and the fairness of the assessment. If you are not happy with the response, the next person to approach should be the Vice Dean or Associate Dean for Teaching/Education in your School/Faculty.
If, on the other hand, the issues are arising in the context of groups being used as part of the course teaching, it may be that you might start with another verbal discussion with your lecturer. Again, think carefully about how you frame your concerns - for instance, that it is stressful because (1) you feel under pressure to help these students, and (2) it feels unfair to them. You might say that you're not getting as much out of the module as you would like, so it's to the detriment of your own learning. (Do not, on the other hand, say "I'm paying a lot for this course", as this will distract from your point.) Ask if there are any ways to change the situation, e.g., by allocating the groups differently. Try to stay calm and polite. If you are not happy with the response then make a written note of what was said, and then put something in writing (starting with the course convenor, and then the individuals as noted above if you're still not happy).
And some other general thoughts for anyone who is still reading:
University funding in the UK is in a dire situation. Many (maybe even most) undergraduate students are loss-making: it costs more to teach them than they pay in fees. This is particularly the case for laboratory-based subjects. It is related to the fact that UG fees have been frozen at £9,250 per year for a very long time.
There are two main responses to this, and many universities do both:
- Recruiting huge undergraduate cohorts in cheaper, popular degrees like law & business, on the basis that certain costs are fixed. You don't make much money on any given student, but you teach so many that you at make some money.
- Increasing the size of cohorts in, and offering new, Masters degrees, including online programmes.
In both cases, foreign students are very attractive, given that foreign students are often charged more than home students. The differential is particularly high for UG students - in some courses, home students pay £9,250 per year and foreign students £20-40k.
The point is that there is a pressure to take foreign students at both the UG and graduate level. If we turned off the tap of foreign students, many universities would be bankrupt overnight. We can discuss whether universities are spending their money wisely – there are lots of issues with centralised administrative bloat and vanity projects. But the point is that, at the moment, these students are essential to keep the show on the road.
I believe the OP, as I've taught numerous students in Masters programs who simply don't have the English language proficiency to follow what is going on. In terms of numbers, I'd say that this has been up to 10-15% of the cohort - not the majority, but a significant minority. These students may be able to pass their English test, and may be able to get by in their "regular" lives, but that is very different from the sort of language skills that are required for academic study. It is very difficult as an academic to deal with these students, as you really want to help all students feel engaged and supported, but we simply don't have the time (and possibly the skills) to help this group of students.